湍流对铝粉爆炸特性的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2016.03.010

兵工学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (3): 455-461.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2016.03.010

湍流对铝粉爆炸特性的影响

沈世磊¹，张奇¹，马秋菊¹，李栋¹，闫华²

(1.北京理工大学爆炸科学与国家重点实验室，北京 100081； 2.第二炮兵装备研究院，北京 100094)

收稿日期:2015-04-20 修回日期:2015-04-20 上线日期:2016-05-24
作者简介:沈世磊（1992—），男，硕士研究生
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（11372044）；爆炸科学与技术国家重点实验室开发基金项目（KFJJ14-3m）

Effect of Turbulence on Explosion Characteristics of Aluminum Dust/Air

SHEN Shi-lei¹, ZHANG Qi¹, MA Qiu-ju¹, LI Dong¹, YAN Hua²

(1.State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology， Beijing Institute of Technology， Beijing 100081， China；2.The Second Artillery Equipment Research Institute， Beijing 100094， China）

Received:2015-04-20 Revised:2015-04-20 Online:2016-05-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于流体力学计算理论，对20 L球形密闭容器内铝粉扩散和爆炸过程进行了数值模拟。通过改变点火延迟时间和粉尘浓度，研究了湍流对不同浓度铝粉爆炸特性的影响。研究结果表明：点火延迟时间对铝粉爆炸的最大爆炸压力和最大爆炸压力上升速率影响较大，且存在最佳点火延迟时间，此时最大爆炸压力取最大；随着容器内铝粉浓度的增大，最佳点火时间先增大后保持不变，故单一的点火延迟时间并不能真正地反映不同浓度粉尘的爆炸威力；湍流强度和粉尘云分布对最大爆炸压力和最大爆炸压力上升速率都存在影响，粉尘云分布的均匀程度对最大爆炸压力的影响要强于湍流强度；湍流强度对最大爆炸压力上升速率的影响要强于粉尘云的分布。

关键词: 兵器科学与技术, 铝粉, 浓度, 点火延迟时间, 湍流强度

Abstract: The dispersion and explosion processes of aluminum dust in 20 L spherical confined chamber are numerically simulated based on computational fluid dynamics theory. The influence of turbulence intensity on the explosion characteristics of aluminum dusts with different concentrations at various ignition delay times is studied. The results indicate that the ignition delay time has a significant effect on maximum explosion pressure and maximum rate of pressure rise of aluminum dust explosion, and there exists an optimum ignition delay time for p_max. With the increase in the concentration of aluminum dust in the chamber, the optimum ignition delay time increases first and then remains unchanged, therefore a single ignition delay time cannot accurately reflect the explosion powers of aluminum dusts with different concentrations. Both turbulence intensity and distribution of dust cloud have the influences on maximum explosion pressure and maximum rate of pressure rise. The uniformity of dust distribution has a greater effect on maximum explosion pressure than the turbulence intensity, while the turbulence intensity has a greater effect on maximum rate of pressure rise than the uniformity of dust distribution.

Key words: ordnance science and technology, aluminum dust, concentration, ignition delay time, turbulence intensity

中图分类号:

O389

沈世磊，张奇，马秋菊，李栋，闫华. 湍流对铝粉爆炸特性的影响[J]. 兵工学报, 2016, 37(3): 455-461.

SHEN Shi-lei, ZHANG Qi, MA Qiu-ju, LI Dong, YAN Hua. Effect of Turbulence on Explosion Characteristics of Aluminum Dust/Air[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2016, 37(3): 455-461.

