Analysis of Tensile Strength of PBT/A3/AP System Based on Power Law Equation

doi:10.12382/bgxb.2023.0686

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to solve the difficulty in predicting the mechanical properties of poly(3,3'-bis(azidomethyl)oxetane-co-tetrahydrofuran) (PBT) solid propellant, the tensile fracture behavior of PBT/A3/AP system is analyzed. A power law equation describing the tensile strength of the system is established. The influence rules of interfacial phase, dispersed phase and continuous phase on tensile strength were obtained. The results show that the elastic modulus and tensile strength of propellant increase with the decrease in oxidant particle size and the increase in volume fraction. The influence of interfacial phase interaction on the tensile strength of propellant is dominant, which is positively correlated with $v f 2$ /r(v_f: volume fraction, r: oxidant particle size). When the oxidant particle size is less than 100μm, the dominant role of interfacial phase becomes more obvious. The effect of dispersed phase increases with the increase in oxidant particle size. The value is positively correlated with v_fr⁵. When the particle size is larger than 100μm, the effect of dispersed phase becomes apparent. When the particle size is larger than 150μm, the effect of dispersed phase approaches that of the interfacial phase. In this case, the interaction between particles cannot be ignored. The continuous phase has little influence on the tensile strength of propellant. The value is positively correlated with (1-v_f)⁵. Compared with the interface phase, the effect of continuous phase is almost negligible. The fitting results of the power law equation for the tensile strength of PBT solid propellant are in good agreement with the experimental results(R²>0.99). The calculated results can be used as reference for propellant formulation design, thereby reducing the development cycle while simultaneously lowering the costs in terms of manpower and resources.

Key words: Poly(3,3'-Bis(azidomethyl)oxetane-co-Tetrahydrofuran), solid propellant, tensile strength, oxidizer, power law equation

CLC Number:

TJ301

SHEN Yewei, XING Shumin, YANG Maofa, ZHANG Zhe, XU Jilin, ZHAO Shuangliang, ZHANG Xianren, XU Sen. Analysis of Tensile Strength of PBT/A3/AP System Based on Power Law Equation[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2024, 45(10): 3530-3537.

