分离涡模拟和非线性声学方法求解腔体气动噪声对比分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2016.06.018

兵工学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (6): 1096-1103.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2016.06.018

分离涡模拟和非线性声学方法求解腔体气动噪声对比分析

张群峰¹，闫盼盼¹，黎军²

(1.北京交通大学土木工程学院，北京 100044; 2.中国航空工业集团公司沈阳飞机设计研究所，辽宁沈阳 110035)

收稿日期:2015-11-06 修回日期:2015-11-06 上线日期:2016-08-06
通讯作者: 张群峰 E-mail:zhangqunfeng@263.net
作者简介:张群峰（1972—），男，讲师，硕士生导师
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（11172283）

Comparison of NLDE and DES Methods for Prediction of Cavity Aerodynamic Noise

ZHANG Qun-feng¹， YAN Pan-pan¹， LI Jun²

(1.School of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China;2.Shenyang Aircraft Design and Research Institute,Aviation Industry Corporation of China， Shenyang 110035, Liaoning, China)

Received:2015-11-06 Revised:2015-11-06 Online:2016-08-06
Contact: ZHANG Qun-feng E-mail:zhangqunfeng@263.net

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 超声速条件下内埋式弹舱通常存在明显的自持振荡现象并产生强烈的气动噪声。分别利用分离涡模拟(DES)方法和求解非线性脉动方程组的非线性声学方法，对来流马赫数为2.0条件下，长度与深度比为5.88的开式空腔进行了数值模拟。计算结果表明，非线性声学方法得到的各模态声压级量级与实验结果符合较好，而DES方法得到的结果偏小，幅值在5 dB左右；DES方法求得的各模态频率与实验吻合较好，而非线性声学方法求得的频率有一定偏差。产生这些差别的原因是DES方法能较为准确地捕捉噪声源，而非线性声学方法由于耗散小而能较好地模拟噪声传播过程。从两种方法所需的计算资源对比表明：DES方法要求较密的网格和较小的时间步，需要耗费较多的计算资源；非线性声学方法采用人工合成湍流的方法来模拟小尺度脉动，可以选择较粗的网格和较大的时间步从而节约计算资源。

关键词: 兵器科学与技术, 开式腔体, 气动噪声, 声压级, 分离涡模拟, 非线性脉动方程组

Abstract: Cavity in the supersonic flow has an obvious self-sustained pressure oscillation which causes a fierce aerodynamic noise. An open cavity which length-to-depth ratio is 5.88 is simulated to predict the noise under the condition of Ma=2.0. Both detached eddy simulation (DES) method and nonlinear acoustic method for solving the non-linear disturbance equations (NLDE) method are used. The results show that NLDE method performs better in predicting the sound pressure level (SPL), and the predicted results are in agreement with the experimental results while the peak values of cavity tones obtained by DES method are 5 dB lower than those obtained by NLDE method. However, the DES method is more accurate in predicting the mode frequencies. The reason for these differences is that the DES method can capture the noise source more accurately, and NLDE method can simulate the noise propagation better. The comparison on computing resource indicates the DES method needs high resolution mesh and small time step which leads to high cost of computing resources, and the NLDE method models the fine scale turbulent motions by synthetic turbulence on coarse mesh and large time step, thus reducing the need for computing resource significantly.

Key words: ordnance science and technology, open cavity, aerodynamic noise, sound pressure level, detached eddy simulation, nonlinear disturbance equation

中图分类号:

V211.3

张群峰，闫盼盼，黎军. 分离涡模拟和非线性声学方法求解腔体气动噪声对比分析[J]. 兵工学报, 2016, 37(6): 1096-1103.

ZHANG Qun-feng， YAN Pan-pan， LI Jun. Comparison of NLDE and DES Methods for Prediction of Cavity Aerodynamic Noise[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2016, 37(6): 1096-1103.

