Acta Armamentarii ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (11): 3382-3393.doi: 10.12382/bgxb.2023.0763
Special Issue: 群体协同与自主技术
Previous Articles Next Articles
WANG Kang, SI Peng, CHEN Li, LI Zhongxin*(), WU Zhilin**(
)
Received:
2023-08-18
Online:
2023-11-02
Contact:
LI Zhongxin, WU Zhilin
CLC Number:
WANG Kang, SI Peng, CHEN Li, LI Zhongxin, WU Zhilin. 3D Path Planning of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Based on Enhanced Sand Cat Swarm Optimization Algorithm[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44(11): 3382-3393.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
算法 | 参数 | 取值 | 算法 | 参数 | 取值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVSCSO | rG | [2,0] | ω | 0.5 | |
R | [-rG,rG] | PSO | c1 | 2 | |
SCSO | rG | [2,0] | c2 | 2 | |
R | [-rG,rG] |
Table 1 Parameter values of each algorithm
算法 | 参数 | 取值 | 算法 | 参数 | 取值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVSCSO | rG | [2,0] | ω | 0.5 | |
R | [-rG,rG] | PSO | c1 | 2 | |
SCSO | rG | [2,0] | c2 | 2 | |
R | [-rG,rG] |
模型 | 山体中心 (xmassi, ymassi)/ km | 山体坡度 (xm,di, ym,di) | 山体 高度 hi/ km | 威胁中心 (xmeni, ymeni)/ km | 威胁 半径 Rmeni/ km | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
模型1 | (37,10) | (7.2,8) | 4 | (10,10) | 6 | |
(27,9) | (6.4,5) | 3.5 | (28,35) | 5 | ||
(12,25) | (8,9.6) | 5 | (20,45) | 4.5 | ||
(39,32) | (6,10) | 6 | (35,45) | 4 | ||
(13,40) | (4.7,6) | 3 | (25,15) | 5.5 | ||
(40,10) | (6,7) | 5.5 | (18,7) | 5 | ||
(10,17) | (6,8) | 4 | (43,35) | 5 | ||
模型2 | (35,25) | (9,8.8) | 6 | (15,45) | 4.5 | |
(15,30) | (8,10) | 6 | (35,45) | 4 | ||
(25,40) | (5,7) | 4.5 | (28,15) | 5.5 | ||
(35,12) | (7,7) | 6 | (13,10) | 5.5 | ||
(25,15) | (6.6,8) | 3 | (32,35) | 5 | ||
模型3 | (12,23) | (8.8,7) | 6 | (15,40) | 4.5 | |
(23,34) | (8,9) | 5 | (40,25) | 4 | ||
(35,41) | (5,7.6) | 4 | (25,15) | 6 |
Table 2 Parameters of mountain model and threat model
模型 | 山体中心 (xmassi, ymassi)/ km | 山体坡度 (xm,di, ym,di) | 山体 高度 hi/ km | 威胁中心 (xmeni, ymeni)/ km | 威胁 半径 Rmeni/ km | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
模型1 | (37,10) | (7.2,8) | 4 | (10,10) | 6 | |
(27,9) | (6.4,5) | 3.5 | (28,35) | 5 | ||
(12,25) | (8,9.6) | 5 | (20,45) | 4.5 | ||
(39,32) | (6,10) | 6 | (35,45) | 4 | ||
(13,40) | (4.7,6) | 3 | (25,15) | 5.5 | ||
(40,10) | (6,7) | 5.5 | (18,7) | 5 | ||
(10,17) | (6,8) | 4 | (43,35) | 5 | ||
模型2 | (35,25) | (9,8.8) | 6 | (15,45) | 4.5 | |
(15,30) | (8,10) | 6 | (35,45) | 4 | ||
(25,40) | (5,7) | 4.5 | (28,15) | 5.5 | ||
(35,12) | (7,7) | 6 | (13,10) | 5.5 | ||
(25,15) | (6.6,8) | 3 | (32,35) | 5 | ||
模型3 | (12,23) | (8.8,7) | 6 | (15,40) | 4.5 | |
(23,34) | (8,9) | 5 | (40,25) | 4 | ||
(35,41) | (5,7.6) | 4 | (25,15) | 6 |
模型 | 最优值及平均值 | LVSCSO算法 | SCSO算法 | PSO算法 |
---|---|---|---|---|
模型1 | 最优值 | 0.2135 | 0.6051 | 0.3395 |
平均值 | 0.2725 | 0.6431 | 0.3718 | |
模型2 | 最优值 | 0.1705 | 0.6230 | 0.3137 |
平均值 | 0.2921 | 0.6675 | 0.3527 | |
模型3 | 最优值 | 0.1960 | 0.5981 | 0.3243 |
平均值 | 0.2779 | 0.6218 | 0.3565 | |
