GNSS/INS/VNS组合定位信息融合的多无人机协同导航方法

doi:10.12382/bgxb.2023.0860

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在信息化战场上,无人机面临多种潜在威胁,不时出现的非意图干扰对无人机系统的卫星信号和通信链路造成干扰,对飞行产生不良影响。为了解决这一挑战,采用多传感器信息融合,以全球导航卫星系统(Global Navigation Satellite System,GNSS)和惯性导航系统(Inertial Navigation System, INS)组合导航系统为主滤波器,并将全球定位系统导航系统和视觉导航系统作为子滤波器,建立了联合滤波器。将多架无人机数字影像的相对导航信息与各无人机平台获取的绝对导航信息融合,实现了一种基于卡尔曼滤波的多地标接力辅助导航算法,有效提高了GNSS/INS相对导航系统的解算精度,降低了多无人机群体的计算负担,扩大了无人机的巡航范围。采用并行分布式的系统框架,将算法部署在多个无人机平台上,通过无人机之间的信息传递和互动,实现多无人机的协同感知与自主定位。在仿真任务场景中进行相关实验,实验结果显示该方法在3架无人机协同导航中位置估计平均误差达到0.66m,速度估计精度保持在±0.4m/s,满足设计要求。

关键词: 无人机, 协同导航, 卡尔曼滤波算法, GNSS/INS组合, 视觉导航

Abstract:

In the informationized battlefield, the unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) face various potential threats, including intermittent unintentional interference that disrupts the satellite signals and communication links of unmanned aircraft systems (UAS), leading to adverse effects on flight. To address this challenge, the multi-sensor data is utilized, and a joint filter is established usingthe global navigation satellite system (GNSS) and inertial navigation system (INS) combination navigation system as the main filter, and the global positioning system (GPS) and visual navigation system (VNS) as sub-filters. This approach fuses the relative navigation information from multiple UAVs’ digital image maps with the absolute navigation information acquired by each UAV platform, creating a Kalman filter-based multi-landmark relay-assisted navigation algorithm. This effectively enhances the solution accuracy of GNSS/INS relative navigation systems, reduces the computational burden on multi-UAVs, and expands the cruising range of UAVs. Additionally, a parallel distributed system framework is used to deploy the algorithm on multiple UAV platforms and facilitatethe information sharing and interaction among UAVs, thereby achieving the collaborative perception and autonomous positioning of multi-UAVs. The experiments conducted in simulated mission scenarios demonstrate that this approach meets the precision requirements, achieving an average positional estimation error of 0.66 mand maintaining the velocity estimation accuracy within ±0.4m/s in the collaborative navigation of three UAVs.

Key words: unmanned aerial vehicles, cooperative navigation, Kalman filter algorithm, GNSS/INS integration, visual navigation

中图分类号:

曹正阳, 张冰, 白屹轩, 勾柯楠. GNSS/INS/VNS组合定位信息融合的多无人机协同导航方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(S2): 157-166.

CAO Zhengyang, ZHANG Bing, BAI Yixuan, GOU Kenan. Multi-UAV Cooperative Navigation Method Based on Fusion of GNSS/INS/VNS Positioning Information[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44(S2): 157-166.

图/表 16

图1 无人机协同导航系统结构示意图

Fig.1 Schematic diagram of multi-UAV cooperative navigation system

图2 融合导航框架

Fig.2 Schematic diagram of collaborative navigation framework

图3 伪距差分定位示意图

Fig.3 Pseudorange differential positioning diagram

图4 节点间信息传递方式示意图

Fig.4 Schematic diagram of information exchange between nodes

表1 导航设备参数

Table 1 Navigation devices parameters

陀螺仪	零漂:0.1(°)/h	随机游走:0.01(°)/√h
加速度计	零漂:100μg	随机游走:5μg/√Hz
GPS	伪距误差:3m	伪距率误差:0.03m/s
光电传感器	稳定精度:5μrad	精度误差:0.35mm/pixel

图5 卡尔曼滤波器速度估计误差对比图

Fig.5 Comparison of speed estimation errors of Kalman filtering

图6 GNSS/INS/VNS组合位置估计距离误差测试图

Fig.6 GNSS/INS/VNS position estimation error Testing

图7 GPS位置估计距离误差测试图

Fig.7 GPS position estimation error testing

表2 定位误差对比

Table 2 Positioning error comparison

定位方式	平均误差/m
GPS	0.66
GNSS/INS/VNS组合	0.25

图8 速度估计误差测试图

Fig.8 Velocity estimation error Testing

图9 多无人机协同导航飞行测试示意图

Fig.9 Schematic diagram of multi-UAVcollaborative navigation flight testing

图10 协同导航算法的鲁棒性对比测试图

Fig.10 Robustness comparison test chart of collaborative navigation algorithms

图11 协同导航位姿漂移特性测试图

Fig.11 Test charts of collaborative navigation pose drift characteristics

表3 无人机1绝对位置误差

Table 3 UAV 1absolute position error

方向	最大偏差/m	平均偏差/m	中间误差/m
x	1.324	0.483	0.467
y	6.057	1.948	1.985
z	1.380	0.594	0.617

