跨速域大后掠角近距耦合翼气动干扰特性

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2021.07.008

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为研究亚声速、跨声速、超声速及高超声速跨速域条件下，某正常式布局飞行器的大后掠角前翼对尾翼气动特性的影响和机理，通过有限体积法求解雷诺平均Navier-Stokes方程，并采用Spalart-Allmaras湍流模型对具有大后掠角近距耦合翼的飞行器绕流场进行数值模拟。计算得出受前翼气动干扰影响时尾翼的升力系数、阻力系数随马赫数和攻角的变化规律，且根据尾翼表面压力系数分布规律和周围流场结构，分析前翼对尾翼的气动干扰机理。研究结果表明：在亚声速、跨声速条件下，大后掠角前翼产生的后脱涡会影响尾翼周围的流场，尤其是尾翼前缘的绕流场，使尾翼上下表面的压力差减小，尾翼的升力和阻力系数均减小；攻角越大，前翼产生的涡流强度越大，前翼对尾翼的下洗作用越强，尾翼的升力系数和阻力系数的减小量越大；随着马赫数的增大，前翼后脱涡逐渐变弱，前翼对尾翼的干扰影响也逐渐减弱。

关键词: 大后掠角近距耦合翼, 跨速域, 气动干扰, 数值模拟, 涡流

Abstract: The paper investigates the aerodynamic interference of close-coupled highly swept-back wings to the tail wings at transonic velocity which is from subsonic velocity to hypersonic velocity. The numerical method is based on the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations and finite volume method. The Spalart-Allmaras turbulence model is used to simulate the flow field around an air vehicle with close-coupled highly swept-back wings. The distributions of aerodynamic coefficients of tail at different Mach numbers and angles of attack under the influence of the front wing are given. The variation of surface pressure coefficient and the flow structure of tail are analyzed to figure out the aerodynamic interference mechanism. The results indicate that the flow field around tail is influenced greatly by the vortex from the highly swept-back wing under both subsonic and transonic flow conditions. The decrease in the pressure difference of upper and lower tail surfaces results in decreasing the lift coefficient and drag coefficient of tail. Besides, the greater the angle of attack is, the greater the vortex intensity is, and the greater the reductions of lift coefficient and drag coefficient of tail are. The influence of wing on tail decreases with the increase in Mach number.

Key words: close-coupledhighlyswept-backwing, transonicvelocity, aerodynamicinterference, numericalsimulation, vortex

中图分类号:

V211.3

刘清扬，雷娟棉. 跨速域大后掠角近距耦合翼气动干扰特性[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(7): 1412-1423.

LIU Qingyang, LEI Juanmian. Numerical Simulation of Aerodynamic Interference of Close-coupled Highly Swept-back Wings at Transonic Velocity[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2021, 42(7): 1412-1423.