总平均值 | 0.2808 | 0.6441 | 0.3603 |
Table 3 Fitness function values of three wilderness environment models
模型 | 最优值及平均值 | LVSCSO算法 | SCSO算法 | PSO算法 |
---|---|---|---|---|
模型1 | 最优值 | 0.2135 | 0.6051 | 0.3395 |
平均值 | 0.2725 | 0.6431 | 0.3718 | |
模型2 | 最优值 | 0.1705 | 0.6230 | 0.3137 |
平均值 | 0.2921 | 0.6675 | 0.3527 | |
模型3 | 最优值 | 0.1960 | 0.5981 | 0.3243 |
平均值 | 0.2779 | 0.6218 | 0.3565 | |
总平均值 | 0.2808 | 0.6441 | 0.3603 |
模型 | 中心位置/ m | 高度/ m | 半径/ m | 中心位置/ m | 高度/ m | 半径/ m | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(400,400) | 350 | 60 | (180,450) | 400 | 75 | ||
(100,700) | 600 | 80 | (500,100) | 550 | 100 | ||
模型1 | (500,580) | 450 | 65 | (400,750) | 500 | 70 | |
(800,120) | 600 | 120 | (800,450) | 900 | 90 | ||
(600,850) | 580 | 80 | (790,880) | 620 | 88 | ||
(400,300) | 450 | 70 | (400,800) | 580 | 62 | ||
(150,400) | 410 | 70 | (800,120) | 630 | 118 | ||
模型2 | (180,600) | 550 | 85 | (600,450) | 880 | 83 | |
(450,100) | 600 | 99 | (600,800) | 600 | 90 | ||
(800,550) | 550 | 70 | (800,900) | 550 | 80 | ||
(300,300) | 350 | 66 | (380,800) | 600 | 76 | ||
(220,480) | 520 | 78 | (750,120) | 450 | 118 | ||
模型3 | (120,680) | 530 | 82 | (780,400) | 760 | 70 | |
(500,100) | 580 | 99 | (560,900) | 620 | 76 | ||
(500,480) | 560 | 80 | (720,790) | 750 | 90 |
Table 4 Building model parameters
模型 | 中心位置/ m | 高度/ m | 半径/ m | 中心位置/ m | 高度/ m | 半径/ m | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(400,400) | 350 | 60 | (180,450) | 400 | 75 | ||
(100,700) | 600 | 80 | (500,100) | 550 | 100 | ||
模型1 | (500,580) | 450 | 65 | (400,750) | 500 | 70 | |
(800,120) | 600 | 120 | (800,450) | 900 | 90 | ||
(600,850) | 580 | 80 | (790,880) | 620 | 88 | ||
(400,300) | 450 | 70 | (400,800) | 580 | 62 | ||
(150,400) | 410 | 70 | (800,120) | 630 | 118 | ||
模型2 | (180,600) | 550 | 85 | (600,450) | 880 | 83 | |
(450,100) | 600 | 99 | (600,800) | 600 | 90 | ||
(800,550) | 550 | 70 | (800,900) | 550 | 80 | ||
(300,300) | 350 | 66 | (380,800) | 600 | 76 | ||
(220,480) | 520 | 78 | (750,120) | 450 | 118 | ||
模型3 | (120,680) | 530 | 82 | (780,400) | 760 | 70 | |
(500,100) | 580 | 99 | (560,900) | 620 | 76 | ||
(500,480) | 560 | 80 | (720,790) | 750 | 90 |
模型 | 最优值及平均值 | LVSCSO算法 | SCSO算法 | PSO算法 |
---|---|---|---|---|
模型1 | 最优值 | 0.1096 | 0.2841 | 0.4156 |
平均值 | 0.1643 | 0.3510 | 0.4905 | |
模型2 | 最优值 | 0.1099 | 0.2792 | 0.4640 |
平均值 | 0.1909 | 0.4690 | 0.5346 | |
模型3 | 最优值 | 0.1236 | 0.3056 | 0.4242 |
平均值 | 0.2387 | 0.5403 | 0.5298 | |
总平均值 | 0.1980 | 0.4534 | 0.5183 |
Table 5 Fitness function values of three urban environment models
模型 | 最优值及平均值 | LVSCSO算法 | SCSO算法 | PSO算法 |
---|---|---|---|---|
模型1 | 最优值 | 0.1096 | 0.2841 | 0.4156 |
平均值 | 0.1643 | 0.3510 | 0.4905 | |
模型2 | 最优值 | 0.1099 | 0.2792 | 0.4640 |
平均值 | 0.1909 | 0.4690 | 0.5346 | |
模型3 | 最优值 | 0.1236 | 0.3056 | 0.4242 |
平均值 | 0.2387 | 0.5403 | 0.5298 | |
总平均值 | 0.1980 | 0.4534 | 0.5183 |
[1] |
李昌玺, 孙玉彪, 范泽昊, 等. 无人作战平台发展现状及趋势[J]. 中国电子科学研究院学报, 2023, 18(3):274-279.
