成型炸药滑动摩擦系数的测试与修正

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2017.10.007

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为研究动摩擦系数对于成型炸药摩擦点火的影响，利用自行设计的基于落锤的摩擦测试系统，以8701压装成型炸药为研究对象，研究了不同压力环境下成型炸药与45号钢之间的动摩擦系数。试验结果表明，当界面压力由1 MPa升高到10 MPa时，动摩擦系数将由0.28降低至0.10，说明动摩擦系数具有压力相关性。基于试验结果，提出了该炸药的摩擦系数计算模型。通过LS-DYNA二次开发，添加了试验所得摩擦系数计算模型，对8701炸药滑道试验进行了摩擦点火热力化耦合数值模拟。计算结果表明，修正的摩擦系数计算模型会延长炸药点火延迟时间，提高临界点火速度和临界点火温度，也说明考虑了压力相关性的摩擦系数计算模型对于研究成型炸药的摩擦点火问题有重要意义。

关键词: 兵器科学与技术, 成型炸药, 摩擦系数, 摩擦点火, 落锤冲击

Abstract: In order to investigate the effect of dynamic friction coefficient on the friction ignition of pressed explosive, 8701 pressed explosive is tested on the friction testing system based on the drop hammer apparatus, and tthe coefficients of dynamic friction between 8701 pressed explosive and 45^# steel at different normal pressures are studied. The experimental results show that, when the normal pressure is increased from 1 MPa to 10 MPa, the dynamic friction coefficient is reduced from 0.28 to 0.10, indicating that the dynamic friction coefficient is dependent on pressure. A calculation model of the friction coefficient is proposed based on the experimental results and introduced into the LS-DYNA through secondary development. The thermo-chemo-mechanical coupling numerical simulation is conducted for the skid test of 8701 pressed explosive. The calculated results show that the improved calculation model of friction coefficient prolongs the ignition delay time, increases the critical ignition velocity and raises the critical ignition temperature. The proposed model can be used to study the non-shock friction ignition problem. Key

Key words: ordnancescienceandtechnology, pressedexplosive, frictioncoefficient, frictionignition, drop-hammerimpact

中图分类号:

TJ410.3⁺41

罗毅，刘彦，黄风雷. 成型炸药滑动摩擦系数的测试与修正[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(10): 1926-1932.

LUO Yi, LIU Yan, HUANG Feng-lei. Measurement and Modification of Dynamic Friction Coefficient of Pressed Explosive[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2017, 38(10): 1926-1932.

参考文献

［1］ Asay B. Shock wave science and technology reference library [M]. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2008:293-617.
[2] Heatwole E, Parker G, Holmes M, et al. Grit-mediated frictional ignition of a polymer-bonded explosive during oblique impacts: probability calculations for safety engineering[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2015, 134:10-18.
[3] White B W, Springer H K, Reaugh J E. Computational studies of the skid test: evaluation of the non-shock ignition of LX-10 using HERMES[J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2014, 500(19): 192021.
[4] Dickson P, Parker G, Novak A, et al. Frictionally induced ignition processes in drop and skid tests, LA-UR-10-2186 [R]. Los Alamos, NM, US: Los Alamos National Laboratory, 2010.
[5] 林文洲, 洪滔. 高能炸药摩擦感度的数值模拟[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2016, 36(6):745-751.
LIN Wen-zhou, HONG Tao. Numerical simulation of friction sensitivity of high explosives[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2016, 36(6):745-751.(in Chinese)

[6] Hayden D W. An analytic tool to investigate the effect of binder on the sensitivity of HMX-based plastic bonded explosives in the skid test[D]. Socorro, NM, US: New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, 2004.
[7] 申春迎, 黄谦, 向永, 等. PBX炸药在滑道试验中的响应[J]. 四川兵工学报, 2015, 36(2):136-140.
SHEN Chun-ying, HUANG Qian, XIANG Yong, et al. Reaction behavior for PBX explosives in skid test[J]. Journal of Sichuan Ordnance, 2015, 36(2):136-140.(in Chinese)

[8] Rol B, Katrin B, Philip E, et al. Nanotribology-fundamental studies of friction and plasticity[J]. Advanced Engineering Materials, 2010, 12(5):362-367.
[9] Amuzu J K A, Briscoe B J, Chaudhri M M. Frictional properties of explosives[J]. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 1976, 9(1): 133-143.

