HIFiRE-1飞行器激波与边界层干扰气动热研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2018.03.015

兵工学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (3): 528-536.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2018.03.015

HIFiRE-1飞行器激波与边界层干扰气动热研究

毛宏霞^1,2，贾居红¹，傅德彬¹，姜毅¹

（1.北京理工大学宇航学院，北京 100081； 2.北京环境特性研究所光学辐射重点实验室, 北京 100854）

收稿日期:2017-05-02 修回日期:2017-05-02 上线日期:2018-05-07
作者简介:毛宏霞（1976—），女，博士研究生。E-mail:maoxh207@126.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（51306019）

Research on Aero Thermodynamics and Influencing Factors for HIFiRE-1

MAO Hong-xia^1,2， JIA Ju-hong¹， FU De-bin¹， JIANG Yi¹

(1.School of Aerospace Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China； 2.Science and Technology on Optical Radiation Laboratory, Beijing Institute of Environmental Features, Beijing 100854, China)

Received:2017-05-02 Revised:2017-05-02 Online:2018-05-07

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 高超声速飞行器存在典型的激波与边界层干扰，由此产生的流动分离与再附会带来严重的气动加热问题。采用雷诺平均方法对HIFiRE-1飞行器激波与边界层干扰气动热进行了数值模拟。讨论雷诺数、马赫数等来流参数和飞行器裙体张角、裙体长度等结构参数对气动热的影响，并分析其影响机理。研究结果表明：柱裙拐角处由于存在边界层分离、再附及强烈的激波干涉，导致飞行器壁面存在严重的气动热问题，控制边界层分离和流场结构能有效控制飞行器壁面热环境。改变来流参数和结构参数会对边界层分离、再附和流场结构带来较大影响,具体表现为：来流雷诺数变化时流场结构变化较小，但会大幅度影响再附热流密度；来流马赫数变化时分离激波与飞行器壁面夹角发生变化，相应的气动热有较大变化；裙体张角变化时引起分离区尺度变化，进而改变壁面热流分布；裙体长度变化时影响边界层分离、再附特性，导致壁面热流分布发生变化。

关键词: 高超声速飞行器, 高超声速流动, 气动热, 激波与边界层干扰, 裙体结构

Abstract: To investigate the aerodynamic heating and the shock wave-boundary layer interaction (SWBLI) for hypersonic vehicles with cylinder flare, three-dimensional (3D) numerical simulation of flow field around HIFiRE-1 is carried out based on the finite volume method and Reynolds average Navier-Stokes equations. The performance of code and the mesh independence are evaluated by using pressure and heat transfer data from ground test. Simulated results show that the flow conditions and vehicle configurations have effect on the flow states and heat transfer significantly. The increase or decrease in the Reynolds numbers brings about the rapid altering of heat transfer only. The variation of Mach number results in the changes of both the flow structure and the heat transfer. Expanding or narrowing the angle of the flare leads to the diversification of separation bubbles, as well as the heat flux. The reattachment of separated shock wave on the flare is influenced by enlarging or shortening the length of flare, then resulting in the fluctuation of heat transfer.Key

Key words: hypersonicvehicle, hypersonicflow, aerothermodynamics, shockwave-boundarylayerinteraction, flarestructure

中图分类号:

V211.3

毛宏霞，贾居红，傅德彬，姜毅. HIFiRE-1飞行器激波与边界层干扰气动热研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2018, 39(3): 528-536.

MAO Hong-xia， JIA Ju-hong， FU De-bin， JIANG Yi. Research on Aero Thermodynamics and Influencing Factors for HIFiRE-1[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2018, 39(3): 528-536.

参考文献

［1］ Persovaa M G, Soloveichika Y G, Belovb V K. Modeling of aerodynamic heat flux and thermoelastic behavior of nose caps of hypersonic vehicles [J].Acta Astronautica, 2017, 136(1): 312-331.
[2］张志豪, 孙得川.飞行器气动加热烧蚀工程计算[J]. 兵工学报, 2015, 36(10): 1949-1954.
ZHANG Zhi-hao, SUN De-chuan. Calculation of aerodynamic heating and ablation of multi-layer thermal protection material[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2015, 36(10): 1949-1954. (in Chinese)
[3］童福林, 李新亮, 唐志共, 等. 转捩对压缩拐角激波/边界层干扰分离泡的影响[J]. 航空学报， 2016, 37(10): 2909-2912.
TONG Fu-lin, LI Xin-liang, TANG Zhi-gong, et al. Transition effect on separation bubble of shock wave/boundary layer interaction in a compression ramp[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2016, 37(10): 2909-2912. (in Chinese)
[4］宋友富, 徐晶磊, 张杨, 等. 压缩拐角激波/边界层干扰的可压缩湍流模型研究[J]. 推进技术, 2017, 38(2): 281-288.
SONG Yong-fu, XU Jing-lei, ZHANG Yang, et al. Research of compressible trubulence model in shock wave/boundary-layer interaction flow at a compression corner[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2017, 38(2): 281-288. (in Chinese)
[5］董祥瑞, 陈耀慧, 董刚, 等. 基于双微楔的高超声速激波与边界层干扰控制研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2016, 37(9): 1624-1632.
DONG Xiang-rui, CHEN Yao-hui, DONG Gang, et al. Research on control of hypersonic shock wave/boundary layer interactions by double micro-ramps[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2016, 37(9): 1624-1632. (in Chinese)
[6］ Bisek N J. High-fidelity simulations of the HIFiRE-6 flow path, AIAA-2016-1115[R]. Reston, VA, US: AIAA, 2016.
［7］ Kimmel R L, Adamczak D W. HIFiRE-1 flight trajectory estimation and initial experimental results, AIAA-2011-2358 [R]. Reston, VA, US: AIAA, 2011.
[8］ MacLean M, Wadhams T, Holden M, et al. Ground test studies of the HIFiRE-1 transition experiment—part 2: computational analysis[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2008, 45(6): 1149- 1164.
[9］ Wadhams T, Mundy E, MacLean M, et al. Pre-flight ground testing of the full-scale HIFiRE-1vehicle at fully duplicated flight conditions: part II, AIAA-2008-0639[R]. Reston, VA, US: AIAA, 2008.
[10］ Kimmel R L, Adamczak D W. HIFiRE-1 preliminary aerothermodynamics measurements, AIAA-2011-3413[R]. Reston, VA, US: AIAA, 2011.