|
|
|
[2] |
张哲, 吴剑, 代冀阳, 等. 基于改进A-Star算法的隐身无人机快速突防航路规划[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(7):254-264.
|
|
|
[3] |
王庆禄, 吴冯国, 郑成辰, 等. 基于优化人工势场法的无人机航迹规划[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(5):1461-1468.
doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2023.05.22 |
doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2023.05.22 |
|
[4] |
张飞凯, 黄永忠, 李连茂, 等. 基于Dijkstra算法的货运索道路径规划方法[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2022, 52(6):176-182.
|
|
|
[5] |
张韬, 项祺, 郑婉文, 等. 基于改进A*算法的路径规划在海战兵棋推演中的应用[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(4):960-968.
doi: 10.12382/bgxb.2021.0209 |
|
|
[6] |
胡铮, 徐斌. 融合A*算法与人工势场法的动态路径规划[J]. 组合机床与自动化加工技术, 2023(7):46-49.
|
|
|
[7] |
黄翼虎, 于亚楠. 基于改进Dijkstra算法的防冲突最短路径规划研究[J]. 计算机与现代化, 2022(8):20-24.
|
|
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
doi: 10.1109/MCI.2006.329691 URL |
[11] |
胡致远, 王征, 杨洋, 等. 基于人工鱼群-蚁群算法的UUV三维全局路径规划[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(7):1676-1684.
doi: 10.12382/bgxb.2021.0215 |
doi: 10.12382/bgxb.2021.0215 |
|
[12] |
赵鹏程, 宋保维, 毛昭勇, 等. 基于改进的复合自适应遗传算法的UUV水下回收路径规划[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(10):2598-2608.
|
|
|
[13] |
黄鹤, 吴琨, 王会峰, 等. 基于改进飞蛾扑火算法的无人机低空突防路径规划[J]. 中国惯性技术学报, 2021, 29 (2):256-263.
|
|
|
[14] |
郭威, 吴凯, 周悦, 等. 基于蚁群算法的深海着陆车路径规划[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(6):1387-1394.
doi: 10.12382/bgxb.2021.0342 |
doi: 10.12382/bgxb.2021.0342 |
|
[15] |
doi: 10.1007/s00366-022-01604-x |
[16] |
doi: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2023.103423 URL |
[17] |
doi: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2023.103411 URL |
[18] |
doi: 10.3390/math11102340 URL |
[19] |
董惠敏, 安海鹏, 张楚. 基于栅格法的人字齿有限元接触精确建模方法[J]. 华中科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 50(3):87-93.
|
|
|
[20] |
熊光明, 于全富, 胡秀中, 等. 考虑平台特性的多层建筑物内履带式无人平台运动规划[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44 (3):841-850.
doi: 10.12382/bgxb.2021.0800 |
doi: 10.12382/bgxb.2021.0800 |
|
[21] |
王磊. 海洋环境下水下机器人快速路径规划研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工程大学, 2007.
|
|
|
[22] |
张舒然. 基于群智算法的无人机航迹规划研究[D]. 成都: 电子科技大学, 2020.
|
|
|
[23] |
doi: 10.3390/s21041224 URL |
[24] |
张昀普, 单甘霖. 道路约束下多传感器协同地面目标跟踪的管理方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(3):542-555.
