Acta Armamentarii ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (2): 240276-.doi: 10.12382/bgxb.2024.0276
Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHANG Xueying1, GAO Xin1,2,*(), XIAO Zeqi1, LIU Kaiyuan1, YUE Lidan1, QIN Zhiqi1, CHEN Pengwan1,3,4,**(
)
Received:
2024-04-11
Online:
2025-02-28
Contact:
GAO Xin, CHEN Pengwan
CLC Number:
ZHANG Xueying, GAO Xin, XIAO Zeqi, LIU Kaiyuan, YUE Lidan, QIN Zhiqi, CHEN Pengwan. Study on Shock-induced Phase Transition of CsPbBr3 through Pulsed Discharge of Cylindrical Wire Array in Water Medium[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2025, 46(2): 240276-.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
序号 | N | U0/kV | E/kJ | 前驱体 |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 15 | 6 | 4.50 | CsPbBr3 |
2 | 15 | 12 | 18.00 | CsPbBr3 |
3 | 15 | 15 | 28.13 | CsPbBr3 |
4 | 15 | 15 | 28.13 |
Table 1 Experimental conditions of pulsed discharge of cylindrical copper wire array
序号 | N | U0/kV | E/kJ | 前驱体 |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 15 | 6 | 4.50 | CsPbBr3 |
2 | 15 | 12 | 18.00 | CsPbBr3 |
3 | 15 | 15 | 28.13 | CsPbBr3 |
4 | 15 | 15 | 28.13 |
序号 | K |
---|---|
1 | 2.16 |
2 | 8.65 |
3 | 13.52 |
4 | 13.52 |
Table 2 Overheating factor values of pulsed discharge of cylindrical copper wire array
序号 | K |
---|---|
1 | 2.16 |
2 | 8.65 |
3 | 13.52 |
4 | 13.52 |
序号 | 峰值电流/kA | 周期/μs | 脉宽/μs |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 320.09 | 164.04 | 43.09 |
2 | 451.12 | 186.74 | 50.87 |
3 | 633.85 | 160.06 | 46.05 |
4 | 631.17 | 160.06 | 45.49 |
Table 3 Characteristic parameters of pulsed discharge of cylindrical copper wire array
序号 | 峰值电流/kA | 周期/μs | 脉宽/μs |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 320.09 | 164.04 | 43.09 |
2 | 451.12 | 186.74 | 50.87 |
3 | 633.85 | 160.06 | 46.05 |
4 | 631.17 | 160.06 | 45.49 |
序号 | Wt/(J·m-1) | τ/μs | T/μs | pm/MPa | pr/MPa | pN/MPa |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 56250 | 21.53 | 41 | 189.26 | 151.39 | 586.34 |
2 | 225000 | 25.44 | 44.5 | 334.39 | 267.49 | 1035.98 |
3 | 351562.5 | 23.03 | 40 | 463.38 | 370.67 | 1435.58 |
Table 4 Pressure calculation results of pulsed discharge of wire array
序号 | Wt/(J·m-1) | τ/μs | T/μs | pm/MPa | pr/MPa | pN/MPa |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 56250 | 21.53 | 41 | 189.26 | 151.39 | 586.34 |
2 | 225000 | 25.44 | 44.5 | 334.39 | 267.49 | 1035.98 |
3 | 351562.5 | 23.03 | 40 | 463.38 | 370.67 | 1435.58 |
原料和 样品 | A峰 | B峰 | C峰 | D峰(主峰) | E峰 | F峰 | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
峰位/ (°) | 相对 峰强 | 偏差 | 峰位/ (°) | 相对 峰强 | 偏差 | 峰位/ (°) | 相对 峰强 | 偏差 | 峰位/ (°) | 相对 峰强 | 偏差 | 峰位/ (°) | 相对 峰强 | 偏差 | 峰位/ (°) | 相对 峰强 | 偏差 | ||
原料 | 15.30 | 0.26 | 21.56 | 0.58 | 30.46 | 0.27 | 30.80 | 1 | 37.91 | 0.45 | 43.81 | 0.35 | |||||||
1号样品 | 15.26 | 0.26 | -0.04 | 21.56 | 0.38 | 0 | 30.46 | 0.44 | 0 | 30.80 | 1 | 0 | 37.91 | 0.18 | 0 | 43.80 | 0.24 | -0.01 | |
2号样品 | 15.34 | 0.20 | 0.04 | 21.68 | 1.16 | 0.12 | 30.62 | 0.72 | 0.16 | 30.91 | 1 | 0.11 | 37.91 | 0.71 | 0 | 44.01 | 0.72 | 0.20 | |
