不同任务需求下军用车辆乘员信息作业适宜性评价指标研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2020.02.004

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对不同任务对军用车辆乘员能力差异性需求的问题，进行不同任务需求下乘员信息作业适宜性评价指标研究。通过模拟实验分析乘员认知能力和心理运动能力对信息录入和原地对静止目标射击任务绩效的影响，采用多元回归建模方法对比分析两项任务的绩效预测因子，建立乘员在不同任务需求下的作业适宜性评价指标。结果表明：通信专业任务操作速度适宜性评价指标应选取反应能力、记忆能力和注意能力，操作准度适宜性评价指标应选取记忆能力和注意能力；射击专业任务操作速度适宜性评价指标应选取手眼协调能力和注意能力，操作准度适宜性评价指标应选取双手操纵能力和注意能力。所得研究结果为确定与任务需求相适应的军用车辆乘员作业能力评价指标提供了参考。

关键词: 军用车辆, 作业适宜性, 任务需求, 评价指标, 乘员, 认知能力, 心理运动能力

Abstract: For the different demands on military vehicle crew's capability posed by different tasks, the evaluation index of crew's information operation aptitude under different task demands is studied. The influences of cognitive ability and psychomotor ability on information imputing and in-situ target shooting task performance are analyzed through simulated experiments. Performance predictors of two tasks are analyzed comparatively by multiple regression modeling. Evaluation indexes of crew's operation aptitude are built under different task demands. The results show that reaction ability, memory ability and attention ability should be selected as evaluation indexes of operation speed aptitude for communication task, while memory ability and attention ability should be selected as evaluation indexes of operation accuracy aptitude. Hand-eye coordination ability and attention ability should be selected as evaluation indexes of operation speed aptitude for shooting task, while bimanual control ability and attention ability should be selected as evaluation indexes of operation accuracy aptitude. The results provide references for identifying evaluation index of military vehicle crew's operation capability adapted to task demands. Key

Key words: militaryvehicle, operationaptitude, taskdemand, evaluationindex, crew, cognitiveability, psychomotorability

中图分类号:

TJ810.2

傅斌贺，刘西侠，刘维平，张传清，宋海军. 不同任务需求下军用车辆乘员信息作业适宜性评价指标研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(2): 239-245.

FU Binhe, LIU Xixia, LIU Weiping, ZHANG Chuanqing, SONG Haijun. Research on Evaluation Index of Military Vehicle Crew's Information Operation Aptitude under Different Task Demands[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2020, 41(2): 239-245.

参考文献

［1］毛明，刘勇，胡建军. 坦克装甲车辆综合电子信息系统的总体设计研究[J]. 兵工学报，2017，38（6）：1192-1202.
MAO M, LIU Y, HU J J. Research on the overall design of integrated electronic information system for tanks and armored vehicles[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2017, 38(6): 1192-1202. (in Chinese)
[2］ JIPP M. Reaction times to consecutive automation failures: a function of working memory and sustained attention[J]. Human Factors, 2016, 58(8): 1248-1261.
[3］ BRANDENBURGER N, JIPP M. Effects of expertise for automatic train operation[J]. Cognition Technology & Work, 2017, 19(4): 699-709.
[4］杨业兵，李鸣皋，韩磊，等. 飞行相关岗位心理选拔对我军舰载机飞行员心理选拔的启示[J]. 空军医学杂志，2016，32（5）：306-309.
YANG Y B, LI M G, HAN L, et al. The enlightenment of the psychological selection of flight-related posts to the psychological selection of our army carrier aircraft pilots[J]. Medical Journal of Air Force, 2016, 32(5): 306-309. (in Chinese)
[5］ CHEONG Y, SHEHAB R L, LING C. Effects of age and psychomotor ability on kinematics of mouse-mediated aiming movement[J]. Ergonomics, 2013, 56(6): 1006-1020.
[6］ OEHL M, SUTTER C. Age-related differences in processing visual device and task characteristics when using technical devices[J]. Applied Ergonomics, 2015, 48: 214-223.
[7］ PAN D, ZHANG Y J, LI Z Z. Predictive capability of cognitive ability and cognitive style for spaceflight emergency operation performance[J]. International Journal Industrial Ergonomics, 2016, 54: 48-56.
[8］雷寰宇，吕创，张学民. 飞行任务中分心物的速度与数量变化对手眼协调追踪绩效的影响[J]. 航天医学与医学工程，2016，29（5）：272-275.
LEI H Y, L C, ZHANG X M. Influence of speed and amount of distractors on eye-hand coordination in a flying task[J]. Space Medicine & Medical Engineering, 2016, 29(5): 272-275. (in Chinese)
[9］刘旭峰，苗丹民，胡文东. 复杂选择反应时测验在飞行员飞行能力评定上的效度分析[J]. 中华航空航天医学杂志，1999，10（3）： 163-166.
LIU X F, MIAO D M, HU W D. Validity analysis of the complex choice reaction time test for evaluating flight ability of pilots[J]. Chinese Journal of Aerospace Medicine, 1999, 10(3): 163-166. (in Chinese)