参考文献

［1］ Stallings R L ,Wilcox F J. Experimental cavity pressure distributions at supersonic speeds, TP-2683 [R]. Hampton, Virginia:NASA, 1987.
[2］ Stallings R L,Wilcox F J. Measurements of forces, moments, and pressures on a generic store separating from a box cavity at supersonic speeds, TP-3110 [R]. Hampton, Virginia:NASA, 1991.
[3］ Rossiter J E. Wind tunnel experiments on the flow over rectangular cavities at subsonic and transonic speeds [R]. UK:Aeronautical Research Council, 1964.
[4］ Heller H H, Holmes D G, Covert E E. Flow-induced pressure oscillations in shallow cavities[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1971, 18(4):545-553.
[5］ Heller H H, Bliss D B. Aerodynamically induced pressure oscillations in cavities physical mechanisms and suppression concepts, TR-74-133 [R]. Ohio, US: AFFDL, 1975.
[6］ Rockwell D, Naudascher E. Review self-sustaining oscillations of flow past cavities [J].Journal of Fluid Engineering 1978, 100(2):152-165.
[7］黎军,李天,张群峰. 开式流动腔体的流动机理与控制[J]. 实验流体力学, 2008, 22(1):80-83.
LI Jun, LI Tian, ZHANG Qun-feng. The mechanism and control of open cavity flow[J].Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2008, 22(1):80-83.(in Chinese)
[8］尉建刚, 桑为民, 雷熙薇. 内埋式武器舱的流动及气动特性分析[J]. 飞行力学, 2011, 29(2): 29-32.
YU Jian-gang, SANG Wei-min, LEI Xi-wei. Analysis of the flow characteristics and aerodynamic problems in internal weapons bay [J]. Flight Dynamics, 2011, 29(2): 29-32. (in Chinese)
[9］徐路, 桑为民, 雷熙薇. 三维内埋式弹舱流动特性及形状影响数值分析[J]. 应用力学学报, 2011, 28(1): 85-89.
XU Lu, SANG Wei-min, LEI Xi-wei. Numerical analysis of flow characteristics and shape effect of three dimensional internal weapons bay [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2011, 28(1): 85-89. (in Chinese)
[10］王一丁, 陈滨琦, 郭亮, 等. 空腔噪声非线性数值模拟[J]. 国防科技大学学报, 2015, 37(4): 151-157.
WANG Yi-ding, CHEN Bin-qi, GUO Liang, et al. Nonlinear numerical simulation of cavity noise [J]. Journal of National University of Defense Technology, 2015, 37(4): 151-157. (in Chinese)
[11］刘瑜, 童明波. 基于 DDES 算法的有扰流片腔体气动噪声分析[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2015, 33(5): 643-648.
LIU Yu, TONG Ming-bo. DDES of aero acoustic over an open cavity with and without a spoiler [J]. Acta Aerodynamic Sinica, 2015, 33(5): 643-648. (in Chinese)
[12］余培汛, 白俊强, 郭博智, 等. 剪切层形态对开式空腔气动噪声的抑制[J]. 振动与冲击, 2015, 34(1): 156-164.
YU Pei-xun, BAI Jun-qiang, GUO Bo-zhi, et al. Suppression of aerodynamic noise by altering the form of shear layer in open cavity [J].Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2015, 34(1): 156-164. (in Chinese)
[13］宁方立,史红兵,丘廉芳,等. 前缘高频振动对亚声速开式空腔内强噪声影响的数值研究[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(12):3843-3852.
NING Fang-li, SHI Hong-bing, QIU Lian-fang, et al. Numerical research of high frequency vibration effect on subsonic open cavity macro-noise [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(12):3843-3852. (in Chinese)
[14］ Spalart P R. Detached eddy simulation[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2009, 41(1):203-229.
[15］ Spalart P R, Jou W H, Strelets M, et al. Comments on the feasibility of LES for wings, and on a hybrid RANS/LES approach[C]∥Proceedings of 1st AFOSR International Conference on DNS/LES. Louisiana,US:Greyden Press, 1997: 4-8.
[16］ Spalart P R, Deck S, Shur M L, et al. A new version of detached-eddy simulation, resistant to ambiguous grid densities[J]. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, 2006, 20(3): 181-195.
[17］ Shur M L, Spalart P R, Strelets M K. A hybrid RANS-LES approach with delayed-DES and wall modelled LES capabilities[J].International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2008,29(6): 1638-1649.
[18］ Strelets M. Detached eddy simulation of massively separated flows[C]∥ AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit.Reno,NV,US:AIAA, 2001.
［19］ Menter F R. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence modeling for engineering applications［J］. AIAA Journal, 1994, 32(8): 1598-1605.
[20］ Gritskevich M S, Garbaruk A V, Schütze J, et al. Development of DDES and IDDES formulations for the k-ω shear stress transport model[J].Flow, Turbulence and Combustion,2012, 88(3): 431-449.
[21］ Batten P, Ribaldone E, Casella M, et al. Towards a generalized non-Linear acoustics solver [C]∥
10th AIAA/ CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference. Manchester, Great Britan: AIAA, 2004.
[22］ Kraichnan R H. Diffusion by a random velocity field[J]. Physics of Fluids,1969,13(1):22-31.
[23］ Smirnov A, Shi S, Celik I. Random flow generation technique for large eddy simulations and particle-dynamics modeling[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2001, 123(2): 359-371.
[24］ Batten P, Goldberg U, Chakravarthy S. Reconstructed sub-grid methods for acoustics predictions at all Reynolds numbers [C]∥8th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference. Breckenridge, Colorado:AIAA,2002.
[25］ Venkatakrishnan V. Convergence to steady state solutions of the Euler equations on unstructured grids with limiters[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1995, 118(11):120-130.
[26］ Heller H H, Bliss D B. The physical mechanism of flow induced pressure fluctuations in cavities and concepts of their suppression[C]∥Proceedings of 2nd Aeroacoustics Conference. Hampton,VA,US.:AIAA,1975.
[27］ Wilcox D C. Turbulence modeling for CFD[M]. La Canada, CA: DCW Industries, 1998.