3号样品 | 15.36 | 0.15 | 0.06 | 21.69 | 0.76 | 0.13 | 30.62 | 0.82 | 0.16 | 30.91 | 1 | 0.11 | 37.91 | 0.91 | 0 | 43.94 | 1.08 | 0.13 |
Table 5 XRD results of recovered samples
原料和 样品 | A峰 | B峰 | C峰 | D峰(主峰) | E峰 | F峰 | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
峰位/ (°) | 相对 峰强 | 偏差 | 峰位/ (°) | 相对 峰强 | 偏差 | 峰位/ (°) | 相对 峰强 | 偏差 | 峰位/ (°) | 相对 峰强 | 偏差 | 峰位/ (°) | 相对 峰强 | 偏差 | 峰位/ (°) | 相对 峰强 | 偏差 | ||
原料 | 15.30 | 0.26 | 21.56 | 0.58 | 30.46 | 0.27 | 30.80 | 1 | 37.91 | 0.45 | 43.81 | 0.35 | |||||||
1号样品 | 15.26 | 0.26 | -0.04 | 21.56 | 0.38 | 0 | 30.46 | 0.44 | 0 | 30.80 | 1 | 0 | 37.91 | 0.18 | 0 | 43.80 | 0.24 | -0.01 | |
2号样品 | 15.34 | 0.20 | 0.04 | 21.68 | 1.16 | 0.12 | 30.62 | 0.72 | 0.16 | 30.91 | 1 | 0.11 | 37.91 | 0.71 | 0 | 44.01 | 0.72 | 0.20 | |
3号样品 | 15.36 | 0.15 | 0.06 | 21.69 | 0.76 | 0.13 | 30.62 | 0.82 | 0.16 | 30.91 | 1 | 0.11 | 37.91 | 0.91 | 0 | 43.94 | 1.08 | 0.13 |
原料和 样品 | 晶型 | a | b | c | α/ (°) | β/ (°) | γ/ (°) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
原料 | 四方 | 5.87721 | 5.87721 | 23.23167 | 90 | 90 | 90 |
1号样品 | 四方 | 5.83567 | 5.83568 | 31.49033 | 90 | 90 | 90 |
2号样品 | 单斜 | 8.23600 | 5.79100 | 5.80800 | 90 | 134.799 | 90 |
3号样品 | 单斜 | 8.70096 | 4.09157 | 6.19904 | 90 | 110.20 | 90 |
Table 6 Calculated results of lattice parameters of raw material and recovered samples
原料和 样品 | 晶型 | a | b | c | α/ (°) | β/ (°) | γ/ (°) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
原料 | 四方 | 5.87721 | 5.87721 | 23.23167 | 90 | 90 | 90 |
1号样品 | 四方 | 5.83567 | 5.83568 | 31.49033 | 90 | 90 | 90 |
2号样品 | 单斜 | 8.23600 | 5.79100 | 5.80800 | 90 | 134.799 | 90 |
3号样品 | 单斜 | 8.70096 | 4.09157 | 6.19904 | 90 | 110.20 | 90 |
原料 | 1号样品 | 2号样品 | 3号样品 |
---|---|---|---|
5.786 | 5.802 | 5.764 | 5.771 |
4.118 | 4.118 | 4.094 | 4.103 |
2.932 | 2.932 | 2.917 | 2.922 |
2.901 | 2.901 | 2.891 | 2.890 |
2.371 | 2.371 | 2.371 | 2.371 |
2.065 | 2.065 | 2.059 | 2.060 |
Table 9 Lattice spacing between the raw material and the recovered sample Å
原料 | 1号样品 | 2号样品 | 3号样品 |
---|---|---|---|
5.786 | 5.802 | 5.764 | 5.771 |
4.118 | 4.118 | 4.094 | 4.103 |
2.932 | 2.932 | 2.917 | 2.922 |
2.901 | 2.901 | 2.891 | 2.890 |
2.371 | 2.371 | 2.371 | 2.371 |
2.065 | 2.065 | 2.059 | 2.060 |
[1] |
|
[2] |
经福谦. 实验物态方程导引[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1999.
|
|
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
李云飞, 高鑫, 陈鹏万, 等. TiB2/B4C复相陶瓷自蔓延热爆炸烧结与性能表征[J]. 兵工学报, 2024, 45(1):26-34.
doi: 10.12382/bgxb.2023.0078 |
|
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
毛志国. 电爆炸金属丝制备纳米粉末的研究[D]. 北京: 清华大学, 2009.
|
|
|
[20] |
周海滨. 水中铜丝微秒电爆炸冲击波产生机制和能量转换特性研究[D]. 西安: 西安交通大学, 2017.
|
|
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
韩若愚, 李柳霞, 钱盾, 等. 液体中金属丝电爆炸的研究现状与展望[J]. 高电压技术, 2021, 47(3):766-777.
|
|
|
[25] |
钱盾, 刘志刚, 邹晓兵, 等. 给定储能下水中金属丝阵电爆炸冲击波增强的方法[J]. 高电压技术, 2021, 47(3):815-825.
|
|
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
|
[31] |
|
[32] |
|
[33] |
|
[34] |
|
[35] |
|
[36] |
doi: 10.1002/adma.201502567 |
[37] |
doi: 10.1039/c9cs00598f pmid: 31960011 |
[38] |
|
[39] |
卫芝贤, 王雅乐, 高原, 等. La0.8Sr0.2CoO3-δ的合成、表征及对硝胺改性双基推进剂的燃烧性能影响研究[J]. 兵工学报. 2013, 34(9):1072-1077.