表4 无人机2绝对位置误差

Table 4 UAV 2 absolute position error

方向	最大偏差/m	平均偏差/m	中间误差/m
x	1.544	0.563	0.559
y	3.249	1.873	1.867
z	1.651	0.682	0.674

表5 无人机3绝对位置误差

Table 5 UAV 3 absolute position error

方向	最大偏差/m	平均偏差/m	中间误差/m
x	1.475	0.522	0.507
y	2.931	1.827	1.796
z	1.275	0.537	0.512

参考文献 31

[1]	甄子洋. 舰载无人机自主着舰回收制导与控制研究进展[J]. 自动化学报, 2019, 45(4): 669-681.
	ZHEN Z Y. Research development in autonomous carrier-landing/ship-recovery guidance and control of unmanned aerial vehicles[J]. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2019, 45(4): 669-681. (in Chinese)
[2]	GONZÁLEZ-GARCÍAJ , SWENSON R L, GÓMEZESPINOSA A. Real-time kinematics applied at unmanned aerial vehicles positioning for orthophotography in precision agriculture[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2020, 177:105695. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2020.105695 URL
[3]	CHEN L Z T, LIU Z C, FANG J C. A novel hybrid observation prediction methodology for bridging GNSS outages in INS/GNSS systems[J]. The Journal of Navigation, 2022, 75: 1206-1225. doi: 10.1017/S037346332200025X URL
[4]	SHANG X Y, SUN F P, LIU B D, et al. GNSS spoofing mitigation with a multi-correlator estimator in the tightly coupled INS/GNSS integration[J]. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurment, 2023, 72:8500112.
[5]	PINTO NETO J B, GOMES L C, ORTIZ F M, et al. An accurate cooperative positioning system for vehicular safety applications[J]. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 2020, 83:106591.
[6]	范博洋, 赵高鹏, 薄煜明, 等. 多目标空地异构无人系统协同任务分配方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(6): 1564-1575. doi: 10.12382/bgxb.2022.0095
	FAN B Y, ZHAO G P, BO Y M, et al. Collaborative task allocation method for multi-target air-ground heterogeneous unmanned system[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44(6): 1564-1575. (in Chinese) doi: 10.12382/bgxb.2022.0095
[7]	王孟阳, 张栋, 唐硕, 等. 基于动态联盟策略的无人机集群在线任务规划方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(8): 2207-2223. doi: 10.12382/bgxb.2022.0247
	WANG M Y, ZHANG D, TANG S, et al. UAV swarm on-line mission planning method based on dynamic allocation strategy[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44(8): 2207-2223. (in Chinese) doi: 10.12382/bgxb.2022.0247
[8]	ALAJAMI A A, MORENO G, POUS R. Design of a UAV for autonomous RFID-based dynamic inventories using stigmergy for mapless indoor environments[J]. Drones, 2022, 6(8):208. doi: 10.3390/drones6080208 URL
[9]	CAO Y, ZHANG X F, HUANG X J, et al. Research on key technologies of multi-rotor UAV high-precision positioning and navigation system[J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2020, 1650(3):032085. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1650/3/032085
[10]	GUO J W, ZHOU Y L, ZHAO S, et al. A new GNSS outlier mitigation method for GNSS/INS integrated system[J]. Measurement Science and Technology, 2023, 34(10):105118. doi: 10.1088/1361-6501/ace19b
[11]	WU J J, JIANG J G, ZHANG C, et al. A Novel optimal robust adaptive scheme for accurate GNSS RTK/INS tightly coupled integration in urban environments[J]. Remote Sensing, 2023, 15(15):3725. doi: 10.3390/rs15153725 URL
[12]	ZHOU Y, CHENG N, LU N, et al. Multi-UAV-aided networks: Aerial-ground cooperative vehicular networking architecture[J]. IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine, 2015, 10(4): 36-44. doi: 10.1109/MVT.2015.2481560 URL
[13]	郑磊, 陈志敏, 贾宇轩. 基于广域部署智能反射面的无人机集群跟踪方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(6): 1837-1845. doi: 10.12382/bgxb.2022.0217
	ZHENG L, CHEN Z M, JIA Y X. UAV swarm tracking method based on wide-area deployment of intelligent reflecting surfaces[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44(6): 1837-1845. (in Chinese) doi: 10.12382/bgxb.2022.0217
[14]	SIVANERI V O, GROSS J N. UGV-to-UAV cooperative ranging for robust navigation in GNSS-challenged environments[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2017, 71: 245-255. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2017.09.024 URL
[15]	XIONG J, XIONG Z, CHEONG J W, et al. Cooperative positioning for low-cost close formation flight based on relative estimation and belief propagation[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2020, 106:106068. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2020.106068 URL
