飞片冲击起爆高能钝感高聚物粘结炸药的实验研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2016.08.018

兵工学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (8): 1464-1468.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2016.08.018

飞片冲击起爆高能钝感高聚物粘结炸药的实验研究

白志玲¹，段卓平¹，景莉²，刘益儒³，欧卓成¹，黄风雷¹

（1.北京理工大学爆炸科学与技术国家重点实验室，北京 100081; 2.北京空间机电研究所，北京 100094；3.北京应用物理与计算数学研究所，北京 100088）

收稿日期:2016-04-06 修回日期:2016-04-06 上线日期:2016-09-30
通讯作者: 白志玲 E-mail:zhilingbai@yeah.net
作者简介:白志玲(1989—)，女，博士研究生
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金重点项目(10832003、11076032)

Experimental Research on Initiation of Insensitive High Energy Plastic Bonded Explosives by Flyer Impact

BAI Zhi-ling¹, DUAN Zhuo-ping¹, JING Li², LIU Yi-ru³, OU Zhuo-cheng¹, HUANG Feng-lei¹

(1.State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China;2.Beijing Institute of Space Mechanics & Electricity, Beijing 100094, China;3.Institute of Applied Physics and Computational Mathematics, Beijing 100088, China)

Received:2016-04-06 Revised:2016-04-06 Online:2016-09-30
Contact: BAI Zhi-ling E-mail:zhilingbai@yeah.net

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了对比奥克托今（HMX）基和三氨基三硝基苯（TATB）基高聚物粘结（PBX）炸药冲击起爆爆轰建立过程的差异，研究高能钝感炸药的爆轰成长特性，采用火炮驱动铝飞片实现平面冲击加载，建立一维拉格朗日锰铜压阻实验测试系统，得到高能PBXC03(以HMX为主)和高能钝感PBXC10(以TATB为主)炸药冲击起爆爆轰成长过程的不同拉格朗日位置处压力变化历史和前导冲击波时程曲线。结果表明：高能钝感PBXC10炸药的爆轰建立过程与高能PBXC03炸药明显不同，HMX基和TATB基PBX炸药冲击起爆和爆轰成长的物理机制存在较大差异。基于所得数据可标定高能钝感PBX炸药的反应速率方程。

关键词: 兵器科学与技术, 爆轰, 高聚物粘结炸药, 冲击起爆, 飞片, 拉格朗日实验

Abstract: In order to study the difference between detonation processes of HMX-based and TATB-based plastic bonded explosives and know more about the detonation growth characteristics of insensitive high energy explosives, an one-dimensional Lagrangian experimental test system is built based on manganin piezoresistive pressure gauge measurement technique, in which the aluminum flyers are used for planar impact loading. The impact initiation experiments are performed for PBXC03 (mainly HMX) and PBXC10 (mainly TATB) explosives. The pressure histories at different Lagrangian locations and the time-distance curve of shock front are obtained through experiment. The results show that the detonation growth progress of PBXC10 explosives distinctly distinguishes from that of PBXC03 explosives. This indicates that the physical mechanism of the shock initiation and detonation growth of HMX-based plastic bonded explosives is different from that of TATB-based plastic bonded explosives. The experimental data can be used to calibrate the reaction rate equation of insensitive high energy explosives.

Key words: ordnance science and technology, detonation, plastic bonded explosive, shock initiation, flyer, Lagrangian experiment

中图分类号:

O381

白志玲，段卓平，景莉，刘益儒，欧卓成，黄风雷. 飞片冲击起爆高能钝感高聚物粘结炸药的实验研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2016, 37(8): 1464-1468.

BAI Zhi-ling, DUAN Zhuo-ping, JING Li, LIU Yi-ru, OU Zhuo-cheng, HUANG Feng-lei. Experimental Research on Initiation of Insensitive High Energy Plastic Bonded Explosives by Flyer Impact[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2016, 37(8): 1464-1468.

参考文献

［1］董海山，周芬芬. 高能炸药及相关物性能[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1989.
DONG Hai-shan, ZHOU Fen-fen.Performance of high energy explosives and related compounds [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1989. (in Chinese)
[2］ Gustavsen R L，Sheffield S A，Alcon R R. Measurements of shock initiation in the tri-amino-tri-nitro-benzene based explosive PBX

