Acta Armamentarii ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (2): 437-451.doi: 10.12382/bgxb.2021.0561
Previous Articles Next Articles
NIU Cao1,2, GU Guangxin1, ZHU Lei1, XU Hongbin1,*(), LI Zhengyu1, ZHANG Weihong2, CHEN Yongwei1, WANG Bo1, SHI Jianxiong1, LI Yizhe1
Received:
2021-08-23
Online:
2022-06-08
Contact:
XU Hongbin
CLC Number:
NIU Cao, GU Guangxin, ZHU Lei, XU Hongbin, LI Zhengyu, ZHANG Weihong, CHEN Yongwei, WANG Bo, SHI Jianxiong, LI Yizhe. Finite Element Structural Analysis and Topology Optimization of a Vehicle-borne Missile Launching Cradle[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44(2): 437-451.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
工况编号 | 工况简称 | 加速度分量 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
x轴 | y轴 | z轴 | ||
1 | 仅重力 | 0 | 0 | -1g |
2 | 垂向-5g | 0 | 0 | -6g |
3 | 垂向+5g | 0 | 0 | +4g |
4 | 横向-5g | -5g | 0 | -1g |
5 | 横向+5g | +5g | 0 | -1g |
6 | 纵向-5g | 0 | -5g | -1g |
7 | 纵向+5g | 0 | +5g | -1g |
Table 1 Overloading conditions of the launching cradle
工况编号 | 工况简称 | 加速度分量 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
x轴 | y轴 | z轴 | ||
1 | 仅重力 | 0 | 0 | -1g |
2 | 垂向-5g | 0 | 0 | -6g |
3 | 垂向+5g | 0 | 0 | +4g |
4 | 横向-5g | -5g | 0 | -1g |
5 | 横向+5g | +5g | 0 | -1g |
6 | 纵向-5g | 0 | -5g | -1g |
7 | 纵向+5g | 0 | +5g | -1g |
Fig.5 Finite element (FE) model of the original design of the launching cradle under the missile-carrying condition (a) (The asterisks “*” indicates the equivalent mass points of the borne missiles and the same would apply hereinafter)
过载 工况 | 载弹工况 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(a) | (b) | (d) | (f) | (h) | |
1 | 0.1309 | 0.1254 | 0.1497 | 0.1442 | 0.1480 |
2 | 0.7855 | 0.7527 | 0.8982 | 0.8653 | 0.8882 |
3 | 0.5237 | 0.5018 | 0.5988 | 0.5769 | 0.5921 |
4 | 1.3867 | 1.4995 | 1.5797 | 1.6927 | 1.1571 |
5 | 1.3867 | 1.3630 | 1.3705 | 1.5047 | 1.1571 |
6 | 0.5010 | 0.4972 | 0.5326 | 0.5284 | 0.4723 |
7 | 0.6378 | 0.5982 | 0.6537 | 0.6537 | 0.6510 |
Table 3 Structural deformations of the original launching cradle under the missile-carrying conditions (a)~(h) mm
过载 工况 | 载弹工况 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(a) | (b) | (d) | (f) | (h) | |
1 | 0.1309 | 0.1254 | 0.1497 | 0.1442 | 0.1480 |
2 | 0.7855 | 0.7527 | 0.8982 | 0.8653 | 0.8882 |
3 | 0.5237 | 0.5018 | 0.5988 | 0.5769 | 0.5921 |
4 | 1.3867 | 1.4995 | 1.5797 | 1.6927 | 1.1571 |
5 | 1.3867 | 1.3630 | 1.3705 | 1.5047 | 1.1571 |
6 | 0.5010 | 0.4972 | 0.5326 | 0.5284 | 0.4723 |
7 | 0.6378 | 0.5982 | 0.6537 | 0.6537 | 0.6510 |
过载 工况 | 载弹工况 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
(i) | (j) | (l) | (n) | |
