中高应变率条件下TC18钛合金动态力学行为的实验研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2017.09.008

兵工学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (9): 1723-1728.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2017.09.008

中高应变率条件下TC18钛合金动态力学行为的实验研究

冉春¹，陈鹏万¹，李玲¹，张旺峰²

(1.北京理工大学爆炸科学与技术国家重点实验室，北京 100081; 2.北京航空材料研究院，北京 100095)

收稿日期:2016-10-26 修回日期:2016-10-26 上线日期:2017-11-03
通讯作者: 陈鹏万（1971—），男，教授，博士生导师 E-mail:pwchen@bit.edu.cn
作者简介:冉春(1987—), 男, 博士研究生。E-mail: rangle123@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（11472054）；北京理工大学爆炸科学与技术国家重点实验室开放课题项目（KFJJ16-02M）

Experimental Research on Dynamic Mechanical Behavior of TC18 Titanium Alloy under Medium and High Strain Rates

RAN Chun¹， CHEN Peng-wan¹, LI Ling¹, ZHANG Wang-feng²

(1.State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China;2.Beijing Institute of Aeronautical Materials, Beijing 100095, China)

Received:2016-10-26 Revised:2016-10-26 Online:2017-11-03

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 应变和应变率是影响材料力学行为的两个重要因素，分离式霍普金森压杆（SHPB）技术是实现不同应变和应变率加载的有效途径之一。为研究室温下TC18钛合金的塑性变形和破坏行为，采用SHPB，通过调节子弹长度和速度实现对TC18钛合金圆柱试样不同应变和应变率的加载。实验得到了TC18钛合金在不同应变率下的真应力-真应变曲线和同一应变率不同应变下的真应力-真应变曲线，并分别分析了应变硬化和应变率强化效应对TC18钛合金的动态力学性能的影响。实验结果表明：TC18钛合金压缩试样破坏时断口与加载方向（轴线）之间的夹角约为45°，其压缩破坏形式为典型的剪切破坏，与应变和应变率相关；应变率越高，TC18钛合金的流动应力和屈服强度越高，故该材料具有明显的应变率强化效应；绝热剪切带是裂纹形成和试样发生宏观剪切破坏的先兆。

关键词: 爆炸力学, 钛合金, 动态压缩, 应变, 应变率, 霍普金森压杆

Abstract: Strain and strain rate are two important factors that affect the mechanical behavior of materials, and the split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) technique is one of the effective ways to realize different strain and strain rate loading conditions. To study the plastic deformation and fracture behavior of TC18 titanium alloy under dynamic loading (ranging from 300 to 3 000 s^-1), a series of dynamic compression tests on TC18 titanium alloy have been performed by means of SHPB technique at room temperature. The different strain and strain rate loading conditions are realized by changing the length and velocity of the striker. Macro true stress-true strain curves are obtained under different strain rate loading, so are the true stress-true strain curves under the same strain rate with different strain loading conditions. The effects of strain hardening and strain rate hardening on the dynamic mechanical properties of TC18 titanium alloy are discussed. Results indicate that the collapse of specimen occurs along a plane inclined at an angle of about 45° to the compression axis, namely, shear failure is the main failure mechanism for TC18 titanium alloy under compression loading at room temperature, and it is dependent on strain and strain rate; the higher the strain rate is, the larger the flow stress (or yield stress) of TC18 titanium alloy is, therefore, the material shows clearly evident strain rate hardening effect; and the analyses of microstructure and fracture morphology show that adiabatic shear bands are the precursor to the crack formation and fracture.Key

Key words: explosionmechanics, titaniumalloy, dynamiccompression, strain, strainrate, Hopkinsonpressurebar

中图分类号:

冉春，陈鹏万，李玲，张旺峰. 中高应变率条件下TC18钛合金动态力学行为的实验研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(9): 1723-1728.

RAN Chun， CHEN Peng-wan, LI Ling, ZHANG Wang-feng. Experimental Research on Dynamic Mechanical Behavior of TC18 Titanium Alloy under Medium and High Strain Rates[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2017, 38(9): 1723-1728.

