Acta Armamentarii ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (7): 2053-2065.doi: 10.12382/bgxb.2022.0305
Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHI Ruoyang, LUO Kai, WANG Hanwei, QIN Kan*()
Received:
2022-04-26
Online:
2023-07-30
Contact:
QIN Kan
ZHI Ruoyang, LUO Kai, WANG Hanwei, QIN Kan. Effects of Injection Mass Flow Rate and Position on the Performance of Partial Admission Axial Impulse Turbines with Jet Impingement Cooling[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44(7): 2053-2065.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
参数 | 数值 | 参数 | 数值 |
---|---|---|---|
喷管个数 | 5 | 叶片安放角/(°) | 25 |
喷管喉部直径/mm | 0.56 | 叶片个数 | 75 |
喷管出口直径/mm | 1.27 | 叶片弦长/mm | 1.88 |
喷管斜切角/(°) | 15 | 叶片高度/mm | 1.52 |
喷管扩张角/(°) | 8 | 叶片边缘厚度/mm | 0.08 |
叶片截距/mm | 1.08 | 涡轮中径/mm | 25.76 |
Table 1 Parameters of the axial turbine from Kiely, et al[20]
参数 | 数值 | 参数 | 数值 |
---|---|---|---|
喷管个数 | 5 | 叶片安放角/(°) | 25 |
喷管喉部直径/mm | 0.56 | 叶片个数 | 75 |
喷管出口直径/mm | 1.27 | 叶片弦长/mm | 1.88 |
喷管斜切角/(°) | 15 | 叶片高度/mm | 1.52 |
喷管扩张角/(°) | 8 | 叶片边缘厚度/mm | 0.08 |
叶片截距/mm | 1.08 | 涡轮中径/mm | 25.76 |
边界条件 | 数值 |
---|---|
涡轮机转速/(r·min-1) | 435000 |
入口总温/K | 1255 |
入口总压/MPa | 2.068 |
出口静压/MPa | 0.035 |
Table 2 Boundary conditions of the axial turbine from Kiely, et al[20]
边界条件 | 数值 |
---|---|
涡轮机转速/(r·min-1) | 435000 |
入口总温/K | 1255 |
入口总压/MPa | 2.068 |
出口静压/MPa | 0.035 |
实验结果和仿真结果 | 输出功率/kW | 内效率/% |
---|---|---|
实验结果 | 2.00 | 62.9 |
仿真结果 | 1.95 | 61.4 |
Table 3 Comparison between simulation results and experimental parameters
实验结果和仿真结果 | 输出功率/kW | 内效率/% |
---|---|---|
实验结果 | 2.00 | 62.9 |
仿真结果 | 1.95 | 61.4 |
边界条件 | 实验1 | 仿真1 | 实验2 | 仿真2 | 实验3 | 仿真3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
喷管入口压力 | 1 | 输入 | 0.417 | 输入 | 0.542 | 输入 |
喷管入口温度 | 1 | 输入 | 1.038 | 输入 | 0.962 | 输入 |
出口静压 | 1 | 输入 | 0.692 | 输入 | 0.692 | 输入 |
涡轮机转速 | 1 | 输入 | 0.5 | 输入 | 0.6 | 输入 |
轴向喷水量 | 1 | 输入 | 0.75 | 输入 | 0.85 | 输入 |
轴向喷水温度 | 1 | 输入 | 1 | 输入 | 1 | 输入 |
径向喷水量 | 1 | 输入 | 1 | 输入 | 1 | 输入 |
径向喷水温度 | 1 | 输入 | 1 | 输入 | 1 | 输入 |
Table 4 Boundary conditions of turbine with jet impingement
边界条件 | 实验1 | 仿真1 | 实验2 | 仿真2 | 实验3 | 仿真3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
喷管入口压力 | 1 | 输入 | 0.417 | 输入 | 0.542 | 输入 |
喷管入口温度 | 1 | 输入 | 1.038 | 输入 | 0.962 | 输入 |
出口静压 | 1 | 输入 | 0.692 | 输入 | 0.692 | 输入 |
涡轮机转速 | 1 | 输入 | 0.5 | 输入 | 0.6 | 输入 |
轴向喷水量 | 1 | 输入 | 0.75 | 输入 | 0.85 | 输入 |
轴向喷水温度 | 1 | 输入 | 1 | 输入 | 1 | 输入 |
径向喷水量 | 1 | 输入 | 1 | 输入 | 1 | 输入 |
径向喷水温度 | 1 | 输入 | 1 | 输入 | 1 | 输入 |
边界条件 | 实验1 | 仿真1 | 实验2 | 仿真2 | 实验3 | 仿真3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
输出功率 | 1 | 1.005 | 0.233 | 0.248 | 0.417 | 0.462 |
测点温度 | 1 | 1.047 | 0.776 | 0.790 | 0.768 | 0.737 |
Table 5 Comparison between simulation and experimental results of jet impingement cooling
边界条件 | 实验1 | 仿真1 | 实验2 | 仿真2 | 实验3 | 仿真3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
