无轴泵喷推进器敞水特性

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2021.04.017

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 无轴泵喷推进器是一种新型集成电机推进装置，其融合了无轴推进和泵喷推进技术的特点。为研究无轴泵喷推进器与常规推进器的水动力性能差异，采用流体数值计算手段，对比分析某无轴泵喷推进器样机与机械式泵喷推进器、E779A螺旋桨的水动力性能，并分析无轴泵喷推进器水动力效率的定义方式。通过设计的试验台架完成了无轴泵喷推进器样机的性能测试，并验证了数值计算结果的有效性。研究结果表明，无轴泵喷推进器最高敞水效率达到了0.662，低于常规螺旋桨，但其高效的进速系数区间远大于常规螺旋桨，能够在更多的工况下高效运行。

关键词: 无轴泵喷推进器, 水动力性能, 数值计算, 敞水效率, 水动力试验

Abstract: The shaftless pump-jet thruster (SPT) is a new type of integrated motor propulsion (IMP) device, which combines both the characteristics of shaftless propulsion and pump-jet propulsion technologies. In order to study the difference of hydrodynamic performance between SPT and conventional thruster, the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) approach is used to analyze and compare the hydrodynamic performances of SPT, traditional mechanical pump-jet thruster and E779A propeller. The definition of hydrodynamic efficiency of SPT is also discussed. The results show that the open-water efficiency of SPT reaches 0.662, which is lower than that of the conventional propeller. The high-efficiency working range of SPT is rather wider than that of the propeller, which means that SPT is able to work efficiently under more working conditions. Finally, a test bench is designed for the hydrodynamic test of SPT and the verification of the numerical simulation model of SPT above.

Key words: shaftlesspump-jetthruster, hydrodynamicperformance, numericalcalculation, open-waterefficiency, hydrodynamictest

中图分类号:

U664.34

祝昊，靳栓宝，王东，王公宝，魏应三，胡鹏飞，武星宇，何升阳，胡风革. 无轴泵喷推进器敞水特性[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(4): 835-841.

ZHU Hao, JIN Shuanbao, WANG Dong, WANG Gongbao, WEI Yingsan, HU Pengfei, WU Xingyu, HE Shengyang, HU Fengge. Open-water Characteristics of Shaftless Pump-jet Thruster[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2021, 42(4): 835-841.

参考文献

［1］ SONG B W, WANG Y J, TIAN W L. Open water performance comparison between hub-type and hubless rim driven thrusters based on CFD method［J］. Ocean Engineering, 2015, 103: 55-63.
［2］王东, 靳栓宝, 魏应三, 等. 集成电机推进装置应用综述［J］. 中国电机工程学报, 2020, 40(11): 3654-3663.
WANG D, JIN S B, WEI Y S, et al. Review on the integrated electric propulsion system configuration and its applications ［J］. Journal of Electrical Engineering, 2020, 40(11): 3654-3663. (in Chinese)
［3］ SHEN Y, HU P F, JIN S B, et al. Design of novel shaftless pump-jet propulsor for multi-purpose long-range and high-speed autonomous underwater vehicle［J］. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2016, 52(7): 1-4.
［4］ HONG D K, JOO D S, LEE J Y, et al. Effects of the pole-slot combination on the PMSM of an integrated motor propulsor for an unmanned underwater vehicle considering its electric performance, noise and vibration［J］. International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics, 2016, 52(3/4): 1689-1695.
［5］ OJAGHLU P, VAHEDI A. Specification and design of ring winding axial flux motor for rim-driven thruster of ship electric propulsion［J］. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2018, 68(2): 1318-1326.
［6］ DAS H N, JAYAKUMAR P, SAJI V F, et al. CFD examination of interaction of flow on high-speed submerged body with pumpjet propulsor［C］∥Proceedings of 5th International Conference on High-performance Marine Vehicles. Launceston, Australian: Australian Maritime College, 2006: 466-480.
［7］ SURYANARAYANA C, SATYANARAYANA B, RAMJI K, et al. Experimental evaluation of pumpjet propulsor for an axi-symmetric body in wind tunnel［J］. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 2010, 2(1): 24-33.
［8］ SURYANARAYANA C, SATYANARAYANA B, RAMJI K, et al. Cavitation studies on axi-symmetric underwater body with pumpjet propulsor in cavitation tunnel［J］. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 2010, 2(4): 185-194.
［9］ IVANELL S. Hydrodynamic simulation of a torpedo with pumpjet propulsion system［D］. Stockholm, Sweden: Royal Institute of Technology, 2001.
［10］姚惠之, 沈泓萃, 朱锡清. 潜艇前置导叶增效降噪试验机理分析研究［J］. 船舶力学, 2003, 7(2): 2-11.
YAO H Z, SHEN H C, ZHU X Q. Experimental analysis of submarine guide vane mechanism［J］. Journal of Ship Mechanics, 2003, 7(2): 2-11. (in Chinese)
［11］ SHARKH S, TURNOCK S R, HUGHES A W. Design and performance of an electric tip-driven thruster［J］. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment, 2003, 217(3): 133-147.
［12］ FREEMAN M D, MARSHALL M A. An analytical investigation into the design of a shaftless thruster using finite element and computational fluid dynamics approaches［J］. The Journal of Ocean Technology, 2011, 6(4): 55-68.
［13］ CAO Q M, HONG F W, TANG D H, et al. Prediction of loading distribution and hydrodynamic measurements for propeller blades in a rim driven thruster［J］. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2012, 24(1): 50-57.
［14］ YAKOVLEV A Y, SOKOLOV M A, MARINICH N V. Numerical design and experimental verification of a rim-driven thruster［C］∥Proceedings of Second International Symposium on Marine Propulsors. Hambur, Germany: Hamburg University of Technology, 2011.
［15］ LEA M, THOMPSON D, BLARCOM B V, et al. Scale model testing of a commercial rim-driven propulsor pod［J］. Journal of Ship Production, 2003, 19(2): 121-130.
［16］曾文德, 王永生, 杨琼方. 全附体潜艇流噪声数值计算［J］. 兵工学报, 2010, 31(9): 1024-1028.
ZENG W D, WANG Y S, YANG Q F. Numerical calculation of flow noise of submarine with full appendages［J］. Acta Armamentarii, 2010, 31(9): 1024-1028. (in Chinese)
［17］邢军强, 王凤翔, 张殿海, 等. 高速永磁电机转子空气摩擦损耗研究［J］. 中国电机工程学报, 2010, 30(27): 14-19.
XING J Q, WANG F X, ZHANG D H, et al. Research on rotor air friction loss of high-speed permanent magnet machines［J］. Proceedings of The CSEE, 2010, 30(27): 14-19. (in Chinese)
［18］徐云龙. 高速永磁电机损耗计算与热分析［D］. 沈阳:沈阳工业大学, 2009.
XU Y L. Loss calculation and thermal analysis for high speed PM machines［D］. Shenyang: Shenyang University of Technology, 2009. (in Chinese)
［19］ GUILMINEAU E, DENG G B, LEROYER A, et al. Numerical simulations for the wake prediction of a marine propeller in straight-ahead flow and oblique flow［J］. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2018, 140(2): 021111.

