基于声场模信号特征和多项式拟合的声速剖面反演技术研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2019.11.013

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对未知环境下利用经验正交函数表示声速剖面的局限性，提出了一种基于多项式拟合和模信号相结合的声速剖面反演方法。介绍了模信号的概念和深海分布特性，通过理论分析和仿真分析，证明低阶多项式拟合可用于深海声速剖面的表征，并提出采用5阶多项式拟合以实现对2 000 m以浅的声速剖面较精确的表征。在反演处理流程中，利用不同参数的多项式拟合计算获得拷贝模信号，利用脉冲声信号获得数据模信号，并通过遗传算法进行参数寻优。以典型Munk剖面为例仿真分析基于垂直阵、单水听器、非海面海底反射(SRBR)信号的反演性能，单水听器的声速剖面反演与垂直阵性能接近，并提出基于非SRBR模信号反演可以提升在海底参数未知条件下反演的技术思路。利用4 000 m海深的单水听器接收的脉冲信号（距离180 km，接收与发射深度均为100 m）进行方法性能验证，结果表明，共轭深度以下（100~2 000 m）的声速剖面反演误差小于0.2 m/s.

关键词: 单水听器, 声场模信号, 声速剖面, 匹配场, 遗传算法, 多项式拟合

Abstract: A sound speed profile inversion method based on mode signal and polynomial fitting is proposed for the limitation of using the empirical orthogonal function to represent the sound speed profile in unknown environment. A concept of mode signal and the distribution characteristics of deep sea are given. It is proven through theoretical analysis and simulation that the low-order polynomial fitting can be used for presenting the sound speed profile in seabed.The five-order polynomial fitting can be used for accurately presenting the sound speed profile in 2 000 m-depth sea water. And in the inversion process, the copy mode signal vector is obtained by polynomial fitting of different parameters, and the mode signal is obtained from the test data by using the pulse acoustic signal, of which the parameters are optimized by genetic algorithm. The inversion performances of vertical array, single hydrophone and non-SRBR signal are simulated and analyzed by taking typical Munk profile as an example. It is concluded that the higher the order of polynomial is, the better the fitting effect of sound speed profile is. When a certain error is allowed, the lower order can be used for fitting the sound speed profile. The simulated results show that the performance of sound speed profile inversion using a single hydrophone is close to that of the vertical array, and the inversion performance under the condition of unknown seabed parameters can be improved by using the non-SRBR mode signal inversion. And finally, the performance of the proposed method is verified by using the pulse signal received by the single hydrophone in 4 000 m-depth sea water (distance: 180 km, and receiving and transmitting depth: 100 m). The results show that the inversion error of sound speed profile is less than 0.2 m/s. Key

Key words: singlehydrophone, modesignal, soundspeedprofile, matched-field, geneticalgorithm, polynomialfitting

中图分类号:

TB566

刘福臣，姬托，张巧力. 基于声场模信号特征和多项式拟合的声速剖面反演技术研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2019, 40(11): 2283-2295.

LIU Fuchen, JI Tuo, ZHANG Qiaoli. Sound Speed Profile Inversion Based on Mode Signal and Polynomial Fitting[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2019, 40(11): 2283-2295.

参考文献

［1］ BUCKER H P. Use of calculated sound fields and matched-field detection to locate sound sources in shallow water［J］. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1976, 59(2):368-373.
［2］ JENSEN F B, KUPERMAN W A, PORTER M B, et al. Computational ocean acoustics［M］. New York, NY, US: Springer, 1994.
［3］ PORTER M B. The KRAKEN normal mode program［J］. SACLANT Undersea Research Centre, 1995, 12(5):35-69.
［4］沈远海, 马远良, 屠庆平, 等. 浅水声速剖面的反演方法与实验验证［J］. 西北工业大学学报, 2000, 18(2):212-215.
SHEN Y H, MA Y L, TU Q P, et al. Inversion method and experimental verification of shallow water acoustic velocity profile［J］. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2000, 18(2): 212-215.(in Chinese)
［5］张振迈, 李整林, 戴琼兴. 利用有限深度声速数据重构全海深声速剖面［J］. 声学技术, 2008, 10, 27(5):18-23.
ZHANG Z M, LI Z L, DAI Q X. Sound speed profile reconstruction from the data measured in a limit depth［J］. Technical Acoustics, 2008, 10, 27(5):18-23. (in Chinese)