输出功率 | 1 | 1.005 | 0.233 | 0.248 | 0.417 | 0.462 |
测点温度 | 1 | 1.047 | 0.776 | 0.790 | 0.768 | 0.737 |
工况 | 轴向喷水量/(kg·s-1) | 径向喷水量/(kg·s-1) |
---|---|---|
1 | 0 | 0 |
2 | 0.2 | 0 |
3 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
4 | 0.2 | 0.1 |
5 | 0.3 | 0.1 |
Table 6 Boundary conditions of cooling water
工况 | 轴向喷水量/(kg·s-1) | 径向喷水量/(kg·s-1) |
---|---|---|
1 | 0 | 0 |
2 | 0.2 | 0 |
3 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
4 | 0.2 | 0.1 |
5 | 0.3 | 0.1 |
流体域 | 边界条件 | 固体域 | 边界条件 |
---|---|---|---|
入口总压/MPa | 19 | 轴面温度/K | 340.65 |
入口总温/K | 1373 | 端面 | 绝热,固定面 |
出口静压/MPa | 0.5 | 耦合面 | 对流换热系数 由流体域得出 |
喷管 | 静止 | 密度/(kg·m-3) | 8226 |
出口段 | 静止 | 杨氏模量/GPa | 191.72 |
交界面 | 冻结转子法 | 泊松比 | 0.4 |
耦合面 | 温度分布由固体 域得出,无滑移 | 热膨胀系数/ K-1 | 1.2596×10-6 |
其他壁面 | 绝热,无滑移 | 导热系数/ (W·m-1·K-1) | 13.2729 |
绝热指数 | 1.222 | ||
气体常数/ (kJ·kg-1·K-1) | 0.369 8 |
Table 7 Boundary conditions
流体域 | 边界条件 | 固体域 | 边界条件 |
---|---|---|---|
入口总压/MPa | 19 | 轴面温度/K | 340.65 |
入口总温/K | 1373 | 端面 | 绝热,固定面 |
出口静压/MPa | 0.5 | 耦合面 | 对流换热系数 由流体域得出 |
喷管 | 静止 | 密度/(kg·m-3) | 8226 |
出口段 | 静止 | 杨氏模量/GPa | 191.72 |
交界面 | 冻结转子法 | 泊松比 | 0.4 |
耦合面 | 温度分布由固体 域得出,无滑移 | 热膨胀系数/ K-1 | 1.2596×10-6 |
其他壁面 | 绝热,无滑移 | 导热系数/ (W·m-1·K-1) | 13.2729 |
绝热指数 | 1.222 | ||
气体常数/ (kJ·kg-1·K-1) | 0.369 8 |
工况 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
效率/% | 51.10 | 48.30 | 48.56 | 47.65 | 46.71 |
Table 8 Performance comparison of turbines with jet impingement cooling
工况 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
效率/% | 51.10 | 48.30 | 48.56 | 47.65 | 46.71 |
工况 | c1/ (m·s-1) | w1/ (m·s-1) | c2/ (m·s-1) | w2/ (m·s-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1380.49 | 963.16 | 445.65 | 784.09 |
2 | 1315.12 | 896.63 | 383.01 | 716.56 |
3 | 1334.54 | 916.73 | 396.60 | 731.89 |
4 | 1307.65 | 888.85 | 379.52 | 713.20 |
5 | 1238.68 | 820.21 | 362.01 | 693.70 |
Table 9 Velocities at the inlet and outlet of the working medium
工况 | c1/ (m·s-1) | w1/ (m·s-1) | c2/ (m·s-1) | w2/ (m·s-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1380.49 | 963.16 | 445.65 | 784.09 |
2 | 1315.12 | 896.63 | 383.01 | 716.56 |
3 | 1334.54 | 916.73 | 396.60 | 731.89 |
4 | 1307.65 | 888.85 | 379.52 | 713.20 |
5 | 1238.68 | 820.21 | 362.01 | 693.70 |
[1] |
|
[2] |
刘亮亮, 竺晓程, 刘昊, 等. 纵向涡发生器对涡轮叶片前缘冲击冷却的影响[J]. 动力工程学报, 2018, 38(9):719-724,762.
|
|
|
[3] |
朱卫兵, 孙润鹏, 徐凌志, 等. 高压涡轮导向器叶片冲击冷却数值研究[J]. 推进技术, 2012, 33(5):710-718.
|
|
|
[4] |
阎鸿捷, 陈冠江, 饶宇. 涡轮叶片前缘冲击-气膜冷却流动传热实验[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2020, 41(12):2970-2976.
|
|
|
[5] |
doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.11.134 URL |
[6] |
席雷, 高建民, 徐亮, 等. 涡轮叶片前缘阵列冲击冷却流动及传热特性数值研究[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2021, 42(2):430-437.
|
|
|
[7] |
姜澎, 黄洪雁, 冯国泰, 等. 水雾/蒸汽相变冲击冷却的数值模拟[J]. 哈尔滨工程大学学报, 2009, 30(10):1097-1101.