[1]	张群峰，闫盼盼，黎军. 尾缘控制措施对开式空腔噪声抑制效果研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2018, 39(1): 170-181.
[2]	娄伟鹏，郑长松，李和言，陈建文，张周立，马源. 高速《Symbol》v湿式换挡离合器排油阀临界开启和关闭压力研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(9): 1665-1672.
[3]	王宪成，杨绍卿，马宁，赵文柱. 车辆柴油机缸套动载荷磨损计算模型研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(9): 1673-1680.
[4]	孙皓泽，常天庆，王全东，孔德鹏，戴文君. 一种基于分层多尺度卷积特征提取的坦克装甲目标图像检测方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(9): 1681-1691.
[5]	张玉燕，孙莎莎，王振春，曹海要，战再吉. 高速载流电枢表面瞬态温度场仿真与测量[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(9): 1692-1698.
[6]	李臣明，宦超，石怀龙. 某箱式火箭炮对面目标分布式杀伤最优火力分配[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(9): 1699-1704.
[7]	雷娟棉，张嘉炜，谭朝明. 小攻角下船尾外形对旋转弹丸马格努斯效应影响的数值研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(9): 1705-1715.
[8]	李泽，闫晓鹏，栗苹，郝新红，王建涛. 扫频式干扰对调频多普勒引信的干扰机理研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(9): 1716-1722.
[9]	张浩为，谢军伟，张昭建，宗彬锋，陈唐军. 基于混合自适应遗传算法的相控阵雷达任务调度[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(9): 1761-1770.
[10]	李茂，侯海量，朱锡，黄晓明，李典，陈长海，胡年明. 结构间隙对芳纶纤维增强复合装甲结构抗侵彻性能的影响[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(9): 1797-1805.
[11]	王鉴, 韩焱, 王黎明, 张丕状, 陈平. 弹丸在膛内运动的回波信号瞬时频率估计方法研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(9): 1806-1814.
[12]	刘海鸥，张文胜，徐宜，赵梓烨. 基于核密度估计的履带车辆传动轴载荷谱编制[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(9): 1830-1838.
[13]	姜缪文，闫健卓，陈继民. 基于拓扑优化技术的军用头盔内胆结构三维打印[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(9): 1845-1853.
[14]	张磊，李世民，朱刚. 基于时间连续灰色Markov模型的维修器材需求预测方法研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(9): 1862-1866.
[15]	张亚舟，李贞晓，程年恺，田慧，栗保明. 一种真空触发开关脉冲电源系统研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(8): 1469-1475.

分离涡模拟和非线性声学方法求解腔体气动噪声对比分析

Comparison of NLDE and DES Methods for Prediction of Cavity Aerodynamic Noise

PDF

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价