1 | 0.1289 | 0.1237 | 0.1426 | 0.0828 |
2 | 0.7736 | 0.7420 | 0.8554 | 0.4968 |
3 | 0.5157 | 0.4947 | 0.5702 | 0.3312 |
4 | 0.3415 | 1.0766 | 1.2703 | 0.4321 |
5 | 0.3415 | 0.8843 | 1.0261 | 0.5296 |
6 | 0.4290 | 0.4342 | 0.4681 | 0.2535 |
7 | 0.5431 | 0.5513 | 0.6089 | 0.3234 |
Table 4 Structural deformations of the original launching cradle design under missile-carrying conditions (i)~(n)mm
过载 工况 | 载弹工况 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
(i) | (j) | (l) | (n) | |
1 | 0.1289 | 0.1237 | 0.1426 | 0.0828 |
2 | 0.7736 | 0.7420 | 0.8554 | 0.4968 |
3 | 0.5157 | 0.4947 | 0.5702 | 0.3312 |
4 | 0.3415 | 1.0766 | 1.2703 | 0.4321 |
5 | 0.3415 | 0.8843 | 1.0261 | 0.5296 |
6 | 0.4290 | 0.4342 | 0.4681 | 0.2535 |
7 | 0.5431 | 0.5513 | 0.6089 | 0.3234 |
过载 工况 | 载弹工况 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(a) | (b) | (d) | (f) | (h) | |
1 | 23.06 | 24.10 | 21.46 | 22.49 | 15.11 |
2 | 138.38 | 144.59 | 128.76 | 134.97 | 90.67 |
3 | 92.26 | 96.40 | 85.84 | 89.98 | 60.45 |
4 | 184.98 | 149.80 | 155.64 | 152.83 | 111.07 |
5 | 184.98 | 135.04 | 143.32 | 135.05 | 111.06 |
6 | 143.33 | 140.69 | 130.85 | 133.21 | 77.11 |
7 | 176.76 | 173.40 | 163.37 | 160.00 | 85.02 |
Table 6 Equivalent stresses of the original launching cradle under the missile-carrying conditions (a)~(h) MPa
过载 工况 | 载弹工况 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(a) | (b) | (d) | (f) | (h) | |
1 | 23.06 | 24.10 | 21.46 | 22.49 | 15.11 |
2 | 138.38 | 144.59 | 128.76 | 134.97 | 90.67 |
3 | 92.26 | 96.40 | 85.84 | 89.98 | 60.45 |
4 | 184.98 | 149.80 | 155.64 | 152.83 | 111.07 |
5 | 184.98 | 135.04 | 143.32 | 135.05 | 111.06 |
6 | 143.33 | 140.69 | 130.85 | 133.21 | 77.11 |
7 | 176.76 | 173.40 | 163.37 | 160.00 | 85.02 |
过载 工况 | 载弹工况 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
(i) | (j) | (l) | (n) | |
1 | 16.07 | 16.22 | 15.76 | 13.08 |
2 | 96.41 | 97.33 | 94.54 | 78.46 |
3 | 64.27 | 64.89 | 63.02 | 52.30 |
4 | 92.98 | 105.45 | 108.38 | 60.77 |
5 | 92.98 | 97.50 | 90.01 | 63.62 |
6 | 108.51 | 95.34 | 79.47 | 92.70 |
7 | 115.10 | 105.07 | 81.65 | 101.70 |
Table 7 Equivalent stresses of the original launching cradle under the missile-carrying conditions (i)~(n) MPa
过载 工况 | 载弹工况 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
(i) | (j) | (l) | (n) | |
1 | 16.07 | 16.22 | 15.76 | 13.08 |
2 | 96.41 | 97.33 | 94.54 | 78.46 |
3 | 64.27 | 64.89 | 63.02 | 52.30 |
4 | 92.98 | 105.45 | 108.38 | 60.77 |
5 | 92.98 | 97.50 | 90.01 | 63.62 |
6 | 108.51 | 95.34 | 79.47 | 92.70 |
7 | 115.10 | 105.07 | 81.65 | 101.70 |
挤压 约束 | 最小尺寸 约束/mm | 最大尺寸 约束/mm | 加权柔顺 度/J | 体分比 | 迭代 步数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
