基于HF-DEMATEL-TOPSIS改进QFD的武器装备体系能力需求分析方法

doi:10.12382/bgxb.2024.0333

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对武器装备体系能力需求分析问题,提出基于犹豫模糊环境下的决策实验室分析法(Decision-making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory,DEMATEL)和逼近理想解排序法改进质量功能展开(Quality Function Deployment,QFD)的新方法。利用基于犹豫模糊理论的DEMATEL方法分析装备体系任务需求之间的影响关系,以确定任务需求重要度;根据装备体系任务需求重要度,建立基于犹豫模糊TOPSIS的装备能力需求优选模型,并通过改进的加权汉明距离计算装备能力需求的相对重要性,以智能城市作战装备体系为例,对比传统方法验证了改进QFD方法的有效性。研究结果表明,改进方法较好地解决了传统QFD在处理犹豫模糊信息时的缺陷,可为装备体系能力需求分析提供新的工具支持。

关键词: 质量功能展开, 犹豫模糊, 决策实验室分析法, 逼近理想解排序法, 装备体系能力需求

Abstract:

A new method is proposed for the analysis of capability requirements for the weapon systems,which enhances quality function deployment (QFD) by using the decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) method and the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) methods under a hesitant fuzzy environment.The proposed method utilizes the hesitant fuzzy theory-based DEMATEL method to analyze the interrelationships among the mission requirements of equipment system,thereby determining the importance of these requirements.Based on the importance of mission requirements,a hesitant fuzzy TOPSIS-based optimal model is established for equipment capability requirements.The relative importance of mission requirements is calculated from an improved weighted Hamming distance.The effectiveness of the improved QFD method is validated using an intelligent urban warfare equipment system as a case study compared to traditional methods.This improved method effectively addresses the shortcomings of traditional QFD method in handling the hesitant fuzzy information,providing new tools for the analysis of capability requirements of equipment systems.

Key words: quality function deployment, hesitant fuzzy, decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory, technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution, equipment system capability requirement

中图分类号:

E919

赵擎天, 李立伟, 张洋铭, 侯立志, 雷震. 基于HF-DEMATEL-TOPSIS改进QFD的武器装备体系能力需求分析方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2025, 46(2): 240333-.

ZHAO Qingtian, LI Liwei, ZHANG Yangming, HOU Lizhi, LEI Zhen. Analysis of Weapon System Capability Requirements Using an HF-DEMATEL-TOPSIS-based Enhanced QFD Method[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2025, 46(2): 240333-.