[1]	赵猛, 戴开达, 向召, 姜涛, 赵晓松, 徐豫新. 近爆荷载下聚氯乙烯泡沫夹芯板的动力学模型研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(12): 3884-3896.
[2]	官典，郭亚雯，李世鹏，唐嘉宁，王宁飞. 横向过载下气-粒两相流对固体火箭发动机点火过程影响[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(8): 1792-1807.
[3]	路宽，饶翔，王花梅，张倩. 不同形式锚泊系统对海洋资料浮标水动力性能的影响[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(1): 120-130.
[4]	官典, 李世鹏, 刘筑, 王宁飞. 横向过载对固体火箭发动机推进剂点火建压过程的影响[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(9): 1877-1887.
[5]	王少新，金国庆，王涵，孙蕊，刘贺. 双车厢两栖车静水直航下的水动力性能研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(3): 434-441.
[6]	范薇，苏子舟，范天峰，张涛，张洪海，刘勇. C形一体电枢的结构设计及接触压力分析[J]. 兵工学报, 2019, 40(10): 1969-1976.
[7]	李科斌，李晓杰，王小红，闫鸿浩. 球形装药水下爆炸近场测量的连续探针法研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2019, 40(1): 1-7.
[8]	王金强，王聪，魏英杰，张成举. 飞翼式混合驱动水下滑翔机水动力与运动特性研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2018, 39(8): 1556-1564.
[9]	邓同晔，徐庆尧，沈双晏. NOx对甲烷点火延迟时间影响的数值研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(3): 476-482.
[10]	宋保维，张宝收，姜军，杜晓旭，王德政. 四旋翼碟形自主水下航行器运动方程建立与流体特性仿真研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2016, 37(2): 299-306.
[11]	赵嘉俊，余永刚. 柱形充液室内多股燃气射流流场的气体与液体两相流场演化特性[J]. 兵工学报, 2016, 37(10): 1852-1859.
[12]	王海兵，张海波，田宙，欧卓成，周刚. 岩石动力学计算中的网格效应及机理研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2016, 37(10): 1828-1836.
[13]	林庆华，栗保明. 电磁轨道炮瞬态磁场测量与数值模拟[J]. 兵工学报, 2016, 37(10): 1788-1794.
[14]	杨后文，余永刚，叶锐. 不同火焰环境下固体火箭发动机烤燃特性数值模拟[J]. 兵工学报, 2015, 36(9): 1640-1646.
[15]	宁全利，蒋滨安，梁希，李俊. 火炮发射环境下弹载光电器件结构动态响应研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2015, 36(11): 2185-2189.