50.38 | 0.25 | 31 | |||
√ | 59.90 | 0.25 | 36 | ||
√ | 30 | 120 | 69.27 | 0.25 | 60 |
√ | 40 | 120 | 71.89 | 0.25 | 74 |
√ | 60 | 120 | 76.54 | 0.25 | 72 |
Table 8 Statistical data of the topology optimization processes
挤压 约束 | 最小尺寸 约束/mm | 最大尺寸 约束/mm | 加权柔顺 度/J | 体分比 | 迭代 步数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
50.38 | 0.25 | 31 | |||
√ | 59.90 | 0.25 | 36 | ||
√ | 30 | 120 | 69.27 | 0.25 | 60 |
√ | 40 | 120 | 71.89 | 0.25 | 74 |
√ | 60 | 120 | 76.54 | 0.25 | 72 |
Fig.14 Iterative curves of weighted compliance and volume fraction in topology optimization processes. The numbers in the parentheses indicate the values of the minimum and maximum member size constraints, respectively
过载 工况 | 载弹工况 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(a) | (b) | (d) | (f) | (h) | |
1 | 0.1198 ↓8.48% | 0.1150 ↓8.29% | 0.1372 ↓8.35% | 0.1323 ↓8.25% | 0.1363 ↓7.91% |
2 | 0.7190 ↓8.47% | 0.6898 ↓8.36% | 0.8232 ↓8.35% | 0.7940 ↓8.24% | 0.8180 ↓7.90% |
3 | 0.4793 ↓8.48% | 0.4599 ↓8.35% | 0.5488 ↓8.35% | 0.5293 ↓8.25% | 0.5453 ↓7.90% |
4 | 1.1285 ↓18.62% | 1.1993 ↓20.02% | 1.2635 ↓20.02% | 1.3347 ↓21.15% | 0.9473 ↓18.13% |
5 | 1.1285 ↓18.62% | 1.0825 ↓20.58% | 1.0977 ↓19.91% | 1.1817 ↓21.47% | 0.9473 ↓18.13% |
6 | 0.4625 ↓7.68% | 0.4605 ↓7.38% | 0.5072 ↓4.77% | 0.4986 ↓5.64% | 0.4781 ↑1.23% |
7 | 0.5937 ↓6.91% | 0.5789 ↓3.23% | 0.6195 ↓10.76% | 0.6033 ↓7.71% | 0.5692 ↓12.57% |
Table 10 Structural deformations of the optimized launching cradle design under the missile-carrying conditions (a)~(h) mm
过载 工况 | 载弹工况 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(a) | (b) | (d) | (f) | (h) | |
1 | 0.1198 ↓8.48% | 0.1150 ↓8.29% | 0.1372 ↓8.35% | 0.1323 ↓8.25% | 0.1363 ↓7.91% |
2 | 0.7190 ↓8.47% | 0.6898 ↓8.36% | 0.8232 ↓8.35% | 0.7940 ↓8.24% | 0.8180 ↓7.90% |
3 | 0.4793 ↓8.48% | 0.4599 ↓8.35% | 0.5488 ↓8.35% | 0.5293 ↓8.25% | 0.5453 ↓7.90% |
4 | 1.1285 ↓18.62% | 1.1993 ↓20.02% | 1.2635 ↓20.02% | 1.3347 ↓21.15% | 0.9473 ↓18.13% |
5 | 1.1285 ↓18.62% | 1.0825 ↓20.58% | 1.0977 ↓19.91% | 1.1817 ↓21.47% | 0.9473 ↓18.13% |
6 | 0.4625 ↓7.68% | 0.4605 ↓7.38% | 0.5072 ↓4.77% | 0.4986 ↓5.64% | 0.4781 ↑1.23% |
7 | 0.5937 ↓6.91% | 0.5789 ↓3.23% | 0.6195 ↓10.76% | 0.6033 ↓7.71% | 0.5692 ↓12.57% |
过载 工况 | 载弹工况 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
(i) | (j) | (l) | (n) | |
1 | 0.1137 ↓11.79% | 0.1140 ↓7.84% | 0.1314 ↓7.85% | 0.0715 ↓13.65% |
2 | 0.6821 ↓11.83% | 0.6840 ↓7.82% | 0.7885 ↓7.82% | 0.4290 ↓13.65% |
3 | 0.4547 ↓11.83% | 0.4560 ↓7.82% | 0.5257 ↓7.80% | 0.2860 ↓13.65% |
4 | 0.2719 ↓20.38% | 0.8827 ↓18.01% | 1.0186 ↓19.81% | 0.3785 ↓13.03% |
