基于灰色层次分析法的水声对抗系统效能评估

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2012.04.009

兵工学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (4): 432-436.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2012.04.009

基于灰色层次分析法的水声对抗系统效能评估

唐政^1,2，孙超₁，刘宗伟₁，孟荻₁

（1.西北工业大学航海学院, 陕西西安 710072; 2.中国电子科技集团公司第20研究所通信部，陕西西安 710068）

收稿日期:2010-03-24 修回日期:2010-03-24 上线日期:2014-03-04
作者简介:唐政(1980—)，男，博士研究生
基金资助:
中国博士后科学基金项目（20100481364）

Research on Efficiency Evaluation for Underwater Acoustic Countermeasure System Based on GreyHierarchy Analysis

TANG Zheng^1,2, SUN Chao₁, LIU Zong-wei₁, MENG Di₁

(1.School of Marine Technology, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, Shaanxi, China;2.Department of Communication, 20th Institute of China Electronics Technology Group Corporation, Xi'an 710068, Shaanxi, China)

Received:2010-03-24 Revised:2010-03-24 Online:2014-03-04

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为解决水下信息模糊与数据缺失对水声对抗系统效能评估的影响，提出水声对抗系统效能灰色-层次分析评估方法，通过分析舰艇水声对抗的任务使命、结构和功能，对影响水声对抗系统效能的相关因素进行属性划分，建立水声对抗系统效能评估指标体系，给出评估不同对抗策略下对抗效果优劣的具体过程。仿真实例表明，该方法能够实现不同对抗策略下对抗效果的量化分析，为水声对抗策略的优化和使用效能的提高提供了参考依据。

关键词: 系统评估与可行性分析, 水声对抗系统, 效能评估, 灰色层次分析

Abstract: In order to solve the disadvantages for the efficiency evaluation of the underwater acoustic countermeasure, resulting from the underwater information fuzzy and data scarcity, the gray analytic hierarchy evaluation method is proposed. These disadvantages are classified based on the attribution, according to the mission, structure and function of the underwater acoustic countermeasure. And then, the efficiency evaluation index system of the underwater acoustic countermeasure system is established. Moreover, the concrete evaluation process for various situations are given. Finally, the simualtion results show that the method can realize the quantitative analysis of efficiency evaluation on different countermeasure strategies, which provde a reference foundation for optimization of underwater acoustic countermeasure strategies.

Key words: analysis on system assessment and feasibility, underwater acoustic countermeasure system, efficiency evaluation, grey hierarchy analysis

中图分类号:

唐政，孙超₁，刘宗伟₁，孟荻₁. 基于灰色层次分析法的水声对抗系统效能评估[J]. 兵工学报, 2012, 33(4): 432-436.

TANG Zheng, SUN Chao₁, LIU Zong-wei₁, MENG Di₁. Research on Efficiency Evaluation for Underwater Acoustic Countermeasure System Based on GreyHierarchy Analysis[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2012, 33(4): 432-436.

