炸药在空气中爆炸冲击波的地面反射超压实验研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2016.12.013

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为进一步研究炸药在空气中爆炸的冲击波参数，对梯恩梯（TNT）、HL0（黑索今（RDX）95%+石蜡（Wax）5%）和HL15（RDX 80%+Wax 5%+Al 15%）3种炸药不同距离处的冲击波反射超压进行了测试。实验结果表明：相比HL0和TNT，HL15在距爆炸中心3 m、4 m和5 m处的峰值超压最大；随着距离的增加，在7 m、9 m和12 m处，3种炸药的冲击波峰值超压越来越接近。采用幂指数公式对3种炸药的冲击波超压与对比距离之间的关系进行拟合后发现：在距离R≤2.6 m时，3种炸药的峰值超压大小顺序为HL0≥HL15>TNT；当2.6 m HL0 >TNT；对于指前因子k值，HL0>HL15>TNT；对于衰减系数α值，HL0> TNT>HL15；k值和α值共同决定着冲击波反射超压大小；幂指数拟合公式在取对数后为线性关系，在外推时得到的数据更接近实验值，因此可以作为研究炸药在空气中爆炸的地面反射超压经验公式。

关键词: 兵器科学与技术, 空中爆炸, 冲击波反射超压, 相似关系, 幂指数拟合

Abstract: In order to investigate the parameters of shock wave in air blast, the ground reflected overpressures of TNT, HL0（RDX 95%+Wax 5%）and HL15（RDX 80%+Wax 5%+Al 15%） at different locations were tested. Test resultes show that the peak overpressures of HL15 are maximal at 3 m, 4 m and 5 m from the center of explosion compared with TNT and HL0. The peak overpressures of three explosives get closer to each other at 7 m, 9 m and 12 m from the center of explosion with the increase in distance. Power exponential formulas are used to fit the relationship between peak overpressure and scaled distance. The fitting results show that the magnitude order of peak overpressures is HL0≥HL15>TNT for R≤ 2.6 m; the magnitude order of peak overpressures is HL15> HL0 >TNT for 2.6 m

Key words: ordnance science and technology, air blast, reflected overpressure, similarity relationship, power exponential fitting

中图分类号:

O384

段晓瑜，崔庆忠，郭学永，焦清介. 炸药在空气中爆炸冲击波的地面反射超压实验研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2016, 37(12): 2277-2283.

DUAN Xiao-yu, CUI Qing-zhong, GUO Xue-yong, JIAO Qing-jie. Experimental Investigation of Ground Reflected Overpressure of Shock Wave in Air Blast[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2016, 37(12): 2277-2283.

参考文献

［1］ Swisdak M M. Explosion effects and properties: part I-explosion effects in air, A018544[R]. New York: Naval Surface Weapons Center, 1975:10-16.
[2］ Brode H L. Numerical solutions of spherical blast wave[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1955, 26(6):766-775.
[3］ Henrych J. The dynamics of explosion and its use[M]. Amsterdam, NL: Elsevier, 1979:204-207.
[4］周南, 田宙. 爆炸冲击波参数计算的普适公式[J]. 兵工学报, 1995, 16(3):23-27.
ZHOU Nan, TIAN Zhou. A universal formula for the prediction of air-shock wave parameters during explosion[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 1995, 16(3):23-27. (in Chinese)
[5］童晓. 爆炸场冲击波压力测量及数据处理方法研究[D].南京:南京理工大学, 2015:74-80.
TONG Xiao. The research of the measurements of shock wave and the method of data treatments[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Science and Technology, 2015:74-80. (in Chinese)
[6］仲倩, 王伯良, 黄菊, 等. TNT空中爆炸超压的相似律[J]. 火炸药学报, 2010, 33(4):32-35.
ZHONG Qing, WANG Bo-liang, HUANG Ju, et al. Study on the similarity law of TNT explosion overpressure in air[J]. Chinese Journal of Explosives & Propellants, 2010, 33(4): 32-35.(in Chinese)
[7］冯晓军, 王晓峰, 黄亚峰, 等. 铝粉含量对梯铝炸药爆压和冲击波参数的影响[J]. 火炸药学报, 2009, 32(5): 1-4.
FENG Xiao-jun, WANG Xiao-feng, HUANG Ya-feng, et al. Effect of aluminium content on the detonation pressure and shock wave parameters of TNT/Al explosives[J]. Chinese Journal of Explosives & Propellants, 2009, 32(5):1-4 (in Chinese)
[8］ Baker W E. Explosions in air[M]. Austin, TX, US: University of Texas Press, 1973.
[9］北京工业学院八系. 爆炸及其作用：下册[M]. 北京:国防工业出版社, 1979:15-25.
The Eighth Department of Beijing Institute of Technology. Explosions and effects: Volume II[M]. Beijing:National Defense Industry Press, 1979:15-25. (in Chinese)
[10］孙业斌. 军用混合炸药[M]. 北京:国防工业出版社, 1969:364-369.
SUN Ya-bin. Military mixing explosives[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press,1969:364-369.(in Chinese)
[11］郭炜, 俞统昌, 金朋刚. 三波点的测量与实验技术研究[J]. 火炸药学报, 2007, 30(4):55-61.
GUO Wei, YU Tong-chang, JIN Peng-gang. Test of triple point and study on its test technology[J]. Chinese Journal of Explosives & Propellants, 2007, 30(4):55-61.(in Chinese)
[12］王建灵, 郭炜, 冯晓军. TNT_PBX和Hexel空中爆炸冲击波参数的实验研究[J]. 火炸药学报, 2008, 31(6):42-44,68.
WANG Ji-ling, GUO Wei, FENG Xiao-jun. Experimental research on the a ir explosion shock wave parameters of TNT, PBX and Hexel[J]. Chinese Journal of Explosives & Propellants, 2008, 31(6):42-44,68. (in Chinese)
[13］赵赫. 温压炸药爆炸毁伤效能评估实验研究[D]. 北京：北京理工大学, 2008:36-40.
ZHAO He. Experimental study of the damage effectiveness evaluation of thermobaric explosive[D]. Beijing:Beijing Institute of Technology, 2008:36-40.(in Chinese)
[14］黄正平. 爆炸与冲击电测技术[M]. 北京:国防工业出版社, 2006:38-52.
HUANG Zheng-ping. Explosion and shock measuring technology[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2006:38-52. (in chinese)
[15］谭庆明. 量纲分析[M]. 合肥:中国科学技术大学出版社, 2005:99-102.
TAN Qing-m. Dimensional analysis[M]. Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China Press, 2005:99-102. (in chinese)
[16］ Zhou Z Q, Nie J X, Ou Z C, et al. Effects of the aluminum content on the shock wave pressure and the acceleration ability of RDX-based aluminized explosives[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 2014, 116(14):144901-144907.
[17］ Gran J K, Ehrgott J J Q, Cargile J D, et al. Cavity expansion experiments with spherical explosive charges in concrete, ERDC/GSL-SR-09-4[R]. Vicksburg MS:Engineer Research and Development Center, Geotechnical and Structures Lab, 2009:1-38.
[18］ Vadhe P P, Pawar R B, Sinha R K, et al. Cast aluminized explosives (review)[J]. Combustion Explosion & Shock Waves, 2008, 44(4):461-475.
[19］ Fowles R, Williams R F. Plane stress wave propagation in solids[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1970, 41(1):360-363.
[20］辛春亮, 徐更光, 刘科种, 等. 考虑后燃烧效应的TNT空气中爆炸的数值模拟[J]. 含能材料, 2008, 16(2):160-163.
XIN Chun-liang, XU Geng-guang, LIU Ke-zhong, et al. Numerical simulation of TNT explosion with post-detonation burning effect in air[J]. Chinese Journal of Energetic Materials, 2008, 16(2):160-163. (in Chinese)

[1]	周伯俊, 于传强，刘志浩，柯冰. 基于高压储能的特种车辆快速起竖技术与验证[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(7): 1488-1497.
[2]	高月光，冯顺山，刘云辉，黄岐. 不同端盖厚度的圆柱形装药壳体破片初速分布[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(7): 1527-1536.
[3]	娄伟鹏，郑长松，李和言，陈建文，张周立，马源. 高速《Symbol》v湿式换挡离合器排油阀临界开启和关闭压力研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(9): 1665-1672.
[4]	王宪成，杨绍卿，马宁，赵文柱. 车辆柴油机缸套动载荷磨损计算模型研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(9): 1673-1680.
[5]	孙皓泽，常天庆，王全东，孔德鹏，戴文君. 一种基于分层多尺度卷积特征提取的坦克装甲目标图像检测方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(9): 1681-1691.
[6]	张玉燕，孙莎莎，王振春，曹海要，战再吉. 高速载流电枢表面瞬态温度场仿真与测量[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(9): 1692-1698.
[7]	李臣明，宦超，石怀龙. 某箱式火箭炮对面目标分布式杀伤最优火力分配[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(9): 1699-1704.
[8]	雷娟棉，张嘉炜，谭朝明. 小攻角下船尾外形对旋转弹丸马格努斯效应影响的数值研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(9): 1705-1715.
[9]	李泽，闫晓鹏，栗苹，郝新红，王建涛. 扫频式干扰对调频多普勒引信的干扰机理研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(9): 1716-1722.
[10]	张浩为，谢军伟，张昭建，宗彬锋，陈唐军. 基于混合自适应遗传算法的相控阵雷达任务调度[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(9): 1761-1770.
[11]	李茂，侯海量，朱锡，黄晓明，李典，陈长海，胡年明. 结构间隙对芳纶纤维增强复合装甲结构抗侵彻性能的影响[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(9): 1797-1805.
[12]	王鉴, 韩焱, 王黎明, 张丕状, 陈平. 弹丸在膛内运动的回波信号瞬时频率估计方法研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(9): 1806-1814.
[13]	刘海鸥，张文胜，徐宜，赵梓烨. 基于核密度估计的履带车辆传动轴载荷谱编制[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(9): 1830-1838.
[14]	姜缪文，闫健卓，陈继民. 基于拓扑优化技术的军用头盔内胆结构三维打印[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(9): 1845-1853.
[15]	张磊，李世民，朱刚. 基于时间连续灰色Markov模型的维修器材需求预测方法研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(9): 1862-1866.