空投货台摆荡阶段流体-固体耦合建模分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2016.01.021

兵工学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (1): 141-148.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2016.01.021

空投货台摆荡阶段流体-固体耦合建模分析

汤健华，钱林方，徐亚栋

（南京理工大学机械工程学院，江苏南京 210094）

收稿日期:2015-03-22 修回日期:2015-03-22 上线日期:2016-03-23
作者简介:汤健华（1984—），男，博士研究生
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（11472137）

Fluid-structure Interaction Modelling of Airdrop Cargo Platform Swinging

TANG Jian-hua，QIAN Lin-fang，XU Ya-dong

(School of Mechanical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, Jiangsu, China)

Received:2015-03-22 Revised:2015-03-22 Online:2016-03-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为获得空投货台摆荡阶段的精确动力学响应，考虑货台大幅度摆荡对空气产生的非定常效应，基于平衡点法构建了空投吊挂系统多体动力学模型，并采用基于ALE格式的有限体积法建立了空气流场模型，在此基础上推导建立了非定常流动作用下的货台-空气流体-固体耦合分析模型。通过数值算例研究：验证了该多体动力学模型的鲁棒性和正确性；明确了层流非定常模型能较好地描述流体对平板的作用力，可用于空投货台摆荡阶段的流场分析；对比指出通过流体-固体耦合分析得到的非定常流动气动力显示出震荡特性，而定常流动假设模型会给货台带来类似粘滞阻尼的特性，其减速效果要比非定常流动模型强烈。

关键词: 流体力学, 非定常流动, 平衡点法, 空投货台, 流体-固体耦合

Abstract: A platform-sling model is established to study the dynamic response of airdrop platform. An uniform equivalent point Newton-Rapshon iteration method is presented. In order to study the unsteady fluid behavior, the time domain is discretized, and an ALE base finite volume method is used to solve the NS equations. The aero-force is obtained and imposed on the platform. The equivalent point method is validated through commercial software RECURDYN. The results show that the equivalent point method can well represent the slack-taut cases of the sling system. It can also be found that the laminar flow model is used to describe the acting force of fluid on plate well at low Reynolds number. Finally, the comparisons are made between the steady and unsteady FSI models. The time history of unsteady fluid force displays severe oscillation while the steady fluid force varies evenly.

Key words: fluid mechanics, unsteady flow, equivalent point, airdrop cargo platform, fluid-structure interaction

中图分类号:

TJ011

汤健华，钱林方，徐亚栋. 空投货台摆荡阶段流体-固体耦合建模分析[J]. 兵工学报, 2016, 37(1): 141-148.

TANG Jian-hua，QIAN Lin-fang，XU Ya-dong. Fluid-structure Interaction Modelling of Airdrop Cargo Platform Swinging[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2016, 37(1): 141-148.