doi: 10.12382/bgxb.2021.0122 |
doi: 10.12382/bgxb.2021.0122 |
|
[25] |
宋志强, 夏庆锋, 陈少博, 等. 基于改进球面向量粒子群优化的UAV航迹规划[J]. 电光与控制, 2023, 30(4):56-60.
|
|
|
[26] |
蔺文轩, 谢文俊, 张鹏, 等. 基于分组优化改进粒子群算法的无人机三维路径规划[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2023, 48(1): 20-25,32.
|
|
|
[27] |
苟进展, 吴宇, 邓嘉宁. 基于群智能-一致性理论的无人机编队全过程飞行航迹规划方法[J]. 控制与决策, 2023, 38 (5) :1464-1472.
|
|
|
[28] |
刘晓琴. 基于GRU的四旋翼无人机飞行姿态估计[D]. 桂林: 桂林电子科技大学, 2021.
|
|
[1] | ZHOU Yue, LI Zhuangzhuang, ZHENG Ranshun, LI Jun. Research on Safe Separation Mechanism of UAV Rocket Booster [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2024, 45(1): 219-230. |
[2] | LI Song, MA Zhuangzhuang, ZHANG Yunlin, SHAO Jinliang. Multi-agent Coverage Path Planning Based on Security Reinforcement Learning [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44(S2): 101-113. |
[3] | LU Ying, PANG Lichen, CHEN Yusi, SONG Wanying, FU Yanfang. A Swarm Intelligence Algorithm for UAV Path Planning in Urban Warfare [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44(S2): 146-156. |
[4] | CAO Zhengyang, ZHANG Bing, BAI Yixuan, GOU Kenan. Multi-UAV Cooperative Navigation Method Based on Fusion of GNSS/INS/VNS Positioning Information [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44(S2): 157-166. |
[5] | YANG Jiaxiu, LI Xinkai, ZHANG Hongli, WANG Hao. Robust Tracking of Quadrotor UAVs Based on Integral Reinforcement Learning [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44(9): 2802-2813. |
[6] | CAO Yan, LONG Teng, SUN Jingliang, ZHOU Yuze. Distributed Task Allocation Algorithm for Multiple Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Based on Information Retransmission and Package Loss Compensation [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44(9): 2697-2708. |
[7] | LI Zenglin, LI Bo, BAI Shuangxia, MENG Bobo. UAV Autonomous Air Combat Decision-making Based on AM-SAC [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44(9): 2849-2858. |
[8] | ZHAO Junmin, HE Haozhe, WANG Shaoqi, NIE Cong, JIAO Yingjie. Joint Trajectory Planning for Multiple UAVs Target Tracking and Obstacle Avoidance in a Complicated Environment [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44(9): 2685-2696. |
[9] | GONG Yuanqiang, ZHANG Yepeng, MA Wanpeng, XUE Xiao. Mechanisms of Group Intelligence Emergence in UAV Swarms [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44(9): 2661-2671. |
[10] | HAN Yu, SONG Tao, ZHENG Duo, LIU Xin. Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Cluster Cooperative Guidance Technology Based on Conflict Trigger Mechanism [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44(7): 1881-1895. |
[11] | ZHANG Kun, LIU Zekun, HUA Shuai, ZHANG Zhenchong, LI Ke, YU Jingting. Generation of Multi-UAV Four-dimensional Cooperative Attack Route Based on T/S-SAS [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44(6): 1576-1587. |
[12] | ZHENG Lei, CHEN Zhimin, JIA Yuxuan. UAV Swarm Tracking Method Based on Wide-Area Deployment of Intelligent Reflecting Surfaces [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44(6): 1837-1845. |
[13] | YIN Yiyi, WANG Xiaofang, ZHOU Jian. Q-Learning-based Multi-UAV Cooperative Path Planning Method [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44(2): 484-495. |
[14] | TAO Junfeng, LIU Hai’ou, GUAN Haijie, CHEN Huiyan, ZANG Zheng. Path Planning of Unmanned Tracked Vehicle Based on Terrain Traversability Estimation [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44(11): 3320-3332. |
[15] | FU Jinbo, ZHANG Dong, WANG Mengyang, ZHAO Junmin. Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Path Planning for Improved Target Positioning Accuracy [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44(11): 3394-3406. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||