非对称云雾爆炸超压场数值模拟

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2017.05.010

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对非对称云雾爆炸超压场的分布特性问题，利用LS-DYNA程序对非对称云雾爆炸超压过程进行数值模拟。将数值模拟超压值与空投试验超压结果进行对比，得到了0°、90°和180°共3个方向的峰值超压随距离的变化规律以及不同云雾倾角对超压场分布的影响。研究结果表明：非对称云雾与地面存在一定的倾斜角度，在起爆后地面冲击波轨迹呈现倾斜的椭球形，且各个方向上的超压衰减特性不同，在0°方向冲击波峰值超压较大，且衰减速率最大，在180°方向冲击波峰值超压较低，且衰减速率较小；当云雾倾角由0°增加到8.27°时，传播距离在13~30 m范围内的0°方向上，峰值超压平均提高了7%，在90°方向上，超压值基本无变化，而在180°方向上，峰值超压平均降低了8%，因此增加云雾倾角使得峰值超压强度降低。

关键词: 兵器科学与技术, 非对称云雾爆轰, 峰值超压, 云雾倾角, 数值模拟

Abstract: In order to study the distribution characteristics of overpressure field for non-symmetry detonation, the process of non-symmetry cloud detonation is simulated by LS-DYNA code. The simulated and experimental results are compared. The changing rules of overpressure with distance in three directions, including 0°, 90°and 180°, are obtained. The influences of different angles of inclined cloud on overpressure are studied. Results show that there is an angle between cloud and ground. The track of shock wave presents inclined spheroidicity. The attenuation properties of overpressure in different directions are different. The peak overpressure in the direction of 0° is larger than those in other directions, and the peak overpressure in the direction of 180° is the smallest. The attenuation velocity in the direction of 0° is higher than those in other directions, and the attenuation velocity in the direction of 180° is lower than those in other directions. When the angle of inclined cloud increases from 0° to 8.27°, the peak overpressure is decreased by 7% averagely in the range from 13 m to 30 m in the direction of 0°. The peak overpressure remains nearly unchanged in the direction of 90°, but is increased by 8% averagely in the range from 13 m to 15 m in the direction of 180°. The peak overpressure is decreased by increasing the angle of inclined cloud. Key

Key words: ordnancescienceandtechnology, non-symmetrydetonation, overpressure, angleofinclinedcloud, numericalsimulation

中图分类号:

O383⁺.1

王晔，白春华，李建平，陈风云. 非对称云雾爆炸超压场数值模拟[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(5): 910-916.

WANG Ye, BAI Chun-hua , LI Jian-ping, CHEN Feng-yun. Simulation of Explosion Overpressure Distribution for Non-symmetry Cloud Detonation[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2017, 38(5): 910-916.

参考文献

［1］许会林,汪家骅.燃料空气炸药[M].北京:国防工业出版社,1980:10-18.
XU Hui-lin, WANG Jia-hua.Fuel air explosion [M].Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 1980:10-18.(in Chinese)
[2] 白春华,梁慧敏,李建平,等.云雾爆轰[M].北京:科学出版社,2012:4-12.
BAI Chun-hua, LIANG Hui-min, LI Jian-ping, et al. Cloud detonation[M].Beijing: Science Press, 2012:4-12.(in Chinese)
[3] 李秀丽,惠君明,王伯良. 云爆剂爆炸/冲击波参数研究[J].含能材料,2008,16(4):410-414.
LI Xiu-li,HUI Jun-ming,WANG Bo-liang. Blast shock wave parameters of single-event FAE[J].Chinese Journal of Energetic Materials,2008,16(4):410-414.(in Chinese)

[4] 宫广东,刘庆明,白春华.管道中瓦斯爆炸特性的数值模拟[J].兵工学报,2010,31(增刊1):17-21.
GONG Guang-dong, LIU Qing-ming, BAI Chun-hua. Numerical simulation for gas explosion in tubes[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2010,31(S1):17-21.(in Chinese)

[5] 陈明生,李建平,白春华.非圆截面云雾爆炸超压场数值模拟[J]. 含能材料,2015,23(5):484-489.
CHEN Ming-sheng, LI Jian-ping, BAI Chun-hua. Simulation of explosion overpressure distribution for non-circular cross-section cloud[J]. Chinese Journal of Energetic Materials, 2015,23(5): 484-489.(in Chinese)
[6] Bai C, Fan B, Li B. Improvement of a gas intake device and a gas mixing study in a large-scale vessel[J]. Chemical, 2014, 37(10): 1751-1756.
[7] Gey W, Mygaard M. Feasibility study of FAX explosive, NAVWEPS-8065[R]. China Lake, CA, US: US Naval Ordnance Test Station, 1963.
[8] Raju M S N. The blast waves from unconfined axisymmetric vapour cloud explosion[D]. Urbana, IL, US: University of Illinois, 1975.
[9] Liu G, Hou F, Cao B, et al. Experimental study of fuel-air explosive[J]. Combustion, Explosion, and Shock Waves, 2008, 44(2): 213-217.

