基于变分信号分解的脉冲多普勒雷达抗扫频式干扰方法

doi:10.12382/bgxb.2023.0037

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对脉冲多普勒(Pulse Doppler, PD)雷达遭受扫频式干扰时,接收机被干扰信号饱和导致的雷达虚警或漏警问题,分析扫频式干扰作用下PD雷达中频信号特征,提出基于变分信号分解的PD雷达抗扫频式干扰方法。利用目标回波时域稀疏性及干扰信号的频域窄带特性,通过极大极小惩罚项和2阶变分惩罚项分别约束中频信号中的目标回波脉冲串分量和干扰分量,设计了基于交替方向乘子法的迭代算法求解优化问题各分量。保留目标回波脉冲串分量,滤除扫频中频分量,从而抑制干扰对雷达的影响,并通过仿真和实测数据验证方法的有效性。研究结果表明:所提抗干扰方法在信干比-20dB扫频式干扰作用下能够有效抑制扫频式干扰对PD雷达的影响,显著提高PD雷达的抗干扰性能。

关键词: 脉冲多普勒雷达, 扫频式干扰, 抗干扰方法, 变分信号分解, 交替方向乘子法

Abstract:

When the pulse Doppler radar is subjected to sweep-jamming, its receiver channel is saturated by the jamming signal, which causes the radar false alarm or miss alarm. Aiming at the above problem, an IF signal model of pulse Doppler radar under sweep-jamming is established, and a separation method of target echo and jamming based on signal variational decomposition (SVD) is proposed. The proposed method uses total variation regularization to decompose the IF signal into two components: pulse and low-frequency narrowband signal. The pulse corresponds to the target echo, while the low-frequency narrowband signal corresponds to the jamming. The ow-frequency narrowband signal and noise are eliminated, and the pulse is retained and processed to detect the real target. The effectiveness of SVD was verified by simulation. The results show that the method can still effectively separate the target echo and jamming under the condition that signal-to-jamming ratio is lower than -20dB, and greatly improve the target detection ability of pulse Doppler radar under the effect of sweep-jamming.

Key words: pulse Doppler radar, sweep-jamming, anti-jamming method, signal variational decomposition, alternating direction method of multipliers

中图分类号:

TJ43⁺4.1

陈齐乐, 钱鹏飞, 孔志杰, 乔彩霞, 张睿恒. 基于变分信号分解的脉冲多普勒雷达抗扫频式干扰方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2024, 45(6): 2076-2084.

CHEN Qile, QIAN Pengfei, KONG Zhijie, QIAO Caixia, ZHANG Ruiheng. Anti-sweep-jamming Method for PD Radar Based on Variational Signal Decomposition[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2024, 45(6): 2076-2084.

