铝粉尘云团爆轰温压效应的数值模拟

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2018.01.011

兵工学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (1): 101-110.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2018.01.011

铝粉尘云团爆轰温压效应的数值模拟

昝文涛^1,2，洪滔²，董贺飞²

（1.北京理工大学机电学院，北京 100081； 2.北京应用物理与计算数学研究所，北京 100094）

收稿日期:2017-04-06 修回日期:2017-04-06 上线日期:2018-03-13
作者简介:昝文涛（1988—），男，博士研究生。 E-mail: wentzan@sina.com
基金资助:
国防基础科研计划项目(B1520132012)

Numerical Simulation of Detonation Temperature and Pressure Effects of Aluminum Powder Cloud

ZAN Wen-tao^1,2, HONG Tao², DONG He-fei²

(1.School of Mechatronical Engineering， Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China; 2. Institute of Applied Physics and Computational Mathematics, Beijing 100094, China)

Received:2017-04-06 Revised:2017-04-06 Online:2018-03-13

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为研究粉尘云团形成的爆轰波在空气中传播过程及对周围环境的温压效应和毁伤规律，采用时-空守恒元解元算法两相流模型模拟了当量比为1，颗粒半径为2 μm的悬浮铝粉尘均匀分布形成的半径3.0 m的云团在空气中的爆轰波传播过程。研究结果表明：在冲击波到达云团边界处3.0 m位置时压力达到最大值2.10 MPa，而后压力产生衰减；冲击波到达4.7 m时铝粉尘全部反应完毕无剩余；铝粉尘反应形成的火球会向外运动可到达10.0 m处，火球内中心区域为温度3 500 K 以上、密度0.120 kg/m³的高温低密度区域；冲击波到达24.5 m处超压为0.10 MPa，达到致人死亡标准；冲击波到达28.0 m处时超压为0.09 MPa，可致人严重损伤。

关键词: 温压弹, 两相流, 铝粉尘, 数值模拟

Abstract: In order to study the temperature and pressure effects of the detonation wave generated by dust clouds in the surrounding environment and its damage law, the two-phase flow model and space-time conservation element and solution element method are used to simulate the propagation of 3.0 m radius detonation wave in the air, which is formed by uniformly distributing the suspended aluminum dust with the equivalence ratio of 1 and the particle radius of 2 μm. The pressure reaches to maximum of 2.10 MPa when the detonation wave arrives at 3.0 m from the boundary of cloud, and then the pressure will decrease. The reaction of aluminum dust particles is completed without surplus at 4.7 m from the boundary of cloud. The fireball formed by the dust reaction move outwards to reach at 10 m from the boundary of cloud. The central area of fireball is a high-temperature and low-density area with temperature of above 3 500 K and density of 0.120 kg/m³. The overpressure reaches to 0.10 MPa when the propagation distance of shock wave arrives at 24.5 m from the boundary of cloud. The overpressure reaches to 0.09 MPa when the shock wave arrives at 28.0 m from the boundary of cloud, which can cause serious injury to the human body. Key

Key words: thermobaricbomb, two-phaseflow, aluminumdust, numericalsimulation

中图分类号:

O382⁺.1

昝文涛，洪滔，董贺飞. 铝粉尘云团爆轰温压效应的数值模拟[J]. 兵工学报, 2018, 39(1): 101-110.

ZAN Wen-tao, HONG Tao, DONG He-fei. Numerical Simulation of Detonation Temperature and Pressure Effects of Aluminum Powder Cloud[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2018, 39(1): 101-110.

参考文献

［1］裴明敬, 毛根旺, 胡华权, 等, 含铝温压燃料性能研究[J]. 含能材料, 2007, 15(5):442-446.
PEI Ming-jing, MAO Gen-wang, HU Hua-quan, et al. Characteristic of the thermobaric explosive contained aluminum powders[J]. Chinese Journal of Energetic Materials, 2007, 15(5): 442-446. (in Chinese)
[2] 郑波, 陈力, 丁雁生, 等, 温压炸药爆炸抛洒的运动规律[J]. 爆轰与冲击, 2008, 28(5): 433-437.
ZHENG Bo, CHEN Li, DING Yan-sheng, et al. Dispersal process of explosion production of thermobaric explosive[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2008, 28(5):433-437.(in Chinese)
[3] 李秀丽, 惠君明, 王伯良. 云爆剂爆炸/冲击波参数研究[J]. 含能材料, 2008, 16(4):410-414.
LI Xiu-li, HUI Jun-ming, WANG Bo-liang. Blast/shock wave parameters of single-event FAE[J]. Chinese Journal of Energetic Materials, 2008, 16(4) :410-414.(in Chinese)

[4] 洪滔, 秦承森. 铝颗粒激波点火机制初探[J]. 爆轰与冲击, 2003, 23(4):295-299.
HONG Tao, QIN Cheng-sen. Mechanism of shock wave ignition of aluminum particle[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2003, 23(4): 295-299.(in Chinese)

[5] 洪滔, 秦承森. 悬浮铝粉尘爆轰波参数[J]. 含能材料, 2004, 12(3):129-133.
HONG Tao, QIN Cheng-sen. Parameters of detonation in suspended aluminum dust[J]. Chinese Journal of Energetic Materials, 2004, 12(3):129-133.(in Chinese)

[6] 洪滔, 秦承森. 爆轰波管中铝粉尘爆轰的数值模拟[J]. 爆轰与冲击, 2004, 24(3):193-200.
HONG Tao, QIN Cheng-sen. Numerical simulation of dust detonation of aluminum powder in explosive tubes[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2004, 24(3):193-200.(in Chinese)

