基于协商定权的飞机生存カ评价体系研究

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 首次从敏感性、易损性和战伤抢修性三个方面构建飞机生存力的评价指标体系；应用协商定权方法赋予各评价指标权重和对飞机生存力进行评价。协商定权方法以最小损失为约束，将各方分歧协调一致，能克服指标定权和评价的偏主观性，具有一定的客观性。实例很好地证明了该方法的合理性和可行性。基于协商定权的飞机生存力评价体系的构建，将对飞机生存力评价与设计产生积极意义。

关键词: 航空航天系统工程 , 飞机生存力 , 协商定权 , 评价指标 , 敏感性 , 易损性

Abstract: The evaluation criteria system for aircraft survivability was constructed by susceptibility, vulnerability and combat resilience for the first time. Aircraft survivability was evaluated by the evalu?ation indexes of which the weights are determined with proposed bargaining weight method. The bar?gaining weight method brings different opinions into accord with the objectivity under the constraint of the minimum loss, can overcome the partial subjectivity in determining weights and evaluating. The example proves well the rationality and feasibility of the method. The evaluation system for aircraft survivability based on the bargaining weight method has active effects on aircraft survivability evalua?tion and design.

Key words: aerospace system engineering , aircraft survivability , bargaining weight , evaluation crite?ria , susceptibility , vulnerability

中图分类号:

V221. 91

童中翔，李寿安，叶广强，惠晓滨. 基于协商定权的飞机生存カ评价体系研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2007, 28(4): 508-512.

TONG Zhong-xiang, LI Shou-an, YE Guang-qiang, HUI Xiao-bin. Evaluation System of Aircraft Survivability Based on Bargaining Weight[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2007, 28(4): 508-512.

参考文献

[1] Robert E. Ball. A History of the Survivability Design of Military Aircraft[R]. AD-A351434,1998.
[2] 宋笔锋，李为吉.飞机概念设计中的生存カ效益/代价综合评估方法[J].航空学报，1997，18(5): 543-546.
SONG Bi-teng, LI 'Wei-ji. Compromise method benefit/ cost of survivability enhancement techniques in conceptual design of air- craft[J] . Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 1997，18(5)： 543 - 546. (in Chinese)
[3] 李寿安，张恒喜，李曙林，等.飞机生存力评估与綜合权衡方法研究[J].航空学报,2005,26(1):23-26.
LI snou-an, ZHANG heng-xi, LI shu-lin, et al. Aircraft combat survivability estimation and synthetic tradeoft methods[ J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2005，26(1): 23 - 26. (in Chinese)
[4] David H. Hall. Integrated Survivability Assessment in the acquisi?tion lifecycle[R]. AIAA Paper 2004 - 2057, 2004.
[5] David E. Jeff coat. The survivability versus quantity trade — off for unmanned aerial vehicles[R]. AIAA Paper 2003 — 6550，2003. [6] 王志良.水资源管理多属性决策与风险分析理论方法及应用研究[D].成都：四川大学，2003.
WANG Zhi-liang. Theory, method and application of multi - at?tribute decision making and risk analysis on water resources man?agement [D]. ChengDu： SiChuan University, 2003. (in Chi?nese)
[7] 李曙林，李寿安,李为吉,等.战伤抢修对飞机生存力的影响分析[J].兵工学报，2005，26(6).
LI Shu-Iin，LI Shou-an, LI Wei-ji, et al. Effect of Battle Damage Assessment and Repair on aircraft survivability [ J」.Acta Arma- mentarii, 2005，26(6). (in Chinese)
[8] 张考，马东立.军用飞机生存カ与隐身设计[M].北京：国防エ业出版社,2002.
ZHANG Kao, MA Dong-n. Military aircraft survivability and stealth design [ M ]. Beijing： National Defense Industry Press, 2002. (in Chinese)
[9] 朱宝鎏，朱荣昌，熊笑非.作战飞机效能评估[M].北京:航空エ业出版社出版，1993.
ZHU Bao-liu, ZHU Rong-chang，XIONG Xiao-fei. Effectiveness evaluation of combat aircratt [ M]? Beijing: Aviation Industry Press, 1993. (in Chinese)
[10] Walter D. Dotseth. Survivability, safety and reliability analyses integration process[R]. AIAA97-5561, 1997. (in Chinese)
[11] 张建华,焦良,姚武文,等，飞机战伤抢修工程学[M].北京：航空エ业出版社,1999.
ZHANG Jian-hua, JIAO Liang, YAO Wu-wen, et al. Aircraft battle damage assessment and repair engineering[M]. Beijing： Aviation Industry Press, 1993. (in Chinese)
[12] 张健，张德智，吴玉斌，等.论评价指标值的可公度性处理 [J].兵工学报，2004,25(6):746-751.
ZHANG Jian, ZHANG De-zhi, WU Yu-bin, et al. Commensu- ration for the evaluation index value [ J ]. Acta Armamentarii, 2004，25(6)： 746-751. (in Chinese)