5 | 0.2719 ↓20.38% | 0.7263 ↓17.87% | 0.8257 ↓19.53% | 0.4317 ↓18.49% |
6 | 0.3984 ↓7.13% | 0.4261 ↓1.87% | 0.4696 ↑0.32% | 0.2380 ↓6.11% |
7 | 0.5162 ↓4.95% | 0.5282 ↓4.19% | 0.5529 ↓9.20% | 0.3148 ↓2.66% |
Table 11 Structural deformations of the optimized launching cradle design under the missile-carrying conditions (i)~(n) mm
过载 工况 | 载弹工况 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
(i) | (j) | (l) | (n) | |
1 | 0.1137 ↓11.79% | 0.1140 ↓7.84% | 0.1314 ↓7.85% | 0.0715 ↓13.65% |
2 | 0.6821 ↓11.83% | 0.6840 ↓7.82% | 0.7885 ↓7.82% | 0.4290 ↓13.65% |
3 | 0.4547 ↓11.83% | 0.4560 ↓7.82% | 0.5257 ↓7.80% | 0.2860 ↓13.65% |
4 | 0.2719 ↓20.38% | 0.8827 ↓18.01% | 1.0186 ↓19.81% | 0.3785 ↓13.03% |
5 | 0.2719 ↓20.38% | 0.7263 ↓17.87% | 0.8257 ↓19.53% | 0.4317 ↓18.49% |
6 | 0.3984 ↓7.13% | 0.4261 ↓1.87% | 0.4696 ↑0.32% | 0.2380 ↓6.11% |
7 | 0.5162 ↓4.95% | 0.5282 ↓4.19% | 0.5529 ↓9.20% | 0.3148 ↓2.66% |
过载 工况 | 载弹工况 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(a) | (b) | (d) | (f) | (h) | |
1 | 23.34 ↑1.21% | 24.57 ↑1.95% | 21.48 ↑0.09% | 22.71 ↑0.98% | 14.54 ↓3.77% |
2 | 140.04 ↑1.20% | 147.43 ↑1.96% | 128.89 ↑0.10% | 136.27 ↑0.96% | 87.23 ↓3.79% |
3 | 93.36 ↑1.19% | 98.28 ↑1.95% | 85.93 ↑0.10% | 90.85 ↑0.97% | 58.15 ↓3.80% |
4 | 125.85 ↓31.97% | 125.35 ↓16.32% | 130.49 ↓16.16% | 130.04 ↓14.91% | 86.14 ↓22.45% |
5 | 125.85 ↓31.97% | 113.43 ↓16.00% | 119.20 ↓16.83% | 117.63 ↓12.90% | 86.14 ↓22.44% |
6 | 130.85 ↓8.71% | 135.18 ↓3.92% | 123.12 ↓5.91% | 127.45 ↓4.32% | 82.45 ↑6.93% |
7 | 144.00 ↓18.53% | 145.36 ↓16.17% | 129.64 ↓20.65% | 131.01 ↓18.12% | 72.67 ↓14.53% |
Table 12 Equivalent stresses of the optimized design under the missile-carrying conditions (a)~(h) MPa
过载 工况 | 载弹工况 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(a) | (b) | (d) | (f) | (h) | |
1 | 23.34 ↑1.21% | 24.57 ↑1.95% | 21.48 ↑0.09% | 22.71 ↑0.98% | 14.54 ↓3.77% |
2 | 140.04 ↑1.20% | 147.43 ↑1.96% | 128.89 ↑0.10% | 136.27 ↑0.96% | 87.23 ↓3.79% |
3 | 93.36 ↑1.19% | 98.28 ↑1.95% | 85.93 ↑0.10% | 90.85 ↑0.97% | 58.15 ↓3.80% |
4 | 125.85 ↓31.97% | 125.35 ↓16.32% | 130.49 ↓16.16% | 130.04 ↓14.91% | 86.14 ↓22.45% |
5 | 125.85 ↓31.97% | 113.43 ↓16.00% | 119.20 ↓16.83% | 117.63 ↓12.90% | 86.14 ↓22.44% |
6 | 130.85 ↓8.71% | 135.18 ↓3.92% | 123.12 ↓5.91% | 127.45 ↓4.32% | 82.45 ↑6.93% |
7 | 144.00 ↓18.53% | 145.36 ↓16.17% | 129.64 ↓20.65% | 131.01 ↓18.12% | 72.67 ↓14.53% |
过载 工况 | 载弹工况 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
(i) | (j) | (l) | (n) | |
1 | 15.10 ↓6.04% | 15.96 ↓1.60% | 15.19 ↓3.62% | 13.23 ↑1.15% |
2 | 90.62 ↓6.01% | 95.78 ↓1.59% | 91.12 ↓3.62% | 79.39 ↑1.19% |