[10］韩厉萍. 短期噪声暴露与工作能力要素的关系[D]. 西安：第四军医大学，1998.
HAN L P. The relationship between the short-time noise exposure and elements of performance[D]. Xi'an: Fourth Military Medical University, 1998. (in Chinese)
[11］ CANAS J J, QUESADA J F, ANTOLI A, et al. Cognitive flexibility and adaptability to environmental changes in dynamic complex problem-solving tasks[J]. Ergonomics, 2003, 46(5): 482-501.
[12］ LONGO F, NICOLETTI L, PADOVANO A. Modeling workers' behavior A human factors taxonomy and a fuzzy[J]. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2019, 69, 29-47.
[13］ KIM B J, BISHU R R. Cognitive abilities in driving: differences between normal and hazardous situations[J]. Ergonomics, 2004, 47(10): 1037-1052.
[14］傅斌贺，刘维平，刘西侠，等.装甲车辆信息系统人机工效试验平台设计与开发[J].兵工学报，2019，40（7）：1537-1545.
FU B H, LIU W P, LIU X X, et al. Design and development of ergonomic test platform of armored vehicle information system[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2019, 40(7): 1537-1545. (in Chinese)
[15］ WONG A L, HAITH A M, KRAKAUER J W. Motor planning[J]. Neuroscientist, 2015, 21(4): 385-398.
[16］ JONES G, MACKEN B. Questioning short-term memory and its measurement: why digit span measures long-term associative learning[J]. Cognition, 2015, 144: 1-13.
[17］刘维平，傅斌贺，刘西侠，等.车载显控终端输入方式对乘员信息处理能力影响试验研究[J].兵工学报,2015,36(11): 2180-2184.
LIU W P, FU B H, LIU X X, et al. Experimental study of influence of input models of vehicle-mounted display and terminal on crew's information processing capability[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2015, 36(11): 2180-2184. (in Chinese)
[18］傅斌贺，刘维平，聂俊峰，等.考虑认知行为差异的乘员信息作业绩效研究[J]. 兵工学报，2019，40（3）：659-665.
FU B H, LIU W P, NIE J F, et al. Research on crew's information operation performance with the difference of cognitive beha- vior[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2019, 40(3): 659-665. (in Chinese)
[19］傅斌贺，刘维平，刘西侠，等.基于认知能力的乘员信息作业行为差异致因分析[J].航天医学与医学工程，2019，32（1）：19-24.
FU B H, LIU W P, LIU X X, et al. Causation analysis of difference in crew information operation behavior based on cognitive ability[J]. Space Medicine & Medical Engineering, 2019, 32(1): 19-24. (in Chinese)
[20］ JIPP M. Individual differences and their impact on the safety and the efficiency of human-wheelchair systems[J]. Human Factors, 2012, 54(6): 1075-1086.
[21］ SCHOLCOVER F, GILLAN D J. Using temporal sensitivity to predict performance under latency in teleoperation[J]. Human Factors, 2018, 60(1): 80-91.

第41卷
第2期2020 年2月兵工学报ACTA
ARMAMENTARIIVol.41No.2Feb.2020

[1]	马孟新，李蓉，牛兰杰. 侵彻引信加速度信号目标特征中干扰叠加程度的评价指标[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(1): 20-28.
[2]	秦国华，高杰，叶海潮，姜国杰，黄帅，赖晓春. 基于融合评价指标和神经网络的刀具磨损预测[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(9): 2013-2023.
[3]	郭司南，完颜笑如，刘双，梁超然，陈浩. 智能化设计与信息加工通道复杂度对装甲车乘员脑力负荷的影响[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(2): 234-241.
[4]	孙晓旺，张进成，彭兵，章金坤，王显会. 军用车辆底部爆炸冲击下载员下肢保护装置设计与优化[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(12): 2555-2564.
[5]	傅斌贺，刘维平，聂俊峰，刘西侠. 考虑认知行为差异的乘员信息作业绩效研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2019, 40(3): 659-665.
[6]	石秉良, 王显会, 张云, 何建清. 军用车辆底部防护研究与发展综述[J]. 兵工学报, 2016, 37(10): 1902-1914.
[7]	阎艳，郝佳，陈中明，王国新，沙金龙. 基于模糊决策图与灰色关联分析的枪械设计方案评价[J]. 兵工学报, 2016, 37(10): 1934-1940.
[8]	王展, 颜云辉, 焦学勇. 基于灰色理论的迷彩伪装多指标综合评价[J]. 兵工学报, 2013, 34(10): 1250-1257.
[9]	曹伟国，刘维平，孙伟，李胜东. 两栖装甲车辆乘员可靠性环境影响因素分析研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2008, 29(11): 1358-1361.
[10]	曹伟国，刘维平，晃志强，王荣辉. 装甲车辆乘员可靠性生理心理影响因素测试研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2007, 28(9): 1030-1035.
[11]	寇保华，杨涛,张晓今，张青斌. 单发末修子母弹对机场跑道毁伤能力的评价指标[J]. 兵工学报, 2007, 28(8): 934-938.
[12]	童中翔，李寿安，叶广强，惠晓滨. 基于协商定权的飞机生存カ评价体系研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2007, 28(4): 508-512.
[13]	1:张健;2:张德智，吴玉斌,舒启林,郝永平. 论评价指标值的可公度性处理[J]. 兵工学报, 2004, 25(6): 746-751.
[14]	1:张琦;2:蒋贤志. 工程车推土铲微机控制系统研究[J]. 兵工学报, 1998, 19(3): 267-270.
[15]	王浚,李敏. 新型军用车辆空调设备[J]. 兵工学报, 1990, 11(1): 1-12.