Protection Performance Analysis and Optimization Design of Vehicle Roof Sandwich Plateunder Air Explosion Condition of Fragment Warhead

doi:10.12382/bgxb.2023.0487

Abstract

Abstract:

In modern warfare, many fragmentation warheads choose the top of vehicle as the preferred attack position to achieve long-range precision strike, but there is little research on the top protection of vehicle under the combined action of shock wave and fragmentation at home and abroad. In order to improve the protection performance of the top of special vehicle and realize the lightweight structural design, The effectiveness and accuracy of numerical simulation are verified by the NATO first-stage alternative charge explosion test and the theoretical calculation of fragment dispersion. A solution processing program for analyzing the fragment point distribution at different initiation heights is written by using Python according to the LS-DYNA analysis result data and the fragment ballistic equation. Then, an I-Y type sandwich plate is designed and compared with another five types of sandwich plates with different structures to prove its superiority. Further, The effects of explosive initiation mode, relative position of explosive, thicknesses of panel and backplane, and structural parameters of sandwich layer on the protection performance of I-Y plate are studied by taking the mass loss, energy absorption, peak displacement and fragment velocity distribution as evaluation criteria. Finally, the thickness of panel, the thickness of backplane, the height of sandwich layer and the width of cell are selected as the design variables, and the peak displacement of backplane and the quality of sandwich plate are taken as the optimization objectives. The optimal Latin Hypercube test method is used for sampling, Kriging method is used to construct the proxy model.and NSGA-Ⅱ genetic algorithm is used for multi-objective optimization. the optimal solution is simulated and verified, which provides support for the optimization design of roof protection structure under the combined action of shock waves and fragments.

Key words: prefabricated fragment, dispersion initial velocity, I-Y shaped sandwich plate, protection performance, multi-objective optimization

CLC Number:

O383⁺.3

FU Yaoyu, GUI Xincheng, ZHOU Yunbo, LIU Jiazhi, SHI Hao, WANG Zheng. Protection Performance Analysis and Optimization Design of Vehicle Roof Sandwich Plateunder Air Explosion Condition of Fragment Warhead[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2024, 45(1): 69-84.