[10] 刘庆明, 白春华, 李建平. 多相燃料空气炸药爆炸压力场研究[J]. 实验力学, 2008, 23(4): 361-370.
LIU Qing-ming,BAI Chun-hua,LI Jian-ping. Study on blast field characteristics of multiphase fuel air explosive[J]. Journal of Experimental Mechanics, 2008, 23(4): 361-370.(in Chinese)
[11] Leyer J C. An experimental study of pressure fields by exploding cylindrical clouds[J]. Combust Flame, 1982, 48(3):251-263.
[12] Borisov A A, Gelfand B E, Gubin S A, et al. Detonation of fuel-air mixtures above the surface of the earth[J]. Combustion, Explosion, and Shock Waves,1988,24(2):238-240.
[13] Fishburn B, Slagg N, Lu P. Blast effect from a pancake shaped fuel drop-air cloud detonation(theory and experiment)[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 1981, 5(1):65-75.
[14] 赵传荣,孔德仁,王胜强,等.飞片厚度对冲击波压力峰值衰减特性的影响分析[J]. 振动与冲击,2016, 35(3):135-138.
ZHAO Chuan-rong, KONG de-ren, WANG Sheng-qiang,et al. Influence of flyer's thickness on the attenuation characteristics of shock wave's pressure peak[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2016, 35(3):135-138.(in Chinese)
[15] 陈明生,白春华,李建平.多点云雾爆炸波相互作用的数值模拟[J].爆炸与冲击,2016, 36(1):81-86.
CHEN Ming-sheng, BAI Chun-hua, LI Jian-ping. Simulation of blast waves interaction for multiple cloud explosion[J].Explosion and Shock Waves, 2016, 36(1):81-86. (in Chinese)
[16] 陈昌明,李建平,白春华.一种新的冲击波超压测试方法:压力响应膜片[J].中国水运,2013,13(1):104-106.
CHEN Chang-ming, LI Jian-ping, BAI Chun-hua. A new shock wave test method: pressure response diaphragm[J].China Water Transport, 2013,13(1):104-106.(in Chinese)

[17] 时党勇,李裕春,张胜民. 基于ANSYS／LS-DYNA 8.1进行显式动力分析[M]. 北京:清华大学出版社,2005:184-249．
SHI Dang-yong, LI Yu-chun, ZHANG Sheng-min. Explicit dynamic analysis based on ANSYS／LS-DYNA 8.1[M].Beijing:Tsinghua University Press,2005:184-249.(in Chinese)
[18] 白金泽. LS-DYNA 3D基础理论与实例分析[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2005:74-103．
BAI Jin-ze. Basic theory and case analysis for LS-DYNA 3D[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2005: 74-103.(in Chinese)
[19] 张宝钅平,张庆明,黄风雷. 爆轰物理学[M].北京:兵器工业出版社,2001.
ZHANG Bao-ping, ZHANG Qing-ming, HUANG Feng-lei. Detonation physics[M]. Beijing:Publishing House of Ordnance Industry, 2001.(in Chinese)
[20] Bai C H, Wang Y, Li J P, et al. Influences of the cloud shape of fuel-air mixtures on the overpressure field[J].Shock and Vibration, 2016(1):1-7.

第38卷第5期
2017 年5月兵工学报ACTA
ARMAMENTARIIVol.38No.5May2017

[1]	严泽臣，岳松林，邱艳宇，王建平，赵跃堂，施杰，李旭. 水下爆炸冲击波反射压力计算方法的改进[J]. 兵工学报, 2024, 45(4): 1196-1207.
[2]	李婧, 孙晓霞, 马兴龙, 朱文祥. 开孔泡沫金属传热和流动特性[J]. 兵工学报, 2024, 45(1): 122-130.
[3]	康耕新, 颜海春, 张亚栋, 刘明君, 郝礼楷. 接触爆炸下混凝土墩破坏效应试验与数值模拟[J]. 兵工学报, 2024, 45(1): 144-155.
[4]	雷娟棉, 高毅, 勇政. 旋转导弹横向喷流干扰特性数值模拟[J]. 兵工学报, 2024, 45(1): 105-121.
[5]	王新宇, 姜春兰, 王在成, 方远德. 烤燃条件下JEO聚能装药战斗部泄压结构研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2024, 45(1): 1-14.
[6]	雷特, 武郁文, 徐高, 邱彦铭, 康朝辉, 翁春生. 基于大涡模拟方法的三维旋转爆轰流场结构研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2024, 45(1): 85-96.
[7]	周广盼, 王荣, 王明洋, 丁建国, 张国凯. 涂覆聚脲混凝土自锚式悬索桥主梁抗爆性能试验与数值模拟[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(S1): 9-25.
[8]	寇永锋, 杨坤, 张斌, 肖迤文, 鲁建英, 陈朗. 基于烤燃实验和数值模拟的战斗部装药热安全性[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(S1): 41-49.
[9]	余双洋, 彭永. 4340钢弹侵彻45号钢靶的温升数值模拟[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(S1): 144-151.
[10]	余雯君, 陈胜云, 邓树新, 于冰冰, 晋冬艳. 爆炸冲击波在变向通道中传播规律数值模拟[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(S1): 180-188.
[11]	杜永刚, 王雪松, 万志华. 助飞运载器螺旋传动失效的机理研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(7): 2033-2040.
[12]	高铁锁, 江涛, 傅杨奥骁, 丁明松, 刘庆宗, 董维中, 许勇, 李鹏. 不同尺度飞行器周围等离子体分布及电磁波传输效应[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(6): 1809-1819.
[13]	唐奎, 王金相, 刘亮涛, 杨明. 长杆弹二次侵彻机理及影响因素研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(12): 3707-3718.
[14]	成乐乐, 黄风雷, 武海军, 田思晨, 陈文戈. 水下爆炸作用下多舱室结构的动力响应及损伤特性[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(12): 3562-3579.
[15]	潘腾, 卞晓兵, 袁名正, 王亮亮, 黄元, 黄广炎, 张宏. 爆炸冲击波作用下聚氨酯-半球夹芯结构的动态响应[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(12): 3580-3589.