参考文献

［1］ WEILAND C. Aerodynamic data of space vehicles[M]. Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 2014.
[2］ SCIAN K, PANDIAN S. An overview of reusable launch vehicle technology demonstrator[J]. Current Science, 2018, 114(1): 38-47.
[3］ GIUSEPPE P, ANTONIO V. Aerodynamic performance analysis of a winged re-entry vehicle from hypersonic down to subsonic speed[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2016, 52:129-143.
[4］ PENG W Y, FENG Z W, YANG T. Rapid aerodynamic shape optimization with payload size constraints for hypersonic vehicle[J]. IEEE Access,2019,7:84429-84447.
[5］李广超, 王得强, 高太元, 等. 高超声速翼舵干扰气动特性研究综述[J]. 飞航导弹, 2016(9):21-27,45.
LI G C, WANG D Q, GAO T Y, et al. An overview of aerodynamic interference with wing and rudder in hypersonic flow[J]. Aerodynamic Missile Journal, 2016(9): 21-27,45. (in Chinese)
[6］ HART H H. Effect of supersonic interference on lateral stability of low aspect ratio missiles in combined pitch and yaw[J]. Journal of Spacecraft & Rockets, 1968, 5(12):1457-1467.
[7］ LEROY M. An overview of some monoplanar missile programs: NASA-TM-86330 [R]. Hampton, VA, US: NASA, 1985.
[8］ BLAIR A B. Supersonic aerodynamic characteristics of monoplanar missiles with low profile quadriform tails[J]. Journal of Spacecraft & Rockets, 1991, 28(1):9-15.
[9］ JERRY M A. Aerodynamics of an axisymmetric missile concept having cruciform strakes and in-line tail fins from Mach 0.6 to 0.43: NASA/TM-2005-213541[R]. Hampton, VA, US: NASA Langley Research Center, 2005.
[10］ ZHANG W D, WANG Y B, LIU Y. Aerodynamic study of theater ballistic missile target[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2013, 24(1):221-225.
[11］ GHOREYSHI M, KORKIS-KANAAN R, JIRASEK A, et al. Simulation validation of static and forced motion flow physics of a canard configured TransCruiser[C]∥Proceedings of the 22nd AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference. Dallas, TX, US: AIAA, 2015:3426.
[12］ BLAIR B G. Effect of canard location and size on canard wing interference and aerodynamic center shift related to maneuvering aircraft at transonic speeds: TN D-7505 [R]. Washington, DC, US: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1974.

[1]	严泽臣，岳松林，邱艳宇，王建平，赵跃堂，施杰，李旭. 水下爆炸冲击波反射压力计算方法的改进[J]. 兵工学报, 2024, 45(4): 1196-1207.
[2]	李婧, 孙晓霞, 马兴龙, 朱文祥. 开孔泡沫金属传热和流动特性[J]. 兵工学报, 2024, 45(1): 122-130.
[3]	康耕新, 颜海春, 张亚栋, 刘明君, 郝礼楷. 接触爆炸下混凝土墩破坏效应试验与数值模拟[J]. 兵工学报, 2024, 45(1): 144-155.
[4]	雷娟棉, 高毅, 勇政. 旋转导弹横向喷流干扰特性数值模拟[J]. 兵工学报, 2024, 45(1): 105-121.
[5]	王新宇, 姜春兰, 王在成, 方远德. 烤燃条件下JEO聚能装药战斗部泄压结构研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2024, 45(1): 1-14.
[6]	雷特, 武郁文, 徐高, 邱彦铭, 康朝辉, 翁春生. 基于大涡模拟方法的三维旋转爆轰流场结构研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2024, 45(1): 85-96.
[7]	周广盼, 王荣, 王明洋, 丁建国, 张国凯. 涂覆聚脲混凝土自锚式悬索桥主梁抗爆性能试验与数值模拟[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(S1): 9-25.
[8]	寇永锋, 杨坤, 张斌, 肖迤文, 鲁建英, 陈朗. 基于烤燃实验和数值模拟的战斗部装药热安全性[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(S1): 41-49.
[9]	余双洋, 彭永. 4340钢弹侵彻45号钢靶的温升数值模拟[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(S1): 144-151.
[10]	余雯君, 陈胜云, 邓树新, 于冰冰, 晋冬艳. 爆炸冲击波在变向通道中传播规律数值模拟[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(S1): 180-188.
[11]	李定远, 方斌, 李一鸣, 刘文玺. 涡流发生器对翼板结合部流噪声的控制机理研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(8): 2404-2413.
[12]	杜永刚, 王雪松, 万志华. 助飞运载器螺旋传动失效的机理研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(7): 2033-2040.
[13]	高铁锁, 江涛, 傅杨奥骁, 丁明松, 刘庆宗, 董维中, 许勇, 李鹏. 不同尺度飞行器周围等离子体分布及电磁波传输效应[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(6): 1809-1819.
[14]	唐奎, 王金相, 刘亮涛, 杨明. 长杆弹二次侵彻机理及影响因素研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(12): 3707-3718.
[15]	成乐乐, 黄风雷, 武海军, 田思晨, 陈文戈. 水下爆炸作用下多舱室结构的动力响应及损伤特性[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(12): 3562-3579.