M855A1步枪弹侵彻钢靶板数值仿真

doi:10.12382/bgxb.2022.0448

摘要/Abstract

摘要： M855A1是一种采用新型穿甲弹结构的小口径步枪弹，较M855步枪弹主要优化了硬目标穿甲与软目标杀伤性能。为研究其穿甲性能，采用有限元软件ANSYS/LS-DYNA对不同射程下M855A1步枪弹侵彻结构钢靶板、装甲钢靶板的过程进行数值仿真，分析穿甲过程中弹头与钢靶板的变形和损伤演化，并对射程与极限穿透厚度的关系进行函数拟合，拟合精度高于99%。结果表明，M855A1步枪弹能基本满足现代小口径步枪弹对穿甲性能的需求，其结构在低速、薄靶条件下对弹体动能、质量的利用效率较高。

关键词: 高速侵彻, M855A1步枪弹, 弹道极限, 穿透仿真, 钢靶板

Abstract: M855A1 is a small-calibre high-velocity rifle bullet with the structure of the new type of small-and medium-calibre armour-piercing projectile. Compare to its predecessor, M855/SS109, M855A1 has enhanced penetration performance against hard targets and lethality against soft targets. To study the penetration performance of the new 5.56 mm M855A1, numerical simulations of the process of M855A1 penetrating structural steel target and armoured steel target at different ranges were carried out using the finite element software ANSYS/LS-DYNA. The deformation and damage evolution of the round and steel target during penetration were analysed, and the relationship between range and maximum penetration thickness was fitted as a function, with a fitting accuracy higher than 99%. The results showed that the M855A1 round can meet the demand for penetration performance against hard targets of modern high velocity small-calibre rifle bullets, and its structure is more efficient in utilising the kinetic energy of the round under low-velocity and thin-target conditions.

Key words: high-velocitypenetration, M855A1EPR, ballisticlimit, penetrationsimulation, steeltarget

中图分类号:

TJ301

王积锐, 刘聪和, 樊俊铃, 焦婷, 巩建坡, 韩啸. M855A1步枪弹侵彻钢靶板数值仿真[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(9): 2339-2349.

WANG Jirui, LIU Conghe, FAN Junling, JIAO Ting, GONG Jianpo, HAN Xiao. Numerical Simulation of the Penetration of M855A1 EPR into Steel Targets[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2022, 43(9): 2339-2349.