[10] Bolotov A N, Strel’Nikov Y A. Effect of high hydrostatic pressure on the external friction coefficient[J]. Journal of Friction and Wear, 2012, 33(3):174-180.
[11] Zukas J A, Walters W P. Explosive effects and applications[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 1998(5):417.
[12] Jiang X B, Guo S, Yao M, et al. Novel method for determining the dynamic friction coefficient of explosives[J]. Combustion, Explosion, and Shock Waves, 2014, 50(1):118-123.
[13] Hoffman D M, Chandler J B. Aspects of the tribology of the plastic bonded explosive LX-04[J]. Propellants Explosives Pyrotechnics, 2004, 29(6):368-373.
[14] Dickson P, Parker G, Smilowitz L, et al. Frictional heating and ignition of energetic materials[J]. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2006, 845(1):1057-1060.
[15] Durand B, Delvare F, Bailly P, et al. Friction between steel and a confined inert material representative of explosives under severe loadings[J]. Experimental Mechanics, 2014, 54(7):1293-1303.
[16] 赵继波, 李克武, 傅华, 等. 炸药与不同材料之间摩擦系数的研究[J]. 高压物理学报, 2014, 28(5):591-596.
ZHAO Ji-bo, LI Ke-wu, FU Hua, et al. Research on the friction coefficient between explosive and different materials[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2014, 28(5):591-596.(in Chinese)
[17] Sun B P, Duan Z P, Ma Z F, et al. Numerical simulation on frictional ignition of charge during projectile penetration[J]. Transaction of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2012, 32(8):771- 775.
[18] 王晔，白春华, 李建平. 弹壳体结构对燃料装药抛撒速率影响的数值模拟研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(1):43-49.
WANG Ye, BAI Chun-hua, LI Jian-ping. Influence of shell structure on dispersing velocity of fuel-air mixture[J]. Acta Armamentarii , 2017, 38(1):43-49.(in Chinese)

[19] 吴林杰，侯海量，朱锡，等. 水下接触爆炸下防雷舱舷侧空舱的内压载荷特性仿真研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(1):143- 150.
WU Lin-jie, HOU Hai-liang, ZHU Xi, et al. Numerical simulation on inside load characteristics of broadside cabin of defensive structure subjected to underwater contact explosion[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2017, 38(1):143-150.(in Chinese)
[20] 丁力, 蒋建伟, 门建兵, 等. 爆炸成型弹丸成型过程中的断裂数值模拟及机理分析[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(3):417-423.
DING Li, JIANG Jian-wei, MEN Jian-bing, et al. Numerical simulation and mechanism analysis of EFP's fracture in forming process[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2017, 38(3):417-423.(in Chinese)
[21] 王晔，白春华, 李建平, 等. 非对称云雾爆炸超压场数值模拟[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(5):910-916.
WANG Ye,BAI Chun-hua, LI Jian-ping, et al. Simulation of explosion overpressure distribution for non-symmetry cloud detonation[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2017, 38(5):910-916.(in Chinese)
[22] 赵梓君, 毕世华. BIC实验的数值模拟研究[J]. 北京理工大学学报, 2015, 35(6):556-559.
ZHAO Zhi-jun, BI Shi-hua. Numerical simulation on ballistic impact chamber test[J]. Transactions of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2015, 35(6):556-559.(in Chinese)

[23] Gibbs T R, Popolato A, Baytos J F. LASL explosive property data[M]. Los Alamos, NM, US: University of California Press, 1980.

第38卷第10期2017 年10月兵工学报ACTA
ARMAMENTARIIVol.38No.10Oct. 2017

[1]	徐京, 胡春东, 陆恒昌, 邓亚辉, 薛钧, 韦习成, 董瀚. 枪管用环保镀层摩擦行为研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2024, 45(2): 651-661.
[2]	杨硕, 杜天玮, 张晓鹏, 马梁, 张桂昌. 外物损伤对叶片振动疲劳裂纹扩展性能的影响[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(6): 1713-1721.
[3]	周伯俊, 于传强，刘志浩，柯冰. 基于高压储能的特种车辆快速起竖技术与验证[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(7): 1488-1497.
[4]	高月光，冯顺山，刘云辉，黄岐. 不同端盖厚度的圆柱形装药壳体破片初速分布[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(7): 1527-1536.
[5]	刘计划，赵宏立，何昌辉，靳建伟，张邹邹，王琼林，赵宝明. 冲击载荷作用下典型发射药的弹性模量分析方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(2): 289-296.
[6]	胡春东，董瀚，赵洪山，向多伦，王俊红，李峻松. 自润滑弹头壳用钢摩擦行为研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2018, 39(12): 2450-2458.
[7]	娄伟鹏，郑长松，李和言，陈建文，张周立，马源. 高速《Symbol》v湿式换挡离合器排油阀临界开启和关闭压力研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(9): 1665-1672.
[8]	王宪成，杨绍卿，马宁，赵文柱. 车辆柴油机缸套动载荷磨损计算模型研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(9): 1673-1680.
[9]	孙皓泽，常天庆，王全东，孔德鹏，戴文君. 一种基于分层多尺度卷积特征提取的坦克装甲目标图像检测方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(9): 1681-1691.
[10]	张玉燕，孙莎莎，王振春，曹海要，战再吉. 高速载流电枢表面瞬态温度场仿真与测量[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(9): 1692-1698.
[11]	李臣明，宦超，石怀龙. 某箱式火箭炮对面目标分布式杀伤最优火力分配[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(9): 1699-1704.
[12]	雷娟棉，张嘉炜，谭朝明. 小攻角下船尾外形对旋转弹丸马格努斯效应影响的数值研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(9): 1705-1715.
[13]	李泽，闫晓鹏，栗苹，郝新红，王建涛. 扫频式干扰对调频多普勒引信的干扰机理研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(9): 1716-1722.
[14]	张浩为，谢军伟，张昭建，宗彬锋，陈唐军. 基于混合自适应遗传算法的相控阵雷达任务调度[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(9): 1761-1770.
[15]	李茂，侯海量，朱锡，黄晓明，李典，陈长海，胡年明. 结构间隙对芳纶纤维增强复合装甲结构抗侵彻性能的影响[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(9): 1797-1805.