图/表 13

图1 雷达中频信号时频特性示意图

Fig.1 Time-frequency characteristics of radar intermediate frequency signal

图2 扫频式干扰效果

Fig.2 Effect of sweep jamming

图3 抗干扰方法总体方案

Fig.3 Scheme of anti-sweep-jamming method

图4 MC函数曲线

Fig.4 Curve of MC function

图5 MC正则项和L1正则项对比结果

Fig.5 Comparison of MC regularizer and L1 norm regularizer

图6 变分正则化效果图

Fig.6 Schematic diagram of variational regularization

图7 VSD算法流程图

Fig.7 Flow chart of VSD algorithm

图8 VSD算法处理结果

Fig.8 Processing results of VSD algorithm

图9 不同算法结果对比

Fig.9 Simulated results of different algorithms

图10 不同算法作用下雷达的距离-多普勒仿真结果

Fig.10 Range-Doppler simulated results based on different algorithms

图11 抗干扰测试场景

Fig.11 Experimental scenario

图12 雷达全相干解调输出

Fig.12 Outputs of radar after correlation demodulation

图13 不同方法抗干扰成功率仿真结果

Fig.13 Simulated results of anti-jamming success rates of different methods

参考文献 25

[1]	于洪海, 闫晓鹏, 贾瑞丽, 等. M序列伪码调相脉冲多普勒引信抗干扰性能研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(3): 417-425. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2020.03.001
	YU H H, YAN X P, JIA R L, et al. Research on anti-jamming performance of M-sequence pseudo-random code phase modulation pulse doppler fuze[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2020, 41(3): 417-425. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2020.03.001
[2]	张亮, 王国宏, 张翔宇, 等. 基于多阶次二维分数阶傅里叶变换的频谱弥散干扰抑制算法[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(9): 1826-1836. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2020.09.015
	ZHANG L, WANG G H, ZHANG X Y, et al. Smeared spectrum jamming suppression algorithm based on multiple orders 2D-FRFT[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2020, 41(9): 1826-1836. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2020.09.015
[3]	陈建军, 王盛利. 基于匹配傅立叶变换的超高速运动目标检测[J]. 兵工学报, 2007, 28(11): 1315-1319.
	CHEN J J, WANG S L. Detection of ultra-high speed moving target based on matched fourier transform[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2007, 28(11): 1315-1319. (in Chinese)
[4]	赵惠昌. 无线电引信设计原理与方法[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2012:147-161.
	ZHAO H C. Fundamentals and methodology of radio fuze[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2012:147-161. (in Chinese)
[5]	刘少坤, 闫晓鹏, 栗苹, 等. 基于码元重构的伪码调相脉冲多普勒引信干扰信号设计[J]. 兵工学报, 2018, 39(6): 1088-1094. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2018.06.007
	LIU S K, YAN X P, LI P, et al. Design of jamming signal on pseudo-random code phase-modulation and pulse doppler combined fuze based on code reconstruction[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2018, 39(6): 1088-1094. (in Chinese)
[6]	李剑锋, 闫晓鹏, 郝新红, 等. 基于生成对抗网络的伪码调相脉冲多普勒引信引导式干扰方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(10): 2534-2544.
	LI J F, YAN X P, HAO X H, et al. Guided jamming method for pseudo-code phase-modulated pulse doppler fuze based on generative adversarial nets[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2022, 43(10): 2534-2544. (in Chinese) doi: 10.12382/bgxb.2021.0504
[7]	ANDREW, DARDINE. ALQ-218(V) (ICAP III)[J]. Electronic Warfare Forecast, 2012: 23-28.
[8]	周新刚, 赵惠昌, 涂友超. 脉冲多普勒引信抗干扰性能评判方法和仿真[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2011, 23(1): 207-211.
	ZHOU X G, ZHAO H C, TU Y C. ECCM evaluation and simulation of pulse doppler fuze[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2011, 23(1): 207-211. (in Chinese)
[9]	周新刚, 赵惠昌, 涂友超, 等. 基于多普勒效应的伪码调相及其与PAM复合引信的抗噪声性能分析[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2008, 30(8): 1874-1877.
	ZHOU X G, ZHAO H C, TU Y C, et al. Performance analysis concerning anti-noise for pseudo-random code phase modulation and pulse amplitude modulation combined fuze based on doppler effect[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2008, 30(8): 1874-1877. (in Chinese)
[10]	涂友超, 赵惠昌, 周新刚. 噪声调频干扰下伪码调相引信启动概率分析[J]. 南京理工大学学报, 2011, 35(2): 252-256.
	TU Y C, ZHAO H C, ZHOU X G. Analysis on starting probability of pseudo-random binary-phase-coded fuze under noise FM jamming[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Science and Technology, 2011, 35(2): 252-256. (in Chinese)
[11]	李泽, 栗苹, 郝新红, 等. 脉冲多普勒引信抗有源噪声干扰性能研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2015, 36(6): 1001-1008. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2015.06.006
	LI Z, LI P, HAO X H, et al. Anti-active noise jamming performance of pulse doppler fuze[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2015, 36(6): 1001-1008. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2015.06.006
[12]	代健, 晏祺, 闫晓鹏, 等. 基于模糊c-均值增量更新的脉冲多普勒引信干扰与目标信号识别[J]. 兵工学报, 2018, 39(9): 1711-1718. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2018.09.006
	DAI J, YAN Q, YAN X P, et al. Recognition of jamming and target signal for pulse doppler fuze based on fcm algorithm with incremental update[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2018, 39(9): 1711-1718. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2018.09.006
[13]	代健, 李泽, 郝新红, 等. 基于目标联合特征提取的脉冲多普勒引信抗干扰方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2019, 40(2): 225-233. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2019.02.001
	DAI J, LI Z, HAO X H, et al. Anti-jamming method for pulse doppler fuze based on joint feature extraction of target signal[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2019, 40(2): 225-233. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2019.02.001
[14]	DAI J, HAO X H, LI Z, et al. Adaptive target and jamming recognition for the pulse doppler radar fuze based on a time-frequency joint feature and an online-updated naive bayesian classifier with minimal risk[J]. Defence Technology, 2022, 18(3): 457-466. doi: 10.1016/j.dt.2021.02.008
[15]	DAI J, HAO X H, LIU Q, et al. Repeater jamming suppression method for pulse doppler fuze based on identity recognition and chaotic encryption[J]. Defence Technology, 2021, 17(3): 1002-1012. doi: 10.1016/j.dt.2020.06.023
[16]	DAUBECHIES I, LU J F, WU H T. Synchrosqueezed wavelet transforms: an empirical mode decomposition-like tool[J]. Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis, 2011, 30(2): 243-261.
[17]	HUANG N E, SHEN Z, LONG S R, et al. The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical Physical & Engineering Sciences, 1998, 454(1971): 903-995.
[18]	SONG C Y, XU J M, ZHAN Y. A method for specific emitter identification based on empirical mode decomposition[C]∥Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Information Security. Beijing, China: IEEE, 2010: 54-57.
[19]	DRAGOMIRETSKIY K, ZOSSO D. Variational Mode Decomposition[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2013, 62(3): 531-544.
[20]	STALLONE A, CICONE A, MATERASSI M. New insights and best practices for the successful use of empirical mode decomposition, iterative filtering and derived algorithms[J]. Scientific Reports, 2020, 10(1): 156161.
[21]	SINGH P. Novel Fourier quadrature transforms and analytic signal representations for nonlinear and non-stationary ime-series analysis[J]. Royal Society Open Science, 2018, 11(5): 181131.
[22]	SELESNICK I, LANZA A, MORIGI S. Non-convex total variation regularization for convex denoising of signals[J]. Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, 2020, 62(6): 825-841.
[23]	CICONE A. Iterative filtering as a direct method for the decomposition of nonstationary signals[J]. Numerical Algorithms, 2020, 85(3): 811-827.
[24]	ZHANG S, XIE W, ZHU H, et al. Combined eigenvector analysis and independent component analysis for multi-component periodic interferences suppression in PRCPM-PD detection system[J]. IEEE Access, 2017, 5: 12552-12562.
[25]	CHEN J J, ZHAO H Z, QIU W. A novel CFAR threshold estimated method for coherent integration detector of PD radar seeker[C] ∥Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE CIE International Conference on Radar, Chengdu, China: IEEE, 2011: 1712-1715.