Acta Armamentarii ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (9): 2622-2630.doi: 10.12382/bgxb.2022.1114
Special Issue: 智能系统与装备技术
Previous Articles Next Articles
PENG Peiran1, REN Shubo2, LI Jianan1, ZHOU Hongwei2, XU Tingfa1,*()
Received:
2022-11-29
Online:
2023-07-28
Contact:
XU Tingfa
CLC Number:
PENG Peiran, REN Shubo, LI Jianan, ZHOU Hongwei, XU Tingfa. Illumination-aware Multispectral Fusion Network for Pedestrian Detection[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44(9): 2622-2630.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
方法 | 所有 | 白天 | 夜晚 | 近距离 | 中距离 | 远距离 | 无遮挡 | 部分遮挡 | 重度遮挡 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACF[ | 47.32 | 42.57 | 56.17 | 28.74 | 53.67 | 88.20 | 62.94 | 81.40 | 88.08 |
Halfway Fusion [ | 25.75 | 24.88 | 26.59 | 8.13 | 30.34 | 75.70 | 43.13 | 65.21 | 74.36 |
Fusion RPN+BN[ | 18.29 | 19.57 | 16.27 | 0.04 | 30.87 | 88.86 | 47.75 | 56.10 | 72.20 |
MSDS-RCNN[ | 11.63 | 10.60 | 13.73 | 1.29 | 16.19 | 63.73 | 29.86 | 38.71 | 63.37 |
IAF-RCNN [ | 15.73 | 14.55 | 18.26 | 0.96 | 25.54 | 77.84 | 40.17 | 48.40 | 69.76 |
CIAN[ | 14.12 | 14.77 | 11.13 | 3.71 | 19.04 | 55.82 | 30.31 | 41.57 | 62.48 |
AR-CNN[ | 9.34 | 9.94 | 8.38 | 0.00 | 16.08 | 69.00 | 31.40 | 38.63 | 55.73 |
MBNet [ | 8.13 | 8.28 | 7.86 | 0.00 | 16.07 | 55.99 | 27.74 | 35.43 | 59.14 |
本文方法 | 7.62 | 8.51 | 5.99 | 0.01 | 12.18 | 48.14 | 24.15 | 27.84 | 52.64 |
Table 1 Missratecomparison on all nine subsets of the KAIST multispectral pedestrian dataset[6]
方法 | 所有 | 白天 | 夜晚 | 近距离 | 中距离 | 远距离 | 无遮挡 | 部分遮挡 | 重度遮挡 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACF[ | 47.32 | 42.57 | 56.17 | 28.74 | 53.67 | 88.20 | 62.94 | 81.40 | 88.08 |
Halfway Fusion [ | 25.75 | 24.88 | 26.59 | 8.13 | 30.34 | 75.70 | 43.13 | 65.21 | 74.36 |
Fusion RPN+BN[ | 18.29 | 19.57 | 16.27 | 0.04 | 30.87 | 88.86 | 47.75 | 56.10 | 72.20 |
MSDS-RCNN[ | 11.63 | 10.60 | 13.73 | 1.29 | 16.19 | 63.73 | 29.86 | 38.71 | 63.37 |
IAF-RCNN [ | 15.73 | 14.55 | 18.26 | 0.96 | 25.54 | 77.84 | 40.17 | 48.40 | 69.76 |
CIAN[ | 14.12 | 14.77 | 11.13 | 3.71 | 19.04 | 55.82 | 30.31 | 41.57 | 62.48 |
AR-CNN[ | 9.34 | 9.94 | 8.38 | 0.00 | 16.08 | 69.00 | 31.40 | 38.63 | 55.73 |
MBNet [ | 8.13 | 8.28 | 7.86 | 0.00 | 16.07 | 55.99 | 27.74 | 35.43 | 59.14 |
本文方法 | 7.62 | 8.51 | 5.99 | 0.01 | 12.18 | 48.14 | 24.15 | 27.84 | 52.64 |
检测方法 | 漏检率/% | ||
