基于GO法和RCM的惯性导航系统预测维修平台设计

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2014.09.017

兵工学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (9): 1443-1450.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2014.09.017

基于GO法和RCM的惯性导航系统预测维修平台设计

江秀红^1,2，段富海¹，陈璞³，金霞¹

(1.大连理工大学传感测控研究所，辽宁大连 116024； 2.沈阳航空航天大学电子信息工程学院，辽宁沈阳 110136；

收稿日期:2013-11-25 修回日期:2013-11-25 上线日期:2014-11-03
通讯作者: 江秀红 E-mail:jxh_mt@163.com
作者简介:江秀红（1977—），女，讲师，博士研究生
基金资助:
航空科学基金项目（20130863006）；中央高校基本科研业务费专项（DUT12LK21）

Design of Predictive Maintenance Platform for INS Based on GO Methodology and RCM

JIANG Xiu-hong^1,2， DUAN Fu-hai¹， CHEN Pu³， JIN Xia¹

(1.Institute of Sensor Measurement and Control Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, Liaoning, China;2.College of Electronic and Information Engineering, Shenyang Aerospace University, Shenyang 110136, Liaoning, China;3.AVIC Xi’an Flight Automatic Control Research Institute, Xi’an 710065, Shaanxi, China)

Received:2013-11-25 Revised:2013-11-25 Online:2014-11-03
Contact: JIANG Xiu-hong E-mail:jxh_mt@163.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对惯性导航系统（INS）结构复杂、难以进行精确的系统可靠性分析和维修优化等问题，提出了一种基于GO法和以可靠性为中心的维修（RCM）的INS预测维修平台设计方法。利用GO法建立INS的可靠性分析模型—GO图，依据部件的寿命分布函数及时间应力采样更新部件的可靠度，实现部件残余寿命及系统可靠度的动态预测和评估。对不满足系统可靠性指标的INS，利用综合评价法权衡部件的贡献度、失效频度、检测度等影响因素，计算出各部件的维修优先度。最后按INS部件失效率恒定、失效率可变及故障部件隔离等不同情况分别进行仿真验证，结果证明所设计的INS预测维修平台是可行的、有效的，评价结果可为维修计划的制定提供参考依据。针对惯性导航系统（INS）结构复杂、难以进行精确的系统可靠性分析和维修优化等问题，提出了一种基于GO法和以可靠性为中心的维修（RCM）的INS预测维修平台设计方法。利用GO法建立INS的可靠性分析模型—GO图，依据部件的寿命分布函数及时间应力采样更新部件的可靠度，实现部件残余寿命及系统可靠度的动态预测和评估。对不满足系统可靠性指标的INS，利用综合评价法权衡部件的贡献度、失效频度、检测度等影响因素，计算出各部件的维修优先度。最后按INS部件失效率恒定、失效率可变及故障部件隔离等不同情况分别进行仿真验证，结果证明所设计的INS预测维修平台是可行的、有效的，评价结果可为维修计划的制定提供参考依据。

关键词: 系统评估与可行性分析, 惯性导航系统, GO法, RCM, 预测性维修

Abstract: A design method of predictive maintenance platform based on GO methodology and reliability-centered maintenance(RCM) is proposed for the complex structure, reliability analysis and optimal maintenance of inertial navigation system (INS). GO methodology is applied to build the INS reliability analyses model—GO chart. In order to realize the dynamic prediction and evaluation of the residual lives of components and the system reliability, the components reliability are updated continuously based on life distribution functions and time stress samples. For the INS that fails to meet the system reliability index, the maintenance priorities of all components are given quantitatively by adopting the comprehensive evaluation method to balance the affecting factors of components: contribution to system, failure likelihood and detection difficulty. Finally, some simulations are processed under the situations of constant failure rate, variable failure rate and fault isolation of INS components. The results show that the proposed predictive maintenance platform for INS is feasible and effective, and the predicted results can be used as a reference for making scientific maintenance decisions.

Key words: system assessment and feasibility analysis, inertial navigation system, GO methodology, RCM, predictive maintenance

中图分类号:

V240.2

江秀红，段富海，陈璞，金霞. 基于GO法和RCM的惯性导航系统预测维修平台设计[J]. 兵工学报, 2014, 35(9): 1443-1450.

JIANG Xiu-hong， DUAN Fu-hai， CHEN Pu， JIN Xia. Design of Predictive Maintenance Platform for INS Based on GO Methodology and RCM[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2014, 35(9): 1443-1450.