[1]	马孟新，李蓉，牛兰杰. 侵彻引信加速度信号目标特征中干扰叠加程度的评价指标[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(1): 20-28.
[2]	刘纯，欧卓成，段卓平，黄风雷. 动态加载下高聚物粘结炸药中椭圆孔洞坍塌引起的热点温度及其半经验解析表达[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(1): 57-68.
[3]	秦国华，高杰，叶海潮，姜国杰，黄帅，赖晓春. 基于融合评价指标和神经网络的刀具磨损预测[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(9): 2013-2023.
[4]	宁子轩，王琳，程兴旺，程焕武，刘安晋，徐雪峰，周哲，张斌斌. 分离式霍普金森压杆加载下不同组织Ti-6321钛合金的动态响应行为[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(4): 862-870.
[5]	侯宇菲，许进升，周长省，陈雄，李宏文. 复合固体推进剂颗粒与基体初始界面有无缺陷的细观模型对比[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(9): 1800-1808.
[6]	傅斌贺，刘西侠，刘维平，张传清，宋海军. 不同任务需求下军用车辆乘员信息作业适宜性评价指标研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(2): 239-245.
[7]	徐雪峰，王琳，沙彦刚，杨思琪，刘安晋， Tayyeb Ali，张斌斌，赵登辉. TC4 ELI钛合金动态压缩性能及绝热剪切敏感性的研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(2): 366-373.
[8]	吴亚琛，沈忱，孙晓乐，焦清介，刘海伦，闫石. 浇注六硝基六氮杂异伍兹烷基混合炸药驱动性能[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(12): 2458-2465.
[9]	周鼎，苗应刚，王严培，李峰，李玉龙. 冲击载荷下硼酸改性端羟基聚硅氧烷-二氧化硅复合材料的响应特性[J]. 兵工学报, 2018, 39(1): 137-145.
[10]	王海兵，张海波，田宙，欧卓成，周刚. 岩石动力学计算中的网格效应及机理研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2016, 37(10): 1828-1836.
[11]	阎艳，郝佳，陈中明，王国新，沙金龙. 基于模糊决策图与灰色关联分析的枪械设计方案评价[J]. 兵工学报, 2016, 37(10): 1934-1940.
[12]	董宾，王涛，徐永成，夏明主. 基于模糊评价法的某型跨超声速风洞增量引射器维修方案评价研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2014, 35(8): 1295-1300.
[13]	王展, 颜云辉, 焦学勇. 基于灰色理论的迷彩伪装多指标综合评价[J]. 兵工学报, 2013, 34(10): 1250-1257.
[14]	马艳，罗美玲. 基于分数阶傅里叶变换水下目标距离及速度的联合估计[J]. 兵工学报, 2011, 32(8): 1030-1035.
[15]	张赤军，赵学刚，刘洪颐. 同轴电流注入法测试制导武器系统的电磁易损性[J]. 兵工学报, 2011, 32(12): 1535-1539.