欢迎访问《兵工学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

兵工学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (10): 1716-1720.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2014.10.028

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    下一篇

坐标系选取对炮兵作战的影响分析

张卫民, 马红卫, 梁建奇, 王彤   

  1. (中国兵器工业导航与控制技术研究所, 北京 100089)
  • 收稿日期:2014-03-03 修回日期:2014-03-03 上线日期:2014-11-28
  • 通讯作者: 张卫民 E-mail::zwm602@263.net
  • 作者简介:张卫民(1955—), 男, 研究员

Analysis on Influence of Coordinate System Selection on Artillery Combat

ZHANG Wei-min, MA Hong-wei, LIANG Jian-qi, WANG Tong   

  1. (Navigation and Control Technology Institute, China North Industries Group Corporation, Beijing 100089, China)
  • Received:2014-03-03 Revised:2014-03-03 Online:2014-11-28
  • Contact: ZHANG Wei-min E-mail::zwm602@263.net

摘要: 针对不断提高的炮兵装备射程,定量分析采用空间大地坐标系和高斯平面直角坐标系计算炮目距离和方向时的差别,同时分析采用1954北京坐标系统和2000中国大地坐标系统对距离计算精度的影响。分析结果表明:由于投影变形,在高斯平面直角坐标系下计算炮目距离时误差可达1‰,计算炮目方向的误差在距离远时也较大,应视情况予以修正;采用1954北京坐标系统和2000中国大地坐标系统计算炮目距离时,二者计算结果之差小于实际距离的0.05‰,其影响可忽略。

关键词: 兵器科学与技术, 炮兵作战, 坐标系统, 投影变形, 炮目距离, 炮目方向

Abstract: The differences among the gun-target distances and directions calculated using the space geodetic coordinate system and the Gauss plane rectangular coordinate system are quantitatively analyzed, and the influences of BJS54 and CGCS2000 on distance calculation accuracy are also analyzed. The results show that, due to projection distortion, the gun-target distance error calculated using the Gauss plane rectangular coordinate system is up to 1‰, and the gun-target direction error is larger at a farther gun-target distance. When BJS54 and CGCS2000 are used to calculate the gun-target distance, the difference between the calculated results is less than the actual distance of 0.05‰, which can be ignored.

Key words: ordnance science and technology, artillery combat, coordinate system, projection distortion, gun-target distance, gun-target direction

中图分类号: