一种分布式多无人机协同定距盘旋跟踪制导律

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2019.10.011

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 多无人机协同跟踪运动目标既可以全方位探测目标信息，又可以应对外界视线干扰，降低丢失目标的概率，因而具有重要研究意义。基于Unicycle模型提出了一种仅需目标和邻近无人机信息的分布式协同定距跟踪制导律，解决了传统Leader-Follower方法中编队过于依赖Leader的问题，提高了编队网络的鲁棒性。针对静止目标设计了基于相对距离与视线角的分布式多无人机协同制导律，并证明了系统稳定性；该制导律推广至对匀速及变速目标的跟踪制导；利用飞行控制器、模拟飞行软件X-Plane和仿真软件MATLAB/Simulink对上述静止、匀速和变速3种运动模式的目标分别进行协同跟踪半实物仿真，结果验证了所提制导律的有效性。

关键词: 无人机, 分布式, 编队, 协同跟踪, 定距盘旋, 制导律, 稳定性

Abstract: The multi-unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) cooperative tracking can not only get the information of targets in various directions, but also respond to the interference of obstacles and reduce the probability of losing the targets. A distributed guidance law is presented for multi-UAV cooperative tracking that relies only on information of target and neighboring UAVs. The distributed guidance law is used to avoid the dependence of UAV formation on the leaders in traditional leader-follower method and improve the robustness of formation. A distributed cooperative guidance law of multi-UAVs based on relative distance and bearing angle was designed for stationary targets, and the stability of the cooperative guidance law was proved. The guidance law is used for tracking the targets with constant and variable speeds. The hardware-in-the-loop simulation of multi-UAVs tracking the targets was made by using the X-Plane software, MATLAB/Simulink software and flight controller (hardware). The simulated results show the effectiveness of proposed guidance law.Key

Key words: unmannedaerialvehicle, distributed, formation, cooperativetracking, circumnavigation, guidancelaw, stability

中图分类号:

V279⁺.2

冯运铎，吴炎烜，曹昊哲. 一种分布式多无人机协同定距盘旋跟踪制导律[J]. 兵工学报, 2019, 40(10): 2060-2069.

FENG Yunduo， WU Yanxuan, CAO Haozhe. Distributed Guidance Law for Multi-UAV Cooperative Tracking[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2019, 40(10): 2060-2069.

参考文献

［1］姚思浩. 无人机的发展现状与趋势［J］. 电子制作,2018(1): 98-100.
YAO S H. Development status and tendency of UAV［J］. Practical Electronics,2018(1):98-100.(in Chinese)
［2］韩亮, 任章, 董希旺, 等. 多无人机协同控制方法及应用研究［J］. 导航定位与授时, 2018, 5(4):1-7.
HAN L, REN Z, DONG X W, et al. Research on cooperative control method and application for multiple unmanned aerial vehicles［J］. Navigation Positioning and Timing, 2018, 5(4):1-7.(in Chinese)
［3］ DEGHAT M, SHAMES I, ANDERSON B D O, et al. Localization and circumnavigation of a slowly moving target using bearing measurements［J］. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2014, 59(8): 2182-2188.
［4］ LI Z, HOVAKIMYAN N, DOBROKHODOV V, et al. Vision-based target tracking and motion estimation using a small UAV［C］∥Proceedings of the 49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control. Atlanta, GA, US: IEEE, 2010: 2505-2510.
［5］ REGINA N, ZANZI M. Camera pan-tilt gimbals robust control law for target tracking with fixed wing UAV［C］∥Proceedings of AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference. Boston, MA, US: AIAA ,2013: 4990.
［6］ CAO Y, MUSE J, CASBEER D, et al. Circumnavigation of an unknown target using UAVs with range and range rate measurements［C］∥Proceeddings of the 52nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control. Florence, Italy: IEEE, 2013: 3617-3622.
［7］ SHAMES I, DASGUPTA S, FIDAN B, et al. Circumnavigation using distance measurements under slow drift［J］. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2012, 57(4): 889-903.
［8］张民, 田鹏飞, 陈欣. 一种无人机定距盘旋跟踪制导律及稳定性证明［J］. 航空学报,2016,37(11):3425-3434.
ZHANG M, TIAN P F, CHEN X. UAV guidance law for circumnavigation and tracking ground target and its stability proof［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica,2016,37(11):3425-3434.(in Chinese)
［9］ SHAMES I, FIDAN B, ANDERSON B D O. Close target reconnaissance with guaranteed collision avoidance［J］. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 2011, 21(16): 1823-1840.

［10］ DEGHAT M, DAVIS E, SEE T L, et al. Target localization and circumnavigation by a non-holonomic robot［C］∥Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Vilamoura, Algarve, Portugal: IEEE, 2012: 1227-1232.
［11］ BOCCIA A, ADALDO A, DIMAROGONAS D V, et al. Tracking a mobile target by multi-robot circumnavigation using bearing measurements［C］∥Proceedings of the 56th IEEE Annual Conference on Decision and Control. Miami Beach, FL, US: IEEE, 2017: 1076-1081.
［12］ DONG X W, ZHOU Y, REN Z, et al. Time-varying formation tracking for second-order multi-agent systems subjected to switching topologies with application to quadrotor formation flying［J］. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2017, 64(6): 5014-5024.
［13］ DONG X W, LI Y F, LU C, et al. Time-varying formation tracking for UAV swarm systems with switching directed topologies［J］. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks And Learning Systems, 2018,29(10):1-12.
［14］ DONG X W, YU B, SHI Z, et al. Time-varying formation control for unmanned aerial vehicles: theories and applications［J］. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2015, 23(1): 340-348.
［15］ DONG X W, HUA Y Z, ZHOU Y, et al. Theory and experiment on formation-containment control of multiple multirotor unmanned aerial vehicle systems［J］. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 2018,16(1): 229-240.
［16］ CAO Y. C UAV circumnavigating an unknown target under a GPS-denied environment with range-only measurements［J］. Automatica, 2015, 55: 150-158.
［17］ CAO Y. UAV circumnavigating an unknown target using range measurement and estimated range rate［C］∥Proceedings of American Control Conference. Portland, OR, US: IEEE, 2014: 4581-4586.
［18］ HASHEMI A, CAO Y C, CASBEER D, et al. UAV circumnavigation of an unknown target without location information using noisy range-based measurements［C］∥Proceedings of American Control Conference. Portland, OR, US:IEEE, 2014: 4587-4592.
［19］ MATVEEV A S, TEIMOORI H, SAVKIN A V. The problem of target following based on range-only measurements for car-like robots［C］∥Proceedings of the 48th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control. Shanghai, China: IEEE, 2009: 8537-8542.
［20］ MATVEEV A S, TEIMOORI H, SAVKIN A V. Range-only measurements based target following for wheeled mobile robots［J］. Automatica, 2011, 47(1): 177-184.
［21］张民,夏卫政,黄坤，等.基于Leader-Follower编队的无人机协同跟踪地面目标制导律设计［J］.航空学报, 2018, 39(2):230-242.
ZHANG M, XIA W Z, HUANG K, et al. Guidance law for cooperative tracking of a ground target based on leader-follower formation of UAVs［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2018, 39(2):230-242.(in Chinese)
［22］林倩玉. 多无人机协同编队控制算法研究［D］.哈尔滨：哈尔滨工业大学,2018:5-8.
LIN Q Y. Research on cooperative formation control algorithm for multi-UAVs［D］. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2018:5-8.(in Chinese)
［23］李炳乾, 董文瀚, 马小山. 无人机编队保持反步容错控制［J］.兵工学报, 2018, 39(11):2172-2184.
LI B Q, DONG W H, MA X S. Back-stepping-fault-tolerant control for keeping the formation of unmanned aerial vehicles［J］. Acta Armamentarii, 2018, 39(11):2172-2184. (in Chinese)
［24］ YOO S J. Distributed consensus tracking of a class of asynchronously switched nonlinear multi-agent systems［J］. Automatica, 2018, 87(1):421-427.
［25］曹昊哲, 吴炎烜, 周峰, 等. 带有避碰机制的2阶非线性多智能体系统包围编队研究［J］. 兵工学报, 2016, 37(9):1646-1654.
CAO H Z, WU Y X, ZHOU F, et al. Research on containment control of second-order nonlinear multi-agent with collision avoidance mechanism［J］. Acta Armamentarii, 2016,37(9): 1646-1654.(in Chinese)
［26］郭向威. 基于改进光流法的运动目标检测与跟踪研究［D］. 南宁:广西大学, 2018.
GUO X W. Research of moving object detection and tracking based on improved optical flow method［D］. Nanning: Guangxi University, 2018.(in Chinese)
［27］王丹. 基于视觉的无人机检测与跟踪系统研究［D］.哈尔滨：哈尔滨工业大学,2016.
WANG D. Research on UAV system based on visual detection and tracking［D］. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology,2016.(in Chinese)
［28］ GU Y, SEANOR B, CAMPA G, et al. Design and flight testing evaluation of formation control laws［J］. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2006, 14(6): 1105-1112.

第40卷
第10期2019 年10月兵工学报ACTA
ARMAMENTARIIVol.40No.10Oct.2019

[1]	张雪雪, 薛智华, 聂洪奇, 严启龙. 含能燃速抑制剂的制备及其对AP分解的负催化效应[J]. 兵工学报, 2024, 45(1): 15-25.
[2]	周悦, 李壮壮, 郑然舜, 李军. 无人机火箭助推机构分离安全性研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2024, 45(1): 219-230.
[3]	禹志龙, 李颖晖, 裴彬彬, 徐文丰, 段效聪, 宋可鑫. 具有飞行包线限制的飞翼无人机鲁棒自适应容错姿态控制[J]. 兵工学报, 2024, 45(1): 231-240.
[4]	丁文俊, 张国宗, 刘海旻, 柴亚军, 王驰宇, 毛昭勇. 面向海流扰动和通信时延的欠驱动AUV编队跟踪控制[J]. 兵工学报, 2024, 45(1): 184-196.
[5]	赵熙俊, 崔星, 李兆冬, 王一全, 杨雨. 编队机动自适应车间距保持控制[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(S2): 44-51.
[6]	郭志明, 娄文忠, 李涛, 张梦宇, 白子龙, 乔虎. 基于改进蝗虫优化算法考虑任务威胁的多无人机协同航迹规划[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(S2): 52-60.
[7]	鞠爽, 王晶, 王灏, 周萌. 基于GWO-WOA的执行器严重故障多移动机器人编队重构控制[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(S2): 114-125.
[8]	曹子建, 孙泽龙, 闫国闯, 傅妍芳, 杨博, 李秦洁, 雷凯麟, 高领航. 基于强化学习的无人机集群对抗策略推演仿真[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(S2): 126-134.
[9]	卢颖, 庞黎晨, 陈雨思, 宋婉莹, 傅妍芳. 一种面向城市战的无人机路径规划群智能算法[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(S2): 146-156.
[10]	曹正阳, 张冰, 白屹轩, 勾柯楠. GNSS/INS/VNS组合定位信息融合的多无人机协同导航方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(S2): 157-166.
[11]	李曹妍, 郭振川, 郑冬冬, 魏延岭. 基于分布式模型预测控制的多机器人协同编队[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(S2): 178-190.
[12]	张继雄, 李宗刚, 宁小刚, 陈引娟. 动态事件触发下一般线性多智能体系统完全分布式一致性控制[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(S2): 223-234.
[13]	陈柏翰, 沈子楷, 邹慧辉, 王伟光, 王可慧. 硬目标内弹体斜侵彻状态的基本演化特性[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(S1): 59-66.
[14]	陈柏翰, 王笠镔, 邹慧辉, 王伟光, 王可慧. 自旋对弹体侵彻效应的影响[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(S1): 117-124.
[15]	赵军民, 何浩哲, 王少奇, 聂聪, 焦迎杰. 复杂环境下多无人机目标跟踪与避障联合航迹规划[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(9): 2685-2696.