参考文献

［1］ Peter C. A software simulation of cargo drop tests[C]∥17th AIAA Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conference and Seminar. Monterey, CA: AIAA, 2003: 2003-2132.
[2] Peter C, Kenneth D. Validation of a cargo airdrop software simulator[C] ∥17th AIAA Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conference and Seminar.Monterey, CA: AIAA, 2003: 2003-2133.
[3] Kenneth D. The motion and aerodynamics of an airdrop platform[C]∥22nd Applled Aerodynamics Conference and Exhibit. Provldence,RI: AIAA ,2004:2004-4845.
[4] Mcqulling M, Potvin J, Riley J. Simulating the flows about cargo containers used during parachute airdrop operations[J]. Journal of Aircraft,2011, 48(4): 1405-1411.
[5] Kenneth D. Aerodynamic forces on an airdrop platform[C]∥18th Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conference and Seminar. Munich, GE：AIAA, 2005:2005-1634.
[6] Vaughan J, Kim D, Singhose W. Control of tower cranes with double-pendulum payload dynamics[J]. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2010, 18(6): 1345-1358.
[7] Masoud Z N, Nayfeh A H, Mook D T. Cargo pendulation reduction of ship-mounted cranes[J]. Nonlinear Dynamics，2004, 35(3): 299-311.
[8] Track H H S T, Holloman N M. Designed experiments for nylon band characterization[C]∥US Air Force T & E Days 2010. Nashville, TN:AIAA, 2010: 2010-1711.
[9] Thomas L, K R. Biaxially oriented nylon-6 as a long duration material[C]∥International Technology Conference. Albuquerque, NM: AIAA, 1991:1991-3659.
[10] Poole L R, Huckins E K. Evaluation of massless-spring modeling of suspension-line elasticity during the parachute unfurling process, NASA-TN-D-6671 [R].WA, US: NASA Langley Research Center,1972.
[11] John F, Robert T, Behzad R. Multibody parachute flight simulations using singular perturbation theory[C]∥20th AIAA Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conference and Seminar. Seattle,WA: AIAA,2009: 2009-2920.
[12] Raiszadeh B. Mutibody parachute flight simulations for planetary entry trajectories using “equilibrium points”[J]. Advances in the Astronautical Sciences,2003, 114: 913-923.
[13] 程文科，秦子增，张晓今. 具有倒“Y”型吊挂系统的物伞组合体动力分析[J]. 弹道学报,1998,10(2):10-14.
CHENG Wen-ke, QIN Zi-zeng, ZHANG Xiao-jin.The dynamic analysis of a parachute and payload assembly with an inverted “Y” suspension system [J]. Journal of Ballistics, 1998,10(2):10-14. (in Chinese)

[1]	郭庆, 罗凯, 耿少航, 秦侃. 含不凝气体的蒸汽凝结换热数值研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(7): 2080-2091.
[2]	贾启明，姜毅，杨莹，赵子熹，王志浩. 新型推力可控垂直发射装置及其内弹道规律[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(7): 1596-1605.
[3]	汪泰霖, 王野, 张富毅, 陈慧岩, 王国玉. 水陆两栖车矢量喷口装置设计与仿真[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(4): 826-850.
[4]	朱毅飞, 林德福, 莫雳, 叶建川. 四旋翼无人机旋翼对机身非定常气动干扰特性[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(2): 410-422.
[5]	刘双, 何广华, 王威, 高云. 附体对分层流中潜艇水动力特性的影响[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(1): 108-117.
[6]	徐路程，郝雪颖，肖凯涛，宋伟伟，陈春生. 爆炸型烟幕弹遮蔽效能仿真研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(7): 1299-1306.
[7]	钟阳，王良明，吴映锋. 基于计算流体力学与刚体动力学耦合的高速旋转弹丸弹道计算方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(6): 1085-1095.
[8]	权辉，谢建，李良，张力. 火箭发射场坪排焰道口射流研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(6): 1111-1122.
[9]	王利利，刘影，李达钦，吴钦，王国玉. 固体火箭发动机水下超音速射流数值研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2019, 40(6): 1161-1170.
[10]	郑秋亚，苏宁亚，梁益华. 欧拉方程数值求解的高精度通量分裂方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2019, 40(12): 2545-2550.
[11]	赵欣怡，周克栋，赫雷，陆野，李峻松. 某大口径轻武器射流噪声的小波分析与数值模拟[J]. 兵工学报, 2019, 40(11): 2195-2203.
[12]	张曼曼，姜毅，程李东，杨桦，刘琦. 基于嵌套网格的超声速子母弹分离数值分析[J]. 兵工学报, 2019, 40(1): 79-88.
[13]	索文超，许翔，耿飞. 基于计算流体力学的车辆发动机散热器芯部外形优化[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(9): 1839-1844.
[14]	刘涛涛，王国玉，张耐民，黄彪. 绕多孔孔板通气气体与液体两相横射流旋涡特性分析[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(7): 1375-1384.
[15]	闫盼盼，张群峰，金明. 舱门对内埋武器分离特性影响分析[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(6): 1120-1130.

空投货台摆荡阶段流体-固体耦合建模分析

Fluid-structure Interaction Modelling of Airdrop Cargo Platform Swinging

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价