Acta Armamentarii ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (4): 240410-.doi: 10.12382/bgxb.2024.0410
Previous Articles Next Articles
WANG Haoning, GUO Jie*(), WAN Yangyang, ZHANG Baochao, TANG Shengjing, LI Xiang
Received:
2023-10-24
Online:
2025-04-30
Contact:
GUO Jie
CLC Number:
WANG Haoning, GUO Jie, WAN Yangyang, ZHANG Baochao, TANG Shengjing, LI Xiang. Formation Control of Hypersonic Glide Vehicles Considering Position Adjustment in Launch Direction[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2025, 46(4): 240410-.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
飞行器 | 任务 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
M1 | (0,30,0) | (0,30,0) | (0,30,0) | (0,30,0) |
M2 | (0,30,0) | (5,30,0) | (5,30,0) | (5,31.5,0) |
M3 | (0,30,0) | (-5,30,0) | (-5,30,0) | (-5,31.5,0) |
M4 | (0,30,0) | (10,30,0) | (10,30,0) | (10,33,0) |
M5 | (0,30,0) | (-10,30,0) | (-10,30,0) | (-10,33,0) |
Table 1 Initial positions of HGVs km
飞行器 | 任务 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
M1 | (0,30,0) | (0,30,0) | (0,30,0) | (0,30,0) |
M2 | (0,30,0) | (5,30,0) | (5,30,0) | (5,31.5,0) |
M3 | (0,30,0) | (-5,30,0) | (-5,30,0) | (-5,31.5,0) |
M4 | (0,30,0) | (10,30,0) | (10,30,0) | (10,33,0) |
M5 | (0,30,0) | (-10,30,0) | (-10,30,0) | (-10,33,0) |
飞行器 | 任务 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
M1 | (0,0,0) | (0,0,0) | (0,0,0) | (0,0,0) |
M2 | (-5,0,0) | (-1.5,0,0) | (-5,0,0) | (-5,1.5,0) |
M3 | (5,0,0) | (1.5,0,0) | (5,0,0) | (5,1.5,0) |
M4 | (-10,0,0) | (-3,0,0) | (-10,0,0) | (-10,3,0) |
M5 | (10,0,0) | (3,0,0) | (10,0,0) | (10,3,0) |
Table 2 Desired formation of HGVs km
飞行器 | 任务 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
M1 | (0,0,0) | (0,0,0) | (0,0,0) | (0,0,0) |
M2 | (-5,0,0) | (-1.5,0,0) | (-5,0,0) | (-5,1.5,0) |
M3 | (5,0,0) | (1.5,0,0) | (5,0,0) | (5,1.5,0) |
M4 | (-10,0,0) | (-3,0,0) | (-10,0,0) | (-10,3,0) |
M5 | (10,0,0) | (3,0,0) | (10,0,0) | (10,3,0) |
任务 | M1与M2 | M1与M3 | M2与M4 | M3与M5 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Δx/m | Δy/m | Δz/m | Δx/m | Δy/m | Δz/m | Δx/m | Δy/m | Δz/m | Δx/m | Δy/m | Δz/m | |
1 | 4994.12 | 0.0021 | 198.90 | 5005.72 | 0.0022 | 4.70 | 5001.31 | 0.0003 | 518.23 | 4989.68 | 0.0005 | 186.78 |
2 | 1592.52 | 0.0067 | 854.82 | 1660.07 | 0.0046 | 579.22 | 1746.29 | 0.0051 | 208.56 | 1737.20 | 0.0001 | 23.46 |
3 | 4943.65 | 0.0110 | 728.30 | 5053.97 | 0.0011 | 172.14 | 4959.98 | 0.0011 | 116.22 | 5029.10 | 0.0135 | 491.62 |
4 | 5095.62 | 1500.01 | 862.75 | 4904.38 | 1500.01 | 862.75 | 4863.37 | 1500.01 | 54.89 | 5136.63 | 1500.01 | 54.89 |
Table 3 Terminal formation interval distance with position adjustment in Method 1
任务 | M1与M2 | M1与M3 | M2与M4 | M3与M5 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Δx/m | Δy/m | Δz/m | Δx/m | Δy/m | Δz/m | Δx/m | Δy/m | Δz/m | Δx/m | Δy/m | Δz/m | |
1 | 4994.12 | 0.0021 | 198.90 | 5005.72 | 0.0022 | 4.70 | 5001.31 | 0.0003 | 518.23 | 4989.68 | 0.0005 | 186.78 |
2 | 1592.52 | 0.0067 | 854.82 | 1660.07 | 0.0046 | 579.22 | 1746.29 | 0.0051 | 208.56 | 1737.20 | 0.0001 | 23.46 |
3 | 4943.65 | 0.0110 | 728.30 | 5053.97 | 0.0011 | 172.14 | 4959.98 | 0.0011 | 116.22 | 5029.10 | 0.0135 | 491.62 |
4 | 5095.62 | 1500.01 | 862.75 | 4904.38 | 1500.01 | 862.75 | 4863.37 | 1500.01 | 54.89 | 5136.63 | 1500.01 | 54.89 |
任务 | M1与M2 | M1与M3 | M2与M4 | M3与M5 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Δx/m | Δy/m | Δz/m | Δx/m | Δy/m | Δz/m | Δx/m | Δy/m | Δz/m | Δx/m | Δy/m | Δz/m | |
