Acta Armamentarii ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (3): 240281-.doi: 10.12382/bgxb.2024.0281
Previous Articles Next Articles
LIU Fuqiang1,2,*(), ZHOU Lun1,2, LIU Zhongyang1,2, PI Yangjun1,2, PU Huayan1,2, LUO Jun1,2
Received:
2024-04-12
Online:
2025-03-26
Contact:
LIU Fuqiang
LIU Fuqiang, ZHOU Lun, LIU Zhongyang, PI Yangjun, PU Huayan, LUO Jun. Dynamic Weapon-target Assignment Based on Three-way Decisionand Genetic Algorithm[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2025, 46(3): 240281-.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
行动 | 状态 | |
---|---|---|
A | ||
aP | λPP | λPN |
aB | λBP | λBN |
aN | λNN |
Table 1 Loss function in each case
行动 | 状态 | |
---|---|---|
A | ||
aP | λPP | λPN |
aB | λBP | λBN |
aN | λNN |
场景规模 | 防御武器数量 | 来袭目标数量 |
---|---|---|
1 | 5 | 10 |
2 | 15 | 20 |
Table 2 The scale of the defense scenario
场景规模 | 防御武器数量 | 来袭目标数量 |
---|---|---|
1 | 5 | 10 |
2 | 15 | 20 |
场景 | NSGA-Ⅲ | PAGA | IHGA | ANSGA- Ⅲ | DC- NSGA-Ⅲ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
规模1 | 最好值 | 0.3576 | 0.4055 | 0.4055 | 0.3871 | 0.4131 |
最差值 | 0.3142 | 0.3000 | 0.3504 | 0.3045 | 0.3570 | |
平均值 | 0.3416 | 0.3462 | 0.3750 | 0.3772 | 0.3829 | |
方差值 | 3.42e-04 | 1.57e-03 | 4.79e-04 | 3.17e-04 | 5.40e-04 | |
规模2 | 最好值 | 0.2355 | 0.1951 | 0.2437 | 0.2552 | 0.2596 |
最差值 | 0.2002 | 0.1659 | 0.1594 | 0.1883 | 0.2008 | |
平均值 | 0.2148 | 0.1846 | 0.1896 | 0.2214 | 0.2327 | |
方差值 | 1.73e-04 | 1.46e-04 | 1.17e-03 | 1.24e-04 | 6.31e-04 |
Table 3 Hypervolume indexes for the solution sets obtained by the five algorithms
场景 | NSGA-Ⅲ | PAGA | IHGA | ANSGA- Ⅲ | DC- NSGA-Ⅲ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
规模1 | 最好值 | 0.3576 | 0.4055 | 0.4055 | 0.3871 | 0.4131 |
最差值 | 0.3142 | 0.3000 | 0.3504 | 0.3045 | 0.3570 | |
平均值 | 0.3416 | 0.3462 | 0.3750 | 0.3772 | 0.3829 | |
方差值 | 3.42e-04 | 1.57e-03 | 4.79e-04 | 3.17e-04 | 5.40e-04 | |
规模2 | 最好值 | 0.2355 | 0.1951 | 0.2437 | 0.2552 | 0.2596 |
最差值 | 0.2002 | 0.1659 | 0.1594 | 0.1883 | 0.2008 | |
平均值 | 0.2148 | 0.1846 | 0.1896 | 0.2214 | 0.2327 | |
方差值 | 1.73e-04 | 1.46e-04 | 1.17e-03 | 1.24e-04 | 6.31e-04 |
场景 | X1 | X2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S1 | S2 | S3 | S4 | S5 | ||
规模1 | S1 | 0.0000 | 0.3711 | 0.1789 | 0.1983 | 0.1515 |
S2 | 0.1400 | 0.0000 | 0.1579 | 0.2046 | 0.1010 | |
S3 | 0.2200 | 0.1577 | 0.0000 | 0.1547 | 0.2323 | |
S4 | 0.2500 | 0.2154 | 0.1846 | 0.0000 | 0.2472 | |
S5 | 0.2600 | 0.4433 | 0.2947 | 0.3142 | 0.0000 | |
规模2 | S1 | 0.0000 | 0.2232 | 0.3568 | 0.1167 | 0.0534 |
S2 | 0.3035 | 0.0000 | 0.2562 | 0.1674 | 0.1336 | |
S3 | 0.1262 | 0.1321 | 0.0000 | 0.2763 | 0.0486 | |
S4 | 0.1664 | 0.2157 | 0.3349 | 0.0000 | 0.2075 | |
S5 | 0.3214 | 0.3472 | 0.5028 | 0.3194 | 0.0000 |
Table 4 Dominant coverages of the solution sets obtained by the five algorithms
场景 | X1 | X2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S1 | S2 | S3 | S4 | S5 | ||
规模1 | S1 | 0.0000 | 0.3711 | 0.1789 | 0.1983 | 0.1515 |
S2 | 0.1400 | 0.0000 | 0.1579 | 0.2046 | 0.1010 | |
S3 | 0.2200 | 0.1577 | 0.0000 | 0.1547 | 0.2323 | |
S4 | 0.2500 | 0.2154 | 0.1846 | 0.0000 | 0.2472 | |
S5 | 0.2600 | 0.4433 | 0.2947 | 0.3142 | 0.0000 | |
规模2 | S1 | 0.0000 | 0.2232 | 0.3568 | 0.1167 | 0.0534 |
S2 | 0.3035 | 0.0000 | 0.2562 | 0.1674 | 0.1336 | |
S3 | 0.1262 | 0.1321 | 0.0000 | 0.2763 | 0.0486 | |
S4 | 0.1664 | 0.2157 | 0.3349 | 0.0000 | 0.2075 | |
S5 | 0.3214 | 0.3472 | 0.5028 | 0.3194 | 0.0000 |
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
罗锐涵, 李顺民. 基于改进BBO算法的火力分配方案优化[J]. 南京航空航天大学学报, 2020, 52(6):897-902.