参考文献

［1］范浩霖.5.8毫米穿甲弹工程研制［D］.南京：南京理工大学,2016.
FAN H L.5.8 mm armor-piercing projectile development［D］.Nanjing:Nanjing University of Science and Technology,2016.(in Chinese)
［2］ BENEDETTO G D, MATTEIS P, SCAVINO G. Impact behavior and ballistic efficiency of armor-piercing projectiles with tool steel cores［J］. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2018, 115: 10-18.
［3］ SENTHIL K, IQBAL M A. Prediction of superior target layer configuration of armour steel, mild steel and aluminium 7075-T651 alloy against 7.62 AP projectile［J］.Structures, 2021, 29: 2106-2119.
［4］ BRVIK T, DEY S, CLAUSEN A H. Perforation resistance of five different high-strength steel plates subjected to small-arms projectiles［J］. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2009, 36(7): 948-964.
［5］ HOLMQUIST T J, JOHNSON G R, GOOCH W A. Modeling the 14.5 mm BS41 projectile for ballistic impact computations［J］. Projectile Impact: Modelling Techniques and Target Performance Assessment, 2014: 73-87.
［6］ HAIGHT C, MCNAMARA K, COURTNEY M. Does v₅₀ depend on armor mass?［R］. Colorads，US:Air Force Academy Colorads Springs, 2012.
［7］王永亮. 枪弹和破片对引信的打击及相关不敏感技术研究［D］.南京：南京理工大学,2019.
WANG Y L.Research on the impact of bullets and fragments on fuze and related insensitive technology［D］.Nanjing:Nanjing University of Science and Technology,2019.(in Chinese)
［8］ EHRHART M T P. Increasing small arms lethality in Afghanistan: Taking back the infantry half-kilometer［M］. Royal Oak, Auckland, New Zealand: Pickle Partners Publishing, 2015.
［9］ WOODS J K. M855A1 enhanced performance round (EPR) media day［R］. Morris, NJ，US:Office of the Program Manager Maneuver Amminition Systems Picatinny Arsenal, 2011.
［10］ WOODS J K. Small caliber ammunition enhancing capabilities［C］∥Proceedings of 2010 NDIA Joint Armaments Conference. Dallas, TX,US:NDIA, 2010, 20.
［11］ WOODS J K. Evolution of the M855A1 enhanced performance round［J］.Infantry,2010,99(4): 22.
［12］景彤,郭子云,雷文星,等.步枪弹M855与M855A1的侵彻效能对比仿真［J］.弹箭与制导学报,2018,38(4):45-48,54.
JING T, GUO Z Y, LEl W X, et al. Simulation comparison of penetration efficiency of rifle projectile M855 and M855A1［J］.Journal of Projectiles,Rockets,Missiles and Guidance,2018,38(4): 45-48,54.(in Chinese)
［13］景彤,陈智刚,兰宇鹏,等.步枪弹M855A1的侵彻效能仿真［C］∥OSEC首届兵器工程大会论文集.北京:中国兵工学会,重庆市科学技术协会,兵器装备工程学报编辑部,2017.
JING T, CHEN Z G, LAN Y P. Simulation of penetration efficiency of rifle projectile M855A1［C］/Proceedings of OSEC first Weapon Engineering Conference. Beijing:China Ordnance Society, Chongqing:Chongqing Science and Technology Associationmeeting, editorial department of the Chinese Journal of Weapons and Equipment Engineering,2017.(in Chinese)
［14］陈勇军.小口径穿甲爆破炮弹侵彻目标数值模拟研究［D］.南京：南京理工大学,2013.
CHEN Y J. Numerical research on small calibre armour-piercing high-explosive projectile penetrating targets［D］. Nanjing:Nanjing University of Science and Technology,2013.(in Chinese)
［15］ BATEMAN M J K, U.S. Air Force. Maximizing engagement area lethality［J］. Military Review, 2022: 21-30.
［16］ JBM ballistics［EB/OL］.(2010-05-31)［2022-06-20］. https:∥www.jbmballistics.com/cgi-bin/jbmtraj-5.1.cgi.
［17］ ARVIDSSON P G. Is there a problem with the lethality of the 5.56 NATO caliber?［C］∥Proceedings of NDIA Joint Armaments Conference. Dallas, TX,US: NDIA, 2010: 17-20.
［18］项帆.引信弹道炸外弹道力学环境研究［D］.南京：南京理工大学,2021.
XIANG F. Research on the fuze trajectory burst and external ballistic mechanics environment［D］.Nanjing: Nanjing University of Science and Technology, 2021. (in Chinese)
［19］ MEYER H W, KLEPONIS D S.An analysis of parameters for the Johnson-Cook strength model for 2-in-thick rolled homogeneous armor:ADA392414［R］.Aberdeen, Harford County, MD，US:Army Research Lab Aberdeen Proving Ground, 2001.
［20］ TRIA D E, TRE＇BISKI R. On the influence of fracture criterion on perforation of high-strength steel plates subjected to armour piercing projectile［J］.Archive of Mechanical Engineering, 2015, 62(2): 157-159.
［21］ MANES A, BRESCIANI L M, GIGLIO M. Ballistic performance of multi-layered fabric composite plates impacted by different 7.62 mm calibre projectiles［J］.Procedia Engineering, 2014, 88: 208-215.
［22］ KARIM M R, FATT M S. Impact of the boeing 767 aircraft into the world trade center［J］.Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2005, 131(10): 1066-1072.
［23］侯二永. 陶瓷间隙靶抗12.7 mm穿甲燃烧弹机理及性能研究［D］.长沙:国防科学技术大学,2008.
HOU E Y.Investigation of mechanism and performance of spaced ceramic target under impact of 12.7 mm armor piercing projectile［D］.Changsha: National University of Defense Technology,2008.(in Chinese)
［24］翟杰. 非致命武器打击能量可控技术研究［D］.南京：南京理工大学,2013.
ZHAI J. Non-lethal weapon killing energy controllable technology research［D］.Nanjing: Nanjing University of Science and Technology, 2013. (in Chinese)
［25］ Armor plate, steel, wrought, homogeneous (for use in combat-vehicles and for ammunition testing):MIL-DTL-12560［S/OL］. (2019-07-19)［2022-09-07］. https:∥standards.globalspec.com/std/13399455/mil-dtl-12560.
［26］ JOO J H, LEE C H, CHOI J H. A numerical research on the penetration into a semi-infinite rolled homogeneous armor by a medium-caliber kinetic energy projectile［J］.Materials Science Forum, 2011, 673: 197-202.
［27］ MEYER H W, KLEPONIS D S.An analysis of parameters for the Johnson-Cook strength model for 2-in-thick rolled homogeneous armor［R］. Aberdeen, Harford County, MD，US:Army Research Lab Aberdeen Proving Ground,2001.
［28］ JAMIL W N M, ARIPIN M A, SAJURI Z, et al. Mechanical properties and microstructures of steel panels for laminated composites in armoured vehicles［J］. International Journal of Automotive & Mechanical Engineering, 2016, 13(3): 3741-3753.
［29］ Spartan Armor Systems. Spartan omega AR500 body armor single plate［EB/OL］.(2020-08-05)［2022-09-07］. https:∥www.spartanarmorsystems.com/spartan-omega-ar500-body-armor-single-plate/.
［30］ Ballistic steel AR 500 tile NIJ Ⅲ 1/4" thick size 16" x 16" color black matte［EB/OL］.(2021-05-05)［2022-09-07］.https:∥www.armorco.com/online-store/Ballistic-Steel-AR-500-Tile-NIJ-Ⅲ-1-4-thick-size-16-x-16-Color-Black-Matte-18-Tiles-p108015347.
［31］ BAO tactical AR500 steel plate, Level Ⅲ standalone, 10x12,single curve.［EB/OL］.(2021-09-20)［2022-09-07］.https:∥www.bodyarmoroutlet.com/products/bao-tactical-steel-plate.
［32］ The Machine Gun Channel. M855A1 vs Level Ⅲ AR500 Armor［Z/OL］.(2015-09-15)［2022-09-07］. https:∥www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0gxeSpjdSk.

