Acta Armamentarii ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (4): 1264-1272.doi: 10.12382/bgxb.2022.1058
Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHAO Wei, ZHUO Zhihai*(), ZHANG Yuexia
Received:
2022-11-15
Online:
2024-04-30
Contact:
ZHUO Zhihai
CLC Number:
ZHAO Wei, ZHUO Zhihai, ZHANG Yuexia. Application of Two-parameter Threshold Function Based on Energy Thresholds in Denoising of Physiological Signal[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2024, 45(4): 1264-1272.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
小波基 | SNR | SNR' | η | σc | σr |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
sym3 | 7.9342 | 18.8275 | 2.3730 | 0.9934 | 0.1170 |
db4 | 7.9342 | 18.6875 | 2.3553 | 0.9932 | 0.1189 |
haar | 7.9342 | 16.7295 | 2.1085 | 0.9893 | 0.1496 |
bior3.1 | 7.9342 | 6.3611 | 0.8017 | 0.8768 | 0.5572 |
Table 1 List of denoising measures for various wavelet bases
小波基 | SNR | SNR' | η | σc | σr |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
sym3 | 7.9342 | 18.8275 | 2.3730 | 0.9934 | 0.1170 |
db4 | 7.9342 | 18.6875 | 2.3553 | 0.9932 | 0.1189 |
haar | 7.9342 | 16.7295 | 2.1085 | 0.9893 | 0.1496 |
bior3.1 | 7.9342 | 6.3611 | 0.8017 | 0.8768 | 0.5572 |
去噪算法 | SNR | σr | σp |
---|---|---|---|
λb+ωb | 14.5885 | 0.0963 | 0.1488 |
λb+ωh | 12.7328 | 0.0718 | 0.2090 |
λb+ωs | 11.2421 | 0.0883 | 0.2493 |
λZ+ωb | 10.9285 | 0.1065 | 0.2682 |
λZ+ωh | 9.2749 | 0.1333 | 0.3518 |
λZ+ωs | 7.0072 | 0.1780 | 0.5111 |
λD+ωb | 13.2187 | 0.0796 | 0.2233 |
λD+ωh | 12.8372 | 0.0834 | 0.2653 |
λD+ωs | 9.7004 | 0.1118 | 0.2755 |
λf+ωb | 8.5310 | 0.1330 | 0.3658 |
λf+ωh | 8.4779 | 0.1330 | 0.3823 |
λf+ωs | 7.6883 | 0.1400 | 0.3872 |
EMD | 1.5329 | 0.3655 | 1.0127 |
带通滤波器 | 1.5462 | 0.3354 | 0.9293 |
Table 2 Comparison of the denoising performance indexes of ten random ECG signals with different noise intensities
去噪算法 | SNR | σr | σp |
---|---|---|---|
λb+ωb | 14.5885 | 0.0963 | 0.1488 |
λb+ωh | 12.7328 | 0.0718 | 0.2090 |
λb+ωs | 11.2421 | 0.0883 | 0.2493 |
λZ+ωb | 10.9285 | 0.1065 | 0.2682 |
λZ+ωh | 9.2749 | 0.1333 | 0.3518 |
λZ+ωs | 7.0072 | 0.1780 | 0.5111 |
λD+ωb | 13.2187 | 0.0796 | 0.2233 |
λD+ωh | 12.8372 | 0.0834 | 0.2653 |
λD+ωs | 9.7004 | 0.1118 | 0.2755 |
λf+ωb | 8.5310 | 0.1330 | 0.3658 |
λf+ωh | 8.4779 | 0.1330 | 0.3823 |
λf+ωs | 7.6883 | 0.1400 | 0.3872 |
EMD | 1.5329 | 0.3655 | 1.0127 |
带通滤波器 | 1.5462 | 0.3354 | 0.9293 |
