烟酸粉尘云爆炸极限的逻辑回归分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2015.03.021

兵工学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (3): 523-529.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2015.03.021

烟酸粉尘云爆炸极限的逻辑回归分析

刘庆明，刘丽斌，汪建平，王斌，张云明

(北京理工大学爆炸科学与技术国家重点实验室，北京 100081)

收稿日期:2014-04-22 修回日期:2014-04-22 上线日期:2015-05-01
通讯作者: 刘庆明 E-mail:qmliu@bit.edu.cn
作者简介:刘庆明(1963—)，男，教授，硕士生导师
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究发展计划项目（2011CB706904）

Logistic Regression Analysis of the Explosion Limit of Nicotinic Acid Dust Cloud

LIU Qing-ming, LIU Li-bin, WANG Jian-ping, WANG Bin, ZHANG Yun-ming

(State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081，China)

Received:2014-04-22 Revised:2014-04-22 Online:2015-05-01
Contact: LIU Qing-ming E-mail:qmliu@bit.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 欧盟标准EN14034-3:2006、美国标准E1515和中国标准GB/T 16425—1996 对粉尘云爆炸下限浓度测定方法的规定和要求各不相同，为更精确地研究粉尘云的爆炸下限，根据统计学的数据收集方式，在20 L球型爆炸装置中测试粒径为96~113 μm的烟酸粉尘云爆炸下限。基于Logistic回归模型，利用SPSS统计软件得到烟酸粉尘云的爆炸下限概率-浓度分布曲线，实现对GB/T 16425— 1996粉尘云爆炸下限浓度测定方法中粉尘云爆炸下限区间的量化，并分析了实验次数的不同对爆炸下限概率分布的影响规律。分析结果表明：爆炸下限概率为50%时，置信区间范围最窄，并且在实验次数不同时，其爆炸下限概率在该值处两边发展趋势不同。与现有粉尘云爆炸下限浓度测定方法得到的结果相比，以概率表示烟酸粉尘爆炸下限更符合实际情况，为企业安全生产标准提供精确的理论依据。

关键词: 爆炸力学, 概率统计分析, 烟酸粉尘, 爆炸下限, Logistic回归模型

Abstract: The regulations and requirements of EN14034-3:2006^\[1\], E1515^\[2\] and GB/T 16425—1996^\[3\] for the measurement methods of lower explosive limit concentration of dust cloud differ from each other. To more precisely research the lower explosive limit of dust cloud, the lower explosive limit of niacin dust with particle size of 96~113 μm is test in 20 L spherical explosion test apparatus according to statistical data collection. Based on logistic regression model, the test results are analyzed using SPSS statistical software to obtain the probability distributions for ignition versus dust concentrations of niacin dust. The scope of dust cloud explosion limit proposed in GB/T 16425—1996 dust cloud explosion limit concentration measurement method is quantified, the influences of different experimental times on the lower explosive limit probability distribution are analyzed. The analysis result shows that the range of the confidence interval is the narrowest with the lower explosive limit of the particularity of 50%. For different number of experiments, the trends of the lower explosive limit probability on both sides of the value are different. Compared with the results obtained by other dust cloud explosion limit concentration measurement methods, the lower explosive limit of niacin dust which is expressed in the probability is more in line with the actual situation.

Key words: explosion mechanics, probabilistic and statistical analyses, nicotinic acid dust, lower explosive limit, logistic regression model

中图分类号:

Q563⁺.6

刘庆明，刘丽斌，汪建平，王斌，张云明. 烟酸粉尘云爆炸极限的逻辑回归分析[J]. 兵工学报, 2015, 36(3): 523-529.

LIU Qing-ming, LIU Li-bin, WANG Jian-ping, WANG Bin, ZHANG Yun-ming. Logistic Regression Analysis of the Explosion Limit of Nicotinic Acid Dust Cloud[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2015, 36(3): 523-529.

