混凝土材料拉伸强度的应变率强化效应实验研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2020.01.017

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 混凝土材料的拉伸强度具有明显的应变率强化效应。采用同批制作的混凝土圆盘和圆杆试样，利用霍普金森杆加载，进行动态劈裂实验和一维杆应力波层裂实验。借助超高速摄像机、数字图像相关(DIC)等测试方法观察实验中试件破坏过程，以准确测量混凝土材料在不同应变率下的拉伸强度。在劈裂实验中注重加载方式，以保证试件满足求解弹性解析解的中心起裂条件；在层裂实验中精确确定层裂发生位置和时刻，获得了可靠的材料拉伸强度，并分析劈裂拉伸与层裂拉伸强度的应变率强化规律。研究结果表明：对于动态劈裂实验，DIC方法显示圆盘中心起裂与否的临界应变率约为10 s^-1；而对于层裂实验，采用DIC方法可以得到多次层裂对应的拉伸强度及相应的应变率（10~100 s^-1）；通过线性拟合拉伸强度应变率强化规律，层裂拉伸强度随应变率增长的斜率较劈裂实验结果偏高，混凝土的层裂拉伸强度动态增强因子可达5以上。所得研究结果对脆性材料动态拉伸强度及应变率强化效应的准确测量，具有一定的参考意义。

关键词: 混凝土材料, 动态, 劈裂, 层裂, 拉伸强度, 应变率, 动态扩大因子

Abstract: Concrete-like materials have a clear strain-rate strengthening effect on tension strength. All specimens, including Brazilian discs and bars, were prepared and cured under the same laboratory conditions. The dynamic Brazilian split tests and the spalling tests were conducted by employing the Hopkinsion pressure bar as a loading platform. The failure processes of specimens in the tests were observed by using ultra-high speed camera and digital image correlation (DIC) method. In quasistatic or dynamic Brazilian split test,the disk specimen is assured to be splitted at the center of the disk. In spalling test, DIC analysis is applied to determine the exact timing and location of spall fracture, specifically in the case of multiple spallations. The dynamic tensile strengths of plain concrete discs and bars were obtained through these tests. The strain rate strengthening rules of split and spall tensile strengths are analyzed. The research results show that, for the dynamic split test, the central breaking only happens at relative low strain rate, and the critical strain rate is about 10 s^-1; the tensile strength and strain rates of multi-spalling can be achieved accurately by using a DIC-based analytical method; dynamic strain rate streng-thening rule of tensile strength are got by linearly fitting the experimental data, the increasing slope of tensile strength in spalling test is larger than that in dynamic Brazilian split test, and the dynamic increase factor of concrete can reach to above 5. The test results, based on the accurate measurements of tensile strength, can be used as a reference for the design and reconsideration of civil and military engineering.Key

Key words: concretematerial, dynamic, split, spall, tensilestrength, strainrate, dynamicincreasefactor

中图分类号:

TU502⁺.6

付应乾，俞鑫炉，董新龙，周风华，宁建国，李平. 混凝土材料拉伸强度的应变率强化效应实验研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(1): 143-151.

FU Yingqian， YU Xinlu， DONG Xinlong， ZHOU Fenghua， NING Jianguo， LI Ping. An Experimental Investigation on the Strain Rate-dependent Tensile Strength of Plain Concretes[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2020, 41(1): 143-151.

参考文献

［1］ MALVAR L J, ROSS C A. Review of strain rate effects for concrete in tension［J］. ACI Materials Journal, 1998, 95(6): 735-739.
［2］ EIBL J, SCHMIDT-HURTIENNE B. Strain-rate-sensitive constitutive law for concrete［J］. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 1999, 125(12):1411-1420.
［3］ CUSATIS G. Strain-rate effects on concrete behavior［J］. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2011, 38(4):162-170.
［4］ OZBOLT J, SHARMA A, IRHAN B, et al. Tensile behavior of concrete under high loading rates［J］. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2014, 69:55-68.
［5］ LI Q M, MENG H. About the dynamic strength enhancement of concrete-like materials in a split Hopkinson pressure bar test［J］. International Journal of Solids & Structures, 2003, 40(2):343-360.
［6］ LU Y B, LI Q M. About the dynamic uniaxial tensile strength of concrete-like materials［J］. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2011, 38(4):171-180.
［7］ ROSSI P, VAN M J G M, TOUTLEMONDE F, et al. Effect of loading rate on the strength of concrete subjected to uniaxial tension［J］. Materials & Structures, 1994, 27(5):260-264.
［8］ ZIELINSKI A J, REINHARDT H W, KRMELING H A. Experiments on concrete under uniaxial impact tensile loading［J］. Matériaux et Construction， 1981, 14(2): 103-112.
［9］ ASPRONE D, CADONI E, PROTA A. Experimental analysis on tensile dynamic behavior of existing concrete under high strain rates［J］. ACI Structural Journal, 2009, 106(1):106-113.