［6］ LI Z L, HE L, ZHANG R H, et al. Sound speed profile inversion using a horizontal line array in shallow water［J］. Science China: Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy, 2015, 58(1):1-7.

图14 利用非SRBR模信号的声速剖面反演收敛图
Fig.14 Convergent graphs of sound speed profile inversion parameters based on non-SRBR mode signal

图15 非SRBR模信号
Fig.15 Non-SRBR mode signal

图16 测量声速剖面
Fig.16 Sound speed profiles on sea areas

图17 深水声传播测线海深分布
Fig.17 Water depth of sea test route

图18 接收信号(距离48.9 km、深度300 m)
Fig.18 Signal received by the hydrophone (distance:
48.9 km, and depth: 300 m)

图19 接收信号(距离48.9 km、深度400 m)
Fig.19 Signal received by the hydrophone (distance:
48.9 km, and depth: 400 m)

图20 测量声速剖面和反演声速剖面对比
Fig.20 Comparison of measured and inversion
sound speed profiles

图21 测量声速剖面和反演声速剖面误差
Fig.21 Inversion sound speed profile error

［7］何利, 李整林, 张仁和, 等. 匹配声场干涉结构反演海水声速剖面［J］. 中国科学:物理学力学天文学, 2013，43(增刊1):112-120.
HE L, LI Z L, ZHANG R H, et al. Sound speed profile inversion by matching the acoustic intensity striations in shallow water［J］. Scientia Sinica: Physica, Mechanica & Astronomica, 2013, 43(S1): 112-120. (in Chinese)
［8］ YU Y, LI Z, HE L. Matched-field inversion of sound speed profile in shallow water using a parallel genetic algorithm［J］. Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, 2010, 28(5):1080-1085.
［9］何利, 李整林, 彭朝晖, 等. 南海北部海水声速剖面声学反演［J］. 中国科学:物理学力学天文学, 2011，41(1):49-57.
HE L, LI Z L, PENG C H, et al. Acoustic inversion of the sound velocity profile of the northern South China Sea［J］. Scientia Sinica: Physica, Mechanica & Astronomica, 2011，41(1): 49-57.(in Chinese)
［10］何利, 李整林, 张仁和, 等. 东中国海声速剖面的经验正交函数表示与匹配场反演［J］. 自然科学进展, 2006, 16(3): 351-355.
HE L, LI Z L, ZHANG R H, et al. Empirical orthogonal function representation and matching field inversion of sound velocity profile in the East China Sea［J］. Progress in Natural Science, 2006,16(3): 351-355. (in Chinese)
［11］ TOLSTOY A. Linearization of the matched field processing approach to acoustic tomography［J］. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1992, 91(2):781-787.
［12］ LIU F, ZHOU L, LIU K, et al. The same-mode coherent characteristic quantity in distinguishing the surface and underwater target［C］∥Proceedings of IEEE/OES China Ocean Acoustics Symposium. Harbin, China: IEEE, 2016:1-8.
［13］ BATTLE D J, GERSTOFT P, HODGKISS W S, et al. Bayesian model selection applied to self-noise geoacoustic inversion［J］. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2004, 116(4):2043-2056.