参考文献

［1］罗艾民, 张奇, 李建平, 等. 爆炸驱动作用下固体燃料分散过程的计算分析［J］. 北京理工大学学报, 2005, 25(2): 103-107.
LUO Ai-min，ZHANG Qi，LI Jian-ping，et al. Computational analysis of dispersion process of explosively driven solid fuel［J］. Trasactions of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2005, 25(2): 103-107. (in Chinese)
［2］赵衡阳. 气体和粉尘爆炸原理［M］. 北京: 北京理工大学出版社, 1996.
ZHAO Heng-yang. Principles of gas and dust explosion［M］. Beijing: Beijing Institute of Technology Press, 1996. (in Chinese)
［3］ Zhang Q，Zhang B. Effect of ignition delay on explosion parameters of corn dust/air in confined chamber［J］. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2015, 33（12）: 23-28.
［4］张博, 张奇, 谭汝媚. 喷粉压力及点火延迟时间对粉尘爆炸参数的影响［J］. 高压物理学报, 2014, 28(2): 183-189.
ZHANG Bo, ZHANG Qi, TAN Ru-mei. Influence of dispersion pressure and ignition delay time on the dust explosion parameters［J］. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2014, 28(2): 183-189. (in Chinese)
［5］ Liu Q M, Bai C H, Li X D, et al. Coal dust/air explosion in a large-scale tube［J］. Fuel, 2010, 89(2): 329-335.
［6］ Di Sarli V, Russo P, Sanchirico R, et al. CFD simulations of dust dispersion in the 20L vessel：effect of nominal dust concentration［J］. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2014, 27（1）: 8-12.
［7］ Liu X L，Zhang Q，Wang Y. Influence of vapor-liquid two-phase n-hexane/air mixtures on flammability limit and minimum ignition energy［J］. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research，2014，53(32)：12856-12865.
［8］ Dufaud O, Traoré M, Perrin L, et al. Experimental investigation and modelling of aluminum dusts explosions in the 20 L sphere［J］. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2010, 23(2): 226-236.
［9］ Fluent Incorporated. Fluent 6.3 user’s guide［M］. Cavendish: Fluent Incorporated, 2006.
［10］ Kwon Y S, Gronmov A A, Ilyin A P, et al. The mechanism of combustion of superfine aluminum powders［J］. Combustion and Flame, 2003, 133(4): 385-391.
［11］陈志华，范宝春，李鸿志. 燃烧管内悬浮铝粉燃烧爆炸过程的研究［J］. 高压物理学报, 2006,20(2): 157-162.
CHEN Zhi-hua, FAN Bao-chun. LI Hong-zhi. Investigations on combustion and explosion process of suspended aluminum particles in a large combustion tube［J］.Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2006,20(2): 157-162. (in Chinese)
［12］温正，石良辰，任毅如. FLUENT流体计算应用教程［M］. 北京：清华大学出版社，2009.
WEN Zheng, SHI Liang-chen, REN Yi-ru. Application course in FLUENT fluid calculation［M］. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2009.(in Chinese)
［13］ Di Benedetto A, Russo P，Sanchirico R，et al. CFD simulations of turbulent fluid flow and dust dispersion in the 20 L liter explosion vessel［J］. AICHE Journal, 2013, 59(7): 2485-2496.
［14］ Sun J H, Dobashi R, Hirano T. Structure of flames propagating through aluminum particles cloud and combustion process of particles［J］. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2006, 19(6): 769-773.
［15］谭汝媚, 张奇, 张博. 点火延迟时间对铝粉爆炸特性参数的影响［J］. 爆炸与冲击, 2014,34(1): 17-22.
TAN Ru-mei, ZHANG Qi, ZHANG Bo. Effects of ignition delay time on characteristic parameters of aluminum dust explosion［J］. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2014,34(1): 17-22. (in Chinese)
［16］ Cashdollar K L, Zlochower I A. Explosion temperatures and pressures of metals and other elemental dust clouds［J］. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2007,20(4): 337-348.
［17］ Eckhoff R K. Dust explosion in the process industries［J］. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 1991,54(3):266-267.
［18］ Nagy J, Verakis C. Development and contral of dust explosions ［M］. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc, 1985.
［19］ Cuervo N, Murillo C, Dufaud O, et al. Combining CFD simulations and PIV measurements to optimize the conditions for dust explosion tests［J］. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 2014，36:259-264.

[1]	李世全，祝文超，孙方平，王宇辉，王健平. 颗粒注射速度对铝粉/空气两相旋转爆轰波的影响[J]. 兵工学报, 2024, 45(4): 1148-1157.
[2]	陈慧敏, 郭鹏宇, 刘承益, 杨旭. 基于热点火机理的脉冲激光点火建模及仿真[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(7): 1930-1937.
[3]	韩若愚, 袁伟, 李琛, 曹雨晨, 白洁. 电爆炸引燃铝粉悬浮液物理特性和冲击波行为研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(12): 3743-3754.
[4]	周伯俊, 于传强，刘志浩，柯冰. 基于高压储能的特种车辆快速起竖技术与验证[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(7): 1488-1497.
[5]	高月光，冯顺山，刘云辉，黄岐. 不同端盖厚度的圆柱形装药壳体破片初速分布[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(7): 1527-1536.
[6]	续晗，罗永晨，倪晓冬，肖博文，张锋，苏晓杰，郑权，翁春生. 铝粉燃料连续旋转爆轰发动机工作特性[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(5): 1046-1053.
[7]	沈忱, 闫石, 姚杰, 焦清介, 廖明义, 常云飞. 液态氟橡胶改性端羟基嵌段共聚醚粘合剂及其对铝粉热氧化行为的影响[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(4): 780-787.
[8]	张晓冬，孙君，付胜华，娄文忠，李楚宝. 基于超声阵列的云爆燃料浓度分布评估试验方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(11): 2785-2790.
[9]	冯晓军，薛乐星，冯博，潘文. “外嵌内包”微结构的奥克托今/铝复合粒子制备及其应用性能[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(8): 1631-1637.
[10]	付胜华，娄文忠，李楚宝，潘晓建，汪金奎，吉童安，刘伟桐. 云爆子引信与云团高速交会的云雾浓度探测试验方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(5): 897-902.
[11]	张江石，刘建华. 分散度对铝粉爆炸敏感性的影响[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(5): 979-986.
[12]	吉童安，娄文忠，付胜华，汪金奎，刘伟桐. 燃料空气炸药二次起爆引信与爆轰云雾动态交会浓度检测方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(11): 2327-2332.
[13]	杨尚贤，陈慧敏，高丽娟，马超，齐斌，邓甲昊. 发烟罐烟雾质量浓度时空分布特性[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(9): 1772-1782.
[14]	徐陈又诗，张合，查冰婷，郑震，陈璟宜. 有限空间的尘浓度分布规律数值模拟研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(3): 618-624.
[15]	李军宝，李伟兵，汪衡，袁书强，王晓鸣，洪晓文，徐赫阳. 爆炸载荷下铝粉与橡胶复合材料中的冲击波传播特性[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(10): 2001-2007.

湍流对铝粉爆炸特性的影响

Effect of Turbulence on Explosion Characteristics of Aluminum Dust/Air

PDF

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价