3 | 60.41 ↓6.01% | 63.86 ↓1.59% | 60.75 ↓3.60% | 52.93 ↑1.20% |
4 | 54.20 ↓41.71% | 81.01 ↓23.18% | 85.68 ↓20.94% | 53.50 ↓11.96% |
5 | 54.20 ↓41.71% | 70.37 ↓27.83% | 72.67 ↓19.26% | 53.46 ↓15.97% |
6 | 90.43 ↓16.66% | 86.80 ↓8.96% | 82.20 ↑3.44% | 75.27 ↓18.80% |
7 | 98.69 ↓14.26% | 82.97 ↓21.03% | 69.74 ↓14.59% | 84.33 ↓17.08% |
Table 13 Equivalent stresses of the optimized launching cradle design under the missile-carrying conditions (i)~(n) MPa
过载 工况 | 载弹工况 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
(i) | (j) | (l) | (n) | |
1 | 15.10 ↓6.04% | 15.96 ↓1.60% | 15.19 ↓3.62% | 13.23 ↑1.15% |
2 | 90.62 ↓6.01% | 95.78 ↓1.59% | 91.12 ↓3.62% | 79.39 ↑1.19% |
3 | 60.41 ↓6.01% | 63.86 ↓1.59% | 60.75 ↓3.60% | 52.93 ↑1.20% |
4 | 54.20 ↓41.71% | 81.01 ↓23.18% | 85.68 ↓20.94% | 53.50 ↓11.96% |
5 | 54.20 ↓41.71% | 70.37 ↓27.83% | 72.67 ↓19.26% | 53.46 ↓15.97% |
6 | 90.43 ↓16.66% | 86.80 ↓8.96% | 82.20 ↑3.44% | 75.27 ↓18.80% |
7 | 98.69 ↓14.26% | 82.97 ↓21.03% | 69.74 ↓14.59% | 84.33 ↓17.08% |
阶数 | 原有设计/Hz | 优化设计/Hz | 提高幅度 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 106.16 | 124.09 | 16.89% |
2 | 111.73 | 137.57 | 23.13% |
3 | 116.68 | 144.63 | 23.95% |
4 | 161.02 | 192.48 | 19.54% |
5 | 168.11 | 216.68 | 28.89% |
6 | 198.89 | 223.19 | 12.22% |
Table 14 Comparison of natural frequencies of the original and optimized designs
阶数 | 原有设计/Hz | 优化设计/Hz | 提高幅度 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 106.16 | 124.09 | 16.89% |
2 | 111.73 | 137.57 | 23.13% |
3 | 116.68 | 144.63 | 23.95% |
4 | 161.02 | 192.48 | 19.54% |
5 | 168.11 | 216.68 | 28.89% |
6 | 198.89 | 223.19 | 12.22% |
[1] |
《车载武器》编委会. 车载武器[M]. 北京: 航空工业出版社, 2010.
|
Editorial Board of Vehicle-borne Weapons. Vehicle-borne weapons[M]. Beijing: Aviation Industry Press, 2010. (in Chinese)
|
|
[2] |
熊文博. “红箭”来袭——珠海航展上的“红箭”10反坦克导弹[J]. 坦克装甲车辆, 2016(23):31-35.
|
|
|
[3] |
中华人民共和国国务院新闻办公室. 新时代的中国国防[R]. 2019-07-24.
|
The State Council Information Office of the People's Republic of China. China's national defense in the new era.[R]. 2019-07-24. (in Chinese)
|
|
[4] |
张永存, 韩亚鹏, 刘书田. 典型火炮静刚度分析与改进设计[J]. 机械工程学报, 2013, 49(21):100-107.
|
|
|
[5] |
张永存, 吴雪云, 刘书田. 典型火炮结构振动分析与前支架设计改进[J]. 工程力学, 2013, 30(6):308-312.
|
|
|
[6] |
薛海瑞, 徐宏斌, 张东生, 等. 基于混合仿真的某导弹发射架结构仿真分析[J]. 弹箭与制导学报, 2014, 34(5):46-50.
|
|
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
doi: 10.1007/s00158-013-0978-6 URL |
[9] |
doi: 10.1007/s11831-015-9151-2 URL |
[10] |
王金明, 鲍国苗, 刘勇, 等. 新型运载火箭结构优化设计与试验验证[J]. 上海航天, 2021, 38(3):134-146.
|
|
|
[11] |
王显会, 许刚, 李守成, 等. 特种车辆车架结构拓扑优化设计研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2007, 28(8):903-908.