［14］ BATTLE D J, GERSTOFT P, KUPERMAN W A, et al. Geoacoustic inversion of tow-ship noise via near-field matched-field processing［J］. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 2003, 28(3): 454-467.
［15］ PARK C, SEONG W, GERSTOFT P. Geoacoustic inversion in time domain using ship of opportunity noise recorded on a horizontal towed array［J］. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2005, 117(4):1933-1941.
［16］ PARK C, SEONG W, GERSTOFT P, et al. Time-domain geoacoustic inversion of high-frequency chirp signal from a simple towed system［J］. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 2003, 28(3):468-478.
［17］ SIDERIUS M, NIELSEN P L, GERSTOFT P. Range-dependent seabed characterization by inversion of acoustic data from a towed receiver array［J］. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2002, 112(4):1523-1535.
［18］ PARK J C, KENNEDY R M. Remote sensing of ocean sound speed profiles by a perceptron neural network［J］. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 1996, 21(2):216-224.
［19］ ZHANG Z B, MA Y L, YANG K D. Inversion for sound speed profile in shallow water using matched-beam processing［J］. Chinese Journal of Acoustics, 2004, 23(3):259-267.
［20］吴双林, 李整林, 秦继兴. 南海深海海底声学参数反演［J］.声学技术, 2015,12,34(6):139-142.
WU S L, LI Z L, QIN J X. Geoacoustic inversion for bottom parameters in the deep-water area of the South China Sea［J］. Technical Acoustics, 2015,12,34(6):139-142. (in Chinese)

第40卷
第11期2019 年11月兵工学报ACTA
ARMAMENTARIIVol.40No.11Nov.2019

[1]	马也，范文慧，常天庆. 基于智能算法的无人集群防御作战方案优化方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(6): 1415-1425.
[2]	汤润之, 班利明, 钱乐, 雷争军, 宋卫星. 资源受限条件下车辆维修工序调度优化[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(9): 2032-2039.
[3]	司骥跃，庞兆君，由锰，冯广斌，杜忠华. 空间绳网结构设计及优化方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(5): 1065-1073.
[4]	冯睽睽，张发平，王武宏，张文杰，张田会. 基于非支配排序遗传算法的涡轮发动机转子系统装配参数优化[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(5): 1092-1100.
[5]	高子茵，杜明刚，李慎龙，李晋. 基于遗传算法优化和模糊控制动态优化的自动变速器换挡规律设计[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(4): 684-696.
[6]	王少华，吕会强，董原生，张远. 装备伴随抢修任务分配决策方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(1): 192-198.
[7]	刘秋，孙晋伟，张华, 胡煦，顾亮. 基于卷积神经网络的路面识别及半主动悬架控制[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(8): 1483-1493.
[8]	叶海潮，范武林，秦国华，林锋，郑许，杨扬. 基于翘曲度阈值约束的铝合金板材热轧工艺优化与实验验证[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(8): 1623-1632.
[9]	杨管金子，李建辰，黄海，国琳娜. 基于最优解析的陀螺现场免转台标校方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(3): 577-584.
[10]	赵星宇，白春华，姚箭，孙彬峰. 燃料空气炸药爆轰产物JWL状态方程参数计算[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(10): 1921-1929.
[11]	张富毅，吴钦，赵晓阳，刘影，王国玉. 基于响应面方法的喷水推进器进水流道多目标优化[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(10): 2071-2080.
[12]	宫志华，段鹏伟，刘洋，陈春江，吕海东. 多样本遗传算法在武器外弹道组网试验中的应用[J]. 兵工学报, 2019, 40(7): 1503-1510.
[13]	刘昊，张策，丁文韬. 基于智能对抗进化的联合火力打击任务规划方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2019, 40(6): 1287-1296.
[14]	富威，吴琼，崔运山，刘琪，周超. 舰炮身管的抗振性能优化研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2019, 40(2): 234-242.
[15]	张进秋，王兴野，贾进峰，孙宜权，李欣. 主动悬架有限频域H_∞时滞控制参数影响分析及优化[J]. 兵工学报, 2018, 39(9): 1850-1857.