基于模糊评价法的某型跨超声速风洞增量引射器维修方案评价研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2014.08.024

兵工学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (8): 1295-1300.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2014.08.024

基于模糊评价法的某型跨超声速风洞增量引射器维修方案评价研究

董宾¹，王涛¹，徐永成²，夏明主¹

(1.中国空气动力研究与发展中心高速空气动力研究所四川绵阳 621000;

收稿日期:2013-08-21 修回日期:2013-08-21 上线日期:2014-11-03
作者简介:董宾（1986—），男，工程师，硕士

Research on Maintenance Scheme of a Trans-supersonic Wind Tunnel Augmentation Ejector Based onFuzzy Evaluation Method

DONG Bin¹， WANG Tao¹， XU Yong-cheng²， XIA Ming-zhu¹

(1.High Speed Aerodynamics Institute, China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center,Mianyang 621000, Sichuan, China;2.Laboratory of Science and Technology on Integrated Logistics Support, National University of Defense Technology,Changsha 410073, Hunan, China)

Received:2013-08-21 Revised:2013-08-21 Online:2014-11-03

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在某型跨超声速风洞增量引射器维修方案评价过程中，针对维修方案评价指标的模糊性，建立了维修方案模糊评价模型，并给出了评价置信度的计算方法。利用建立的模型，对某型跨超声速风洞增量引射器4个维修方案进行安全性、经济性、拆卸装配性、人素工程、时效性、维修质量6个指标的定性与定量分析，得出了最优维修方案。文中所建立的数学模型也可对风洞其他系统的维修方案进行评价，以确定最优维修方案，从而提高风洞其他系统维修方案评价的科学性。

关键词: 航空航天系统工程, 增量引射器, 维修方案, 模糊评价模型, 置信度

Abstract: A fuzzy evaluation model is proposed for the fuzziness of evaluation indexes of maintenance schemes in the maintenance scheme evaluating process of a trans-supersonic wind tunnel augmentation ejector, and the calculation method for evaluating confidence index is concluded. This model is used to qualitatively and quantitatively analyze 4 maintenance schemes in terms of safety, economics, disassemblability and assemblability, human factors engineering, timeliness, and maintenance quality, and the optimized maintenance scheme of the trans-supersonic wind tunnel augmentation ejector is obtained. At the same time, the maintenance schemes of other wind tunnel systems are also able to be evaluated to confirm the optimized maintenance schemes with this model, which promotes scientific nature of choosing optimal maintenance schemes.

Key words: aerospace systems engineering, augmentation ejector, maintenance scheme, fuzzy evaluation model, confidence index

董宾，王涛，徐永成，夏明主. 基于模糊评价法的某型跨超声速风洞增量引射器维修方案评价研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2014, 35(8): 1295-1300.

DONG Bin， WANG Tao， XU Yong-cheng， XIA Ming-zhu. Research on Maintenance Scheme of a Trans-supersonic Wind Tunnel Augmentation Ejector Based onFuzzy Evaluation Method[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2014, 35(8): 1295-1300.

参考文献

［1］于择斌，刘政崇，陈振华，等．2 m超声速风洞结构设计与研究[J]．航空学报, 2013, 34(2):197-207．
YU Ze-bin，LIU Zheng-chong，CHEN Zhen-hua，et al．Structure design and research of the 2 m supersonic wind tunnel[J]．Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica，2013，34(2):197-207.（in Chinese）
[2] 朱绍强，王卓健．基于TOPSIS法的飞机维修方案的决策[J]．航空计算技术, 2004, 34(3):10-12．
ZHU Sao-qiang，WANG Zhuo-jian．Decision of aviation maintenance project based on TOPSIS[J]．Aeronautical Computer Technical，2004, 34(3):10-12．（in Chinese）
[3] 马小霞，李经宽．热风炉维修方案评价模型研究及应用[J]．电力学报, 2011, 26(4):339-342．
MA Xiao-xia，LI Jing-kuan．The research and application of maintenance scheme evaluating model in hot-blast stove[J]. Journal of Electrical Power, 2011, 26(4):339-342．（in Chinese）
[4] Slavila C A, Decreuse C, Ferney M. Fuzzy approach for maintainability evaluation in the design process[J]．Concurrent Engineering, 2005, 13(4):291-300．
[5] Chiou H K, Tzeng G H. Fuzzy multiple-criteria decision-making approach for industrial green engineering[J]. Environmental Management, 2002, 30(6):816-830．
[6] 刘英平，杨素君，陈晓霞．不确定信息的机械产品设计方案评价方法[J]．机械科学与技术, 2008, 27(7):946-949．
LIU Ying-ping，YANG Su-jun，CHEN Xiao-xia．Study of evaluation method for mechanical product design schemes with uncertainty information[J]. Mechanical Science and Technology for Aerospace Engineering, 2008, 27(7):946-949．（in Chinese）
[7] 周文坤．模糊偏好下多目标决策的一种客观赋权方法[J]．上海大学学报, 2004, 10(4):410-412．
ZHOU Wen-kun. Objective weighting in multi-object decision making under fuzzy preference[J]. Journal of Shanghai University, 2004, 10(4):410-412．（in Chinese）

基于模糊评价法的某型跨超声速风洞增量引射器维修方案评价研究

Research on Maintenance Scheme of a Trans-supersonic Wind Tunnel Augmentation Ejector Based onFuzzy Evaluation Method

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价