|
|
|
[12] |
张海航, 于存贵, 唐明晶. 某火炮上架结构拓扑优化设计[J]. 弹道学报, 2009, 21(2):83-85,89.
|
|
|
[13] |
孙全兆, 杨国来, 葛建立. 某火炮上架结构改进设计[J]. 兵工学报, 2012, 33(11):1281-1285.
|
|
|
[14] |
孙玲庆, 李志刚, 王思杰. 某火炮翻板机构回转臂的结构优化设计[J]. 兵器装备工程学报, 2021, 42(4):224-227.
|
|
|
[15] |
doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2005.12.006 URL |
[16] |
|
[17] |
温晶晶, 吴斌, 刘承骛. 导弹整体式翼面骨架结构的拓扑优化设计[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(1):81-88.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2017.01.011 |
|
|
[18] |
杨翠东, 鄢章渝, 韩磊, 等. 火箭武器发射箱结构优化方法及应用[J]. 中北大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 39(1):61-68.
|
|
|
[19] |
孙延超, 李军, 韩世东, 等. 火箭发射装置回转箱体拓扑优化设计方法研究[J]. 弹箭与制导学报, 2012, 32(1):208-210.
|
|
|
[20] |
刘晴, 李军, 张震, 等. 某火箭炮底架结构的拓扑优化设计[J]. 四川兵工学报, 2015, 36(2):54-56.
|
|
|
[21] |
刘瀚超, 王学智, 李敏, 等. 基于多体动力学的发射装置托架拓扑优化设计[J]. 弹道学报, 2021, 33(1):11-15,22.
|
|
|
[22] |
刘欢, 李韶华, 张培强. 刚柔耦合特种车辆越障行驶动力学分析及悬架优化[J]. 动力学与控制学报, 2021, 19(3):74-82.
|
|
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
doi: 10.1007/s11831-019-09331-1 |
[25] |
doi: 10.1007/BF01650949 URL |
[26] |
doi: 10.1007/s001580050130 URL |
[27] |
doi: 10.1002/nme.2499 URL |
[28] |
doi: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2020.102897 URL |
[29] |
doi: 10.1007/s00158-012-0803-7 URL |
[30] |
doi: 10.1007/s00158-008-0250-7 URL |
[1] | XIANG Xinmei, LUO Linlin, FU Zushu, HE Shizhu. Effect of Gradient Mode on Mechanical Properties of Miura-ori Metamaterials [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2024, 45(2): 618-627. |
[2] | LIU Teng, ZHOU Xiongfei, WANG Chengquan, JING Lin. Wheel-rail Interaction Mechanism and Derailment Suppression Technology for Train Collision Accidents [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44(S1): 67-78. |
[3] | LOU Li, FAN Jian-hua, XU Cheng. Research on Topologically Optimized Anti-jamming Technology for Tactical MANETs [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2016, 37(9): 1662-1669. |
[4] | GAO Jun-qiang, TANG Xia-qing, HUANG Xiang-yuan, CHENG Xu-wei. FEA Method for Analysis of SINS Error Caused by Vibration Isolation System [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2016, 37(9): 1570-1577. |
[5] | XU Xiao, FAN Li-xia, WANG Ya-ping, DONG Xiao-bin. Trans-scale Polycrystalline Finite Element Simulation of Radial Forging Process for Barrel and Prediction of Texture [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2016, 37(7): 1180-1186. |
[6] | YANG Qing-tao, BAI Han-chen, ZHANG Tao, YANG Juan, WANG Hui. Design and Response Characteristics Analysis of a Fast-response Sensor for Temperature and Heat Flux Measurement [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2014, 35(6): 927-934. |
[7] | QIN Guo-hua, ZHANG Yun-jian, YE Hai-chao. A Neural Network-Based Prediction Method of Machining Deformation for Thin-walled Workpiece [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2013, 34(7): 840-845. |
[8] | LIU Jian-ning, JIANG Jun-biao, SHI Shun-xiang, MA Jia-jun, GUO Qiang. Optimization Analysis of Frequency Stabilization Servo System of Prisms Laser Gyro [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2013, 34(7): 821-827. |
[9] | QU Kai, ZHANG Jie, ZHANG Xu-dong. Research on Effects of Ship Motion on Interface Fatigue Damage of Solid Rocket Motor [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2012, 33(8): 986-990. |
[10] | SUN Quan-zhao, YANG Guo-lai, GE Jian-li. Improved Design for Top Carriage of a Gun [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2012, 33(11): 1281-1285. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||