Acta Armamentarii ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (8): 240898-.doi: 10.12382/bgxb.2024.0898
Previous Articles Next Articles
GU Minhui, TANG Kui*(), WANG Jinxiang**(
), XIA Jingwen, LI Yuanbo, WANG Hongfei
Received:
2024-09-27
Online:
2025-08-28
Contact:
TANG Kui, WANG Jinxiang
CLC Number:
GU Minhui, TANG Kui, WANG Jinxiang, XIA Jingwen, LI Yuanbo, WANG Hongfei. Penetration Fragmentation Characteristics and Damage After-effects of PELE with Slits[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2025, 46(8): 240898-.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
材料 | 密度/ (g·cm-3) | Gruneisen 系数 | Hugoniot参数 c0/(km·s-1) | Hugoniot 参数s | 剪切模量/ MPa | 屈服应力/ MPa | 侵蚀几何 应变 | 失效塑性 应变 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
95W钨合金 | 18.000 | 4.03 | 1.237 | 1.3902×105 | 1.5×103 | 0.6 | ||
聚乙烯 | 0.920 | 1.6 | 2.90 | 1.480 | 1.30×102 | 2.0×101 | 1.8 | |
4340钢 | 7.823 | 4.57 | 1.490 | 7.70×104 | 8.0×102 | 1.2 | ||
7075铝 | 2.800 | 5.20 | 1.360 | 2.67×104 | 4.0×102 | 1.2 |
Table 1 Material parameters[29]
材料 | 密度/ (g·cm-3) | Gruneisen 系数 | Hugoniot参数 c0/(km·s-1) | Hugoniot 参数s | 剪切模量/ MPa | 屈服应力/ MPa | 侵蚀几何 应变 | 失效塑性 应变 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
95W钨合金 | 18.000 | 4.03 | 1.237 | 1.3902×105 | 1.5×103 | 0.6 | ||
聚乙烯 | 0.920 | 1.6 | 2.90 | 1.480 | 1.30×102 | 2.0×101 | 1.8 | |
4340钢 | 7.823 | 4.57 | 1.490 | 7.70×104 | 8.0×102 | 1.2 | ||
7075铝 | 2.800 | 5.20 | 1.360 | 2.67×104 | 4.0×102 | 1.2 |
工况 | 内芯 | v/(m·s-1) | 试验结果 | 仿真结果 |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 铝合金 | 925 | | |
2 | 铝合金 | 1261 | | |
3 | 聚乙烯 | 936 | | |
4 | 聚乙烯 | 1262 | | |
Table 2 Comparison of the fragmentation effects betwee experiments and simulation
工况 | 内芯 | v/(m·s-1) | 试验结果 | 仿真结果 |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 铝合金 | 925 | | |
2 | 铝合金 | 1261 | | |
3 | 聚乙烯 | 936 | | |
4 | 聚乙烯 | 1262 | | |
工况 | 最大径向速度/(m·s-1) | 轴向剩余速度/(m·s-1) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
试验值 | 仿真值 | 误差/% | 试验值 | 仿真值 | 误差/% | |
1 | 184 | 193 | 4.9 | 895 | 878 | -1.9 |
2 | 243 | 227 | -6.6 | 1231 | 1219 | -1.0 |
3 | 94 | 99 | 5.3 | 889 | 901 | 1.3 |
4 | 145 | 154 | 6.2 | 1206 | 1226 | 1.7 |
Table 3 Comparison between experimental and simulation velocity data
工况 | 最大径向速度/(m·s-1) | 轴向剩余速度/(m·s-1) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
试验值 | 仿真值 | 误差/% | 试验值 | 仿真值 | 误差/% | |
1 | 184 | 193 | 4.9 | 895 | 878 | -1.9 |
2 | 243 | 227 | -6.6 | 1231 | 1219 | -1.0 |
3 | 94 | 99 | 5.3 | 889 | 901 | 1.3 |
4 | 145 | 154 | 6.2 | 1206 | 1226 | 1.7 |
切缝 方式 | 时间/μs | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
10 | 20 | 35 | 80 | 150 | |
无 切缝 | | | | | |
轴向 切缝 | | | | | |
螺旋 切缝 | | | | | |
Table 4 PELE penetration and dispersion at different times
切缝 方式 | 时间/μs | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
10 | 20 | 35 | 80 | 150 | |
无 切缝 | | | | | |
