基于加速度测量的高超声速飞行器抗干扰控制

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2018.09.009

兵工学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (9): 1733-1740.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2018.09.009

基于加速度测量的高超声速飞行器抗干扰控制

张伸¹，王青¹，董朝阳²，杨格³

(1.北京航空航天大学自动化与电气工程学院，北京 100083；2.北京航空航天大学航空科学与工程学院，北京 100083；3.中国船舶工业集团有限公司系统工程研究院，北京 100094）

收稿日期:2018-01-17 修回日期:2018-01-17 上线日期:2018-10-25
通讯作者: 王青（1968—），女，教授，博士生导师 E-mail:wangqing@buaa.edu.cn
作者简介:张伸（1991—），男，博士研究生。E-mail：zhangshen@buaa.edu.cn
基金资助:
航空科学基金项目（2016ZA51011）

Anti-disturbance Control for Hypersonic Vehicles Based on Acceleration Measurement

ZHANG Shen¹， WANG Qing¹， DONG Chao-yang²， YANG Ge³

(1.School of Automation Science and Electrical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100083, China；2.School of Aeronautic Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100083, China；3.System Engineering Research Institute, China State Shipbuilding Corporation Limited, Beijing 100094, China）

Received:2018-01-17 Revised:2018-01-17 Online:2018-10-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对吸气式高超声速飞行器气动特性复杂且不确定性强的特点，提出了一种基于加速度测量信号，包括内、外双回路设计的反步抗干扰控制方案。外回路在反步法中引入传感器所测加速度信号，并设计非线性干扰观测器对复合干扰进行观测与补偿；内回路设计采用基于奇异摄动理论的动态逆方法，利用Lyapunov理论证明了系统的一致最终有界。该控制方案均基于传感器可以直接测得的信号构成控制，对气动参数不确定鲁棒性强，且通过干扰观测进一步提高系统抗干扰能力。仿真结果表明，反步抗干扰控制方案在强不确定性与外部干扰条件下，可获得理想的控制效果。

关键词: 高超声速飞行器, 反步法, 加速度测量, 非线性干扰观测器, 动态逆

Abstract: An anti-disturbance backstepping control scheme based on acceleration measurement is proposed for the complexity and uncertainty of the aerodynamic characteristics of air-breathing hypersonic vehicle（AHV）. The control scheme includes both internal and external loop designs. The external loop introduces the measured acceleration signals of sensor in the backstepping method. And a nonlinear disturbance observer is designed to observe and compensate the composite disturbance. The dynamic inversion method based on singular perturbation theory is used for the internal loop design. The Lyapunov theory is used to prove the uniformly ultimately bounded stabilization. In this scheme, the control signal is totally constituted by signals which can be directly measured by sensors. The controller has high robustness for the uncertainty of aerodynamic parameters. Moreover, the anti-disturbance capacity is improved by the disturbance observer. The simulated results demonstrate that the control scheme can obtain desired control performance considering high uncertainty and external disturbance. Key

Key words: hypersonicvehicle, backsteppingmethod, accelerationmeasurement, nonlineardisturbanceobserver, dynamicinversion

中图分类号:

TJ765.2⁺32

张伸，王青，董朝阳，杨格. 基于加速度测量的高超声速飞行器抗干扰控制[J]. 兵工学报, 2018, 39(9): 1733-1740.

ZHANG Shen， WANG Qing， DONG Chao-yang， YANG Ge. Anti-disturbance Control for Hypersonic Vehicles Based on Acceleration Measurement[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2018, 39(9): 1733-1740.