[7] 昝文涛, 洪滔, 董贺飞. 基于CE/SE方法关于RDX-AL悬浮粉尘在空气中的两相爆轰的数值模拟[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2016, 36(5):603-610.
ZAN Wen-tao, HONG Tao, DONG He-fei. Numerical simulation of two phase detonation of suspending RDX-AL dust in air with CE/SE method[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2016, 36(5):603-610.(in Chinese)
[8] 昝文涛, 洪滔, 董贺飞. 带管道连接的空间中悬浮铝粉尘爆轰波传播数值模拟[J]. 含能材料, 2017, 25(6): 508-514.
ZAN Wen-tao, HONG Tao, DONG He-fei. Numerical simulation of detonation of suspending aluminum dust in air in the universal spaces connected by channel[J]. Chinese Journal of Energetic Materials, 2017, 25(6):508-514.(in Chinese)
[9] Zan W T, Hong T, Dong H F. Simulation of double-front detonation of suspended mixed RDX and aluminum dust in air[J]. Chinese Physics Letter, 2017, 34(7): 074701.
[10] Steinberg T A, Wilson D B, Benz F. The combustion phase of burning particle[J]. Combustion and Flame, 1992, 91(2):200-208.
[11] Price E W. Combustion of metalized propellants[C]∥Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics: Fundamenals of Solid-Propellant Combustion. NY, US:AIAA, 1984:479-513.
[12] Chang S C. The method of space-time conservation element and solution element-a new approach for solving the Navier-Stokes and Euler equations[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1995,119(2): 295-324.
[13] Zhang D L, Wang J T, Wang G. High-order CE/SE method and applications[J]. Chinese Journal of Computational Physics, 2009, 26(2):211-220.
[14] Wang J T, Zhang D L, Liu K X. A Eulerian approach based on CE/SE method for 2D multimaterial elastic-plastic flows[J]. Chinese Journal of Computational Physics, 2007, 24(4):395-401.
[15] Tulis A J, Selman J R. Detonation tube studies of aluminum particles dispersed in air[J]. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1982, 19(1):655-663.
[16] 洪滔, 秦承森, 林文洲. 悬浮RDX炸药和铝颗粒混合粉尘爆轰的数值模拟[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2009, 29(5):468-473.
HONG Tao, QIN Cheng-sen, LIN Wen-zhou. Numerical simulation of detonation in suspended mixed RDX and aluminum dust[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2009, 29(5):468-473.(in Chinese)
[17] GJB 5212—2004 云爆弹定型实验规程[S]. 北京: 中国人民解放军总装备部, 2004.
GJB 5212—2004 Finalizing test procedures for fuel-air-explosive ammunition[S]. Beijing: General Armament Department of PLA, 2004.(in Chinese)

第39卷
第1期2018 年1月兵工学报ACTA
ARMAMENTARIIVol.39No.1Jan.2018

[1]	李世全，祝文超，孙方平，王宇辉，王健平. 颗粒注射速度对铝粉/空气两相旋转爆轰波的影响[J]. 兵工学报, 2024, 45(4): 1148-1157.
[2]	严泽臣，岳松林，邱艳宇，王建平，赵跃堂，施杰，李旭. 水下爆炸冲击波反射压力计算方法的改进[J]. 兵工学报, 2024, 45(4): 1196-1207.
[3]	李婧, 孙晓霞, 马兴龙, 朱文祥. 开孔泡沫金属传热和流动特性[J]. 兵工学报, 2024, 45(1): 122-130.
[4]	康耕新, 颜海春, 张亚栋, 刘明君, 郝礼楷. 接触爆炸下混凝土墩破坏效应试验与数值模拟[J]. 兵工学报, 2024, 45(1): 144-155.
[5]	雷娟棉, 高毅, 勇政. 旋转导弹横向喷流干扰特性数值模拟[J]. 兵工学报, 2024, 45(1): 105-121.
[6]	王新宇, 姜春兰, 王在成, 方远德. 烤燃条件下JEO聚能装药战斗部泄压结构研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2024, 45(1): 1-14.
[7]	雷特, 武郁文, 徐高, 邱彦铭, 康朝辉, 翁春生. 基于大涡模拟方法的三维旋转爆轰流场结构研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2024, 45(1): 85-96.
[8]	周广盼, 王荣, 王明洋, 丁建国, 张国凯. 涂覆聚脲混凝土自锚式悬索桥主梁抗爆性能试验与数值模拟[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(S1): 9-25.
[9]	寇永锋, 杨坤, 张斌, 肖迤文, 鲁建英, 陈朗. 基于烤燃实验和数值模拟的战斗部装药热安全性[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(S1): 41-49.
[10]	余双洋, 彭永. 4340钢弹侵彻45号钢靶的温升数值模拟[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(S1): 144-151.
[11]	余雯君, 陈胜云, 邓树新, 于冰冰, 晋冬艳. 爆炸冲击波在变向通道中传播规律数值模拟[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(S1): 180-188.
[12]	杜永刚, 王雪松, 万志华. 助飞运载器螺旋传动失效的机理研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(7): 2033-2040.
[13]	高铁锁, 江涛, 傅杨奥骁, 丁明松, 刘庆宗, 董维中, 许勇, 李鹏. 不同尺度飞行器周围等离子体分布及电磁波传输效应[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(6): 1809-1819.
[14]	程扬帆, 王中华, 胡芳芳, 张蓓蓓, 夏煜, 沈兆武. TiH₂粉尘火焰传播速度及温度分布的高速二维测量[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(4): 1181-1192.
[15]	唐奎, 王金相, 刘亮涛, 杨明. 长杆弹二次侵彻机理及影响因素研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(12): 3707-3718.

铝粉尘云团爆轰温压效应的数值模拟

Numerical Simulation of Detonation Temperature and Pressure Effects of Aluminum Powder Cloud

PDF

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价