轴向 切缝 | | | | | |
螺旋 切缝 | | | | | |
旋转 方向 | 转速大小/ (r·s-1) | 着靶速度/(m·s-1) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
600 | 800 | 1000 | 1200 | ||
逆时针 | 500 | 94.95 | 121.51 | 98.64 | 87.39 |
1000 | 98.63 | 123.68 | 102.73 | 89.46 | |
1 500 | 98.41 | 130.63 | 104.75 | 97.17 | |
2000 | 95.63 | 133.11 | 112.45 | 86.98 | |
顺时针 | 500 | 93.82 | 110.93 | 99.48 | 91.18 |
1000 | 83.93 | 111.06 | 99.98 | 88.34 | |
1500 | 80.86 | 109.76 | 98.78 | 88.74 | |
2000 | 80.65 | 119.63 | 99.13 | 86.32 |
Table 5 Maximum perforation diameters under different working conditions
旋转 方向 | 转速大小/ (r·s-1) | 着靶速度/(m·s-1) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
600 | 800 | 1000 | 1200 | ||
逆时针 | 500 | 94.95 | 121.51 | 98.64 | 87.39 |
1000 | 98.63 | 123.68 | 102.73 | 89.46 | |
1 500 | 98.41 | 130.63 | 104.75 | 97.17 | |
2000 | 95.63 | 133.11 | 112.45 | 86.98 | |
顺时针 | 500 | 93.82 | 110.93 | 99.48 | 91.18 |
1000 | 83.93 | 111.06 | 99.98 | 88.34 | |
1500 | 80.86 | 109.76 | 98.78 | 88.74 | |
2000 | 80.65 | 119.63 | 99.13 | 86.32 |
序号 | 射弹 类型 | 质量/g | 着靶速度/ (m·s-1) | 初始动能/ kJ | 后效靶穿孔范 围直径/mm |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 常规PELE | 169.5 | 962.3 | 78.5 | 258.2 |
2 | 螺旋切缝PELE | 163.8 | 972.4 | 77.4 | 296.8 |
Table 6 Experimental data
序号 | 射弹 类型 | 质量/g | 着靶速度/ (m·s-1) | 初始动能/ kJ | 后效靶穿孔范 围直径/mm |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 常规PELE | 169.5 | 962.3 | 78.5 | 258.2 |
2 | 螺旋切缝PELE | 163.8 | 972.4 | 77.4 | 296.8 |
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
顾敏辉, 展婷变, 印立魁, 等. 螺旋切缝对PELE毁伤性能的影响研究[J]. 弹道学报, 2022, 34(3):58-64,110.
doi: 10.12115/j.issn.1004-499X(2022)03-008 |
doi: 10.12115/j.issn.1004-499X(2022)03-008 |
|
[4] |
樊自建. 横向效应增强弹丸侵彻及破碎机理研究[D]. 长沙: 国防科技大学, 2016.
|
|
|
[5] |
doi: 10.1016/j.dt.2020.04.012 |
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
doi: 10.1016/j.dt.2019.05.002 |
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
朱建生, 赵国志, 杜忠华, 等. PELE垂直侵彻薄靶的机理分析[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2009, 29(3):281-288.
|
|
|
[19] |
樊自建, 冉宪文, 汤文辉, 等. PELE贯穿薄靶后外壳破片径向速度计算方法与影响因素分析[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2017, 37(4):621-628.
|
|
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
张甲浩, 郭萌萌, 周晟, 等. 活性横向增强弹靶后横向效应实验与数值模拟[J]. 兵工学报, 2024, 45(7):2270-2281.
doi: 10.12382/bgxb.2023.0537 |
doi: 10.12382/bgxb.2023.0537 |
|
[23] |
王展翾, 李欣田, 徐立志, 等. 横向效应增强侵彻体撞击靶板后破片径向速度预测模型的对比分析[J]. 兵工学报, 2025, 46(6):240533.
doi: 10.12382/bgxb.2024.0533 |
|
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
张甲浩, 王海福, 葛超, 等. 活性PELE侵彻钢筋混凝土靶扩孔增强行为[J]. 兵工学报, 2025, 46(3):240307.
doi: 10.12382/bgxb.2024.0307 |
|
|
[26] |
郭萌萌, 王海福, 张甲浩, 等. 活性PELE侵彻钢筋混凝土毁伤效应仿真研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2024, 45(增刊1):89-96.
|
doi: 10.12382/bgxb.2024.0527 |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
陈浦. PELE弹丸破碎及横向扩孔效应研究[D]. 长沙: 国防科技大学, 2014.