[16]	SAVIC V, ZAZO S. Cooperative localization in mobile networks using nonparametric variants of belief propagation[J]. Ad Hoc Networks, 2013, 11(1): 138-150. doi: 10.1016/j.adhoc.2012.04.012 URL
[17]	MEYER F, HLINKA O, HLAWATSCH F, et al. Sigma point belief propagation[J]. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 2014, 21(2): 145-149. doi: 10.1109/LSP.2013.2290192 URL
[18]	LYU X, HU B Q, WANG Z, et al. A SINS/GNSS/VDM integrated navigation fault-tolerant mechanism based on adaptive information sharing factor[J]. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2022, 71: 1-13.
[19]	李松, 刘哲, 唐小妹, 等. 基于固定点迭代的Huber鲁棒容积卡尔曼滤波算法[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2021, 57(16): 90-96. doi: 10.3778/j.issn.1002-8331.2007-0105
	LI S, LIU Z, TANG X M, et al. Fixed-point interred Huber-based robust cubature Kalman filter[J]. Computer Engineering and Applicationgs, 2021, 57(16): 90-96. (in Chinese)
[20]	宁静, 陈俊, 吴麒. 一种基于期望模型的自适应Singer模型滤波算法[J]. 电讯技术, 2022, 62(10): 1464-1469.
	NING J, CHEN J, WU Q. An adaptive filtering algorithm for Singer model based on expectation model[J]. Telecommunication Engineering, 2022, 62(10): 1464-1469. (in Chinese)
[21]	郝顺义, 卢航, 魏翔, 等. 简化高阶强跟踪容积卡尔曼滤波及其在组合导航中的应用[J]. 控制与决策, 2019, 34(10): 2105-2114.
	HAO S Y, LU H, WEI X, et al. Reduced high-degree strong tracking cubature Kalman filter and its application in integrated navigation system[J]. Control and Decision, 2019, 34(10): 2105-2114. (in Chinese)
[22]	XIONG H L, BIAN R C, LI Y J, et al. Fault-tolerant GNSS/SINS/DVL/CNS integrated navigation and positioning mechanism based on adaptive information sharing factors[J]. IEEE Systems Journal, 2020, 14(3): 3744-3754.
[23]	SU K, JIN S G. A novel GNSS single-frequency PPP approach to estimate the ionospheric TEC and satellite pseudorange observable-specific signal bias[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2021, 60:5801712.
[24]	LI B X, CHEN G W, SI Y B, et al. GNSS/INS integration based on machine learning lightgbm model for vehicle navigation[J]. Applied Sciences, 2022, 12(11):5565. doi: 10.3390/app12115565 URL
[25]	LIU Y H, LUO Q S, ZHOU Y M. Deep learning-enabled fusion to bridge GPS outages for INS/GPS integrated navigation[J]. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2022, 22(9): 8974-8985. doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2022.3155166 URL
[26]	WU X J, SU Z, LI L, et al. Improved adaptive federated Kalman filtering for INS/GNSS/VNS integrated navigation algorithm[J]. Applied Sciences, 2023, 13(9):5790. doi: 10.3390/app13095790 URL
[27]	万芯炜, 王晶, 杨辉, 等. BP神经网络结合粒子群优化卡尔曼滤波的MEMS陀螺随机误差补偿方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(2): 556-565. doi: 10.12382/bgxb.2022.0110
	WAN X W, WANG J, YANG H, et al. A random error compensation method of MEMS gyroscope based on BP neural network combined with PSO-optimized Kalman filter[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44(2): 556-565. (in Chinese) doi: 10.12382/bgxb.2022.0110
[28]	XIA X, EHSAN H, XIONG L, et al. Autonomous vehicle kinematics and dynamics synthesis for sideslip angle estimation based on consensus Kalman filter[J]. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2023, 31(1): 179-192. doi: 10.1109/TCST.2022.3174511 URL
[29]	WANG J, JIANG W P, LI Z, et al. A new multi-scale sliding window lstm framework (Mssw-lstm): a case study for gnss time-series prediction[J]. Remote Sensing, 2021, 13(16):3328. doi: 10.3390/rs13163328 URL
[30]	BLAZQUEZ-GARCIAA, CONDEA, MORI U, et al. A review on outlier/anomaly detection in time series data[J]. ACM Computing Surveys, 2021, 54(3): 1-33.
[31]	LV J, GAO Z Z, XU Q Z, et al. Assessment of real-time GPS/BDS-2/BDS-3 single-frequency PPP and INS tight integration using different RTS products[J]. Remote Sensing, 2022, 14(17):4367. doi: 10.3390/rs14174367 URL

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

191

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	8	0	0	183

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	138	53
比例	72%	28%

摘要

471

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	471

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	72	399
比例	15%	85%