参考文献

［1］ Boyer R R. An overview on the use of titanium in the aerospace industry[J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 1996, 213(1): 103-114.
[2］ Dai L，Y Bai, Basic mechanical behaviors and mechanics of shear banding in BMGs[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2008， 35(8): 704-716.
[3］ Pursche F，Meyer L. Correlation between dynamic material behavior and adiabatic shear phenomenon for quenched and tempered steels[J]. Engineering Transactions, 2011，59(2): 67-84.
[4］ Xue Q, Meyers M, Nesterenko V.Self organization of shear bands in stainless steel[J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2004，384(1): 35-46.
[5］ Peirs J, Verleysen P, Degrieck J, et al.The use of hat-shaped specimens to study the high strain rate shear behaviour of Ti-6Al-4V[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2010，37(6):703-714.
[6］ Staker M R.The relation between adiabatic shear instability strain and material properties[J]. Acta Metallurgica, 1981，29(4): 683-689.

[7］ Luo J, Wang L F, Liu S F, et al.The correlation between the flow behavior and the microstructure evolution during hot working of TC18 alloy[J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2016，654:213-220.
[8］ Liu L, Shangguan Y L, Li H Z, et al.Sliding wear behavior of laser-nitrided and thermal oxidation-treated Ti-5Al-5Mo-5V-1Cr-1Fe alloy fabricated by laser melting deposition[J]. Applied Physics A, 2016，122(4): 1-7.
[9］ Nie X, Liu H, Zhou X, et al.Creep of Ti-5Al-5Mo-5V-1Fe-1Cr alloy with equiaxed and lamellar microstructures[J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2016，651: 37-44.

[10］ Liu C, Lu Y, Tian X, et al.Influence of continuous grain boundary α on ductility of laser melting deposited titanium alloys[J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2016，661: 145-151.
[11］ Chichili D R, Ramesh K T, Hemker K J.The high-strain-rate response of alpha-titanium: experiments, deformation mechanisms and modeling[J]. Acta Materialia, 1998，46(3): 1025-1043.
[12］ Rittel D, Wang Z, Merzer M.Adiabatic shear failure and dynamic stored energy of cold work[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2006，96(7): 075502.
[13］ Rittel D, Landau P, Venkert A.Dynamic recrystallization as a potential cause for adiabatic shear failure[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2008，101(16): 165501.
[14］ Rittel D，Wang Z.Thermo-mechanical aspects of adiabatic shear failure of AM50 and Ti6Al4V alloys[J]. Mechanics of Materials, 2008，40(8): 629-635.
[15］徐媛, 孙坤, 杨永安. TC18 钛合金绝热剪切带晶粒细化机制[J]. 稀有金属材料与工程，2011, 40(8): 1454-1457.
XU Yuan, SUN Kun, YANG Yong-an. Refining mechanisms of grains in the adiabatic shear band of TC18 titanium alloy[J]. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering, 2011, 40(8): 1454-1457.(in Chinese)
[16］ Zherebtsov S V, Murzinova M A, Klimova M V, et al.Microstructure evolution during warm working of Ti-5Al-5Mo-5V-1Cr-1Fe at 600 and 800℃[J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2013，563: 168-176.
[17］ Shi C, Wu G, Sha A, et al.Effect of microstructures on fatigue property of TC18 titanium alloy with equal strength[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2012，27: 1209-1215.
[18］ Wang B, Sun J, Wang X, et al.Adiabatic shear localization in a near beta Ti-5Al-5Mo-5 V-1Cr-1Fe alloy[J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2015，639: 526-533.
[19］ Ran C, Chen P W, Li L, et al. Dynamic shear deformation and failure of Ti-5Al-5Mo-5V-1Cr-1Fe titanium alloy[J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2017，694: 41-47.
[20］苗圃. TC18 钛合金和低合金超高强度钢绝热剪切力学行为研究[D]. 北京: 北京理工大学，2008.
MIAO Pu. Study on adiabatic shear behavior of TC18 titanium alloy and low alloy ultra high strength steel[D]. Beijing: Beijing Institute of Technology, 2008. (in Chinese)
[21］王礼立, 余同希, 李永池. 冲击动力学进展[M]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学出版社, 1992.
WANG Li-li, YU Tong-xi, LI Yong-chi. Advances in impact dynamics[M]. Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China Press, 1992.(in Chinese)
[22］ Bai Y L, Xue Q, Xu Y B, et al.Characteristics and microstructure in the evolution of shear localization in Ti-6A1-4V alloy[J]. Mechanics of Materials, 1994，17(2): 155-164.

