Research on Suppression Effect of Rear Edge Control Method on Aerodynamic Noise in Open Cavity

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2018.01.019

Abstract

Abstract: Improved delayed detached eddy simulation method based on Menter SST k-ω model is used to analyze the aero-acoustic characteristics of open cavity. Flow control method of porous rear wall combined with dissipative cavity is used to suppress the noise. The effects of aerodynamic noise suppression under the conditions of subsonic and supersonic inflows are analyzed. The control mechanism of aerodynamic noise from open cavity is studied using a variety of flow field analysis techniques, such as numerical schlieren method. The results show that the suppression effect is sensitive to the dissipative cavity length under the condition of subsonic inflow. If the dissipative cavity is too short, the noise level in open cavity can not be effectively suppressed by the control method, instead of increasing the noise level to 12 dB. The suppression effect is improved when increasing the length of dissipative cavity, the noise reduction level increases with the increase in dissipative cavity length. Under the condition of supersonic inflow, the aerodynamic noise inside the cavity is effectively suppressed by the control method, the self-sustained oscillation is terminated, the tone noise in the cavity disappears, and the maximum reduction of the sound pressure level (SPL) inside the cavity reaches to 23 dB. Key

Key words: opencavity, aerodynamicnoise, flowcontrol, numericalsimulation, improveddelayeddetachededdysimulation

CLC Number:

V211.3

ZHANG Qun-feng, YAN Pan-pan, LI Jun. Research on Suppression Effect of Rear Edge Control Method on Aerodynamic Noise in Open Cavity[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2018, 39(1): 170-181.

References

［1］ Krishnamurty K. Acoustic radiation from two dimensional rectangular cutouts in aerodynamic surfaces, TN 3487 [R]. Pasadena, CA, US: California Institute of Technology, 1955.
[2］ Charwat A F. An investigation of separated flows-part I: the pressure field[J]. Journal of the Aerospace Sciences, 1961, 28(5): 457-470.
[3］ Rossiter J E. Wind tunnel experiments on the flow over rectangular cavities at subsonic and transonic speeds[R]. Farnborough: Royal Aircraft Establishment, 1964.
[4］ Heller H H, Holmes D G, Covert E E. Flow induced pressure oscillations in shallow cavities[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1971, 18(4):545-546.
[5］ Covert E, Bilanin A J. Estimation of possible excitation frequencies for shallow rectangular cavities[J]. AIAA Journal, 1973, 11(3): 347-351.
[6］黎军, 李天, 张群峰. 开式流动腔体的流动机理与控制[J]. 实验流体力学, 2008, 22(1): 80-83.
LI Jun, LI Tian, ZHANG Qun-feng. The mechanism and control of open cavity flow[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2008, 22(1):80-83. (in Chinese)
[7］黎军, 张群峰, 曾宏刚, 等. 腔体闭式流动控制的实验和数值模拟[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2008, 34(1): 96-99.
LI Jun, ZHANG Qun-feng, ZENG Hong-gang. Experiment and numerical investigation of controls for closed cavity flow[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2008, 34(1): 96-99. (in Chinese)
[8］ Givogue G, Vakili A, Fowler W.An experimental investigation of 2-D cylinders affecting supersonic cavity flow[C]∥29th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. Honolulu, HI, US: AIAA, 2011.
[9］ Thieman C C, Vakili A. An experimental investigation of supersonic cavity flow control with vertical cylinders[C]∥43rd AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference. San Diego, CA, US: AIAA, 2013.