Figures/Tables 46

References 18

[1]	张超, 赵祥君, 周华钦. 美军特种作战车辆装备发展与启示[J]. 军事交通学院学报, 2019, 21(10): 52-56.
	ZHANG C, ZHAO X J, ZHOU H Q. Development and enlightenment of special operational vehicle equipment in US army[J]. Journal of Military Transportation University, 2019, 21(10): 52-56. (in Chinese)
[2]	张浩宇, 张树凯, 程立, 等. 杀伤爆破战斗部起爆方式对地面目标杀伤威力的影响[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(11): 2300-2309. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2021.11.002
	ZHANG H Y, ZHANG S K, CHENG L, et al. The Impact of initiation mode of blast fragmentation warhead on the power to kill the ground target[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2021, 42(11): 2300-2309. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2021.11.002
[3]	印立魁, 蒋建伟, 门建兵, 等. 立方体预制破片战斗部破片初速计算模型[J]. 兵工学报, 2014, 35(12): 1967-1971. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2014.12.005
	YIN L K, JIANG J W, MEN J B, et al. An initial velocity model of explosively-driven cubical fragments[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2014, 35(12): 1967-1971. (in Chinese)
[4]	曹贺全, 张广明, 孙素杰, 等. 装甲车辆防护技术研究现状与发展[J]. 兵工学报, 2012, 33(12): 1549-1554.
	CAO H Q, ZHANG G M, SUN S J, et al. Status and development of protection technology of armored vehicles[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2012, 33(12): 1549-1554. (in Chinese)
[5]	李茂, 高圣智, 侯海量, 等. 空爆冲击波与破片群联合作用下聚脲涂覆陶瓷复合装甲结构毁伤特性[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2020, 40(11): 51-63.
	LI M, GAO S Z, HOU H L, et al. Damage characteristics of polyurea coated ceramic/steel composite armor structures subjected to combined loadings of blast and high-velocity fragments[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2020, 40(11): 51-63. (in Chinese)
[6]	WU J Y, JI C, LONG Y, et al. Dynamicresponses and damage of cylindrical shells under the combined effects of fragments and shock waves[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2017, 113: 94-103. doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2017.01.009 URL
[7]	NYSTROEM U, GYLLTOFT K. Numerical studies of the combined effects of blast and fragment loading[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2009, 36(8): 995-1005. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.02.008 URL
[8]	ZHANG C Z, CHENG Y S, ZHANG P, et al. Numerical investigation of the response of I-core sandwich panels subjected to combined blast and fragment loading[J]. Engineering Structures, 2017, 115: 459-471.
[9]	吴港, 王昕, 纪冲, 等. 高速破片与爆炸冲击波对钢板联合作用的数值模拟分析[J]. 火工品, 2021(3): 24-28.
	WU G, WANG X, JI C, et al. Numerical simulation analysis of combined action of high-speed fragments and explosion shock wave on steel plate[J]. Initiators & Pyrotechnics, 2021(3): 24-28. (in Chinese)
[10]	程远胜, 谢杰克, 李哲, 等. 冲击波和破片群联合作用下高强聚乙烯/泡沫铝夹芯复合结构毁伤响应特性[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(8): 1753-1762. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2021.08.020
	CHENG Y S, XIE J K, LI Z, et al. Damage response characteristics of UHMWPE/aluminum foam composite sandwich panel subjected to combined blast and fragment loadings[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2021, 42(8): 1753-1762. (in Chinese)
[11]	KONG X S, WU W G, LI J, et al. Experimental and numerical investigation on a multilayer protective structure under the synergistic effect of blast and fragment loadings[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2014, 65: 146-162. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.11.009 URL
[12]	田力, 胡建伟. 近爆冲击波和破片群联合作用下I-V型夹芯板的防护性能研究[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 49(11): 2831-2842.
	TIAN L, HU J W. Research on protective properties of I-V sandwich panel under the combined loading of close-range blast wave and fragments[J]. Journal of Central South University(Science and Technology), 2018, 49(11):2831-2842. (in Chinese)
[13]	张志理, 乐贵高, 仲健林, 等. 爆炸载荷下波纹板防护性能分析与优化设计[J]. 兵器装备工程学报, 2018, 39(3): 83-88.
	ZHANG Z L, LE G G, ZHONG J L, et al. Analysis and optimization of corrugated plate under explosion load[J]. Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering, 2018, 39(3): 83-88. (in Chinese)
[14]	雷灏, 姚志敏, 尉广军. 基于Gurney公式的半预制破片飞散特性研究[J]. 爆破, 2014, 31(1): 38-41, 74.
	LEI H, YAO Z M, WEI G J. Research on dispersion characteristics of pre-formed fragments based on gurney formula[J]. Blasting, 2014, 31(1): 38-41, 74. (in Chinese)
[15]	郑红伟, 陈长海, 侯海量, 等. 破片尺寸对空爆冲击波及破片传播过程的影响仿真分析[J]. 中国舰船研究, 2017, 12(6): 73-80.
	ZHENG H W, CHEN C H, HOU H L, et al. Simulation analysis of effects of single fragment size on air-blast wave and fragment propagation[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2017, 12(6): 73-80. (in Chinese)
[16]	王孟鑫, 陈睿颖, 王金相. 破片与冲击波联合作用下多孔泡沫铝夹芯复合材料板的防护性能[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(5): 1041-1052. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2021.05.017
	WANG M X, CHEN R Y, WANG J X. Protective properties of porous foam aluminum sandwich composite plate under the combined action of fragment and shock wave[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2021, 42(5): 1041-1052. (in Chinese)
[17]	胡玉涛, 蒋邦海, 卢芳云, 等. 基于LS-DYNA计算结果的破片战斗部虚拟打击仿真[J]. 弹道学报, 2012, 24(1): 27-31.
	HU Y T, JIANG B H, LU F Y, et al. Simulation of fragment warhead attack based on LS-DYNA simulation results[J]. Journal of Ballistics, 2012, 24(1): 27-31. (in Chinese)
[18]	孙晓旺, 张进成, 彭兵, 等. 军用车辆底部爆炸冲击下载员下肢保护装置设计与优化[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(12): 2555-2564. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2021.12.003
	SUN X W, ZHANG J C, PENG B, et al. Design and optimization of occupant lower limb protection device against explosion shock below military vehicle[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2021, 42(12): 2555-2564. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2021.12.003

参数	数值	参数	数值
p_C-J/MPa	21000	R₁	4.15
爆速v/(m·s^-1)	6930	R₂	0.9
ρ/(kg·m^-3)	1630	ω	0.35
A/MPa	37377	E_TNT/(J·m^-3)	6000
B/MPa	37347	V	1

参数	数值	参数	数值
p_C-J/MPa	21000	R₁	4.15
爆速v/(m·s^-1)	6930	R₂	0.9
ρ/(kg·m^-3)	1630	ω	0.35
A/MPa	37377	E_TNT/(J·m^-3)	6000
B/MPa	37347	V	1

类型	t_a/ mm	t_b/ mm	t_e/ mm	t_f/ mm	b_c/ mm	h_c/ mm	总质量/ kg
单层	8.9
I型	3.2	3.2		3.0	36	25
V型	3.2	3.2	1.8		36	25	18.5
Y型	3.1	3.1	1.8		36	25
I-V型	2.7	2.7	1.9	1.8	36	25
I-Y型	2.5	2.5	1.8	1.8	36	25

类型	t_a/ mm	t_b/ mm	t_e/ mm	t_f/ mm	b_c/ mm	h_c/ mm	总质量/ kg
单层	8.9
I型	3.2	3.2		3.0	36	25
V型	3.2	3.2	1.8		36	25	18.5
Y型	3.1	3.1	1.8		36	25
I-V型	2.7	2.7	1.9	1.8	36	25
I-Y型	2.5	2.5	1.8	1.8	36	25

工况	起爆方式	起爆点
1	单点起爆	1
2	单点起爆	2
3	单点起爆	3
4	单点起爆	4
5	单点起爆	5
6	多点起爆	1,5
7	多点起爆	2,4
8	线起爆