复合防护液舱抗爆效能对比试验研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2018.12.018

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 液舱是舰船多层防护结构体系中的重要功能舱室，战斗部近距离爆炸时，高速破片和冲击波载荷将对防护液舱产生严重的毁伤效应。针对高速破片和冲击波作用下防护液舱的动态响应特性和毁伤模式，提出了复合防护液舱的结构形式。为了对比该液舱相对常规液舱的抗爆效能，开展了战斗部模型近距离爆炸载荷作用下复合液舱和常规结构形式液舱毁伤的模型试验，得到了战斗部模型破片速度、液舱结构的变形、应变、破口尺寸、舱壁压力等参量。通过对比发现，相对于传统液舱结构，复合防护液舱前面板、后面板最大变形分别减少22.78%和8.47%，结构应变降低30%，冲击波峰值减弱18.62%，该新型结构形式明显提高了液舱抗爆防御效果。

关键词: 复合防护液舱, 冲击波, 高速破片, 防御效果, 抗爆性能, 对比试验

Abstract: The liquid cabin with multi-layer protective structure plays an important role in defending the loadings of combined high-speed fragments and blast wave, which are usually due to the close-in explosion of a cast charge, and cause severe damage to the structure of liquid cabin. A new composite structure of liquid cabin is designed based on the dynamic response characteristics and failure mode of liquid cabin under the synergistic effect of high-speed fragments and blast wave. In order to investigate the anti-blast performance of composite liquid cabin, the traditional liquid cabin and newly designed composite liquid cabin are experimentally test under the blast load of cased charge. The fragment velocity, bulkhead deformation, perforation size, strain and shock wave pressure are obtained. The experimental data are analyzed and compared.It is found that, in the composite liquid cabin, the maximum deformations of front and rear bulkheads are decreased by 22.78% and 8.47%, respectively, the plastic strain is decreased by 30%, and the shock wave peak is decreased by 18.62%. Key

Key words: compositeprotectiveliquidcabin, blastwave, highspeedfragment, protectiveeffect, anti-explosionperformance, comparativeexperiment

中图分类号:

O383⁺.1

孔祥韶，王旭阳，徐敬博，郑成，徐双喜，袁天, 吴卫国. 复合防护液舱抗爆效能对比试验研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2018, 39(12): 2438-2449.

KONG Xiang-shao， WANG Xu-yang， XU Jing-bo ， ZHENG Cheng， XU Shuang-xi, YUAN Tian, WU Wei-guo. Comparative Experimental Study of Anti-explosion Performance of Compound Protective Liquid Cabin[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2018, 39(12): 2438-2449.

参考文献

［1］ Chou P C, Schaller R, Hoburg J. Analytical study of the fracture of liquid-filled tanks impacted by hypervelocity particles, DIT Report 160-9 [R]. Philadelphia, PA, US: Drexel Institute of Technology, 1967: 2-10.
[2] Lee M, Longoria R G, Wilson D E. Ballistic waves in high-speed water entry[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 1997, 11(7): 819-844.
[3] Deletombe E, Fabis J, Dupas J, et al. Experimental analysis of 7.62 mm hydrodynamic ram in containers [J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures,2013, 37(2):1-21.
[4] Varas D, López-Puente J, Zaera R. Experimental analysis of fluid-filled aluminium tubes subjected to high-velocity impact [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2009, 36(1): 81-91.
[5] Varas D, Zaera R, López-Puente J. Numerical modelling of partially filled aircraft fuel tanks submitted to hydrodynamic ram [J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2012, 16(1): 19-28.
[6] Townsend D, Park N, Devall P M. Failure of fluid filled structures due to high velocity fragment impact[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2003, 29(1/2/3/4/5/6/7/8/9/10): 723-733.
[7] Liu F, Kong X S, Zheng C, et al. The influence of rubber layer on the response of fluid-filled container due to high-velocity impact [J]. Composite Structures, 2018, 183:671-681.
[8] Sarlin E, Apostol M, Lindroos M, et al. Impact properties of novel corrosion resistant hybrid structures [J]. Composite Structures, 2014, 108: 886-893.
[9] Tasdemircl A, Tunusoglu G, Güden M. The effect of the interlayer on the ballistic performance of ceramic/composite armors: experimental and numerical study [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2012, 44(3): 1-9.