实验参数 | 数值 |
---|---|
起始频率/GHz | 77 |
调频斜率/(MHz·μs-1) | 70 |
有效带宽/MHz | 3500 |
ADC采样点数 | 200 |
采样率/(kS·s-1) | 4000 |
每帧时间/s | 0.05 |
采集帧数 | 1024 |
Table 3 Millimeter-wave radar parameter configuration
实验参数 | 数值 |
---|---|
起始频率/GHz | 77 |
调频斜率/(MHz·μs-1) | 70 |
有效带宽/MHz | 3500 |
ADC采样点数 | 200 |
采样率/(kS·s-1) | 4000 |
每帧时间/s | 0.05 |
采集帧数 | 1024 |
算法 | 呼吸频率 | 心跳频率 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
参考值 | 波峰波 谷检测 结果 | 误差 | 参考值 | 波峰波 谷检测 结果 | 误差 | |
λZ+ωh | 23 | 15.2344 | 7.7656 | 86 | 75.0000 | 9.0000 |
λD+ωs | 23 | 15.2344 | 7.7656 | 86 | 75.0000 | 9.0000 |
λb+ωb | 23 | 25.0938 | 2.0938 | 86 | 87.9922 | 1.9922 |
EMD | 23 | 27.5391 | 4.5319 | 86 | 69.7266 | 16.2734 |
带通滤波器 | 23 | 18.7500 | 4.3500 | 86 | 88.4766 | 2.4766 |
Table 4 Results of peak-to-trough average detection of physiological signals after denoising by 5 algorithms
算法 | 呼吸频率 | 心跳频率 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
参考值 | 波峰波 谷检测 结果 | 误差 | 参考值 | 波峰波 谷检测 结果 | 误差 | |
λZ+ωh | 23 | 15.2344 | 7.7656 | 86 | 75.0000 | 9.0000 |
λD+ωs | 23 | 15.2344 | 7.7656 | 86 | 75.0000 | 9.0000 |
λb+ωb | 23 | 25.0938 | 2.0938 | 86 | 87.9922 | 1.9922 |
EMD | 23 | 27.5391 | 4.5319 | 86 | 69.7266 | 16.2734 |
带通滤波器 | 23 | 18.7500 | 4.3500 | 86 | 88.4766 | 2.4766 |
算法 | 呼吸频率平均 相对误差 | 心跳频率平均 相对误差 |
---|---|---|
λZ+ωh | 0.1680 | 0.2343 |
λD+ωs | 0.1680 | 0.2343 |
λb+ωb | 0.0547 | 0.0781 |
EMD | 0.3125 | 0.1874 |
带通滤波器 | 0.0859 | 0.0938 |
Table 5 Average relative errors of five algorithms
算法 | 呼吸频率平均 相对误差 | 心跳频率平均 相对误差 |
---|---|---|
λZ+ωh | 0.1680 | 0.2343 |
λD+ωs | 0.1680 | 0.2343 |
λb+ωb | 0.0547 | 0.0781 |
EMD | 0.3125 | 0.1874 |
带通滤波器 | 0.0859 | 0.0938 |
算法 | 呼吸频率最小二乘 损失函数 | 心跳频率最小二乘 损失函数 |
---|---|---|
λZ+ωh | 12.47 | 45.56 |
λD+ωs | 12.47 | 45.56 |
λb+ωb | 5.87 | 5.09 |
EMD | 43.24 | 16.17 |
带通滤波器 | 6.58 | 15.59 |
Table 6 Comparison of least squares loss functions of five algorithms
算法 | 呼吸频率最小二乘 损失函数 | 心跳频率最小二乘 损失函数 |
---|---|---|
λZ+ωh | 12.47 | 45.56 |
λD+ωs | 12.47 | 45.56 |
λb+ωb | 5.87 | 5.09 |
EMD | 43.24 | 16.17 |
带通滤波器 | 6.58 | 15.59 |
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
doi: 10.1016/j.isatra.2020.12.029 pmid: 33419569 |
[4] |
|
[5] |
杜岳峰, 张丽榕, 毛恩荣, 等. 基于EMD的联合收获机籽粒损失监测传感器设计与试验[J]. 农业机械学报, 2022, 53(增刊1): 158-165.
|
|
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
陈妍, 徐海黎, 邢强, 等. 结合小波变换和双边滤波的SICM图像降噪算法[J]. 电子测量技术, 2022, 45(4): 114-119.