---|---|---|---|
所有 | 白天 | 夜晚 | |
MACF[ | 69.71 | 72.63 | 65.43 |
Halfway Fusion [ | 31.99 | 36.29 | 26.29 |
Park et al[ | 26.29 | 28.67 | 23.48 |
AR-CNN [ | 22.10 | 24.70 | 18.10 |
MBNet[ | 21.10 | 24.70 | 13.50 |
本文方法 | 21.03 | 24.84 | 12.97 |
Table 2 Miss rate comparison on the CVC-14 pedestrian dataset [25]
检测方法 | 漏检率/% | ||
---|---|---|---|
所有 | 白天 | 夜晚 | |
MACF[ | 69.71 | 72.63 | 65.43 |
Halfway Fusion [ | 31.99 | 36.29 | 26.29 |
Park et al[ | 26.29 | 28.67 | 23.48 |
AR-CNN [ | 22.10 | 24.70 | 18.10 |
MBNet[ | 21.10 | 24.70 | 13.50 |
本文方法 | 21.03 | 24.84 | 12.97 |
检测方法 | 总漏检 率/% | 检测速度/ (幅·ms-1) | 硬件 平台 |
---|---|---|---|
ACF[ | 47.32 | 2730 | TITAN X |
Halfway Fusion[ | 25.75 | 430 | TITAN X |
Fusion RPN+BN[ | 18.29 | 800 | TITAN X |
MSDS-RCNN[ | 11.63 | 220 | TITAN X |
IAF-RCNN[ | 15.73 | 210 | TITAN X |
CIAN[ | 14.12 | 70 | GTX 1080Ti |
AR-CNN[ | 9.34 | 120 | GTX 1080Ti |
MBNet[ | 8.13 | 70 | GTX 1080Ti |
本文方法 | 7.62 | 70 | GTX 1080Ti |
Table 4 Comparison of detection speeds
检测方法 | 总漏检 率/% | 检测速度/ (幅·ms-1) | 硬件 平台 |
---|---|---|---|
ACF[ | 47.32 | 2730 | TITAN X |
Halfway Fusion[ | 25.75 | 430 | TITAN X |
Fusion RPN+BN[ | 18.29 | 800 | TITAN X |
MSDS-RCNN[ | 11.63 | 220 | TITAN X |
IAF-RCNN[ | 15.73 | 210 | TITAN X |
CIAN[ | 14.12 | 70 | GTX 1080Ti |
AR-CNN[ | 9.34 | 120 | GTX 1080Ti |
MBNet[ | 8.13 | 70 | GTX 1080Ti |
本文方法 | 7.62 | 70 | GTX 1080Ti |
骨干 网络 | 交叉注意 力特征提 取网络 | 光照感 知子 网络 | 白天 漏检 率/% | 夜晚 漏检 率/% | 总漏 检率/ % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
13.70 | 10.76 | 12.68 | |||
ResNet50 | √ | 8.92 | 7.63 | 8.83 | |
√ | 11.24 | 9.17 | 10.14 | ||
√ | √ | 8.51 | 5.99 | 7.62 |
Table 5 Ablation study of module validation
骨干 网络 | 交叉注意 力特征提 取网络 | 光照感 知子 网络 | 白天 漏检 率/% | 夜晚 漏检 率/% | 总漏 检率/ % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
13.70 | 10.76 | 12.68 | |||
ResNet50 | √ | 8.92 | 7.63 | 8.83 | |
√ | 11.24 | 9.17 | 10.14 | ||
√ | √ | 8.51 | 5.99 | 7.62 |
骨干网络 | 交叉注意力模块数量 | 漏检率(所有)/% |
---|---|---|
0 | 12.68 | |
1 | 10.07 | |
ResNet50 | 2 | 9.39 |
3 | 9.13 | |
4 | 8.83 | |
5 | 8.91 |
Table 6 Ablation study of cross-attention module quantity validation
骨干网络 | 交叉注意力模块数量 | 漏检率(所有)/% |
---|---|---|
0 | 12.68 | |
1 | 10.07 | |
ResNet50 | 2 | 9.39 |
3 | 9.13 | |
4 | 8.83 | |
5 | 8.91 |
[1] |
李博, 王博, 韩京冶, 等. 基于车载计算机的红外图像移动目标检测[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(增刊1): 66-73.
