以系统效能为目标的装甲车辆可靠性、维修性、保障性和测试性权衡分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2014.02.020

兵工学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2): 268-272.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2014.02.020

以系统效能为目标的装甲车辆可靠性、维修性、保障性和测试性权衡分析

韩坤，何成铭，刘维维，申莹

(装甲兵工程学院技术保障系, 北京 100072)

收稿日期:2013-07-18 修回日期:2013-07-18 上线日期:2014-03-25
通讯作者: 韩坤 E-mail:hankun-2005@163.com
作者简介:韩坤(1985—)，男，博士研究生

Trade-off Analysis of Reliability/Maintainability/Supportability/Testability of Armored Vehicle Based on System Effectiveness

HAN Kun, HE Cheng-ming, LIU Wei-wei, SHEN Ying

(Technology Support Department, Academy of Armored Forces Engineering, Beijing 100072, China)

Received:2013-07-18 Revised:2013-07-18 Online:2014-03-25
Contact: HAN Kun E-mail:hankun-2005@163.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在装甲车辆论证过程中，权衡分析是确定可靠性、维修性、保障性和测试性（RMST）定量要求的关键环节，但目前缺少科学有效的方法。提出以系统效能为目标的装甲车辆RMST权衡分析方法。基于装甲车辆使用和维修管理的实际情况，构建了由战备完好率、任务可信度和固有能力三部分组成的装甲车辆系统效能模型。在系统效能模型的基础上提出两种RMST权衡分析方法，即基于比较的权衡分析方法和基于灵敏度的权衡分析方法。该方法为合理地确定装甲车辆RMST定量要求，提高装甲车辆系统效能提供一种有效手段。

关键词: 兵器科学与技术, 装甲车辆, 可靠性, 维修性, 保障性, 测试性, 权衡分析, 系统效能

Abstract: Trade-off analysis is a key link of quantitative requirement determination of reliability/maintainability/supportability/testability (RMST) in the process of armored vehicle demonstration, but an effective method is absent. A method to balance RMST of armored vehicle based on system effectiveness is proposed. Based on the operation and management conditions of armored vehicle, an armored vehicle system effectiveness model is set up, which is made up of three parts, including operational readiness, battle dependability and capability. Two kinds of methods are proposed for the trade-off analysis of RMST, which are trade-off analysis methods based on comparison and sensitivity, respectively. This provides an effective method to determine RMST quantitative requirement of armored vehicle, and improve system effectiveness.

Key words: ordnance science and technology, armored vehicle, reliability, maintainability, supportability, testability, trade-off analysis, system effectiveness

中图分类号:

韩坤，何成铭，刘维维，申莹. 以系统效能为目标的装甲车辆可靠性、维修性、保障性和测试性权衡分析[J]. 兵工学报, 2014, 35(2): 268-272.

HAN Kun, HE Cheng-ming, LIU Wei-wei, SHEN Ying. Trade-off Analysis of Reliability/Maintainability/Supportability/Testability of Armored Vehicle Based on System Effectiveness[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2014, 35(2): 268-272.