|
|
|
[10] |
吴叶丽, 行鸿彦, 李瑾, 等. 改进阈值函数的小波去噪算法[J]. 电子测量与仪器学报, 2022, 36(4): 9-16.
|
|
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
doi: 10.1109/51.932724 pmid: 11446209 |
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
刘震宇, 陈惠明, 陆蔚, 等. 基于改进经验模态分解的雷达生命信号检测[J]. 仪器仪表学报, 2018, 39(12): 171-178.
|
|
|
[23] |
田静. 基于毫米波雷达的呼吸心跳检测系统设计与实现[D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2021.
|
|
[1] | LIU Bin, LI Xuemei. A Self-adaptive Dual Radius Filtering Algorithm Based on LiDAR Point Cloud [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44(9): 2768-2777. |
[2] | LI Bo, WANG Bo, HAN Jingye, YANG Zongrui, LI Linyun, FU Changzhi. Infrared Image Moving Object Detection Technology Based on Onboard Computer [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2022, 43(S1): 66-73. |
[3] | LIAO Dahai, YIN Mingshuai, LUO Hongbin, HUANG Jiawen, WU Nanxing. Detection and Analysis of Surface Defects of Si3N4 Cylindrical Roller in Aero-engine Based on Coupled Denoising Algorithm [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2022, 43(1): 190-198. |
[4] | QIN Guohua, GAO Jie, YE Haichao, JIANG Guojie, HUANG Shuai, LAI Xiaochuun. Tool Wear Prediction Based on Fusion Evaluation Index and Neural Network [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2021, 42(9): 2013-2023. |
[5] | WANG Jian, QIN Chunxia, YANG Ke, REN Ping. A SAR Target Recognition Algorithm Based on Guided Filter Reconstruction and Denoising Sparse Autoencoder [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2020, 41(9): 1861-1870. |
[6] | ZENG Teng, ZHANG Chunhua, WANG Peng. Research on the 3D Sonar Single-frame Reconstruction Based on Local Outlier Factor Algorithm [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2020, 41(3): 552-558. |
[7] | LI Zi-gao, LI Shu-qiu, WEN Shu-lin. A Novel ICA-based DOA Estimation Method for Underwater Wideband Source [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2017, 38(1): 114-122. |
[8] | ZHANG Bin, LI Jia-lu, ZHAO Dong-e, LIU Ji, LI Yuan, SHI Xiao-jun. Signal Processing of Laser Screen Fragments Velocity Measurement Based on Wavelet Transform and Correlation Analysis [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2016, 37(3): 489-495. |
[9] | BO Chao, GU Hong, SU Wei-min, CHEN Jin-li. Under-dense Meteor Trail Interference Suppression Algorithm for Over-the-horizon Radar [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2015, 36(5): 846-853. |
[10] | LIU Kun, MA Wen-ping , LIU Hong-ying, WANG Shuang. Matrix Log Cumulant-based Speckle Filtering Method for Polarimetric Synthetic Aperture Radar Data [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2014, 35(9): 1400-1407. |
[11] | SHEN Qing-ming, WANG Guo-bo, ZHAO Jian-zhong, XU Guan-li. Multi-noise Model-based Denoising Method for Radiographic Image [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2014, 35(12): 2087-2091. |
[12] | YAN Feng, CHEN Xiao, WANG Xin-min, PENG Cheng, HU Ya-zhou. Fault Diagnosis of Tiltrotor Aircraft via Improved Discrete Wavelet-OMELM [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2014, 35(11): 1914-1921. |
[13] | JIA Yi-zhuo, JIANG Run-xiang, GONG Shen-guang. Research on Wavelet Modulus Maximum-based Detection Algorithm of Ship爷s Shaft-rate Electric Field [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2013, 34(5): 579-584. |
[14] | HU Ling-ling, GUO Ye-cai. Orthogonal Wavelet Transform Dynamic Weighted Multi-modulus Blind Equalization Algorithm Based on Dynamic Particle Swarm [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2013, 34(12): 1547-1554. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||