Acta Armamentarii ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (8): 240751-.doi: 10.12382/bgxb.2024.0751
Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHOU Le1,2, YIN Qiaozhi1,2,3, ZHONG Peilin1,2, WEI Xiaohui1,2,4,*(), NIE Hong1,2,3
Received:
2024-08-30
Online:
2025-08-28
Contact:
WEI Xiaohui
CLC Number:
ZHOU Le, YIN Qiaozhi, ZHONG Peilin, WEI Xiaohui, NIE Hong. Autonomous UAV Location Selection Technique Based on Data Fusion[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2025, 46(8): 240751-.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
参数 | 数值 |
---|---|
焦距/pixel | 639.997649 |
视场角/(°) | 69×42 |
分辨率 | 640×480 |
畸变系数 | [0,0,0,0,0] |
帧率/(帧·s-1) | 30 |
Table 1 Performance parameters of vision sensor in simulation
参数 | 数值 |
---|---|
焦距/pixel | 639.997649 |
视场角/(°) | 69×42 |
分辨率 | 640×480 |
畸变系数 | [0,0,0,0,0] |
帧率/(帧·s-1) | 30 |
参数 | 取值 |
---|---|
扫描模式 | 非重复式扫描 |
测量范围/m | 190 |
视场角/(°) | 70.4×77.2 |
输出/(点·次-1) | 24000 |
更新频率/Hz | 10 |
Table 2 Performance parameters of LiDAR in simulation
参数 | 取值 |
---|---|
扫描模式 | 非重复式扫描 |
测量范围/m | 190 |
视场角/(°) | 70.4×77.2 |
输出/(点·次-1) | 24000 |
更新频率/Hz | 10 |
参数 | 平面拟合 | 地形成本图 |
---|---|---|
点云数量/个 | 225881 | 225881 |
最佳点坐标/m | (5.23,-1.07,-18.24) | (6.75,-1.35,-18.24) |
运行时间/s | 1.1787 | 0.1437 |
Table 3 Comparison of simulated results in the fine landing point search stage
参数 | 平面拟合 | 地形成本图 |
---|---|---|
点云数量/个 | 225881 | 225881 |
最佳点坐标/m | (5.23,-1.07,-18.24) | (6.75,-1.35,-18.24) |
运行时间/s | 1.1787 | 0.1437 |
设备 | 类型 | 参数 |
---|---|---|
视觉传感器 | Realsense D455 | RGB摄像头 分辨率:640×480 视场角:90° × 65° 帧率:30帧/s |
激光雷达 | Livox avia | 量程:190m @10%反射率 扫描模式:非重复扫描 视场角:70.4°×77.2° 点云输出:240000点/s |
Table 4 Detailed information of some sensors
设备 | 类型 | 参数 |
---|---|---|
视觉传感器 | Realsense D455 | RGB摄像头 分辨率:640×480 视场角:90° × 65° 帧率:30帧/s |
激光雷达 | Livox avia | 量程:190m @10%反射率 扫描模式:非重复扫描 视场角:70.4°×77.2° 点云输出:240000点/s |
场景 | 图像尺寸/pixel | 像素坐标/pixel | 时间/s |
---|---|---|---|
场景1 | 640×480 | (284,344) | 0.077 |
场景2 | 640×480 | (224,344) | 0.071 |
场景3 | 640×480 | (124,264) | 0.073 |
场景4 | 640×480 | (504,124) | 0.074 |
Table 5 Real test results in the rough landing point search phase
场景 | 图像尺寸/pixel | 像素坐标/pixel | 时间/s |
---|---|---|---|
场景1 | 640×480 | (284,344) | 0.077 |
场景2 | 640×480 | (224,344) | 0.071 |
场景3 | 640×480 | (124,264) | 0.073 |
场景4 | 640×480 | (504,124) | 0.074 |
场景 | 方式 | 点云坐 标/m | 时间/ s | 时间 对比/% |
---|---|---|---|---|
场景1 (105 394个点) | 平面拟合 | (4.36,-6.15, -22.26) | 0.491 | 72.30 |
地形成本图 | (4.25,-6.55, -22.26) | 0.136 | ||
场景2 (84 640个点) | 平面拟合 | (1.26,-3.74, -19.19) | 0.465 | 72.36 |
地形成本图 | (1.15,-3.85, -19.21) | 0.129 | ||
场景3 (89798个点) | 平面拟合 | (-6.43,-4.94, -20.52) | 0.447 | 73.60 |
地形成本图 | (-6.45,-5.65, -20.54) | 0.118 | ||
场景4 (84416个点) | 平面拟合 | (4.48,1.96, -19.51) | 0.419 | 75.42 |
地形成本图 | (4.25,2.75, -19.52) | 0.103 |
Table 6 Comparison of real test results in the fine landing point search phase
场景 | 方式 | 点云坐 标/m | 时间/ s | 时间 对比/% |
---|---|---|---|---|
场景1 (105 394个点) | 平面拟合 | (4.36,-6.15, -22.26) | 0.491 | 72.30 |
地形成本图 | (4.25,-6.55, -22.26) | 0.136 | ||
场景2 (84 640个点) | 平面拟合 | (1.26,-3.74, -19.19) | 0.465 | 72.36 |
地形成本图 | (1.15,-3.85, -19.21) | 0.129 | ||
场景3 (89798个点) | 平面拟合 | (-6.43,-4.94, -20.52) | 0.447 | 73.60 |
地形成本图 | (-6.45,-5.65, -20.54) | 0.118 | ||
场景4 (84416个点) | 平面拟合 | (4.48,1.96, -19.51) | 0.419 | 75.42 |
地形成本图 | (4.25,2.75, -19.52) | 0.103 |
[1] |
刘闯, 鱼小军, 张婷, 等. 无人集群装备仿真试验关键技术现状及趋势[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(增刊1):726919.
