爆炸成型弹丸侵彻不同材料靶板后效破片特性试验研究

doi:10.12382/bgxb.2022.0696

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为研究靶板材料性能对爆炸成型弹丸(Explosively Formed Projectile,EFP)侵彻靶后破片特性的影响,开展EFP侵彻不同材料靶板(Q235钢、45号钢、装甲钢、2A12铝)后效破片特性试验,采用X光摄影方法观测靶后破片云形态及膨胀尺寸,通过布置多层纤维板获得破片散布特性,并对靶后破片进行回收。研究结果表明:在靶板密度一定的情况下,靶板强度主要影响破片云轴向膨胀能力,对径向膨胀能力影响很小;靶后破片环形毁伤区的飞散角位于20°~25°范围内差别不大,但是靶板背面出口崩落会造成靶后破片飞散角出现极大值,随着钢靶强度的增大,靶后破片径向散布增强,破片总数减小,但是大质量段钢破片数量增多;不同强度钢靶产生的钢破片平均尺寸满足Kipp等提出的基于材料流动应力的碎片尺寸模型。

关键词: 爆炸成型弹丸, 靶后破片, 径向散布, 质量分布, 破片尺寸

Abstract:

In order to study the effect of target material properties on the characteristics of behind-armor debris (BAD) generated by explosively formed projectile(EFP) penetration, the experimental research on the characteristics of BAD from EFP penetrating into the targets made of different materials, including Q235 steel, 45^# steel, armor steel and 2A12 aluminum, was carried out. The morphology and expansion size of BAD cloud was observed by X-ray photography, and the fragment dispersion characteristics was obtained by arranging multi-layered witness fiber plates, meanwhile the BAD were recovered. The results show that, when the target material density is constant, the strength of the target mainly affects the axial expansion capacity of the debris cloud, but has little effect on the radial expansion capacity. The dispersion angle of annular damage region of BAD is in the range of 20°-25°, but the back surface of the target is spalled to cause a maximum value of dispersion angle. With the increase of the strength of steel target, the radial dispersion of BAD increases, the total number of fragments decreases, while the number of steel fragments in the large mass segment increases. The average size of steel fragments produced by steel targets with different yield strengths satisfies the fragment size model based on material flow stress proposed in Ref.[19].

Key words: explosively formed projectile, behind-armor debris, radial dispersion, mass distribution, fragment size

中图分类号:

TJ410.3⁺33

黄炫宁, 李伟兵, 李文彬, 尹贵祥, 郭腾飞. 爆炸成型弹丸侵彻不同材料靶板后效破片特性试验研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2024, 45(1): 58-68.

HUANG Xuanning, LI Weibing, LI Wenbin, YIN Guixiang, GUO Tengfei. Experimental Research on the Characteristics of Behind-armor Debris from Explosively Formed Projectile Penetrating Targets of Different Materials[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2024, 45(1): 58-68.

图/表 18

图1 EFP战斗部

Fig.1 EFP warhead

图2 试验布置

Fig.2 Experimental setup

图3 靶板破坏照片(左为靶板正面,右为靶板背面)

Fig.3 Photographs of damaged target (left: the front side of target; right: the backside of target)

图4 靶板孔径

Fig.4 Perforation diameters of targets

图5 靶后破片图像

Fig.5 Photographs of BAD

图6 破片云尺寸

Fig.6 Debris cloud size

图7 验证板毁伤图像

Fig.7 Photographs of damaged witness plates

图8 靶后破片飞散角

Fig.8 Dispersion angles of BAD

图9 回收的靶板破片和弹丸破片

Fig.9 Recovered targets and EFP fragments

图10 回收的冲塞块与钢-铜粘结体

Fig.10 Recovered plug block and steel-copper bond fragment

图11 靶后破片质量分布

Fig.11 Mass distribution of BAD

表1 靶后破片质量分布拟合参数

Table 1 Fitting parameters of fragment mass distribution

靶板材料	靶板破片			EFP破片
靶板材料	c	λ	R²	c	λ	R²
Q235钢	1.56	1.00	0.984	1.02	0.93	0.977
RHA	5.42	1.28	0.977	1.38	1.04	0.987
45号钢	1.44	0.80	0.984	0.78	0.89	0.981
2A12铝	0.19	1.08	0.918	0.27	0.72	0.896

图12 破片累计数量分布

Fig.12 Distribution of cumulative number of fragments

表2 破片累计数量分布拟合结果

Table 2 Fitting results of cumulative number distribution of fragments

钢靶材料	A₁	t₁	y₀	R²
Q235钢	-16.87	-0.51	1.86	0.985
45号钢	-6.55	-0.73	1.85	0.982
RHA	-9.84	-0.52	1.63	0.995