[10] 范志强. PVDF压力测量特性与水下爆炸近场多孔金属夹芯板动力响应的研究[D]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学, 2015.
FAN Zhi-qiang. Characteristics of pressure measurements using PVDF gauge and the dynamic response of metallic sandwich panels subjected to proximity underwater explosion[D]. Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China, 2015. (in Chinese)

[11] Lloyd R M. Conventional warhead systems physics and engineering design[M]. Reston, VA, US: AIAA, 1998: 20-35.
[12] 王鹏飞. 偏心起爆战斗部相关技术研究[D]. 北京: 北京理工大学, 2015.
WANG Peng-fei. Research on the eccentric initiation warhead[D]. Beijing: Beijing Institute of Technology, 2015. (in Chinese)

[13] Danel J F, Kazandjian L. A few remarks about the gurney energy of condensed explosives[J]. Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics, 2004, 29(5): 314-326.
[14] 周保顺, 张立恒, 王少龙, 等. TNT炸药爆炸冲击波的数值模拟与实验研究[J]. 弹箭与制导学报, 2010, 30(3): 88-90.
ZHOU Bao-shun, ZHANG Li-heng, WANG Shao-long, et al. Numerical simulation and experimental research on TNT explosion shock wave[J]. Journal of Projectiles, Rockets, Missiles and Guidance, 2010, 30(3): 88-90. (in Chinese)

[15] Hutchinson M D. The escape of blast from fragmenting munitions casings[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2009, 36(2): 185-192.
[16] 沈慧铭, 李伟兵, 王晓鸣，等. 圆柱壳体装药偏心多点起爆下破片速度的分布[J]. 爆炸与冲击,2017,37(6): 1039-1045.
SHEN Hui-ming, LI Wei-bing, WANG Xiao-ming, et al. Velocity distribution of fragments resulted by explosion of a cylindrical shell charge on multi-spots eccentric initiation[J].Explosion and Shock Waves, 2017,37(6): 1039-1045. (in Chinese)

[17] 仲强, 侯海量, 朱锡, 等. 陶瓷/液舱复合结构抗侵彻数值分析[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2017, 37(3): 510-519.
ZHONG Qiang, HOU Hai-liang, ZHU Xi,et al. Numerical analysis of penetration resistance of ceramic/fluid composite structure [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2017, 37(3): 510- 519. (in Chinese)
[18] 孔祥韶. 大型水面舰艇舷侧防护结构内爆的数值模拟研究[D]. 武汉: 武汉理工大学, 2009.
KONG Xiang-shao . Research on response simulation of war-ship broadside protective structure under inner explosion[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Technology, 2009. (in Chinese)
[19] 张钟文. 橡胶填充异型夹层结构抗射流侵彻研究[D]. 南京: 南京理工大学, 2013.
ZHANG Zhong-wen. Study on the effects of composite armor with corrugated sandwich against the shaped charge jet penetration[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Science and Technology, 2013. (in Chinese)
[20] 唐廷, 朱锡, 侯海量, 等. 大型水面舰艇防雷舱结构防护机理数值仿真[J]. 哈尔滨工程大学学报, 2012, 33(2): 142-149.
TANG Ting, ZHU Xi, HOU Hai-liang, et al. Numerical simulation study on the defense mechanism of a cabin near the shipboard for large surface vessels[J]. Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 2012, 33(2): 142-149. (in Chinese)

[21] 李营. 液舱防爆炸破片侵彻作用机理研究[D]. 武汉: 武汉理工大学, 2014.
LI Ying. Fragment resistant mechanism research of safety liquid cabin[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Technology, 2014. (in Chinese)