参考文献

［1］丁定浩. 论证军用装备 RMS 顶层参数指标的意义和建议[J]. 电子产品可靠性与环境试验, 2011, 29(5): 1-5.
DING Ding-hao. Significance and recommendation on top-level parameter of military equipment[J]. Electronic Product Reliability and Environmental Testing, 2011, 29(5): 1-5. (in Chinese)
［2］乔三保，耿俊豹，孙林凯. 基于LCC的舰船RMS的权衡技术分析[J]. 装备制造技术，2012(1):90-92.
QIAO San-bao, GENG Jun-bao, SUN Lin-kai. Warship’s RMS based on LCC of balance technology analysis[J]. Equipment Manufacturing Technology, 2012 （1）:90-92. (in Chinese)
［3］耿俊豹，刘海庆，杨志红. 以使用可用度为中心的RMS权衡分析技术[C]∥中国设备管理协会设备寿命周期费用论坛暨第八次全国学术研讨会论文集. 武汉：中国设备管理协会，2008:147-149.
GENG Jun-bao, LIU Hai-qing, YANG Zhi-hong. Balance analysis of RMS based on availability[C]∥Proceedings of LCC Committee of China Association of Plant Management & Eighth National Conference. Wuhan: China Association of Plant Management, 2008:147-149.(in Chinese)
［4］谭云涛. 武器装备费用、性能与RMS综合优化设计方法研究[D]. 长沙：国防科学技术大学，2007.
TAN Yun-tao. A study on weapon equipments cost, performance, and RMS integration design optimization method[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2007. (in Chinese)
［5］ GJB451A—2005 可靠性维修性保障性术语[S]. 北京：总装备部，2005.
GJB451A—2005 Reliability, maintainability and supportability terms[S]. Beijing: General Armament Department，2005. (in Chinese)
［6］ Kevin W B. Measuring the effectiveness of weapons systems in terms of system attributes[D]. California: Naval Postgraduate School, 1995.
［7］ John M V. Application of the JANUS combat model for analysis of alternatives: a study of the operational effectiveness of the common missile as compared to the hellfire[D]. California: Naval Postgraduate School, 2002.
［8］魏继才，胡晓峰. 武器系统效能建模方法研究与应用[J]. 系统工程与电子技术，2002，24(6)：20-24.
WEI Ji-cai, HU Xiao-feng. Modeling method of weapon system’s effectiveness and applications[J]. System Engineering and Electronics, 2002, 24(6): 20-24.(in Chinese)
［9］罗来科，蒋宝唐，宣益民. 主战坦克作战效能分析与模糊综合评价[J]. 火力与指挥控制，2003，28(3): 39-41.
LUO Lai-ke, JIANG Bao-tang, XUAN Yi-min. The efficiency analysis of the main battle tank and its fuzzy synthetic evaluation[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2003，28(3): 39-41. (in Chinese)
［10］萧元星, 毛和瑞. 系统效能建模方法综述[J]. 兵工学报，1997，18(3)：256-259.
XIAO Yuan-xing, MAO He-rui.An overview of modeling methods for the representation of weapon system effectiveness[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 1997，18(3)：256-259. (in Chinese)

[1]	刘勤，姬广振，曹璞琳，李娟，刘英. 基于故障物理的复杂机械系统可靠性设计分析技术[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(S1): 189-195.
[2]	赵健，张亮，李岙然，冯宇，张宇，刘锐，李毅，李鑫勇，朱振雷. 基于系统工程方法的装甲装备可靠性指标分配[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(S1): 196-202.
[3]	刘琳，龚晨，李朦朦，王然. 基于虚拟现实技术的可靠性、测试性、维修性、安全性、保障性设计[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(S1): 208-213.
[4]	杜志岐，唐镜. 基于系统工程的装甲车辆总体设计[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(S1): 1-10.
[5]	李景奎，林文杰，江秀红，卢雨泽. 基于GO-Markov的飞机燃油闭环控制系统可靠性分析[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(6): 1447-1455.
[6]	丁力，谷加辉，周金宇，康绍鹏，陈逸飞，李子依. 基于包络法的冗余机器人运动可靠性[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(6): 1426-1434.
[7]	纪明，卜珺珺，马聪. 最大熵试验法对航天作动器输出可靠性的评估[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(4): 919-923.
[8]	江秀红，李佳欣，刘彦娟，王玉颖. 含反馈环的电动飞机驱动系统可靠性分析方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(2): 451-457.
[9]	王博，蒋平，郭波. 基于多源信息融合的航天阀门可靠性评估[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(1): 199-206.
[10]	邱继伟，罗海胜. 结构可靠性分析的自适应共轭非线性近似方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(3): 648-654.
[11]	翟禹尧，史贤俊，韩露，吕佳朋. 基于广义随机有色Petri网的测试性建模方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(3): 655-662.
[12]	郭司南，完颜笑如，刘双，梁超然，陈浩. 智能化设计与信息加工通道复杂度对装甲车乘员脑力负荷的影响[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(2): 234-241.
[13]	胡听春，孙宇锋，赵广燕. 武器装备可靠性设计保证系数取值方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(12): 2753-2761.
[14]	廖自力，疏歆，高强，李嘉麒. 电传动装甲车辆母线电压双通道补偿控制[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(10): 2082-2091.
[15]	刘春光，陈路明，张运银，张征，徐浩轩. 基于改进灰色马尔可夫链的电传动装甲车辆负载需求功率预测[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(10): 2130-2144.

以系统效能为目标的装甲车辆可靠性、维修性、保障性和测试性权衡分析

Trade-off Analysis of Reliability/Maintainability/Supportability/Testability of Armored Vehicle Based on System Effectiveness

PDF

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价