图13 靶板鼓包变形示意图

Fig.13 Schematic diagram of target bulging deformation

图14 不同应变率下靶后破片平均尺寸

Fig.14 Average size of steel fragments under different strain rates

图15 不同钢靶产生的破片特征尺寸的试验与模型计算值

Fig.15 Experimental and model calculation values of the characteristic size of fragments produced by different steel targets

表3 钢破片特征尺寸的模型与试验结果对比

Table 3 Comparison between model and experimental results of characteristic sizes of steel fragments

靶板材料	试验值/mm	模型计算值/mm	相对误差/%
Q235钢	5.87	5.65	3.68
45号钢	6.10	6.29	3.03
RHA	8.68	8.45	2.60

参考文献 33

[1]	DALZELL M W, HAZELL P J, MEULMAN J H. Modeling behind-armor debris formed by the perforation of an EFP through a steel target[C]// Proceedings of the 20th International Symposium on Ballistics.Orlando,FL, US: International Ballistics Society, 2002: 23-27.
[2]	PEDERSEN B, BLESS S. Behind-armor debris from the impact of hypervelocity tungsten penetrators[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2006, 33(1-12):605-614. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.09.007 URL
[3]	ARNOLD W, PAUL W. Behind armor debris investigation and their application into a new vulnerability model[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering. 2001, 26: 21-32. doi: 10.1016/S0734-743X(01)00071-9 URL
[4]	KIM H S, ARNOLD W, HARTMANN T. A model for behind armor debris from EFP impact[C]// Proceedings of the 26th International Symposium on Ballistics.Miami,FL, US: International Ballistics Society, 2011: 1410-1419.
[5]	WANG X, JIANG J W, SUN S J, et al. Investigation on the spatial distribution characteristics of behind-armor debris formed by the perforation of EFP through steel target[J]. Defence Technology, 2020, 16:119-135. doi: 10.1016/j.dt.2019.05.016
[6]	王昕, 蒋建伟, 王树有, 等. 爆炸成型弹丸侵彻钢靶的后效破片云实验研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2018, 39(7): 1284-1290. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2018.07.005
	WANG X, JIANG J W, WANG S Y, et al. Experimental research on fragments after explosively-formed projectile penetrating into steel target[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2018, 39(7): 1284-1290. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2018.07.005
[7]	XING B Y, ZHANG D J, GUO Z Y, et al. Analysis of the mass of behind-armor debris generated by RHA subjected to normal penetration of variable cross-section EFP[J]. Defence Technology, 2019, 15:390-397. doi: 10.1016/j.dt.2018.10.006
[8]	邢柏阳, 侯云辉, 李泰华, 等. 爆炸成型弹丸垂直侵彻装甲钢靶后破片动能分析[J]. 兵工学报, 2019, 40(10):2014-2021. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2019.10.006
	XING B Y, HOU Y H, LI T H, et al. Analysis of kinetic energy of behind-armor debris generated during the normal penetration of EFP into armor steel[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2019, 40(10): 2014-2021. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2019.10.006
[9]	邢柏阳, 赵建霞, 陈亮, 等. 爆炸成型弹丸垂直穿透钢板靶后破片飞散特性[J]. 北京理工大学学报, 2022, 42(10):1026-1033.
	XING B Y, ZHAO J X, CHEN L, et al. Disperse characteristic of behind-armor debris formed by explosively formed penetrator vertically penetrating steel target[J]. Transactions of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2022, 42(10):1026-1033. (in Chinese)
[10]	HEINE A, WICKERT M. Unified investigation of secondary behind armor effects[C]// Proceedings of the 25th International Symposium on Ballistics. Beijing, China: International Ballistics Society, 2010:1049-1057.
[11]	HOHLER V, KLEINSCHITGER K, SCHMOLINSKE E, et al. Debris cloud expansion around a residual rod behind a perforated plate target[C]// Proceedings of the 13rd international symposium on ballistics. Stockholm, Sweden: International Ballistics Society, 1992: 327-334.
[12]	WEBER K, HOHLER V, KLEINSCHNITGER K, et al. Debris cloud expansion behind oblique single plate targets perforated by rod projectiles[C]// Proceedings of the 17th International Symposium on Ballistics.Midrand, South Africa: International Ballistics Society, 1998: 89-96.
[13]	HIERMAIER S, KNKE D, STILP A J, et al. Computational simulation of the hypervelocity impact of al-spheres on thin plates of different materials[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 1997, 20(1):363-374. doi: 10.1016/S0734-743X(97)87507-0 URL
[14]	POORMON K L, PIEKUTOWSKI A J. Comparisons of cadmium and aluminum debris clouds[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 1995, 17(4/5/66):639-648. doi: 10.1016/0734-743X(95)99887-W URL
[15]	WEN K, CHEN X W. Influence of the impedance gradient on the debris cloud produced by hypervelocity impact[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2022, 159:104034. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2021.104034 URL