Figures/Tables 11

References 26

[1]	庞爱民, 黎小平. 固体推进剂技术的创新与发展规律[J]. 含能材料, 2015, 23(1): 3-6.
	PANG A M, LI X P. Invovation and development laws of solid propellant technology[J]. Chinese Journal of Energetic Materials, 2015, 23(1): 3-6. (in Chinese)
[2]	吴战武, 刘旭峰, 纪明卫, 等. 少烟PBT推进剂制备及性能研究[J]. 爆破器材, 2019, 48(4): 17-22.
	WU Z W, LIU X F, JI M W, et al. Preparation and properties of reduced smoke PBT propellant[J]. Explosive Materials, 2019, 48(4): 17-22. (in Chinese)
[3]	李苗苗, 陈静静, 郑亭亭, 等. HTPE与PBT对推进剂慢速烤燃特性的影响[J]. 兵器装备工程学报, 2022, 43(6): 13-18.
	LI M M, CHEN J J, ZHENG T T, et al. Effect of HTPE and PBT binders on slow cook-off characteristics of propellant[J]. Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering, 2022, 43(6): 13-18. (in Chinese)
[4]	王旭, 徐森, 李苗苗, 等. 钝感氧化剂对PBT基推进剂低易损性的影响[J]. 兵器装备工程学报, 2022, 43(6): 7-12, 18.
	WANG X, XU S, LI M M, et al. Influence of insensitive oxidants on low vulnerability of PBT-based propellants[J]. Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering, 2022, 43(6): 7-12, 18. (in Chinese)
[5]	LÓPEZ R, ORTEGA DE LA ROSA A, SALAZAR A, et al. Structural integrity of aged hydroxyl-terminated polybutadiene solid rocket propellant[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2018, 34(1): 75-84.
[6]	TEJAS NIKAM, MRUNAL PARDESHI, AMIT PATIL, et al. Structural integrity analysis of propellant in solid rocket motor[C]// Proceedings of International Conference on Ideas, Impact and Innovation in Mechanical Engineering (ICIIIME 2017). Vadgao, India: International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication, 2017, 5(6): 896-902.
[7]	ZHOU D M, LIU X Y, SUI X,et a1. Accelerated aging and structural integrity analysis approach to predict the service life of solid rocket motors[C]// Proceedings of the 51st AIAA/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference. Orlando, FL, US: AIAA, 2015: 1-8.
[8]	胡义文, 左海丽, 郑启龙, 等. PBT基复合固体推进剂高温蠕变行为研究[J]. 固体火箭技术, 2018, 41(1): 41-46.
	HU Y W, ZUO H L, ZHENG Q L, et al. Creep behavior of composite solid propellant based on PBT at high temperature[J]. Journal of Solid Rocket Technology, 2018, 41(1): 41-46. (in Chinese)
[9]	张哲, 曾国伟, 张正金, 等. PBT 固体推进剂低温力学性能研究[J]. 推进技术, 2022, 43(9): 384-390.
	ZHANG Z, ZENG G W, ZHANG Z J, et al. Low temperature mechanical properties of PBT solid propellant[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2022, 43(9): 384-390. (in Chinese)
[10]	沈业炜, 仉玉成, 童丽伦. 中性键合剂在叠氮高能推进剂中应用工艺研究[J]. 上海航天, 2017, 34(6): 90-95.
	SHEN Y W, ZHANG Y C, TONG L L. Study on application process of neutral polymeric bonding agent in high energy nitrine propellant[J]. Aerospace Shanghai, 2017, 34(6): 90-95. (in Chinese)
[11]	宋琴, 王艳萍, 廖菊平, 等. 叠氮微烟推进剂宽温域力学性能研究[J]. 火炸药学报, 2021, 44(4): 521-525. doi: 10.14077/j.issn.1007-7812.202102006
	SONG Q, WANG Y P, LIAO J P, et al. Research on the mechanical property of azide low smoke propellant at broad temperature range[J]. Chinese Journal of Explosives & Propellants, 2021, 44(4): 521-525. (in Chinese)
[12]	谢五喜, 赵昱, 刘运飞, 等. 3,3-二叠氮甲基氧丁环-四氢呋喃共聚醚推进剂的力学性能影响因素[J]. 化工新型材料, 2020, 48(2): 163-165, 172.
[27]	MERMET-GUYENNET M R B, GIANFELICE DE CASTRO J, VAROL H S, et al. Size-dependent reinforcement of composite rubbers[J]. Polymer, 2015, 73: 170-173.
[12]	XIE W X, ZHAO Y, LIU Y F, et al. Influence factor for mechanical property of azido-typed BAMO-THF propellant[J]. New Chemical Materials, 2020, 48(2): 163 -165, 172. (in Chinese)
[13]	赵菲, 孙学红, 郝立新, 等. 聚氨酯弹性体的力学性能影响因素研究[J]. 聚氨酯工业, 2001, 16(1): 9-11.
	ZHAO F, SUN X H, HAO L X, et al. Study on the factors influencing mechanical properties of polyurethane elastomers[J]. Polyurethane Industry, 2001, 16(1): 9-11. (in Chinese)
[14]	WUBULIAISAN M, WU Y Q, HOU X, et al. A viscoelastic constitutive model considering deformation and environmental- induced damages for solid propellants[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2023, 132: 108055.
[15]	ZHANG H N, CHANG H, LI X J, et al. The effect of strain rate on compressive behavior and failure mechanism of CMDB propellant[J]. Defence Technology, 2022, 18(3): 467-475. doi: 10.1016/j.dt.2021.02.007
[16]	张镇国, 何景轩, 沙宝林, 等. 丁羟基固体推进剂的破坏包络及其演化行为研究[J]. 宇航学报, 2021, 42(12): 1571-1578.
	ZHANG Z G, HE J X, SHA B L, et al. A study on failure envelopes of HTPB solid propellant and their evolution[J]. Journal of Astronautics, 2021, 42(12): 1571-1578. (in Chinese)
[17]	张炜. 基于材料基因工程的复合固体推进剂力学性能预估方法[J]. 含能材料, 2019, 27(4): 270-273.
	ZHANG W. Mechanical property prediction for composite solid propellants based on genetic engineering of materials[J]. Chinese Journal of Energetic Materials, 2019, 27(4): 270-273. (in Chinese)
[18]	张高章, 司马凯. 复合固体推进剂力学性能的建模预测研究[J]. 化工新型材料, 2018, 46(12): 160-164.
	ZHANG G Z, SIMA K. Modeling and prediction of mechanical property of composite solid propellant[J]. New Chemical Materials, 2018, 46(12): 160-164. (in Chinese)
[19]	INGLIS H M. Modeling the effect of debonding on the constitutive response of heterogeneous materials[D]. Champaign, IL, US: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2014.
[20]	胡应杰, 陈昌云, 陈凯. 单基和双基发射药力学性能的MD模拟研究[J]. 南京晓庄学院学报, 2007(6): 47-50.
	HU Y J, CHEN C Y, CHEN K. Molecular dynamics simulation of mechanical properties of single-base and double-base propellants[J]. Journal of Nanjing Xiaozhuang University, 2007(6): 47-50. (in Chinese)
[21]	王鸿丽, 许进升, 刘宗魁, 等. 复合改性双基推进剂黏弹性-黏塑性-黏损伤本构模型研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2018, 39(7): 1308-1315. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2018.07.008
	WANG H L, XU J S, LIU Z K, et al. Research on the Viscoelasticity-viscoplasticity-viscodamage constitutive model of composite modified double base propellant[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2018, 39(7): 1308-1315. (in Chinese)
[22]	田德余, 洪伟良, 刘剑洪, 等. 丁羟固体推进剂力学性能模拟计算[J]. 推进技术, 2008, 29(1): 114-118.
	TIAN D Y, HONG W L, LIU J H, et al. Modeling for mechanical properties of HTPB solid propellants[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2008, 29(1): 114-118. (in Chinese)
[23]	贵大勇, 刘剑洪, 田德余, 等. NEPE高能推进剂力学性能模拟计算[J]. 推进技术, 2010, 31(4): 63-66,70.
	GUI D Y, LIU J H, TIAN D Y, et al. Modeling of mechanical properties of NEPE high energetic propellants[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2010, 31(4): 63-66,70. (in Chinese)
[24]	沈业炜, 仉玉成, 童丽伦. PBT钝感高能推进剂高温力学性能调节技术研究[J]. 推进技术, 2018, 39(11): 2595-2600.
	SHEN Y W, ZHANG Y C, TONG L L. Study on adjustment technology for high temperature mechanical properties of PBT insensitive high energy propellant[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2018, 39(11): 2595-2600. (in Chinese)
[25]	张涛. Al粉对推进剂力学性能的影响[J]. 化学推进剂与高分子材料, 2023, 21(5): 54-57.
	ZHANG T. Influence of Al power on mechanical performance of propellant[J]. Chemical Propellants & Polymeric Materials, 2023, 21(5): 54-57. (in Chinese)
[26]	袁申, 刘海青, 齐铭, 等. 复合推进剂力学性能及其改善技术研究进展[J]. 兵工自动化, 2022, 41(12): 114-121.
	YUAN S, LIU H Q, QI M, et al. Research status of mechanical properties for composite propellant and its improvement technology[J]. Ordnance Industry Automation, 2022, 41(12): 114-121. (in Chinese)