[10］刘瑜, 童明波. 基于DDES算法的有扰流片腔体气动噪声分析[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2015, 33(5): 643-648.
LIU Yu, TONG Ming-bo. DDES of aero-acoustic over an open cavity with and without a spoiler[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2015, 33(5): 643-648. (in Chinese)
[11］余培汛, 白俊强, 郭博智. 剪切层形态对开式空腔气动噪声的抑制[J]. 振动与冲击, 2015, 34(1): 156-164.
YU Pei-xun, BAI Jun-qiang, GUO Bo-zhi. Suppression of aerodynamic noise by altering the form of shear layer in open cavity[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2015, 34(1): 156-164. (in Chinese)
[12］吴继飞, 徐来武, 范召林, 等. 开式空腔气动声学特性及其流动控制方法[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(7): 2155-2165.
WU Ji-fei, XU Lai-wu, FAN Zhao-lin, et al. Aero acoustic characteristics and flow control method of open cavity flow[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(7): 2155- 2165. (in Chinese)
[13］陶洋, 吴继飞, 徐来武, 等. 基于前缘边界层扰动的空腔压力脉动抑制研究[J]. 实验流体力学, 2016, 30(3):66-70.
TAO Yang, WU Ji-fei, XU Lai-wu, et al. Control of cavity flow pressure oscillation through leading edge boundary layer perturbation[J］. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2016, 30(3): 66-70. (in Chinese)
[14］ Williams D, Cornelius D, Rowley C.Closed-loop control of linear supersonic cavity tones[C]∥45th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference. Miami, FL, US: AIAA, 2007.
[15］杨党国, 吴继飞, 罗新福. 零质量射流对开式空腔气动噪声抑制效果分析[J]. 航空学报, 2011, 32(6): 1007-1014.
YANG Dang-guo, WU Ji-fei, LUO Xin-fu. Investigation on suppression effect of zero-net-mass-flux jet on aerodynamic noise inside open cavity[J］.Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2011, 32(6): 1007-1014. (in Chinese)
[16］余培汛, 白俊强, 郭博智. 射流对空腔噪声抑制效果研究[J]. 计算力学学报, 2014, 31(5): 663-669.
YU Pei-xun, BAI Jun-qiang, GUO Bo-zhi. Suppression effect of jet flow on aerodynamic noise of cavity[J］.Chinese Journal of Computational Mechanics, 2014, 31(5): 663-669. (in Chinese)
[17］ Zhang Y, Arora N, Sun Y, et al. Suppression of cavity oscillations via three-dimensional steady blowing[C]∥45th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference. Dallas, TX, US: AIAA, 2015.
[18］王一丁, 郭亮, 童明波, 等. 高速飞行器空腔脉动压力主动控制与非线性数值模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(1): 213-222.
WANG Yi-ding, GUO Liang, TONG Ming-bo, et al. Active control and nonlinear numerical simulation for oscillating pressure of high-speed aircraft cavity[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(1): 213-222. (in Chinese)
[19］宁方立, 史红兵, 丘廉芳. 前缘高频振动对亚声速开式空腔内强噪声影响的数值研究[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(12): 3843-3852.
NING Fang-li, SHI Hong-bing, QIU Lian-fang. Numerical research of high frequency vibration effect on subsonic open cavity macro-noise[J］.Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(12): 3843-3852. (in Chinese)
[20］ Blazek J. Computational fluid dynamics principles and applications[M]. Oxford, UK: Elsevier, 2005.
[21］ Venkatakrishnan V.On the accuracy of limiters and convergence to steady state solutions[C]∥31st Aerospace Sciences Meeting. Reno, NV, US: AIAA, 1994.
[22］ Shur M L, Spalart P R, Strelets M K. A hybrid RANS-LES approach with delayed-DES and wall-modeled LES capabilities[J]. International Heat and Fluid Flow, 2008, 29(6): 1638-1649.
[23］ Menter F R. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence modeling for engineering application[J]. AIAA Journal, 1994, 32(8): 1598-1605.
[24］ Spalart P R, Jou W H, Strelets M, et al. Comments on the feasibility of LES for wings, and on a hybrid RANS/LES approach[C]∥Proceedings of the 1st AFOSR International Conference on DNS/LES. Ruston, LA, US:Greyden Press, 1997:4-8.
[25］ Spalart P R, Deck S, Shur M L, et al. A new version of detached-eddy simulation, resistant to ambiguous grid densities[J]. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, 2006, 20(3): 181-195.
[26］张群峰, 闫盼盼, 黎军. 内埋式弹舱与弹体相互影响的精细模拟[J]. 兵工学报, 2016, 37(12):2366-2376.
ZHANG Qun-feng, YAN Pan-pan, LI Jun. Elaborate simulation of interaction effect between internal weapon bay and missile[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2016, 37(12): 2366-2376. (in Chinese)
[27］ Quirk J. A contribution to the great Riemann solver debate[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 1994, 18(2): 555-574.
[28］ Aradag S, Knight D. Simulation of supersonic flow over a cavity[C]∥43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reno, NV, US: AIAA, 2005.
[29］ Henshaw M J C. M219 cavity case: verification and validation data for computational unsteady aerodynamics, RTO-TR-26 [R]. London, UK: QinetiQ, 2002.
[30］熊红亮, 袁格. 可压缩自由剪切层纹影试验研究[J]. 流体力学实验与测量, 2003, 17(2):74-77.
XIONG Hong-liang, YUAN Ge. Flow visualization about a compressible shear flow[J]. Experiments and Measurement in Fluid Mechanics, 2003, 17(2):74-77. (in Chinese)