9502: wave forms from embedded gauges and comparison of four different material lots[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 2006, 99(11): 114907.
[3］ Sheffield S A，Gustavsen R L，Alcon R R. In-situ magnetic gauging technique used at LANL-method and shock information obtained[C]∥Proceedings of the Conference of the American Physical Society Topical Group on Shock Compression of Condensed Matter. New York: American Institute of Physics,1999:1043-1048.
[4］ Tarver C M, Forbes J W, Garcia F, et al. Manganin gauge and reactive flow modeling study of the shock initiation of PBX 9501[C]∥Proceedings of the Conference of the American Physical Society Topical Group on Shock Compression of Condensed Matter. New York: American Institute of Physics, 2001:1043-1046.
[5］ Vandersall K S，Garcia F，Tarver C M，et al. Shock initiation experiments on the TATB based explosive RX-03-GO with ignition and growth modeling[C]∥Proceedings of the Conference of the American Physical Society Topical Group on Shock Compression of Condensed Matter . New York: American Institute of Physics, 2009.
[6］ Wen L J，Duan Z P，Zhang L S，et al. Effects of HMX particle size on the shock initiation of PBXC03 explosive[J]. International Journal of Nonlinear Sciences and Numerical Simulation, 2012, 13(2): 189-194.
[7］温丽晶，段卓平，张震宇，等. 不同加载压力下炸药冲击起爆过程实验和数值模拟研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2013, 34(3): 283-288.
WEN Li-jing, DUAN Zhuo-ping, ZHANG Zhen-yu, et al. Experimental and numerical study on the shock initiation of PBXC03 explosive under the different loading pressure[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2013, 34(3): 283-288. (in Chinese)
[8］温丽晶，段卓平，张震宇，等. HMX 基和 TATB 基 PBX 炸药爆轰成长差别的实验研究[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2013(增刊): 135-139.
WEN Li-jing, DUAN Zhuo-ping, ZHANG Zhen-yu, et al. Experimental research on differences of detonation growth process between HMX-based and TATB-based plastic bonded explosive[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2013(S): 135-139. (in Chinese)
[9］刘益儒. 多元混合PBX炸药冲击起爆细观反应流模型研究[D]. 北京：北京理工大学, 2015.
LIU Yi-ru. Research on mesoscopic reactive flow model of shock initiation of multi-component PBX[D]. Beijing: Beijing Institute of Technology, 2015. (in Chinese)
[10］ Duan Z P，Liu Y，Pi A G，et al. Foil-like manganin gauges for dynamic high pressure measurements[J]. Measurement Science and Technology, 2011, 22(7):75206-75210.
[11］ Grebenkin K F. Comparative analysis of physical mechanisms of detonation initiation in HMX and in a low-sensitive explosive (TATB)[J]. Combustion Explosion and Shock Waves, 2008, 45(1):78-87.

[1]	冯文康，郑权，汪小卫，董晓琳，翁春生，肖强，孟豪龙. 当量比对煤油-空气两相旋转爆轰波的影响[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(6): 1304-1315.
[2]	李淑睿，段卓平，白志玲，张旭，黄风雷. 2，4-二硝基苯甲醚基熔铸含铝炸药冲击起爆特性[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(6): 1288-1294.
[3]	续晗，罗永晨，倪晓冬，肖博文，张锋，苏晓杰，郑权，翁春生. 铝粉燃料连续旋转爆轰发动机工作特性[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(5): 1046-1053.
[4]	康杨，李宁，黄孝龙，翁春生. 基于环形喷管的脉冲爆轰发动机爆轰声波声学特性[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(5): 1075-1082.
[5]	孟豪龙，翁春生，武郁文，郑权，肖强，王放，白桥栋. 环形燃烧室中凹腔对C₂H₄/Air旋转爆轰流场影响的数值模拟[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(5): 1063-1074.
[6]	刘纯，欧卓成，段卓平，黄风雷. 动态加载下高聚物粘结炸药中椭圆孔洞坍塌引起的热点温度及其半经验解析表达[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(1): 57-68.
[7]	吴明亮，郑权，续晗，翁春生，白桥栋. 氢气占比对氢气-煤油-空气旋转爆轰波传播特性的影响[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(1): 86-97.
[8]	贺翔，严楠，曾祥涛，解瑞珍，鲍丙亮，张良，吴伟明. 微尺寸叠氮化铅驱动飞片重要结构参数与飞片速度和能量的关系[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(7): 1363-1371.
[9]	李淑睿，段卓平，郑保辉，罗观，黄风雷. 24-二硝基苯甲醚基熔铸含铝炸药圆筒试验及爆轰产物状态方程[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(7): 1424-1430.
[10]	解瑞珍，褚恩义，戴旭涵，苏谦，薛艳，任小明，刘兰，刘卫. 微起爆序列设计及传爆与隔爆性能[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(6): 1178-1184.
[11]	魏万里，郑权，鲁江涛，翁春生，武郁文. 中心锥对液态燃料旋转爆轰发动机工作过程与性能的影响[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(6): 1185-1194.
[12]	白志玲，段卓平，黄风雷. 高聚物粘结炸药冲击起爆统计热点反应速率模型[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(11): 2379-2387.
[13]	赵聘，陈朗，李金河，鲁建英，伍俊英. 聚能射流侵彻隔板形成的前驱冲击波起爆不同温度炸药特性[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(1): 45-55.
[14]	徐萧，金磊，黄莎玲，高世桥，张虎生. 飞片冲击载荷在环氧树脂/印刷电路板/环氧树脂界面处的传递特性[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(9): 1817-1825.
[15]	李宝星, 王中, 许桂阳，翁春生, 赵凤起. 煤油燃料旋转爆轰波起爆与传播特性实验研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(7): 1339-1346.

飞片冲击起爆高能钝感高聚物粘结炸药的实验研究

Experimental Research on Initiation of Insensitive High Energy Plastic Bonded Explosives by Flyer Impact

PDF

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价