|
doi: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2022.26919 |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
孙浩, 尹乔之, 魏小辉, 等. 新型自适应起落架的单支腿落震性能研究[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2023, 49(4):990-998.
|
|
|
[4] |
王盼, 吴昊, 梁宇, 等. 轻型无人机起落架设计与强度分析[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(增刊1):140-145.
|
|
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
马宁, 曹云峰. 面向无人机自主着陆的视觉感知与位姿估计方法综述[J]. 自动化学报, 2024, 50(7):1284-1304.
|
|
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
袁俊. 基于无人机平台的目标跟踪和着陆位姿估计[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2020.
|
|
|
[10] |
黄建宇, 屈玉福, 姜吉祥. 无人飞行器自主降落区识别方法研究[J]. 液晶与显示, 2018, 33(3):238-244.
|
|
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
刘飞, 单佳瑶, 熊彬宇, 等. 基于多传感器融合的无人机可降落区域识别方法研究[J]. 航空科学技术, 2022, 33(4):19-27.
|
|
|
[18] |
张炯, 牛欢, 陈雪. 基于多传感器融合的无人机应急着陆功能研究[J]. 航空科学技术, 2022, 33(11):11-20.
|
|
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
张泽旭, 王卫东, 崔平远, 等. 一种行星软着陆地形风险评估方法[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2011, 43(5):25-29.
|
|
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
doi: 10.1016/j.isatra.2022.04.005 pmid: 35697539 |
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
闫璐. 基于机载激光雷达的旋翼无人机自主择址方法研究[D]. 天津: 天津大学, 2020.
|
|
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
|
[1] | ZHANG Yue, ZHANG Ning, XU Xiping, PAN Yue. UAV Trajectory Planning under Complex Constraints Based on GOTDBO Algorithm [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2025, 46(8): 240997-. |
[2] | LI Junhui, WANG Wei, WANG Yuchen, JI Yi. Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Formation Control Based on Prescribed-time Consensus Theory [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2025, 46(8): 240863-. |
[3] | SHEN Ying, ZHANG Shuo, WANG Shu, SU Yun, XUE Fang, HUANG Feng. A Method for Detecting the Camouflaged Small Target in Complex Scene Using Airborne Polarization Remote Sensing [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2025, 46(7): 240797-. |
[4] | XIAO Peng, YU Haixia, HUANG Long, ZHANG Siming. 3D Path Planning of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Based on MDEPSO Algorithm [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2025, 46(7): 240710-. |
[5] | XU Yang, WEI Chao, FENG Fuyong, HU Leyun. Autonomous Landing of UAVs based on Spatio-temporal Decomposition Planning [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2025, 46(7): 240653-. |
[6] | ZHAI Weiguang, WANG Feng, MA Xingyu, ZHAO Wei, MENG Pengshuai. YSG-SLAM:a Real-time Semantic RGB-D SLAM Based on YOLACT in Dynamic Scene [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2025, 46(6): 240443-. |
[7] | WANG Weihan, GAO Mingze, SHI Xiaolong, HU Shiyuan, WU Yanjiang, CHEN Huimin. Modeling and Verification of Dynamic Imaging of UAV-borne Line-array LiDAR [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2025, 46(6): 240836-. |
[8] | YAN Xiaojia, ZHU Huimin, SUN Shiyan, SHI Zhangsong, JIANG Shang. An Improved Mutant Firefly Algorithm Optimized Particle Filter Algorithm for UAV Target Positioning [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2025, 46(5): 240549-. |
[9] | ZHOU Zhenlin, LONG Teng, LIU Dawei, SUN Jingliang, ZHONG Jianxin, LI Junzhi. Path Planning Method for Large-scale UAV Swarms Based on Reinforcement Learning Conflict Resolution [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2025, 46(5): 241146-. |
[10] | HE Ziqi, LI Bochen, WANG Chenggang, SONG Lei. Multi-UAV Sequential Capture Algorithm for Area Defense [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2025, 46(4): 240343-. |
[11] | HOU Tianle, BI Wenhao, HUANG Zhanjun, LI Minghao, ZHANG An. Prescribed-time Formation Control with Event-triggering Mechanism for Multi-agent Systems [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2025, 46(4): 240292-. |
[12] | ZENG Zhaoyang, PENG Wensheng, LI Yunkai, XU Ming. Connotation,Development and Challenges of Reliability Technology of Intelligent UAV Swarm [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2025, 46(3): 240322-. |
[13] | LIU Cong, LI Baiqing, ZHANG Zongwei, SHAN Zezhong. Investigation of Multi-dimensional Aerodynamic Characteristics of UAV Rotor Subjected to Horizontal Inflow [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2025, 46(3): 240316-. |
[14] | ZHANG Fenglin, DONG Yihao, XIN Jianshe, GUO Liping, GU Xuechen, QU Jiaqi. Parameter Selection and Optimization Algorithm for Low-overload Compressed Air Launch of Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Based on Particle Swarm Optimization [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2025, 46(2): 240014-. |
[15] | ZHANG Xinze, XIAO Haijian, LIU Xinglong, XING Kongrui, LU Xiang. Design and Realization of a Ducted Fan Water-air Amphibious UAV [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2025, 46(1): 231172-. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||