[11］ Stanfield S A, Kimmel R L, Adamczak D W, et al. Boundary layer transition experiment during reentry of HIFiRE-1[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2015, 52(3): 637-649.
[12］ Yentsch R J, Gaitonde D V, Kimmel R L. Performance of turbulence modeling in simulation of the HIFiRE-1 flight test[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2014, 51(1): 117-127.
[13］ Rautaheimo P R. Developments in turbulence modeling with Reynolds-averaged Navie Stokes equations[M]. Helsinki, Finland: Finnish Academies Technology Press, 2001: 17-19.
[14］ Xu L, Wu Q J, Weng P F. HLLC Riemann solver based on high-order reconstruction for unsteady inviscid compressible flows[C］∥Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Science and Automation Engineering. Shanghai, China: IEEE, 2011: 618-622.
[15］ Holden M, Wadhams T, MacLean M, et al. Experimental studies of shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction in high Reynolds number supersonic and hypersonic flows to evaluate the performance of CFD codes, AIAA-2010-4468[R]. Reston, VA, US: AIAA, 2010.
[16］ Yang J L, Liu M. A wall grid scale criterion for hypersonic aerodynamic heating calculation[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2017, 136(1): 137-143.
[17］张智超, 高振勋, 蒋崇文, 等. 高超声速气动热数值计算壁面网格准则[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2015, 41(4): 594-600.
ZHANG Zhi-chao, GAO Zhen-xun, JIANG Chong-wen, et al. Grid generation criterions in hypersonic aeroheating computations[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2015, 41(4): 594-600. (in Chinese)
[18］ Sohag F A, Mohanta L, Cheung F B. CFD analyses of mixed and forced convection in a heated vertical rod bundle[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2017, 117(4): 85-93.

第39卷
第3期2018 年3月兵工学报ACTA
ARMAMENTARIIVol.39No.3Mar.2018

[1]	张晚晴，余文斌，李静琳，陈万春. 基于纵程解析解的飞行器智能横程机动再入协同制导[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(7): 1400-1411.
[2]	于哲峰，胥建宇，罗跃，杨鹰，刘进博，兰京川. 高超声速飞行器烧蚀后退量时序提取及基于神经网络的预测[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(6): 1230-1237.
[3]	岳彬，马文，呼卫军. 高超声速飞行器的自适应容错控制[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(3): 521-529.
[4]	蔺君，何英姿，黄盘兴. 带推力高超声速飞行器非连续点火再入轨迹研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(7): 1307-1316.
[5]	余跃，王宏伦. 基于深度学习的高超声速飞行器再入预测校正容错制导[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(4): 656-669.
[6]	于哲峰，陈旭明，杨鹰，部绍清，谢爱民，黄洁，柳森. 高超声速飞行器尾迹转捩及其对雷达散射截面的影响[J]. 兵工学报, 2019, 40(12): 2467-2472.
[7]	蔡光斌，赵阳，张胜修，杨小冈. 高超声速飞行器鲁棒多目标线性变参数控制[J]. 兵工学报, 2019, 40(11): 2229-2240.
[8]	王肖，郭杰，唐胜景，祁帅. 基于准平衡滑翔的解析再入制导方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2019, 40(1): 58-67.
[9]	张伸，王青，董朝阳，杨格. 基于加速度测量的高超声速飞行器抗干扰控制[J]. 兵工学报, 2018, 39(9): 1733-1740.
[10]	赵贺伟，杨秀霞，沈如松，胡云安. 弹性高超声速飞行器预设性能精细姿态控制[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(3): 501-511.
[11]	董祥瑞，陈耀慧，董刚，刘怡昕. 基于双微楔的高超声速激波与边界层干扰控制研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2016, 37(9): 1624-1632.
[12]	陈辰，马广富，孙延超，李传江. 基于扰动观测器的高超声速飞行器递阶滑模控制[J]. 兵工学报, 2016, 37(5): 840-850.
[13]	赵江，周锐. 基于粒子群优化的再入可达区计算方法研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2015, 36(9): 1680-1687.
[14]	赵江，周锐. 基于倾侧角反馈控制的预测校正再入制导方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2015, 36(5): 823-830.
[15]	张志豪, 孙得川. 飞行器气动加热烧蚀工程计算[J]. 兵工学报, 2015, 36(10): 1949-1954.

HIFiRE-1飞行器激波与边界层干扰气动热研究

Research on Aero Thermodynamics and Influencing Factors for HIFiRE-1

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价