第38卷
第9期2017 年9月兵工学报ACTA
ARMAMENTARIIVol.38No.9Sep.2017

[1]	王凡, 郭伟国, 吴倩, 高猛. 高应变率下高温应变计灵敏度系数的校准方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(4): 899-909.
[2]	胡榕，姜春兰，毛亮，祁宇轩，蔡尚晔，胡万翔. Al粒径对富铝聚四氟乙烯基铝活性材料冲击反应性能的影响[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(1): 48-56.
[3]	党泉勇，葛彦鑫，高玉波. 冲击加载下Al₂O₃/SiC复合陶瓷的动态力学行为[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(1): 175-180.
[4]	赵奇峰，李运良，李进，张向荣，朱玉荣，谭书舜，张子栋. 基于应变测试系统的二级轻气炮活塞运动测量[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(8): 1803-1808.
[5]	宁子轩，王琳，程兴旺，程焕武，周哲，张斌斌，王芳，陈东萍. 微观组织对Ti6321钛合金靶板爆炸断裂失效的影响[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(7): 1506-1515.
[6]	刘强，陈鹏万，苏健军，李芝绒，张玉磊. 碳化硅与聚脲纳米复合材料拉伸力学性能和本构模型[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(6): 1238-1249.
[7]	宁子轩，王琳，程兴旺，程焕武，刘安晋，徐雪峰，周哲，张斌斌. 分离式霍普金森压杆加载下不同组织Ti-6321钛合金的动态响应行为[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(4): 862-870.
[8]	李东伟，苗飞超，张向荣，熊国松，周霖，赵双双. 2，4-二硝基苯甲醚基不敏感熔注炸药动态力学性能[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(11): 2344-2349.
[9]	黄竣皓, 王琳, 刘小品, 徐雪峰, 刘安晋, Tayyeb Ali, 周哲, 宁子轩, 杨佳彬, 张斌斌, 程兴旺. Ti-6321钛合金力学性能和抗弹性能[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(1): 124-132.
[10]	徐雪峰，王琳，程兴旺，刘安晋， Tayyeb Ali，周哲，宁子轩，张斌斌，赵登辉. Ti6321钛合金在Taylor杆冲击下的动态断裂微观组织观测[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(7): 1401-1407.
[11]	童维，杨晨，杨宇召，扶云峰，陈晓萍，樊黎霞. 身管弹膛和线膛同锻时下沉段皱褶试验研究及其预测[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(5): 865-873.
[12]	徐雪峰，王琳，沙彦刚，杨思琪，刘安晋， Tayyeb Ali，张斌斌，赵登辉. TC4 ELI钛合金动态压缩性能及绝热剪切敏感性的研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(2): 366-373.
[13]	程文涛，马捷，魏建忠，李洪义，吴龙. 钛合金表面化学气相沉积钼复合涂层制备工艺[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(11): 2320-2325.
[14]	付应乾，俞鑫炉，董新龙，周风华，宁建国，李平. 混凝土材料拉伸强度的应变率强化效应实验研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(1): 143-151.
[15]	沈飞，王辉，李彪彪，张皋. 拉拔成型无氧铜管在爆轰加载下的膨胀及断裂特性研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2019, 40(8): 1634-1640.

中高应变率条件下TC18钛合金动态力学行为的实验研究

Experimental Research on Dynamic Mechanical Behavior of TC18 Titanium Alloy under Medium and High Strain Rates

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价