1 | 5000.00 | 0 | 4200.43 | 5000.00 | 0 | 5296.45 | 5000.00 | 0 | 12806.37 | 5000.00 | 0 | 13826.46 |
2 | 1500.01 | 0 | 1807.01 | 1500.01 | 0 | 2272.72 | 1500.01 | 0 | 5579.01 | 1500.01 | 0 | 6013.45 |
3 | 5000.50 | 0 | 1206.19 | 4999.61 | 0 | 1326.80 | 5000.06 | 0 | 1267.05 | 5000.06 | 0 | 1266.07 |
4 | 5000.00 | 1500.00 | 11047.87 | 5000.00 | 1500.00 | 11047.87 | 5000.00 | 1500.00 | 7067.40 | 5000.00 | 1500.00 | 7067.40 |
Table 4 Terminal formation interval distance without position adjustment in Method 2
任务 | M1与M2 | M1与M3 | M2与M4 | M3与M5 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Δx/m | Δy/m | Δz/m | Δx/m | Δy/m | Δz/m | Δx/m | Δy/m | Δz/m | Δx/m | Δy/m | Δz/m | |
1 | 5000.00 | 0 | 4200.43 | 5000.00 | 0 | 5296.45 | 5000.00 | 0 | 12806.37 | 5000.00 | 0 | 13826.46 |
2 | 1500.01 | 0 | 1807.01 | 1500.01 | 0 | 2272.72 | 1500.01 | 0 | 5579.01 | 1500.01 | 0 | 6013.45 |
3 | 5000.50 | 0 | 1206.19 | 4999.61 | 0 | 1326.80 | 5000.06 | 0 | 1267.05 | 5000.06 | 0 | 1266.07 |
4 | 5000.00 | 1500.00 | 11047.87 | 5000.00 | 1500.00 | 11047.87 | 5000.00 | 1500.00 | 7067.40 | 5000.00 | 1500.00 | 7067.40 |
方法 | 任务1 | 任务2 | 任务3 | 任务4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.52 | 1.06 | 0.79 | 0.92 |
2 | 19.12 | 8.29 | 5.07 | 18.12 |
Table 5 The maximum terminal distance in launch direction of each mission km
方法 | 任务1 | 任务2 | 任务3 | 任务4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.52 | 1.06 | 0.79 | 0.92 |
2 | 19.12 | 8.29 | 5.07 | 18.12 |
[1] |
赵良玉, 雍恩米, 王波兰. 反临近空间高超声速飞行器若干研究进展[J]. 宇航学报, 2020, 41(10):1239-1250.
|
|
|
[2] |
郭杰, 郑金库, 王浩凝, 等. 高超声速滑翔飞行器再入制导方法及热点问题研究综述[J]. 空天技术, 2022(1):54-63.
|
|
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
姜鹏, 郭栋, 韩亮, 等. 多飞行器再入段时间协同弹道规划方法[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(增刊1):171-183.
|
|
|
[6] |
韩嘉俊, 王小虎, 郝昀, 等. 带有时间约束的再入滑翔轨迹设计[J]. 宇航学报, 2020, 41(4):438-446.
|
|
|
[7] |
王培臣, 闫循良, 南汶江, 等. 考虑时间约束的近解析滑翔轨迹快速规划方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2024, 45(7):2294-2305.
|
|
|
[8] |
方科, 张庆振, 倪昆, 等. 飞行时间约束下的再入制导律[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2019, 51(10):90-97.
|
|
|
[9] |
王肖, 郭杰, 唐胜景, 等. 基于解析剖面的时间协同再入制导[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(3):239-250.
|
|
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
张晚晴, 余文斌, 李静琳, 等. 基于纵程解析解的飞行器智能横程机动再入协同制导[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(7):1400-1411.
|
|
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
李文, 尚腾, 姚寅伟, 等. 速度时变情况下多飞行器时间协同制导方法研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(6):1096-1110.
|
|
|
[17] |
许强强. 高超声速多飞行器编队协同动力学研究[D]. 长沙: 国防科学技术大学, 2016.
|
|
|
[18] |
水晓冰, 王晓芳, 林平, 等. 高超声速飞行器编队控制方法[J]. 战术导弹技术, 2020(5):139-148.
|
|
|
[19] |
李兆亭. 高超声速滑翔导弹集群控制方法研究[D]. 长沙: 国防科技大学, 2018.
|
|
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
|
[1] | PAN Yunwei, LI Min, ZENG Xiangguang, HUANG Ao, ZHANG Jiaheng, REN Wenzhe, PENG Bei. AUV Obstacle Avoidance and Path Planning Based on Artificial Potential Field and Improved Reinforcement Learning [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2025, 46(4): 240300-. |
[2] | JI Peng, GUO Minghao. Local Path Planning for Unmanned Ground Vehicles Based on Improved Artificial Potential Field Method in Frenet Coordinate System [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2024, 45(7): 2097-2109. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||