参考文献

［1］ Li Z S, Li J S. Design and implementation of operational effectiveness evaluation simulation system for ECM［C］∥Proceedings of the IEEE First International Conference on Innovative Computing, Information and Control-Volume 3. DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society Washington, 2006: 356-359.
［2］ Lee J H. Efficiency evaluations of synchronous reluctance motor using coupled FEM and preisach modeling［J］. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2003, 39(5):3271-3273.
［3］ Mcquay W K, Allen K R. J-MASS in the EW test and evaluation process［C］∥Proceedings of IEEE 1995 National Conference on Aerospace and Electronics-Volume 2. Dayton, OH, USA: NAECON, 1995: 793-798.
［4］刘博，马亮，刘国清，等. 基于损伤分析和ER算法的潜艇作战系统战损评估建模与仿真［J］. 兵工学报, 2008, 29(6): 731-734.
LIU Bo, MA Liang, LIU Guo-qing, et al. Modeling and simulation of battlefield damage assessment for submarine combat system based on damage analysis and ER algorithm［J］. Acta Armamentarii, 2008, 29(6): 731-734. (in Chinese)
［5］贾跃，赵学涛，林贤杰. 基于BP神经网络的鱼雷作战效能模糊综合评估模型及其仿真［J］. 兵工学报, 2009, 30(9): 1232-1235.
JIA Yue, ZHAO Xue-tao, LIN Xian-jie. Fuzzy multifactorial evaluation model of torpedo operational effectiveness based on BP neural network and its simulation［J］. Acta Armamentarii, 2009, 30(9): 1232-1235. (in Chinese)
［6］唐政. 机载自卫电子对抗与火力打击综合决策与效能评估［D］. 西安：西北工业大学, 2009: 61-85.
TANG Zheng. The efficiency evaluation and integrated decision-making of the airborne electronic countermeasure and firepower attack［D］. Xi’an: Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2009: 61-85. (in Chinese)
［7］王国玉，汪连栋. 雷达电子战系统数学仿真与评估［M］. 北京：国防工业出版社，2004: 387-408.
WANG Guo-yu, WANG Lian-dong. Math simulation and evaluation of radar electronic countermeasure system［M］. Beijing: National Defense Industy Press, 2004: 387-408. (in Chinese)
［8］罗修波，董晓恒，钱斌. 水声对抗器材对抗效果评估方法研究［J］. 系统仿真学报, 2007, 19(3): 657-659.
LUO Xiu-bo, DONG Xiao-heng, QIAN Bin. Research on method of counterwork effectiveness of underwater acoustic countermeasure equipment［J］. Journal of System Simulation, 2007, 19(3): 657-659. (in Chinese)
［9］王百合，黄建国，张群飞. 基于层次分析法的水下多目标威胁评估模型［J］. 舰船科学技术, 2006, 28(6): 75-77.
WANG Bai-he, HUANG Jian-guo, ZHANG Qun-fei. Underwater multi-target threat evaluation model based on analytic hierarchy process［J］. Ship Science and Technology, 2006, 28(6): 75-77. (in Chinese)

[1]	陈美杉, 刘赢, 曾维贵, 钱坤. 空射诱饵弹干扰资源动态分配策略[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(5): 1443-1455.
[2]	张琦, 葛玉雪, 李攀, 康淇钧, 裴扬. 基于ABMS的全光化无人机集群体系贡献率评估方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(11): 3422-3435.
[3]	李烨，郑纯，滕哲，顾晓东，罗荣，辛泽宇. 基于模糊小波神经网络的高功率微波武器与中近程防空武器协同作战效能评估[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(S2): 87-96.
[4]	魏武臣，徐硕，何晓夫，王晓光，岳通. 基于作战仿真推演的空-地制导弹药效能评估[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(S1): 107-114.
[5]	刘遵飞，邹波，陈续麟，张文娟，叶双平，盘江丽. 有人与无人联合作战模式下的装备体系结构建模与效能评估[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(S1): 155-161.
[6]	郭雷平，段文博，刘宇，张魁甲，石凯，王亚伟. 基于OODA环的合成部队光电装备作战效能评估[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(S1): 177-182.
[7]	陈清霖，田鸿堂，王鹏，冷淑香，肖作林. 基于“OODA”环的分布式协同作战武器编配方案[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(8): 1780-1788.
[8]	王双川，贾希胜，李锋，胡起伟，齐良哲，曹文斌. 基于仿真的合成部队装备维修保障资源需求确定和效能评估[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(8): 1646-1657.
[9]	洪晓文，李伟兵，李文彬，徐赫阳，李军宝. 多层复合装药爆炸冲击波信号能量谱[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(11): 2243-2251.
[10]	王双川，胡起伟，白永生，郭驰名，马云飞. 基于非对称灰色云模型的装备维修保障系统效能评估[J]. 兵工学报, 2019, 40(6): 1277-1286.
[11]	于涛，郝永平，郑斌，李建伟，李广林. 上升扫描式末敏子弹对坦克目标的毁伤效能评估[J]. 兵工学报, 2018, 39(10): 1927-1935.
[12]	曹文斌，胡起伟，苏续军，赵建民. 随机共因失效条件下的多阶段任务成功概率评估研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(4): 766-775.
[13]	苏续军, 吕学志. 基于离散事件仿真的多状态多阶段任务系统可靠性分析[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(4): 776-784.
[14]	王京，李天梅，何华锋，徐从启. 多源测试性综合评估数据等效折合模型与方法研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(1): 151-159.
[15]	闫华，高黎，王魁，漆磊. 大规模多阶段任务系统马尔可夫可靠性模型的存储和计算[J]. 兵工学报, 2016, 37(9): 1715-1720.

基于灰色层次分析法的水声对抗系统效能评估

Research on Efficiency Evaluation for Underwater Acoustic Countermeasure System Based on GreyHierarchy Analysis

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价