[22] 朱锡, 冯刚, 张振华. 爆炸载荷作用下固支方板的应变场及破坏分析[J]. 船舶力学, 2005, 9(2): 83-89.
ZHU Xi, FENG Gang, ZHANG Zhen-hua. Strain field and damage analysis of clamped sguare plates subjected to explosive loading[J]. JournaI of Ship Mechanics, 2005, 9(2): 83-89. (in Chinese)

[23] 陈闯, 王晓鸣, 李文彬, 等. 多层介质阻抗匹配对隔爆效果的影响[J]. 振动与冲击, 2014,33(17): 105-110.
CHEN Chuang, WANG Xiao-ming, LI Wen-bin, et al. Influence of multilayered media impedance matching on explosion interruption effect[J]. Jouranal of Vibration and Shock, 2014,33(17): 105-110. (in Chinese)

第39卷第12期
2018 年12月兵工学报ACTA
ARMAMENTARIIVol.39No.12Dec. 2018

[1]	张玉磊, 陈华, 袁建飞, 姬建荣, 冯晓军, 刘彦. 爆炸冲击波超压非均匀分布特性及最优测点数量[J]. 兵工学报, 2024, 45(3): 744-753.
[2]	姚梦雷, 侯海量, 李典, 谢悦. 舰船舱内爆炸载荷下Y形夹层板动响应及抗爆性能影响因素[J]. 兵工学报, 2024, 45(3): 837-854.
[3]	周广盼, 王荣, 王明洋, 丁建国, 张国凯. 涂覆聚脲混凝土自锚式悬索桥主梁抗爆性能试验与数值模拟[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(S1): 9-25.
[4]	周猛, 梁民族, 林玉亮. 冲击波-破片联合载荷对固支方板的耦合作用机理[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(S1): 99-106.
[5]	吴张君, 王雪明, 余雯君, 邓树新, 陈建宇, 晋冬艳, 于冰冰. Z型扩散室内爆炸冲击波传播规律[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(S1): 160-169.
[6]	余雯君, 陈胜云, 邓树新, 于冰冰, 晋冬艳. 爆炸冲击波在变向通道中传播规律数值模拟[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(S1): 180-188.
[7]	梁晓扬, 陆辰昱, 乐贵高. 发射箱后盖构型对箱内初始冲击波形成的影响[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(5): 1277-1287.
[8]	杨光瑞, 汪维, 杨建超, 汪剑辉, 王幸. POZD涂覆波纹钢加固钢筋混凝土板抗爆性能[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(5): 1374-1383.
[9]	刘巍, 马宏昊, 徐钦明, 姚象洋, 赵勇, 杨科, 杨辉, 沈兆武. 浅埋炸药加载下含空穴泡沫铝夹芯板动态响应机制[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(12): 3613-3621.
[10]	周岳兰, 裴鲁, 龙仁荣, 张庆明, 刘博文, 任健康. 激波管内压力脉冲演化特性及模拟空爆冲击波的方法研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(12): 3815-3825.
[11]	许迎亮, 刘彦, 闫俊伯, 白帆, 于浩, 李旭, 王虹富. 双装药同步爆炸钢筋混凝土梁毁伤效应[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(12): 3719-3732.
[12]	杜亮亮, 钱伟新, 刘寿先, 赵宇, 李生福, 翟召辉, 畅里华, 朱瑜, 翁继东, 吴建, 李俊, 朱礼国. 冲击波与爆轰实验瞬态光电测试技术研究进展[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(12): 3622-3640.
[13]	韩若愚, 袁伟, 李琛, 曹雨晨, 白洁. 电爆炸引燃铝粉悬浮液物理特性和冲击波行为研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(12): 3743-3754.
[14]	王昊, 徐斌, 王舒, 徐永杰, 吴浩. 盒型芯层波纹板的抗爆炸冲击防护性能[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(12): 3687-3695.
[15]	郑监, 毛致远, 张代鑫, 胡宏伟, 宋浦. 不同间距两点空中爆炸威力场特性数值模拟研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(12): 3590-3600.