|
|
|
[40] |
卫芝贤, 刘海燕, 张学俊, 等. LaFeO3和Fe2O3制备及其对三硝基甲苯光催化降解作用研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2009, 30(12):1596-1601.
|
|
|
[41] |
卫芝贤, 胡长文, 李延斌, 等. 硬脂酸溶胶—凝胶法制备超细LaCoO3及对硝胺改性双基推进剂燃烧性能的影响研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2007, 28(11):1310-1314.
|
|
|
[42] |
|
[43] |
doi: 10.1016/j.mattod.2019.02.016 |
[44] |
doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b05260 pmid: 28682634 |
[45] |
周爱武. 丝电爆制备纳米粉电参数的测试及分析研究[D]. 兰州: 兰州理工大学, 2013.
|
|
|
[46] |
李业勋. 金属丝电爆炸机理及特性研究[D]. 北京: 中国工程物理研究院, 2002.
|
|
|
[47] |
|
[48] |
|
[49] |
|
[1] | REN Guowu, KANG Huaipu, ZHANG Shaolong, ZHANG Chongyu, CHEN Yongtao, TANG Tiegang. Investigating the Shockwave Collision of Different Metals Driven by Two-point Lateral Symmetric Initiation [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2024, 45(11): 3892-3902. |
[2] | XIONG Manman, QIN Bin, XU Cheng, AN Shuo, WU Yang. Dynamic Physical Response Law of Protected/Unprotected Head Surrogate Under Shock Wave [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2022, 43(9): 2182-2189. |
[3] | SHEN Wenni, HOU Lijun, TANG Jiawei, MU Chunyuan, ZHANG Haoyu, XU Tao. Experimental Investigation of Underwater Blast Injuries to Beagles [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2022, 43(9): 2172-2181. |
[4] | WU Yang, QIN Bin, WANG Shu, XIONG Manman, AN Shuo, LU Haitao, ZHANG Xianfeng. Protective Performance of Helmet Based on Blast Shock Wave [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2022, 43(9): 2121-2128. |
[5] | WANG Mengxin, CHEN Ruiying, WANG Jinxiang. Protective Properties of Porous Foam Aluminum Sandwich Composite Plate under the Combined Action of Fragment and ShockWave [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2021, 42(5): 1041-1052. |
[6] | ZHAO Pin, CHEN Lang, LI Jinhe, LU Jianying, WU Junying. The Characteristics of Explosives Initiated by Precursor Shock Waves in Shaped Charge Jet Penetrating a Bulkhead at DifferentTemperatures [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2021, 42(1): 45-55. |
[7] | DAI Xianghui, DUAN Jian, SHEN Zikai, WANG Kehui, LI Mingrui, LI Pengjie, ZHENG Yafeng, ZHOU Gang. Experiment of Slow Cook-off Response Characteristics of Penetrator [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2020, 41(2): 291-297. |
[8] | HONG Xiaowen, LI Weibing, LI Wenbin, XU Heyang, LI Junbao. Energy Spectrum of Explosion Shock Wave Signals of Multi-layer Composite Charge [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2020, 41(11): 2243-2251. |
[9] | LI Junbao, LI Weibing, WANG Heng, YUAN Shuqiang, WANG Xiaoming, HONG Xiaowen, XU Heyang. Propagation Properties of Shock Wave in Aluminum Powder/rubber Composites under Explosion Loading [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2020, 41(10): 2001-2007. |
[10] | WANG Xinying, WANG Shushan, LU Xi. Experimental Study of the Expansion of Non-standard Metal Cylinders by Detonation [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2019, 40(5): 897-903. |
[11] | WANG Chuanhao, WANG Shushan, ZHANG Jingxiao, WEI Jifeng. Research on Testing Method of Explosion Pressure in Cabin [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2019, 40(5): 1003-1010. |
[12] | JAIO Liqi, HOU Hailiang, CHEN Pengyu, JIN Jian. Research on Dynamic Response and Damage Characteristics of Fixed Supported One-way Stiffened Plates under Blast Loading [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2019, 40(3): 592-600. |
[13] | LIN Yixue, DI Changan, DI Changchun, GONG Xinyu, JI Han. Double Triangle Array Model of Bullet Oblique Penetration Based on Shockwave Propagation Path [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2019, 40(2): 251-256. |
[14] | ZHANG Xiaoyuan, LI Shipeng, YANG Baoyu, WANG Yong, TONG Yue, WANG Ningfei. Analysis of the Flow Instability of Supersonic Gaseous Jets for Submarine Vehicles Working in Deep Water [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2019, 40(12): 2385-2398. |
[15] | WEI Huiyang, RONG Jili, WEI Zhenqian, XIANG Dalin, HE Xuan, ZHAO Zitong. Research on Dynamic Response of Pre-cracked Target Plate Subjected to Underwater Shock Wave [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2019, 40(11): 2250-2258. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||