参考文献

［1］ Sziroczak D, Smith H. A review of design issues specific to hypersonic flight vehicles ［J］. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2016, 84(7): 1-28.
［2］ Hank J M, Murphy J S, Mutzman R C. The X-51A scramjet engine flight demonstration program, AIAA-2008-2540 ［R］. Reston, VA, US: AIAA, 2008.
［3］孙长银, 穆朝絮, 余瑶. 近空间高超声速飞行器控制的几个科学问题研究［J］. 自动化学报, 2013, 39(11): 1901-1913.
SUN Chang-yin, MU Chao-xu, YU Yao. Some control problems for near space hypersonic vehicles ［J］. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2013, 39(11): 1901-1913. (in Chinese)
［4］方洋旺, 柴栋, 毛东辉, 等. 吸气式高超声速飞行器制导与控制研究现状及发展趋势［J］. 航空学报, 2014, 35(7): 1776-1786.
FANG Yang-wang, CHAI Dong, MAO Dong-hui, et al. Status and development trend of the guidance and control for air-breathing hypersonic vehicles ［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinca, 2014, 35(7): 1776-1786. (in Chinese)
［5］ Parker J T, Serrani A, Yurkovich S, et al. Control-oriented modeling of an air-breathing hypersonic vehicle ［J］. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2007, 30(3): 856-869.
［6］ Fiorentini L, Serrani A, Bolender M A, et al. Nonlinear robust adaptive control of flexible air-breathing hypersonic vehicle ［J］. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2009, 32(2): 401-416.
［7］ Sun H B, Li S H, Sun C Y. Finite time integral sliding model control of hypersonic vehicles ［J］. Nonlinear Dynamics, 2013, 73(1/2): 229-244.
［8］ Hu X X, Wu L G, Hu C H, et al. Sliding mode tracking control for a flexible air-breathing hypersonic vehicle ［J］. Journal of Franklin Institute, 2012, 349(2): 559-577.
［9］ Zhang S, Wang Q, Dong C Y. A novel adaptive dynamic surface control scheme of hypersonic flight vehicle with thrust and actuator constraints ［J/OL］. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control (2017-05-03) ［2017-09-25］. http:∥journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/014233121768690223.

［10］王肖, 郭杰, 唐胜景, 等. 吸气式高超声速飞行器鲁棒非奇异Terminal滑模反步控制［J］. 航空学报, 2017, 38(3): 189-201.
WANG Xiao, GUO Jie, TANG Sheng-jing, et al. Robust nonsingular terminal sliding mode backstepping control for air-breathing hypersonic vehicles ［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinca, 2017, 38(3): 189-201. (in Chinese)
［11］ Bu X W, Wu X Y, Ma Z, et al. Nonsingular direct neural control of air-breathing hypersonic vehicle via backstepping ［J］. Neurocomputing, 2015, 153(1): 164-173.
［12］张旭, 王利, 林言中, 等. 超燃冲压发动机总体化性能分析［J］. 推进技术, 2014, 35(2): 157-165.
ZHANG Xu, WANG Li, LIN Yan-zhong, et al. Analysis of overall scramjet performance ［J］. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2014, 35(2): 157-165. (in Chinese)
［13］ Bahm C, Baumann E, Martin J, et al. The X-43A Hyper-X Mach 7 flight 2 guidance, navigation, and control overview and flight test results［C］∥AIAA/CIRA 13th International Space Planes and Hypersonics Systems and Technologies Conference. Capua, Italy: AIAA, 2005.
［14］ Hovakimyan N, Lavretsky E, Sasane A. Dynamic inversion for nonaffine-in-control systems via time-scale separation ［J］. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2007, 13(4): 451-465.
［15］ Shaughnessy J D, Pinckney S Z. Hypersonic vehicle simulation model: winged-cone configuration,NASA-TM-102610 ［R］. Hampton, VA, US: NASA Langley Research Center, 1990.
［16］ Chen W H. Nonlinear disturbance observer-enhanced dynamic inversion control of missiles ［J］. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2003, 26(1): 161-166.
［17］ Menon P K, Badgett M E, Waker R A, et al. Nonlinear flight test trajectory controllers for aircraft ［J］. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 1998, 21(1): 67-72.
［18］ Waseem A B, Lin Y, Amezquita S K. Adaptive dynamic surface control of a hypersonic flight vehicle with improved tracking ［J］. Asian Journal of Control, 2013, 15(2): 594-605.
［19］ Zong Q, Wang F, Tian B L, et al. Robust adaptive dynamic surface control design for a flexible air-breathing hypersonic vehicle with input constraints and uncertainty ［J］. Nonlinear Dynamics, 2014, 78(1): 289-315.
［20］ Hovakimyan N, Lavretsky E, Sasane A, et al. Dynamic inversion for nonaffine-in-control systems via time-scale separation. Part I ［J］. Journal of Dynamical and Control Systems, 2007, 13(4): 451-465.
［21］ Xu B, Huang X Y, Wang D W, et al. Dynamic surface control of constrained hypersonic flight models with parameter estimation and actuator compensation ［J］. Asian Journal of Control, 2014, 16(1): 162-174.
［22］ Wang Q, Stengel R F. Robust nonlinear control of a hypersonic aircraft［J］. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2000, 23(4): 577-585.
［23］ Wang Y H, Wu Q X. Adaptive non-affine control for the short-period model of a generic hypersonic flight vehicle［J］. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2017, 66: 193-202.