[16]	SAKONG J, WOO S C, KIM T W. Determination of impact fragments from particle analysis via smoothed particle hydrodynamics and k-means clustering[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2019, 134:103387. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.103387 URL
[17]	黄正祥, 祖旭东. 终点效应[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2014.
	HUANG Z X, ZU X D. Terminal effects[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2014. (in Chinese)
[18]	ARNOLD W, ROTTENKOLBER E. Behind armor debris investigation (Part Π)[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2003, 29: 95-104. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2003.09.009 URL
[19]	KIPP M E, GRADY D E, SWEGLE J W. Numerical and experimental studies of high-velocity impact fragmentation[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 1993, 14: 427-438. doi: 10.1016/0734-743X(93)90040-E URL
[20]	SCHAFER F K. An engineering fragmentation model for the impact of spherical projectiles on thin metallic plates[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2006, 33(1): 745-762. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.09.067 URL
[21]	黄炫宁, 李伟兵, 郭腾飞, 等. EFP垂直侵彻靶板后效破片云形状描述[J]. 含能材料, 2020, 28(11):1068-1075.
	HUANG X N, LI W B, GUO T F, et al. Shape description of behind-armor debris cloud from vertical penetration of target plate by EFP[J]. Chinese Journal of Energetic Materials, 2020, 28(11):1068-1075. (in Chinese)
[22]	WEN K, CHEN X W, CHI R Q, et al. Analysis on the fragmentation pattern of sphere hypervelocity impacting on thin plate[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2020, 146:103721. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2020.103721 URL
[23]	MAYSELESS M, SELA N, STILP A J, et al. Behind the armor debris distribution Function[C]// Proceedings of the 13rd International Symposium on Ballistics. Stockholm, Sweden: International Ballistics Society, 1992:77-85.
[24]	AKAHOSHI Y, KAJI M, HATA H. Meaurement of mass. spray angle and velocity distribution of fragment cloud[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2003, 29(1/10):845-853. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2003.10.029 URL
[25]	段占强, 程国强, 李守新, 等. 高速冲击下钢板的微观组织及绝热剪切带[J]. 金属学报, 2003, 39(5):486-491.
	DUAN Z Q, CHENG G Q, LI S X, et al. Microstructures and adiabatic shear bands formed in steel plate under high rate impact[J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica, 2003, 39(5):486-497. (in Chinese)
[26]	李晓源, 时捷, 董瀚. 不同强度的40CrNi2Mo钢抗弹性能研究[J]. 兵器材料科学与工程, 2008, 31(1):14-18.
	LI X Y, SHI J, DONG H. Research on ballistic behavior of 40CrNi2Mo steel targets with different strength[J]. Ordnance Material Science and Engineering, 2008, 31(1):14-18. (in Chinese)
[27]	张先锋, 陈惠武, 赵有守. EFP对有限厚靶板侵彻过程及后效研究[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2006, 26(4):323-327.
	ZHANG X F, CHEN H W, ZHAO Y S. Investigation of process and aftereffect of EFP penetration into target of finite thickness[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2006, 26(4):323-327.
[28]	WIERZBICKI T. Petalling of plate under explosive and impact loading[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 1999, 22(9):935-954. doi: 10.1016/S0734-743X(99)00028-7 URL
[29]	GRADY D E. Local inertial effects in dynamic fragmentation[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1982, 53(1): 322-325. doi: 10.1063/1.329934 URL
[30]	GRADY D E, OLSEN M L. A statistics and energy based theory of dynamic fragmentation[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2003, 29(1-10):293-306. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2003.09.026 URL
[31]	陈刚, 陈忠富, 陶俊林, 等. 45钢动态塑性本构参量与验证[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2005, 25(5):69-74.
	CHEN G, CHEN Z F, TAO J L, et al. Investigation and validation on plastic constitutive parameters of 45 steel[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2005, 25(5):69-74. (in Chinese)
[32]	陈刚, 陈小伟, 陈忠富, 等. A3钢钝头弹撞击45钢板破坏模式的数值分析[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2007, 27(5):390-397.
	CHEN G, CHEN X W, CHEN Z F, et al. Simulations of A3 steel blunt projectiles impacting 45 steel plates[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2007, 27(5):390-397. (in Chinese)
[33]	YOSSIFON G, YARIN A L. Behind-the-armor debris analysis[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering. 2002, 27(8): 807-835. doi: 10.1016/S0734-743X(02)00009-X URL