|
|
|
[6] |
李梦杰, 常雪凝, 石建迈, 等. 武器目标分配问题研究进展:模型、算法与应用[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(4):1049-1071.
doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2023.04.14 |
|
|
[7] |
doi: 10.23919/JSEE.2023.000102 |
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
王邑, 孙金标, 肖明清, 等. 基于类型2区间模糊K近邻分类器的动态武器目标分配方法研究[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2016, 38(6):1314-1319.
|
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2016.06.15 |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023591 pmid: 37501487 |
[19] |
孙海文, 于邵祯, 江源, 等. 海上无人机蜂群目标威胁评估方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(增刊2):32-39.
|
|
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
于博文, 吕明. 基于D-NSGA-GKM算法的多阶段武器协同火力分配方法[J]. 控制与决策, 2022, 37(3):605-615.
|
|
[1] | ZHAO Xin, SU Tiexiong, MA Fukang, SHI Jianhua, CHAI Chang. Collaborative Optimization Design Method of Main Bearing Assembly Structure with Multi-structural Characteristics Based on Improved EHO Algorithm [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2025, 46(1): 231135-. |
[2] | XIA Huanxiong, LI Kang, GAO Feng, LIU Jianhua, AO Xiaohui. Intelligent Optimization for Forming Quality of Melt-cast Explosives Based on the Evolution Characteristics of Solidification Front [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2024, 45(9): 2936-2950. |
[3] | WAN Silai, WANG Guoxin, MING Zhenjun, LI Chuanhao, YAN Yan, DING Wei, YUAN Ke, WANG Yuqian. Modeling and Optimization Method of Kill Chains Based on AGE-MOEA [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2024, 45(8): 2617-2628. |
[4] | LIU Shengyu, QI Xiaogang, LIU Lifang. Multi-objective Joint Optimization of Resource Allocation and Task Scheduling for Accompanying Repair [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2024, 45(7): 2442-2450. |
[5] | WEI Jialin, WANG Youlong, WEN Xuhui, CHEN Chen, LI Wenshan. Optimization Design of a 300kW High-speed Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machine for Aviation Aircraft [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2024, 45(5): 1363-1373. |
[6] | SU Sheng, GU Sen, SONG Zhiqiang, LIU Ping. Military Cockpit Color Design Method Based on Deep Representation Learning and Genetic Algorithm [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2024, 45(4): 1060-1069. |
[7] | SUN Shiming, YU Wei, WANG Xiaohui, LI Zhenwang, LIU Cailian. Initial Kinematic Parameters Design of Trans-media Vehicle Skipping over Water Surface Based on Multi-objective Optimization [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2024, 45(2): 541-551. |
[8] | MA Weining, HU Qiwei, CHEN Jing, JIA Xisheng. Joint Optimization of Selective Maintenance Decision and Mission Assignment for Equipment Groups [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2024, 45(2): 407-416. |
[9] | QIN Guohua, LOU Weida, LIN Feng, XU Yong. A Novel Method of Stability Judgment and Milling Parameter Optimization Based on Cotes Integration Method and Neural Network [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2024, 45(2): 516-526. |
[10] | LIU Zichang, LI Siyu, PEI Mochao, LIU Jie, MENG Shuo, WU Weiyi. Fault Diagnosis Method for Diesel Engine Based on Texture Analysis [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2024, 45(2): 684-694. |
[11] | REN Xiaochen, PENG Jianxin, WANG Cheng, GONG Ran, HU Yuhui. Research on Automatic Optimization of Oil Pressure Curve during Shift Process of Integrated Transmission Device in Service [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2024, 45(12): 4475-4487. |
[12] | ZHAO Wei, HOU Baolin. Multi-objective Optimization of Filament Winding Constrained Structure of Electromagnetic Gun [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2024, 45(11): 3820-3832. |
[13] | DANG Wanying, ZHOU Lelai, LI Yibin, ZHANG Chen. Neural Network Planning Method for Optimal Off-road Configuration of Modular Robots [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2024, 45(10): 3674-3685. |
[14] | TIAN Hengxu, LIN Shengye, LI Hao, WU Yinghao, WANG Maosen, DAI Jinsong. Fatigue Optimization of Sell Extractor Skateboard in a High-firing-speed Automatic Gun Based on Kriging Model [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2024, 45(10): 3585-3595. |
[15] | FU Yaoyu, GUI Xincheng, ZHOU Yunbo, LIU Jiazhi, SHI Hao, WANG Zheng. Protection Performance Analysis and Optimization Design of Vehicle Roof Sandwich Plateunder Air Explosion Condition of Fragment Warhead [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2024, 45(1): 69-84. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||