［10］ KLEPACZKO J R, BRARA A. An experimental method for dynamic tensile testing of concrete by spalling［J］. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2001, 25(4):387-409.
［11］ SCHULER H, MAYRHOFER C, THOMA K. Spall experiments for the measurement of the tensile strength and fracture energy of concrete at high strain rates［J］. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2006, 32(10):1635-1650.
［12］ BRARA A, CAMBORDE F, KLEPACZKO J R, et al. Experimental and numerical study of concrete at high strain rates in tension［J］. Mechanics of Materials, 2001, 33(1):33-45.
［13］ FORQUIN P, LUKIAC＇U2 B. On the processing of spalling experiments. Part I: identification of the dynamic tensile strength of concrete［J］. Journal of Dynamic Behavior of Materials, 2018, 4(1): 34-55.
［14］ LUKIC B B, SALETTI D, FORQUIN P. On the processing of spalling experiments. Part II: identification of concrete fracture energy in dynamic tension［J］. Journal of Dynamic Behavior of Materials, 2017, 4(1):56-73.
［15］ ROSS C A, THOMPSON P Y, TEDESCO J W. Split-Hopkinson pressure-bar tests on concrete and mortar in tension and compression ［J］. ACI Materials Journal, 1989, 86(5):475-481.
［16］ MACHIDA A. Studies on tests for splitting tensile strength of concrete［J］. Proceedings of the Japan Society of Civil Engineers, 1975, 1975(242):115-124
［17］ TEDESCO J W, ROSS C A, BRUNAIR R M. Numerical analysis of dynamic split cylinder tests［J］. Computers & Structures, 1989, 32(3/4):609-624.
［18］ ZHAO J, LI H B. Experimental determination of dynamic tensile properties of granite［J］. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 2000, 37(5):861-866.
［19］ DONG X L, CHEN J Y, GAO P C, et al. Experimental study on common and steel fiber reinforced concrete under dynamic tensile stress［J］. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2004, 13(3): 254-259.
［20］ GOMEZ J T, SHUKLA A, SHARMA A. Static and dynamic behavior of concrete and granite in tension with damage［J］. Theoretical & Applied Fracture Mechanics, 2001, 36(1):37-49.
［21］ FORQUIN P, ZINSZNER J L. A pulse-shaping technique to investigate the behaviour of brittle materials subjected to plate-impact tests［J］. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 2017, 375(2085): 20160333.
［22］高光发.混凝土材料动态拉伸强度的应变率强化规律［J］.高压物理学报,2017,31(5):593-602.
GAO G F. Hardening effect of the strain rate on the dynamic tensile strength of the plain concrete［J］. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2017, 31(5): 593-602. (in Chinese)
［23］ MELLINGER F M, BIRKIMER D L. Measurements of stress and strain on cylindrical test specimens of rock and concrete under impact loading［R］. Cincinnati, OH, US:Ohio River Div Labs Cincinnati, 1966: 4-46.
［24］ BIRKIMER D L. Critical normal fracture strain of Portland cement concrete［D］. Cincinnati, OH, US: University of Cincinnati, 1968: 3731-3731.
［25］ BIRKIMER D L, ROBERT L. Dynamic tensile strength of concrete materials［J］. Journal of Proceedings, 1971, 68(1): 47-49.
［26］ MCVAY, MARK K. Spall damage of concrete structures:SL-88-22［R］. Vicksburg, MS, US: Structures Laboratory, ARMY Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Corps of Engineers, Department of the Army, 1988.
［27］ WU H J, ZHANG Q M, HUANG F L, et al. Experimental and numerical investigation on the dynamic tensile strength of concrete［J］. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2005, 32(1/2/3/4): 605-617.
［28］ BRARA A, KLEPACZKO J R. Experimental characterization of concrete in dynamic tension［J］. Mechanics of Materials, 2006, 38(3):253-267.
［29］ ERZAR B, FORQUIN P. Experiments and mesoscopic modelling of dynamic testing of concrete［J］. Mechanics of Materials, 2011, 43(9):505-527.
［30］ COWELL W L. Dynamic properties of plain Portland cement concrete［R］. Port Hueneme, CA, US:Naval Civil Engineering Laboratory, 1966:46.
［31］ TAKEDA J, TACHIKAWA H. Deformation and fracture of concrete subjected to dynamic load［C］∥Proceedings of the Conference on Mechanical Behavior of Materials. Kyoto, Japan: Society of Materials Science, 1972:77-86.
［32］ JOHN R, ANTOUN T, RAJENDRAN A M. Effect of strain rate and size on tensile strength of concrete［C］∥Proceedings of the Conference of American Physical Society Topical Group on Shock Compression of Condensed Matter. Williamsburg, VA,US:American Physical Society, 1991:501-504.
［33］ ANTOUN T H. Constitutive/failure model for the static and dynamic behaviors of concrete incorporating effects of damage and anisotropy［D］. Dayton, OH,US: University of Dayton, 1991.
［34］ CHU T C, RANSON W F, SUTTON M A. Applications of digital image correlation techniques to experimental mechanics［J］. Experimental Mechanics, 1985, 25(3):232-244.
［35］ ZHANG Q B, ZHAO J. Determination of mechanical properties and full-field strain measurements of rock material under dynamic loads［J］. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 2013, 60(8):423-439.
［36］ American Society for Testing and Material. Standard test method for splitting tensile strength of cylindrical concrete specimen: ASTM C496-86 ［S］. West Conshohocken, PA, US: American Society for Testing and Material, 1986:256-259.
［37］ GLVEZ F, SANCHEZ GALVEZ V. Numerical modelling of SHPB splitting tests［J］. Journal de Physique IV, 2003, 110:347-352.
[38] 郭瑞奇, 任辉启, 张磊, 等. 分离式大直径Hopkinson杆实验技术研究进展[J]. 兵工学报, 2019, 40(7):1518-1536.
GUO R Q, REN H Q, ZHANG L, et al. Research progress of large diameter split Hopkinson bar experimental technique[J]. Acta Armamentraii, 2019, 40(7):1518-1536.(in Chinese)
［39］ CHEN J Y, XIANG D, WANG Z H, et al. Dynamic tensile strength enhancement of concrete in split Hopkinson pressure bar test［J］. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 2018, 10(6): 1-7.