|
|
|
[30] |
唐奎, 王金相, 刘亮涛, 等. 长杆弹二次侵彻机理及影响因素研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(12):35-46.
|
|
|
[31] |
唐奎. 两种非均质长杆弹芯侵彻半无限厚金属靶研究[D]. 南京: 南京理工大学, 2020.
|
|
|
[32] |
李晓杰, 闫鸿浩, 王小红, 等. Mie-Grüneisen状态方程的物理力学释义[J]. 高压物理学报, 2014, 28(2):227-231.
|
|
|
[33] |
|
[34] |
陈智刚. 爆炸及其终点效应[M]. 北京: 兵器工业出版社, 2004:245-247.
|
|
[1] | AN Chengyuan, LIU Haipeng, LIU Yan, REN Wei. Shock Wave Power Characteristics of Cylindrical Explosives with Elliptical Cross-section [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2025, 46(8): 240969-. |
[2] | WANG Ye, CHEN Huiyan, XI Junqiang, YU Huilong. An Overview of Research on Navigation of Amphibious Vehicle on Water [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2025, 46(7): 240156-. |
[3] | LI Qingsong, WANG Lei, ZHAO Ning, ZHANG Xiaotian, ZHANG Lei, WANG Kehong. Finite Element Simulation Analysis and Experimental Study of Arc Additive Frame Structure [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2025, 46(7): 240629-. |
[4] | GONG Xiaohui, RAO Guoning, ZHOU Rudong, ZHU Xiaofeng, KONG Decheng, MENG Chenyu. Test and Numerical Simulation of Penetration Resistance of Polyurea/fiber Composite Structures [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2025, 46(7): 240709-. |
[5] | YAN Ming, WANG Xinjie, HUANG Fenglei, YOU Sa. Thermal-ignition Response of Warhead Charge and Characteristics of Typical Thermal Protection Structure under Hypersonic Aerodynamic Heating [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2025, 46(6): 240401-. |
[6] | WANG Zhanxuan, LI Xintian, XU Lizhi, DU Zhonghua. Comparative Study on Predictive Models for Radial Velocities of Fragments after PELE Impacting on Target Plates [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2025, 46(6): 240533-. |
[7] | ZHANG Jiahao, WANG Haifu, GE Chao, ZHOU Sheng, YU Qingbo. Enhanced Opening Behavior of Reactive PELE Penetrating into Reinforced Concrete Target [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2025, 46(3): 240307-. |
[8] | LIU Zhenxian, JIANG Jianwei, LI Mei, XIE Hongwei. High Precision Simulation of the Influence of Pressing Ring on EFP Forming Properties [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2025, 46(1): 231193-. |
[9] | YANG Xi, FENG Yukun, CHEN Zuogang, ZHANG Yan. Investigation of Navigation Performance and Jet Flow Characteristics of Water-jet Propulsion Vessel in Shallow Water [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2024, 45(S2): 123-132. |
[10] | ZHANG Jiansheng, JING Jianbin, SUN Hao, WANG Xiquan, LI Bo. Numerical Simulation and Experimental Study on Damage Effect of Prestressed T-shaped Beam under Blast Load [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2024, 45(S2): 193-198. |
[11] | LI Pengfei, XIA Hongli, HOU Chuanyu, ZHOU Yuqi, MIAO Haibin. The Virtual Test of Impact Damage on Weapon SystemBased on SPH Numerical Simulation Method [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2024, 45(S2): 208-214. |
[12] | JIANG Haojie, PENG Yong, SUN Yuyan, WANG Ziguo, XU Jiapei. Explosive Damage Law and Rapid Calculation Model for RC Bridge Piers [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2024, 45(S2): 305-316. |
[13] | JIN Wen, JIANG Jianwei, MEN Jianbing, LI Mei, LI Haifeng, ZHOU Xin. Investigation on Dynamic Response Characteristic of the Confined Powder under Impact Loading [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2024, 45(S1): 183-190. |
[14] | ZHANG Kun, ZHAO Changxiao, HAN Biao, JI Chong, ZHANG Bo, ZHANG Kaikai, TANG Rong. Numerical Simulation and Experimental Study on the Response Characteristics of Cylindrical Shell Charge under Collaborative Impact of Multiple Projectiles [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2024, 45(S1): 70-80. |
[15] | WANG Qingshuo, GUO Lei, GAO Hongyin, HE Yuan, WANG Chuanting, CHEN Pengxiang, HE Yong. Simulation Study of Axial Vibration of Graded Projectile Structure [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2024, 45(S1): 191-199. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||