[1]	解亚宸, 黄广炎, 张宏, 周颖. UHMWPE纤维二维织物抗弹道冲击性能[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(9): 2152-2163.
[2]	姚志彦，李金柱，齐凯丽，徐杨，黄风雷. 长杆弹超高速侵彻砂浆靶临界速度的实验和计算[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(7): 1578-1588.
[3]	刘铁磊，徐豫新，王晓锋，张鹏，张健. 钨合金球形破片侵彻低碳钢的弹道极限速度计算模型[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(4): 768-779.
[4]	吕映庆，陈南勋，武海军，赵宏远，张雪岩. 弹体高速侵彻超高性能混凝土靶机理[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(1): 37-47.
[5]	宁建国，李钊，马天宝，许香照. 动能弹高速侵彻钢筋混凝土靶时弹丸头部质量侵蚀微观机理[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(9): 1809-1818.
[6]	高飞，张国凯，纪玉国，陈建宇. 卵形弹体超高速侵彻砂浆靶的响应特性[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(10): 1979-1987.
[7]	陈海华，张先锋，刘闯，丁力，王季鹏，杜宁. 基于弯管-流线模型的长杆弹侵彻头部材料流动过程分析[J]. 兵工学报, 2019, 40(9): 1787-1796.
[8]	张雪岩，武海军，李金柱，皮爱国，黄风雷. 弹体高速侵彻两种强度混凝土靶的对比研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2019, 40(2): 276-283.
[9]	肖艳文，徐峰悦，余庆波，郑元枫，王海福. 类钢密度活性材料弹丸撞击铝靶行为实验研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2016, 37(6): 1016-1022.
[10]	金学科，余庆波，郑元枫，王海福. 高速侵彻体碰撞子母化学弹头有效载荷毁伤效应[J]. 兵工学报, 2015, 36(3): 437-442.
[11]	李常胜1，黄献聪2，李焱2，王雷2，李茂辉2，周宏2. 软体防弹衣穿透概率的分析[J]. 兵工学报, 2013, 34(1): 20-24.
[12]	武海军，黄风雷，王一楠，段卓平，皮爱国. 高速侵彻混凝土弹体头部侵蚀终点效应实验研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2012, 33(1): 48-55.
[13]	何丽灵，陈小伟，夏源明. 侵彻混凝土弹体磨蚀的若干研究进展[J]. 兵工学报, 2010, 31(7): 950-966.
[14]	王晓强，朱锡，梅志远. 高速钢质破片侵彻高强聚乙烯纤维增强塑料层合板试验研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2009, 30(12): 1574-1578.
[15]	蒋志刚，曾首义，周建平. 刚性尖头弹侵彻贯穿金属薄靶板耗能分析[J]. 兵工学报, 2004, 25(6): 777-781.