爆炸成型弹丸侵彻钢靶的后效破片云实验研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2018.07.005

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为研究爆炸成型弹丸（EFP）穿透钢靶后的后效威力，设计了长杆形EFP装置及对45号钢靶板的侵彻实验。采用X光摄影方法观测EFP穿过靶板后的破片云形态及飞散特性；通过测量靶板后一定距离处验证板上的穿孔，得到靶板后破片数量。从拍摄的脉冲X光照片可以看出：EFP穿透钢靶后形成的破片云形状是截椭圆形，飞散角约50°. 从验证板上的穿孔可以看出：靶后破片可穿透10 mm铝板，破片穿孔分布相对随机，穿孔直径近似呈正态分布特征，破片飞散角与X光观测结果一致；随着靶板厚度增大，破片飞散角均为50°，但靶后破片数量呈先增大、后减小的趋势，即存在靶后破片数量最大化的靶板厚度。从回收到的破片可以看出：靶后碎片由EFP和钢靶碎片共同构成。

关键词: 爆炸成型弹丸, 钢靶, 验证板, 靶后破片

Abstract: A series experiments that the explosively-formed projectiles (EFPs) penetrate 10-40 mm-thick mild carbon steel (45# steel) were designed to investigate the effect of behind armor debris(BAD) after EFP penetrating into steel target. The morphology and scattering characteristics of BAD are observed by pulsed X-ray photography, and the number and damage ability of BAD are obtained by measuring the perforation on witness target. It can be seen from the pulsed X-ray photographs that the shape of BAD presented as fragments is of partial ellipse with the scattering angle of about 50°. The perforation on witness plate shows that BAD could penetrate 10mm-thick aluminum plate, the perforation distribution is relatively random, and the diameter of hole on witness plate approximately conform to normal distribution. The scattering angle varies little with the increase in the target thickness, while the number of BAD increases first and then decreases, namely there is a target thickness that maximizes the number of BAD. It can also be seen from recovered fragments that EFP and steel target debris together constitute the BAD.Key

Key words: explosively-formedprojectile, steeltarget, witnessplate, behindarmordebris

中图分类号:

TJ410.3⁺33

王昕，蒋建伟，王树有，李梅. 爆炸成型弹丸侵彻钢靶的后效破片云实验研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2018, 39(7): 1284-1290.

WANG Xin, JIANG Jian-wei, WANG Shu-you, LI Mei. Experimental Research on Fragments after Explosively-formed Projectile Penetrating into Steel Target[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2018, 39(7): 1284-1290.

参考文献

［1］隋树元,王树山.终点效应学[M]. 北京：国防工业出版社，2000:233-237.
SUI Shu-yuan, WANG Shu-shan. Terminal effects[M].Beijing: National Defense Industry Press，2000：233-237. (in Chinese)
[2］林加剑. EFP成型及其终点效应研究[D].合肥：中国科学技术大学，2009.
LIN Jia-jian. Research on the formability of EFP and its terminal effect[D].Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China, 2009.(in Chinese)
[3］罗健,侯云辉,任良,等. EFP战斗部毁伤效应及毁伤效应评估方法研究[C]∥第十四届战斗部与毁伤技术学术交流会.重庆:中国宇航学会战斗部与毁伤技术专业委员会,2015:872-877.
LUO Jian, HOU Yun-hui, REN Liang，et al. Study on evaluation method and damage effect of EFP warhead[C]∥Proceedings of the 14th Academic Conference on Warhead and Damage Technology. Chongqing: Warhead and Damage Technology Committee, Chinese Society of Aeronautics, 2015:872-877.(in Chinese)
[4］ Dalzell M W. Modelling behind-armor debris formed by the perforation of an EFP through a steel target[C]∥ Proceedings of the 20th International Symposium on Ballistics. Orlando，FL, US: International Ballistics Society, 2002:23-27.
[5］ Kim H S. A model for behind armor debris from EFP impact[C]∥Proceedings of the 26th International Symposium on Ballistics.Miami，FL,US: International Ballistics Society, 2011:1410-1419.
[6］叶严,姚志敏,杨州，等. EFP垂直侵彻靶后破片云描述模型[J]. 工程爆破,2016,22(6):28-31.
YE Yan, YAO Zhi-min, YANG Zhou, et al. EFP vertical penetration target description model of debris cloud[J].Engineering Blasting, 2016,22(6):28-31.(in Chinese)
[7］ Wang Y Y, Jiang J W, Meng J Y, et al. Effect of add-on explosive reactive armor on EFP penetration[C]∥Proceedings of the 29th International Symposium on Ballistics.Edinburg，UK: International Ballistics Society, 2016:2395-2406.
[8］姚志敏，刘波，李金明，等. 聚能装药垂直侵彻靶后破片的散布规律[J]. 工程爆破,2015,21(5):53-57.
YAO Zhi-min, LIU Bo, LI Jin-ming, et al. Dispersion law of behind armor debris by vertical penetration of shaped charge[J]. Engineering Blasting,2015,21(5):53-57.(in Chinese)
[9］ Grady D E. Local inertial effects in dynamic fragmentation[J]. Journal of Applied Physics,1982,53(1): 322-325.