|
doi: 10.12382/bgxb.2022.A012 |
|
[2] |
doi: 10.1109/TCSVT.2016.2581660 URL |
[3] |
|
[4] |
doi: 10.3390/electronics11142162 URL |
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2018.08.005 URL |
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2014.2300479 pmid: 26353336 |
[16] |
doi: 10.1016/j.inffus.2018.09.015 URL |
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
doi: 10.3390/s16060820 URL |
[26] |
doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2018.03.007 URL |
[1] | SONG Xiaoru, LIU Kang, GAO Song, CHEN Chaobo, YAN Kun. Research on Improved YOLOv5-based Military Target Recognition Algorithm Used in Complex Battlefield Environment [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2024, 45(3): 934-947. |
[2] | TIAN Daming, MIAO Pu. Visible Light Communication Nonlinear Equalizer Based on Model Solving and Deep Learning [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2024, 45(2): 466-473. |
[3] | YANG Jiaming, PAN Yue, WANG Qiang, CAO Huaigang, GAO Sunpei. Research on Deep Learning Method of Underwater Weak Target Tracking [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2024, 45(2): 385-394. |
[4] | ZHANG Kun, DU Ruiyi, SHI Haotian, HUA Shuai. Prediction of Aircraft Trajectory Based on Mogrifier-BiGRU [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2024, 45(2): 373-384. |
[5] | LÜ Weimin, SUN Chenfeng, REN Likun, ZHAO Jie, LI Yongqiang. A Gas Path Fault Diagnosis Method for Aero-engine Based on TCN-LGBM Model [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2024, 45(1): 253-263. |
[6] | QIN Haolin, XU Tingfa, LI Jianan. Semi-supervised Hyperspectral Salient Object Detection Using Superpixel Attention and Siamese Structure [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44(9): 2639-2649. |
[7] | LI Zenglin, LI Bo, BAI Shuangxia, MENG Bobo. UAV Autonomous Air Combat Decision-making Based on AM-SAC [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44(9): 2849-2858. |
[8] | WU Liyang, GUO Pengcheng, LIU Chao, LI Wenqiang. Radar Signal Modulation Type Recognition Based on Attention Mechanism Enhanced Residual Networks [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44(8): 2310-2318. |
[9] | ZHOU Yu, CAO Ronggang, LI Ping, MA Xiao. A Fuze Burst Point Detection Method for Outfield Test Images [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44(8): 2453-2464. |
[10] | LIAN Jing, DING Rongqi, LI Linhui, WANG Xuecheng, ZHOU Yafu. Vehicle Trajectory Prediction Method Based on Graph Models and Attention Mechanism [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44(7): 2162-2170. |
[11] | WANG Yang, FENG Yongxin, SONG Bixue, TIAN Binghe. A Modulation Recognition Algorithm of DP-DRCnet Convolutional Neural Network [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44(2): 545-555. |
[12] | ZHANG Liang'an, CHEN Yang, XIE Shenglong, LIU Tongxin. Crack Detection System for Aircraft Protective Grill based on Machine Vision and Deep Learning [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44(2): 507-516. |
[13] | CHEN Zihan. Prognosticating Remaining Useful Life of Electro-Mechanical Actuators Using a Multi-mode Transformer Model [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44(10): 2920-2931. |
[14] | WANG Qiang, WU Letian, LI Hong, WANG Yong, WANG Huan, YANG Wankou. An Infrared Small Target Detection Method via Dual Network Collaboration [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44(10): 3165-3176. |
[15] | ZHENG Zhiwei, GUAN Xueyuan, FU Jian, MA Xunqiong, YIN Shang. Projectile Trajectory Prediction Based on CNN-LSTM Model [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44(10): 2975-2983. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||