第39卷
第1期2018 年1月兵工学报ACTA
ARMAMENTARIIVol.39No.1Jan.2018

[1]	WANG Ge， ZHANG Chun， LIN Zhiwei， WANG Baohua， TAN Hu， CHEN Chen. Research on's Opening Distance of AHEAD Ammunition [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2022, 43(S1): 115-120.
[2]	L Dailong， CHEN Shaosong， XU Yihang， QIU Jiawei. Aerodynamic Characteristics of Close-coupled Canard Missile [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2022, 43(6): 1316-1325.
[3]	WANG Danyu, NAN Fengqiang, LIAO Xin, XIAO Zhongliang, DU Ping, WANG Binbin. Effect of Flame Inhibitor of the Muzzle Flame of Large Caliber Gun [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2022, 43(2): 273-278.
[4]	XU Gancheng, YUAN Weize, CHEN Linheng, LI Chengxue, XIE Xuhu, NIE Mengqi. Seismic Collapse Resitance of NFB700 High-strength Steel Plate [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2022, 43(2): 391-400.
[5]	LU Kuan， RAO Xiang， WANG Huamei， ZHANG Qian. The Influences of Different Mooring Systems on the Hydrodynamic Performance of Buoy [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2022, 43(1): 120-130.
[6]	CHENG Shenshen, TAO Ruyi, WANG Hao, XUE Shao, LIN Qingyu. Dampling Characteristics of Projectile in Engraving Process of Nylon Sealing Band [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2021, 42(9): 1847-1857.
[7]	GUAN Dian, LI Shipeng, LIU Zhu, WANG Ningfei. Influence of Lateral Acceleration on Ignition Transients of Solid Rocket Motor [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2021, 42(9): 1877-1887.
[8]	WANG Danyu, NAN Fengqiang, LIAO Xin, XIAO Zhongliang, DU Ping, WANG Binbin. Characteristics of Muzzle Flow Field of Large Caliber Gun Considering Chemical Reaction [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2021, 42(8): 1624-1630.
[9]	TAN Meijing， YANG Guang， LI Yu， ZHOU Yu， CAO Zhanwei， YAN Hao， TAN Zijing. Influence of Rectifying Wedge on the Flow Structure and Aerodynamic Heating Environment around All-movable Rudder [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2021, 42(8): 1648-1659.
[10]	CHENG Yuansheng， XIE Jieke， LI Zhe， LIU Jun， ZHANG Pan. Damage Response Characteristics of UHMWPE/aluminum Foam Composite Sandwich Panel Subjected to CombinedBlast and Fragment Loadings [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2021, 42(8): 1753-1762.
[11]	GAO Feng, ZHANG Ze. Review on Performance Evaluation of Solid Rocket Motors with Charge Defects [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2021, 42(8): 1789-1802.
[12]	LIU Qingyang, LEI Juanmian. Numerical Simulation of Aerodynamic Interference of Close-coupled Highly Swept-back Wings at Transonic Velocity [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2021, 42(7): 1412-1423.
[13]	DU Huachi， ZHANG Xianfeng， LIU Chuang， XIONG Wei， LI Pengcheng， CHEN Haihua. Trajectory Characteristics of Projectile Obliquely Penetrating into Steel Target with Multi-layer Space Structure [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2021, 42(6): 1204-1214.
[14]	WANG Mengxin， CHEN Ruiying， WANG Jinxiang. Protective Properties of Porous Foam Aluminum Sandwich Composite Plate under the Combined Action of Fragment and ShockWave [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2021, 42(5): 1041-1052.
[15]	TONG Ding, TIAN Hongyan, LIU Xinyuan, LIU Ye, GAO Chao, LI Xin. Effect of Inlet Bend Pipe on the Centrifugal Compressor Performance and Its Optimization Design [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2021, 42(4): 706-714.