摩擦对电动直线负载模拟器的影响及其抑制研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2019.10.010

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为抑制摩擦非线性因素对电动直线负载模拟器（ELLS）的影响，采用仿真与实验结合的方法分析摩擦对ELLS的影响。利用遗传算法对系统中的摩擦模型进行辨识，并得出了系统摩擦力与速度的关系；提出了一种摩擦前馈加变增益PID的混合控制方法，摩擦前馈用于消除摩擦对系统的影响，变增益PID用于进一步抑制系统在低速时的相位滞后；进行了对比仿真与实验。仿真分析与实验结果表明：与传统PID控制相比，采用摩擦前馈加变增益PID控制的ELLS加载波形畸变被抑制、加载误差与相位滞后均明显减少；所提出控制方法能够较好地抑制摩擦对ELLS的影响，提高加载精度。

关键词: 电动直线负载模拟器, 辨识, 摩擦模型, 摩擦前馈补偿, 变增益PID

Abstract: In order to suppress the effect of friction on electric linear load simulator (ELLS), the simulation analysis and experimental methods are used to analyze the effect of friction on ELLS, the genetic algorithm is used to identify the friction model in ELLS, and the relationship between friction and velocity is obtained. A hybrid control method of friction feedforward and variable gain PID is proposed, the friction feedforward compensation is used to eliminate the effect of friction, and the variable gain PID is used to further suppress the phase lag of ELLS at low velocity. Comparative simulation and experiment were made. The simulated analysis and the experimental results show that, compared with traditional PID control, the loading wave distortion of ELLS using the friction feedforward and variable gain PID is suppressed, and the loading error and phase lag are significantly reduced. The proposed control method can better suppress the effect of friction on ELLS and improve the loading accuracy. Key

Key words: electriclinearloadsimulator, identification, frictionmodel, frictionfeedforwardcompensation, variablegainproportion-integration-differentiation

中图分类号:

TP273⁺.3

潘卫东，范元勋，雷建杰，曹大伟，陆鹏程，徐志伟. 摩擦对电动直线负载模拟器的影响及其抑制研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2019, 40(10): 2050-2059.

PAN Weidong, FAN Yuanxun, LEI Jianjie, CAO Dawei, LU Pengcheng, XU Zhiwei. Effect of Friction on Electric Linear Load Simulator and Research on Friction Suppression[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2019, 40(10): 2050-2059.

参考文献

［1］牛国臣, 王巍, 宗光华. 基于迭代学习的电动负载模拟器复合控制[J]. 控制理论与应用, 2014, 31(12): 1740-1747.
NIU G C, WANG W, ZONG G H. Composite control for electric load simulator based on iterative learning[J]. Control Theory and Applications, 2014, 31(12): 1740-1747. (in Chinese)
[2］雷建杰, 范元勋, 徐志伟, 等. 影响电动直线负载模拟器性能的因素分析[J]. 组合机床与自动化加工技术, 2018(9): 12-15.
LEI J J, FAN Y X, XU Z W, et al. Analysis of factors affecting the performance of the electric linear load simulator[J]. Modular Machine Tool & Automatic Manufacturing Technique, 2018(9): 12-15. (in Chinese)
[3］王晓东, 华清, 焦宗夏, 等. 负载模拟器中的摩擦力及其补偿控制[J]. 中国机械工程, 2003, 14(6): 511-514.
WANG X D, HUA Q, JIAO Z X, et al. Friction force in load simulator and its compensation control[J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2003, 14(6): 511-514. (in Chinese)
[4］ HUANG Y, CHEN K, WEI J L. Robust controller design and experiment for electric load simulator[C]∥Proceedings of the 2010 3rd International Conference on Advanced Computer Theory and Engineering. Chengdu, China: IEEE, 2010: 3236-3240.
[5］张文静, 台宪青. 基于LuGre模型的火炮伺服系统摩擦力矩自适应补偿[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 47(增刊2): 1756-1760.
ZHANG W J, TAI X Q. Adaptive friction compensation in gun servo systems based on the LuGre model[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2007, 47(S2): 1756-1760. (in Chinese)
[6］倪志盛. 被动式力矩伺服鲁棒控制系统设计[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2014.
NI Z S. Research on key technology for passive torque servo system[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2014. (in Chinese)
[7］王晓东, 焦宗夏. 基于LuGre模型的电液加载系统摩擦补偿[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2008, 34(11): 1254-1257.
WANG X D, JIAO Z X. LuGre-based compensation for friction in electro-hydraulic loading system[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2008, 34(11): 1254-1257. (in Chinese)
[8］姚建勇, 焦宗夏. 改进型LuGre模型的负载模拟器摩擦补偿[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2010, 36(7): 812-815.
YAO J Y, JIAO Z X. Friction compensation for hydraulic load simulator based on improved LuGre friction model[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2010, 36(7): 812-815. (in Chinese)
[9］兰远锋. 电动舵机伺服系统的间隙与摩擦补偿控制[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2016.
LAN Y F. Compensation control of electric servo systems with backlash and friction[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2016. (in Chinese)