第41卷第1期
2020 年1月兵工学报ACTA
ARMAMENTARIIVol.41No.1Jan.2020

[1]	吕佳朋, 史贤俊, 肖支才. 基于DTW时序距离的故障可诊断性评估方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2024, 45(3): 997-1009.
[2]	许怡岚, 郭唐仪, 唐坤, 张滢颖, 李林蔚. 基于超网络的军事交通运输网络节点价值评估方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2024, 45(2): 552-563.
[3]	杨迪, 周颖, 谢振平. 基于战场环境孪生的迷彩伪装动态效果评估方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2024, 45(1): 349-362.
[4]	吉新博, 卢卫建, 吕琛, 王玺, 廉政, 何丽. 不同冲击载荷下典型路面结构的动态弯沉响应[J]. 兵工学报, 2024, 45(1): 299-311.
[5]	刘谦, 张祝新, 赵丁选, 王辉, 秦占永. 舰载直升机电驱动助降装置及其关键特性分析[J]. 兵工学报, 2024, 45(1): 241-252.
[6]	岳胜哲, 王正杰. 基于实例分割与光流的动态环境SLAM[J]. 兵工学报, 2024, 45(1): 156-165.
[7]	张继雄, 李宗刚, 宁小刚, 陈引娟. 动态事件触发下一般线性多智能体系统完全分布式一致性控制[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(S2): 223-234.
[8]	姜金佐, 徐翔云, 任王军, 于潇, 么梅利. 战斗部动态爆炸破片威力场综述[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(S1): 1-8.
[9]	周猛, 梁民族, 林玉亮. 冲击波-破片联合载荷对固支方板的耦合作用机理[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(S1): 99-106.
[10]	李艺烁, 付用全, 白峰涛. 强荷载作用下随机分布非均匀颗粒材料的仿真[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(S1): 125-131.
[11]	张仲昊, 汪维, 张国凯, 王振, 吴汩. 不同高温作用后混凝土劣化损伤性能[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(S1): 152-159.
[12]	刘大卫, 孙景亮, 龙腾, 何镜, 王晓悦. 弹群分布式一致误差约束自适应最优协同拦截方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(9): 2580-2590.
[13]	叶闻语, 王春阳, 于金阳, 拓明侃, 王子硕. 基于贪心遗传算法的液晶光学相控阵多光束扫描[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(9): 2650-2660.
[14]	王西康, 孟庆微, 许华, 齐子森, 张悦. 基于DNA动态编码和VMP-WFRFT的安全通信方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(8): 2521-2532.
[15]	王子瑶, 唐胜景, 郭杰, 阎宏磊, 葛健豪. 高超声速攻防博弈自适应微分对策三维制导[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(8): 2342-2353.