第39卷
第9期2018 年9月兵工学报ACTA
ARMAMENTARIIVol.39No.9Sep.2018

[1]	韩小霞, 冯永保, 谢建, 魏列江, 王亚强, 魏小玲. 考虑油液黏温特性的电静液作动器流量死区动态逆补偿方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(2): 316-327.
[2]	张晚晴，余文斌，李静琳，陈万春. 基于纵程解析解的飞行器智能横程机动再入协同制导[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(7): 1400-1411.
[3]	于哲峰，胥建宇，罗跃，杨鹰，刘进博，兰京川. 高超声速飞行器烧蚀后退量时序提取及基于神经网络的预测[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(6): 1230-1237.
[4]	岳彬，马文，呼卫军. 高超声速飞行器的自适应容错控制[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(3): 521-529.
[5]	李万礼，李炯，李明杰. 拦截弹中制导弹道在线快速规划方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(12): 2617-2625.
[6]	蔺君，何英姿，黄盘兴. 带推力高超声速飞行器非连续点火再入轨迹研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(7): 1307-1316.
[7]	余跃，王宏伦. 基于深度学习的高超声速飞行器再入预测校正容错制导[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(4): 656-669.
[8]	王金强，王聪，魏英杰，张成举. 未知海流干扰下自主水下航行器位置跟踪控制策略研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2019, 40(3): 583-591.
[9]	刘真畅，唐胜景，李梦婷，王肖，郭杰. 固定翼垂直起降无人机过渡机动优化控制分配研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2019, 40(2): 314-325.
[10]	郑琛，唐鹏，李秋实. 基于增量动态逆的倾转旋翼飞行器飞行控制律设计[J]. 兵工学报, 2019, 40(12): 2457-2466.
[11]	于哲峰，陈旭明，杨鹰，部绍清，谢爱民，黄洁，柳森. 高超声速飞行器尾迹转捩及其对雷达散射截面的影响[J]. 兵工学报, 2019, 40(12): 2467-2472.
[12]	蔡光斌，赵阳，张胜修，杨小冈. 高超声速飞行器鲁棒多目标线性变参数控制[J]. 兵工学报, 2019, 40(11): 2229-2240.
[13]	王肖，郭杰，唐胜景，祁帅. 基于准平衡滑翔的解析再入制导方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2019, 40(1): 58-67.
[14]	毛宏霞，贾居红，傅德彬，姜毅. HIFiRE-1飞行器激波与边界层干扰气动热研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2018, 39(3): 528-536.
[15]	赵贺伟，杨秀霞，沈如松，胡云安. 弹性高超声速飞行器预设性能精细姿态控制[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(3): 501-511.

基于加速度测量的高超声速飞行器抗干扰控制

Anti-disturbance Control for Hypersonic Vehicles Based on Acceleration Measurement

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价