[10］ KOLEGAIN K, LEONARD F, ZIMMER-CHEVRET S, et al. A feedforward deflection compensation scheme coupled with an offline path planning for robotic friction stir welding[J]. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2018, 51(11): 728-733.
[11］周金柱, 段宝岩, 黄进. LuGre摩擦模型对伺服系统的影响与补偿[J]. 控制理论与应用, 2008, 25(6): 990-994.
ZHOU J Z, DUAN B Y, HUANG J. Effect and compensation for servo systems using LuGre friction model[J]. Control Theory and Applications, 2008, 25(6): 990-994. (in Chinese)
[12］ SHAMISA A, KIANI Z. Robust fault-tolerant controller design for aerodynamic load simulator[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2018, 78(7): 332-341.
[13］ YAO J Y, JIAO Z X, YAO B, et al. Nonlinear adaptive robust backstepping force control of hydraulic load simulator: Theory and experiments[J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2014, 28(4): 1499-1507.
[14］张博文. 被动式力矩伺服鲁棒控制系统设计[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2016.
ZHANG B W. Control design for a passive torque servo system based on robust methods[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2016. (in Chinese)
[15］罗雄飞. 基于神经网络的电动负载模拟器控制策略研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2007.
LUO X F. Research on electric loading system control strategy based on neural network[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2007. (in Chinese)
[16］王英, 熊振华, 丁汉. 基于状态观测的自适应摩擦力补偿的高精度控制[J]. 自然科学进展, 2005, 15(9): 1100-1105.
WANG Y, XIONG Z H, DING H. High precision control of adaptive friction compensation based on state observation[J]. Progress in Natural Science, 2005, 15(9): 1100-1105. (in Chinese)
[17］徐志伟. 电动直线加载测试系统优化设计及其控制方法研究[D]. 南京: 南京理工大学, 2018.
XU Z W. Research on optimization design and control method of electric linear loading test system[J]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Science and Technology, 2018. (in Chinese)
[18］ NASER M F M, IKHOUANE F. Hysteresis loop of the LuGre model[J]. Automatica, 2015, 59(4): 48-53.
[19］张鹏, 付永领, 郭彦青. 火箭发动机喷管伺服机构负载模拟系统设计与实验[J]. 兵工学报, 2014, 35(9): 1495-1502.
ZHANG P, FU Y L, GUO Y Q. Design and experiment of load simulation system for servo mechanism of rocket engine nozzle[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2014, 35(9): 1495-1502. (in Chinese)
[20］郭彦青, 付永领, 张朋, 等. 电液负载模拟器摩擦参数辨识及补偿[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2014, 40(9): 1256-1262.
GUO Y Q, FU Y L, ZHANG P, et al. Friction parameter identification and compensation for electro-hydraulic load simulator[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2014, 40(9): 1256-1262. (in Chinese)
[21］谭文斌, 李醒飞, 向红标, 等. 应用稳态误差分析辨识LuGre模型参数[J]. 光学精密工程, 2011, 19(3): 664-670.
TAN W B, LI X F, XIANG H B, et al. Parameter identification of LuGre model based on analysis of steady state error[J]. Optics and Precision Engineering, 2011, 19(3): 664-670. (in Chinese)

第40卷
第10期2019 年10月兵工学报ACTA
ARMAMENTARIIVol.40No.10Oct.2019

[1]	王伟平, 王琦, 于洋. 基于注意力机制与深度学习算法的机床主轴系统故障辨识[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(4): 861-875.
[2]	刘宗凯，刘满红，郭正阳，李占江. 全附体潜航器螺旋桨桨叶损伤故障辨识机理[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(12): 2710-2721.
[3]	孟柳, 章回炫, 范涛. 永磁同步电机静止参数辨识及电流环控制器自动参数整定[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(10): 2114-2122.
[4]	林通，钱林方，付佳维，王明明. 火炮高平机参数辨识与灵敏度[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(9): 1736-1744.
[5]	刘洋，常思江，魏伟. 多发弹气动参数联合辨识方法研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(5): 890-901.
[6]	余磊，张永励，袁梦笛，刘瑞卿. 基于泛函序列时变自回归滑动平均模型的弹箭时变模态参数递推估计方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(11): 2189-2197.
[7]	褚式新，茅云生，董早鹏，杨鑫. 基于极大似然法的高速无人艇操纵响应模型参数辨识[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(1): 127-134.
[8]	殷婷婷，贾方秀，于纪言，王晓鸣. 基于改进LuGre摩擦模型的双旋弹丸固定舵翼滚转位置鲁棒自适应控制算法[J]. 兵工学报, 2019, 40(12): 2425-2432.
[9]	李炳乾，董文瀚，马小山. 无人机编队保持反步容错控制[J]. 兵工学报, 2018, 39(11): 2172-2184.
[10]	丁传俊，张相炎，刘宁. 基于自适应无迹卡尔曼滤波算法的多股螺旋弹簧动态响应模型参数辨识和分析[J]. 兵工学报, 2018, 39(1): 28-37.
[11]	周焕银, 刘亚平，胡志强，刘开周, 衣瑞文. 基于辨识模型集的无人半潜水下机器人系统深度动态滑模控制切换策略研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(11): 2198-2206.
[12]	赵抢抢，侯保林. 火炮弹药协调器区间不确定参数辨识[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(1): 35-42.
[13]	管军，周家胜，易文俊，刘世平，常思江，史继刚. 基于自适应混沌变异粒子群优化算法的旋转弹丸气动参数辨识[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(1): 73-80.
[14]	金鑫，周克栋，赫雷，黄雪鹰，张俊斌. 枪托连续冲击作用下的人体参数辨识[J]. 兵工学报, 2016, 37(4): 598-602.
[15]	杨雪松，李长春，延皓，黄静，李竞. 基于矢量匹配的扰动力矩消除方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2016, 37(2): 348-356.