组分	PBT	A3	AP	TDI	其他
质量百分数/%	12~20	16~28	50~70	0.8~1.2	0.8~1.2

组分	PBT	A3	AP	TDI	其他
质量百分数/%	12~20	16~28	50~70	0.8~1.2	0.8~1.2

序号	氧化剂粒径/μm	质量分数/%	体积分数/%	弹性模量/MPa	抗拉强度/kPa
1	150.0	50	38	0.63	209
2	100.0	50	38	0.63	222
3	62.5	50	38	0.43	335
4	150.0	60	48	1.70	305
5	100.0	60	48	1.00	308
6	62.5	60	48	1.22	453
7	150.0	70	59	4.68	420
8	100.0	70	59	4.85	450
9	62.5	70	59	5.92	719

序号	氧化剂粒径/μm	质量分数/%	体积分数/%	弹性模量/MPa	抗拉强度/kPa
1	150.0	50	38	0.63	209
2	100.0	50	38	0.63	222
3	62.5	50	38	0.43	335
4	150.0	60	48	1.70	305
5	100.0	60	48	1.00	308
6	62.5	60	48	1.22	453
7	150.0	70	59	4.68	420
8	100.0	70	59	4.85	450
9	62.5	70	59	5.92	719

α	参数	β
α	参数	-2	-1	1	2
1	a	4775780.819	70582.792	6.415	0.042
	R²	-0.114	0.734	-1.120	-2.722
2	a	9269481.313	136894.544	12.418	0.080
	R²	-0.011	0.838	-1.064	-2.688
3	a	16891594.410	249281.761	22.570	0.146
	R²	-0.176	0.642	-1.231	-2.814