[10］张先锋,陈慧武,赵有守. EFP对有限厚度靶板侵彻过程及后效研究[J]. 爆炸与冲击,2006,26(4):323-327.
ZHANG Xian-feng, CHEN Hui-wu, ZHAO You-shou. Investigation of process and after effect of EFP penetration into target of finite thickness[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2006,26(4):323-327. (in Chinese)
[11］段占强,程国强,李守新，等.高速冲击下钢板的微观组织及绝热剪切带[D].金属学报,2003,39(5):486-497.
DUAN Zhan-qiang, CHENG Guo-qiang, LI Shou-xin, et al．Microstructures and adiabatic shear bands formed in steel plate under high rate impact[J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica,2003,39(5):486-497. (in Chinese)
[12］ Arnold W, Rottenkolber E. Behind armor debris investigation[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2003,29:95-104.

第39卷
第7期2018 年7月兵工学报ACTA
ARMAMENTARIIVol.39No.7Jul.2018

[1]	高鹏, 王芳, 汪聪, 牛文煜. 偏心药型罩在D型装药中的设计及成型性能研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2024, 45(3): 720-730.
[2]	黄炫宁, 李伟兵, 李文彬, 尹贵祥, 郭腾飞. 爆炸成型弹丸侵彻不同材料靶板后效破片特性试验研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2024, 45(1): 58-68.
[3]	余双洋, 彭永. 4340钢弹侵彻45号钢靶的温升数值模拟[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(S1): 144-151.
[4]	郑元枫, 王仕鹏, 李培亮, 张勇, 葛超. 活性/金属串联爆炸成型弹丸侵爆耦合毁伤行为[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(8): 2273-2282.
[5]	冯炜，崔东华，刘海晓，周末，赵江，李恒，胡志鹏. 反无人艇群弹药战斗部参数对效能影响分析[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(S2): 26-31.
[6]	王积锐, 刘聪和, 樊俊铃, 焦婷, 巩建坡, 韩啸. M855A1步枪弹侵彻钢靶板数值仿真[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(9): 2339-2349.
[7]	付恒, 蒋建伟, 王树有, 门建兵, 李梅. 爆炸成型弹丸药型罩用高密度合金选取准则[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(9): 2330-2338.
[8]	任思远, 张庆明, 张晓伟, 田志敏. 环形射流和中心爆炸成型弹丸组合战斗部对混凝土墙的破孔特性[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(8): 1569-1579.
[9]	杜华池，张先锋，刘闯，熊玮，李鹏程，陈海华. 弹体斜侵彻多层间隔钢靶的弹道特性[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(6): 1204-1214.
[10]	门建兵，聂源，蒋建伟，王树有，冯高鹏. 反爆炸反应装甲串联爆炸成型弹丸匹配设计方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(12): 2369-2378.
[11]	邢柏阳，侯云辉，李泰华，张东江，刘荣忠，郭锐. 爆炸成型弹丸垂直侵彻装甲钢靶后破片动能分析[J]. 兵工学报, 2019, 40(10): 2014-2021.
[12]	聂源，蒋建伟，王树有，刘瀚. 爆炸反应装甲对爆炸成型弹丸侵彻效应影响的实验研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2018, 39(8): 1576-1581.
[13]	王哲，蒋建伟，王树有，任芮池. 双层药型罩形成的串联爆炸成型弹丸速度计算模型[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(7): 1301-1306.
[14]	丁力，蒋建伟，门建兵，王树有. 爆炸成型弹丸成型过程中的断裂数值模拟及机理分析[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(3): 417-423.
[15]	樊雪飞，李伟兵，王晓鸣，郭腾飞，李瑞. 爆轰驱动钽药型罩形成双模毁伤元仿真与试验研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(10): 1918-1925.