参考文献

［1］ Charles E E. 可靠性与维修性工程概论[M]. 康锐, 李瑞莹, 王乃超, 等，译. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2010: 169-190.
Charles E Ebeling. An introduction to reliability and maintainability engineering[M]. KANG Rui, LI Rui-ying, WANG Nai-chao, et al, translated. Beijing:Tsinghua University Press, 2010: 169-190. (in Chinese)
[2] Jardine A K, Lin D, Banjevic D. A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing,2006, 20(7): 1483-1510.
[3] 李树广, 赵彦峻, 徐诚, 等. 装备维修备件需求预测与决策方法研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2011, 32(7): 901-905.
LI Shu-guang, ZHAO Yan-jun, XU Cheng, et al. The study of requirement forecasting and decision-making methodology of equipment’s maintenance spares-parts[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2011, 32(7): 901-905. (in Chinese)
[4] 顾煜炯, 董玉亮, 杨昆. 基于模糊评判和 RCM 分析的发电设备状态综合评价[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2004, 24(6): 189- 194.
GU Yu-jiong, DONG Yu-liang, YANG Kun. Synthetic evaluation on conditions of equipment in power plant based on fuzzy judgment and RCM analysis[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2004, 24(6): 189-194. (in Chinese)
[5] 徐玉国, 邱静, 刘冠军, 等. 基于损伤标尺的电子设备预测维修决策优化[J]. 航空学报, 2012, 33(11): 2093-2103.
XU Yu-guo, QIU Jing, LIU Guan-jun, et al. Optimal predictive maintenance decision of electronics based on canaries[J]. Acts Aeronautics et Astronautics Sinica, 2012, 33(11): 2093-2103. (in Chinese)
[6] Compare Michele, Zio Enrico. Risk sensitive particle filtering in support of predictive maintenance[J]. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 2013, 33: 307-312.
[7] Ivan Mustakerov, Daniela Borissova. An intelligent approach to optimal predictive maintenance strategy defining [C]∥2013 IEEE International Symposium on Innovations in Intelligent Systems and Applications. Albena,Bulgaria: IEEE, 2013.
[8] William R W. Reliability engineering approach to achieve RCM for mechanical systems-2012[C]∥2012Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium. Reno, Nevada:Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc, 2012.
[9] Vichare N M, Pecht M G. Prognostics and health management of electronics[J]. IEEE Transactions on Components and Packaging Technologies, 2006, 29(1): 222-229.
[10] Chun B B. GO methodology: overview manual, EPRI NP- 3123l[R]. Washington, DC, US: Electric Power Research Institute, 1983.
[11] 沈祖培, 黄祥瑞. GO法原理及应用——一种系统可靠性分析方法[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2004: 169-190.
SHEN Zu-pei, HUANG Xiang-rui. Principle and application of GO methodology—a system reliability analysis methodology[M]. Beijing:Tsinghua University Press, 2004: 169-190. (in Chinese)
[12] 李哲, 鲁宗相, 刘井泉. 基于GO法的核电厂电气主接线系统可靠性分析[J]. 核动力工程, 2010, 31(3): 69-73.
LI Zhe, LU Zong-xiang, LIU Jing-quan. Reliability analysis of nuclear power plant bus systems arrangement based on GO methodology[J]. Nuclear Power Engineering, 2010, 31(3): 69-73. (in Chinese)
[13] 龚剑波, 黄民翔, 徐国锋. 基于改进GO 法的1 000 kV电气主接线可靠性研究[J]. 机电工程, 2012,29(2): 215-219.
GONG Jian-bo, HUANG Min-xiang, XU Guo-feng. Reliability research of 1 000 kV main electrical connections based on improved GO methodology[J]. Journal Mechanical & Electrical Engineering, 2012, 29(2): 215-219. (in Chinese)
[14] Shen Z P, Gao J, Huang X R. A new quantification algorithm for the GO methodology[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2000, 67(3): 241-247.
[15] Shen Z P, Gao J, Huang X R. An exact algorithm dealing with shared signals in the GO methodology[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2001, 73(2): 177-181.

[1]	李景奎，林文杰，江秀红，卢雨泽. 基于GO-Markov的飞机燃油闭环控制系统可靠性分析[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(6): 1447-1455.
[2]	张羽，王朋，刘纪元，钟荣兴，韦琳哲，迟骋. 合成孔径声纳重叠相位中心与惯性导航系统联合估计运动误差算法[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(3): 588-597.
[3]	戴天，缪玲娟，邵海俊. 一种基于多波束测深仪的水下同步定位与地图构建方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(7): 1384-1392.
[4]	沈世斌，谢非，赵静，钱伟行，康国华，刘锡祥. 基于相位控制的惯性与卫星超紧组合导航系统信号解调方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(3): 495-506.
[5]	胡杰，严勇杰，王子卉. 基于速度约束与模糊自适应滤波的车载组合导航[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(2): 231-238.
[6]	王琪，汪立新，梁树晖，秦伟伟，沈强. 基于可观测性分析的混合式惯性导航系统连续自标定模型选择[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(1): 56-67.
[7]	朱兵，许江宁，吴苗，李京书，何泓洋，李峰. 基于逆向导航算法的捷联式惯性导航系统改进优化对准方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2019, 40(9): 1860-1870.
[8]	董春梅，任顺清，陈希军，李巍. 一种激光陀螺捷联惯性导航系统级标定方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2019, 40(8): 1618-1626.
[9]	徐昊玮，廉保旺，刘尚波. 基于滑动窗迭代最大后验估计的多源组合导航因子图融合算法[J]. 兵工学报, 2019, 40(4): 807-819.
[10]	江秀红，段富海，胡爱玲. 一种新型GO法操作符及其在多态系统中的应用[J]. 兵工学报, 2019, 40(4): 857-864.
[11]	李群生，赵剡，王进达. 一种适用于高动态强干扰环境的视觉辅助微机械捷联惯性导航系统/全球定位系统超紧组合导航系统[J]. 兵工学报, 2019, 40(11): 2241-2249.
[12]	刘生攀, 王文举, 饶兴桥. 单轴旋转捷联惯性导航系统误差分析与转位方案研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2018, 39(9): 1749-1755.
[13]	李伟，姜俊峰，任海波，张光辉. 行进间火炮指向稳定跟踪系统建模与控制[J]. 兵工学报, 2018, 39(8): 1479-1490.
[14]	王蕾，王玮，刘增军，宋天骁. 混合式惯性导航系统全数字平台技术研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2018, 39(7): 1316-1322.
[15]	周召发，胡文，张志利，徐梓皓，陈河. 一种新的捷联惯性导航系统姿态四元数方程求解方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2018, 39(3): 511-518.

基于GO法和RCM的惯性导航系统预测维修平台设计

Design of Predictive Maintenance Platform for INS Based on GO Methodology and RCM

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价