|
|
|
[8] |
叶纯杰, 潘红良. 湍流射流冲击移动平板的流动和传热分析[J]. 热能动力工程, 2011, 26(6):669-674.
|
|
|
[9] |
doi: 10.1115/1.3450761 URL |
[10] |
doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2011.03.017 URL |
[11] |
李炎军, 徐伟鹏, 刘振侠, 等. 滑油射流冲击旋转壁面的流动换热数值模拟研究[J]. 推进技术, 2022, 43(1):246-253.
|
|
|
[12] |
卢康博, 马超, 白战术, 等. 微型燃气轮机涡轮背盘冲击冷却特性研究[J]. 热科学与技术, 2020, 19(1):55-63.
|
|
|
[13] |
赵瑞勇, 陈晖, 刘军年, 等. 基于流固耦合的部分进气涡轮数值模拟研究[J]. 火箭推进, 2015, 41(5):38-42.
|
|
|
[14] |
李磊, 敖良波, 李元生, 等. 船用高压比大流量增压器涡轮多学科设计优化[J]. 兵工学报, 2010, 31(5):574-579.
|
|
|
[15] |
肖炎彬, 史小锋, 伊寅, 等. 水下小型特种燃气轮机轮盘热-流耦合仿真分析[J]. 水下无人系统学报, 2019, 27(2): 206-211.
|
|
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
邱国栋, 蔡伟华, 吴志勇, 等. Lee相变传质方程中传质系数取值的分析[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2014, 46(12):15-19.
|
|
|
[19] |
doi: 10.1080/08916158708946327 URL |
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
doi: 10.1016/0017-9310(64)90052-3 URL |
[1] | DING Wengjun, ZHANG Guozong, LIU Haimin, CHAI Yajun, WANG Chiyu, MAO Zhaoyong. Tracking Control of Underactuated Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Formation under Current Disturbance and Communication Delay [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2024, 45(1): 184-196. |
[2] | ZHANG Jian, SHEN Lin. Simulation Analysis and Experimental Verification of the Electrical Energy Power System for Underwater Vehicles [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44(7): 2101-2113. |
[3] | WANG Xuemin, YU Hongbo, ZHANG Xiangyu, AN Shu, LI Wenhai. Underwater Multi-target Detection Method Based on Hough Transform Track-before-detect Technique [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44(7): 2114-2121. |
[4] | LIU Yue, ZHAO Zijie, DAI Qi, WANG Anhua, ZHANG Hui. Load Characteristics of High Chamber Pressure and High Speed Launch of Underwater Vehicle [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44(4): 1126-1138. |
[5] | GAO Quanxi, KE Wei, QIAO Haiyan. Underwater Vehicle Control Based on Linear Active Disturbance Rejection [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44(3): 783-791. |
[6] | DU Xiao-xu, CUI Hang, XIANG Zhen-hui. The Multi-body System Dynamics Modeling of Wave-driven Underwater Vehicle Based on Kane Method [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2016, 37(7): 1236-1244. |
[7] | ZHANG Xiao-shi, WANG Cong, WEI Ying-jie, SUN Tie-zhi. Research on Collapse Characteristics of Ventilated Cavities around an Underwater Vehicle [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2016, 37(12): 2324-2330. |
[8] | YANG PAN-pan, LIU Ming-yong, LEI Xiao-kang, WU Xiao-jin. Information Coupling Degree-based Fission Control Algorithm for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles withoutVelocity Measurements [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2015, 36(5): 891-897. |
[9] | WAN Lei, ZHANG Ying-hao, SUN Yu-shan, LI Yue-ming, HE Bin. AUV's Depth Control Based on Reconstructive Fault-tolerant Control [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2015, 36(4): 723-730. |
[10] | WAN Lei, ZHANG Ying-hao, SUN Yu-shan, LI Yue-ming. AUV’s Bottom Following Control Method Based on ADRC [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2015, 36(10): 1943-1948. |
[11] | MA Peng, ZHANG Fu-bin, XU De-min, LIU Shu-qiang. Observability Analysis of Cooperative Localization System for MAUV Based on Condition Number [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2015, 36(1): 138-143. |
[12] | ZHANG Fang-fang, ZHANG Zhen-shan, LIANG Wei-ge,WANG Zheng-li. Numerical Analysis on Thermal Characteristics of Underwater Stream Turbine in Non-Design Condition [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2014, 35(9): 1466-1472. |
[13] | YAN Zhe-ping, ZHAO Yu-fei, CHEN Tao, ZHOU Jia-jia. A Novel Method of UUV Path Planning Based on Navigation Error Space [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2014, 35(8): 1243-1250. |
[14] | ZHANG Bin, SONG Bao-wei, ZHU Xin-yao, ZHU Qi-feng. Modeling and Simulation of Unmanned Underwater Vehicle Parking on Seabed [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2014, 35(4): 572-576. |
[15] | PAN Guang,LIU Ya-nan,DU Xiao-xu,Saeed Akram Malik. Computational Analysis and Prediction of Wave Forces on Portable Underwater Vehicle [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2014, 35(3): 371-378. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||