参考文献

［1］ EN 14034-3:2006 Determination of explosion characteristics of dust clouds-part 3:determination of the lower explosion limit LEL of dust clouds[S]. Bruxelles, Belgium:European Committee for Standardization, 2006.
[2] American Society for Testing Material. E1515—2007 Standard test method for minimum explosible concentration of combustible dusts[S]. Pennsylvania, US:Standards Press of America, 2007.
[3] 煤炭工业部煤炭科学研究总院. GB/T 16425—1996 粉尘云爆炸下限浓度测定方法[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社, 1996.
Central Coal Mining Research Institute, Ministry of Coal Industry. GB/T 16425—1996 Determination for minimum explosive concentration of dust cloud[S]. Beijing:China Stranded Press, 1996.(in Chinese)
[4] Bane S P M, Ziegler J L, Boettcher P A, et al. Experimental investigation of spark ignition energy in kerosene, hexane, and hydrogen[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2013, 26:290-294．
[5] Bane S P M，Shepherd J E，Kwon E，et al．Statistical analysis of electrostatic spark ignition of lean H2/O2/Ar mixtures[J]．International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2011, 36(7):2344-2350.
[6] Bernard S, Lebecki K, Gillard P, et al．Statistical method for the determination of the ignition energy of dust cloud experimental validation[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2010, 23(1):404-411．
[7] My Ngo．Determination of the minimum ignition energy(MIE) of premixed propane/air[D]．Norway：Department of Physics and Technology University of Bergen, 2009．
[8] Cesana C, Siwek R. MIKE 3.Minimum ignition energy[S]. Birsfelden, Switzerland: Adolf Kuhner AG, 2003.
[9] Pilao R, Ramalho E, Pinho C. Overall characterization of cork dust explosion[J]．Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2006, 133(1/2/3):183-195．
[10] Zhen G P，Leuckel W． Effects of ignitors and turbulence on dust explosions [J]．Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 1997, 10(5):317-324.
[11] 蒯念生，黄卫星，袁旌杰, 等．点火能量对粉尘爆炸行为的影响[J]．爆炸与冲击，2012，32(4)：432–438．
KUAI Nian-sheng, HUANG Wei-xing, YUAN Jing-jie, et al. The impact of energy on the ignition behavior of dust explosion[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2012, 32(4):432–438.(in Chinese)
[12] Eckhoff R K. Dust explosions in the process industries[M]. 3rd ed.Burlington: Gulf Professional Publishing, 2003:249-250.
[13] 宇灿. 高能电点火设备放电过程研究[D]. 北京:北京理工大学, 2013.
YU Can. High-energy electrical discharge ignition device research[D]. Beijing:Beijing Institute of Technology, 2013.(in Chinese)
[14] 何宁, 吴黎兵, 腾冲. 统计分析系统SAS与SPSS[M]．北京：机械工业出版社, 2008:155-157.
HE Ning, WU Li-bing, TENG Chong．Statistical analysis system SAS and SPSS[M]. Beijing: China Machine Press，2008:155-157.(in Chinese)
[15] 王保进. 多变量分析：统计软件与数据分析[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社, 2007:378-380．
WANG Bao-jin. Multivariate analysis:statistical software and data analysis[M]. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2007:378-380．(in Chinese)
[16] Dufaud O, Perrin L, Traore M, et al. Explosions of vapour/dust hybrid mixtures: a particular class[J]. Powder Technology, 2009, 190(1/2):269-273．
[17] Garcia-Agreda A, Di Benedetto A, Russo P, et al. Dust/gas mixtures explosion regimes[J]. Powder Technology, 2011, 205(1/2/3): 81-86．

[1]	冉春，陈鹏万，李玲，张旺峰. 中高应变率条件下TC18钛合金动态力学行为的实验研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(9): 1723-1728.
[2]	陈浩玉，洪仁楷，陈永涛，张世文，任国武，莫俊杰. 用于微层裂物质诊断的小型动量探针技术[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(9): 1729-1735.
[3]	唐廷，周健南. 地震后地下受损拱结构的抗爆炸能力研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(9): 1736-1744.
[4]	杨军，李焰，张德志，史国凯，张敏，刘文祥，王昭，熊琛. 光子多普勒测速仪与压杆相结合的冲击波反射压力测试技术[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(7): 1368-1374.
[5]	刘俊，田宙，钟巍，谢淑红. 冲击波作用下单层钢化玻璃抗爆性能的数值模拟研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(7): 1402-1408.
[6]	李勇，程远胜，张攀，刘均. 空中爆炸载荷下梯度波纹夹层板抗爆性能仿真研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(6): 1131-1139.
[7]	赵天辉，高康华，王明洋，李斌，孙松，郭强. 方形容器爆燃泄放过程中的压力特性实验研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(4): 722-727.
[8]	崔云霄，陈鹏万，郭保桥， David A. Cendón，周忠彬. 基于内聚裂纹模型的高聚物粘结炸药模拟材料动态断裂行为研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(12): 2379-2385.
[9]	刘坚成，皮爱国，黄风雷. 反弹道斜撞击下自由梁结构响应研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(11): 2117-2125.
[10]	武强，张庆明，龙仁荣，龚自正. 含能材料防护屏在球形弹丸超高速撞击下的穿孔特性研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(11): 2126-2133.
[11]	任国武，郭昭亮，汤铁钢，苏红梅，温上捷，金山. 高应变率加载下金属柱壳断裂的实验研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2016, 37(1): 77-82.
[12]	崔杰，周塞北，王逸，何宝. 减压条件下竖直边界附近气泡动力学行为数值与实验研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2015, 36(9): 1696-1703.
[13]	任鹏，张伟，刘建华，黄威. 高强度水下爆炸等效冲击波加载特性研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2015, 36(4): 716-722.
[14]	项大林，荣吉利，何轩，刘函，陈鹏万，冯志伟. 基于三维数字图像相关方法的水下冲击载荷作用下铝板动力学响应研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2014, 35(8): 1210-1217.
[15]	刘超，石艺娜，秦承森，梁仙红. 多晶铁冲击相变的离散元方法研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2014, 35(7): 1009-1015.

烟酸粉尘云爆炸极限的逻辑回归分析

Logistic Regression Analysis of the Explosion Limit of Nicotinic Acid Dust Cloud

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价