图/表 13

参考文献 28

[1]	郭齐胜, 樊延平, 穆歌, 等. 装备需求论证理论与方法[M]. 北京: 电子工业出版社, 2017.
	GUO Q S, FAN Y P, MU G, et al. Theory and methodology of equipment requirement demonstration[M]. Beijing: Publishing House of Electronics Industry, 2017. (in Chinese)
[2]	李娟, 郭雷平, 王宁, 等. 装备体系建设现状分析[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(增刊1):222-226.
	LI J, GUO L P, WANG N, et al. Analysis of the current situation of equipment system construction[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2022, 43(S1):222-226. (in Chinese)
[3]	AN J, ZHANG X C, YOU C L. Overview of capability requirement analysis methods for operational concept development[J]. Applied and Computational Engineering, 2023, 5(1):54-61.
[4]	刘己斌, 连志平, 苗永新. 作战任务清单与作战能力需求清单的映射机理[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2023, 48(2):52-56.
	LIU J B, LIAN Z P, MIAO Y X. Mapping mechanism between operational task list and operational capability requirements list[J]. Firepower and Command Control, 2023, 48(2):52-56. (in Chinese)
[5]	李驰运, 缪建明, 沈丙振. 基于改进STACKING集成学习方法的武器装备体系作战效能预测[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(11):3455-3464. doi: 10.12382/bgxb.2022.0797
	LI C Y, MIAO J M, SHEN B Z. Prediction of weapon equipment system combat effectiveness based on improved stacking ensemble learning method[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44(11):3455-3464. (in Chinese)
[6]	丁伟, 明振军, 王国新, 等. 基于正向解析式和多目标博弈优化算法的复杂装备体系优化设计方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2024, 45(6):1974-1990. doi: 10.12382/bgxb.2023.0031
	DING W, MING Z J, WANG G X, et al. Optimization design method of complex equipment system based on forward analytical model and multi-objective game optimization algorithm[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2024, 45(6):1974-1990. (in Chinese) doi: 10.12382/bgxb.2023.0031
[7]	MANSOURI M, MCGRATH M, SCHLOMER D, et al. Report on joint capabilities integration and development system (JCIDS)[R]. Hoboken,NJ, US: Stevens Institute of Technology, 2022.
[8]	KOIVISTO J, RITALA R, VILKKO M. Conceptual model for capability planning in a military context-a systems thinking approach[J]. Systems Engineering, 2022, 25(5):457-474.
[9]	AHMAD K, ABDELRAZEK M, ARORA C, et al. Requirements engineering for artificial intelligence systems:a systematic mapping study[J]. Information and Software Technology, 2023, 158:107176.
[10]	REZA D, AMINEH A. Non-functional requirement extracting methods for AI-based systems:a survey[C]// Proceedings of International Conference on Computer and Knowledge Engineering: Washington,D.C.,US: IEEE, 2023:535-539.
[11]	韦正现, 鞠鸿彬, 黄百乔, 等. 面向任务基于能力的武器装备体系需求分析[C]// 第二届体系工程学术会议—国防数字化战略与体系工程管理. 北海: 国防科技大学系统工程学院, 2020:8-19.
	WEI Z X, JU H B, HUANG B Q, et al. Task-oriented capability-based requirements analysis for weapon equipment systems[C]// Proceedings of the 2nd Symposium on System Engineering-National Defense Digitalization Strategy and System Engineering Management. Beihai GuangXi,China: School of Systems Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, 2020:8-19. (in Chinese)
[12]	张天鹏, 刘铁林, 高萍, 等. 基于STT-QFD-改进灰色关联分析的陆军装备体系作战能力评价[J]. 海军工程大学学报, 2021, 33(5):105-112.
	ZHANG T P, LIU T L, GAO P, et al. Evaluation of army equipment system combat capability based on STT-QFD and improved grey relational analysis[J] Journal of Naval University of Engineering, 2021, 33(5):105-112. (in Chinese)
[13]	姜相争, 刘铁林, 崔帅博, 等. 基于GQFD的智能化装备保障能力需求分析[J]. 现代防御技术, 2022, 50(4):38-44. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-086x.2022.04.005
	JIANG X Z, LIU T L, CUI S B, et al. Requirement analysis of intelligent equipment support capability based on GQFD[J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2022, 50(4) 38-44. (in Chinese)
[14]	李凯, 刘铁林, 高健, 等. 基于GQFD的智能化弹药保障装备能力需求分析[J]. 指挥控制与仿真, 2022, 44(6):46-50. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-3819.2022.06.007
	LI K, LIU T L, GAO J, et al. Analysis of intelligent ammunition support equipment capability requirements based on GQFD[J]. Command Control & Simulation, 2022, 44(6):46-50. (in Chinese)
[15]	班明莉, 王运斗, 高树田, 等. 基于战略到任务方法和质量功能展开的传染病现场防控装备需求分析方法研究[J]. 中国医学装备, 2022, 19(3):172-176.
	BAN M L, WANG Y D, GAO S T, et al. Research on infectious disease on-site prevention and control equipment requirements analysis method based on the strategy-to-task approach and quality function deployment[J]. China Medical Equipment, 2022, 19(3):172-176. (in Chinese)
[16]	邱华清. 基于QFD的产品服务系统设计需求多目标优化研究[D]. 上海: 上海理工大学, 2018.
	QIU H Q. Research on multi-objective optimization of product service system design requirements based on QFD[D]. Shanghai: University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, 2018. (in Chinese)
[17]	宫华萍, 尤建新, 王岑岚. 基于改进质量功能展开的质量特性重要度确定[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 47(9):1359-1368.
	GONG H P, YOU J X, WANG C L. Determination of the importance of quality characteristics based on improved quality function deployment[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2019, 47(9):1359-1368. (in Chinese)
[18]	WU S M, LIU H C, WANG L E. Hesitant fuzzy integrated MCDM approach for quality function deployment:a case study in electric vehicle[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2017, 55(15):4436-4449.
[19]	杨强. 群体模糊信息环境下的质量功能展开理论与应用研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2020.
	YANG Q. Research on theory and application of quality function deployment in a group fuzzy information environment[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020. (in Chinese)
[20]	HUANG J, YOU X Y, LIU H C, et al. New approach for quality function deployment based on proportional hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and prospect theory[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2018, 57(5):1283-1299.
[21]	LIU H C, WU S M, WANG Z L, et al. A new method for quality function deployment with extended prospect theory under hesitant linguistic environment[J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2021, 68(2):442-451.
[22]	彭安华, 张宜震, 王天宇, 等. 基于QFD和犹豫模糊语言的敏捷制造合作伙伴决策[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2021, 51(10):33-44.
	PENG A H, ZHANG Y Z, WANG T Y, et al. Decision-making for agile manufacturing partners based on QFD and hesitant fuzzy linguistic terms[J]. Mathematics in Practice and Theory, 2021, 51(10):33-44. (in Chinese)
[23]	杨惠. 基于犹豫模糊Dematel-Kano模型的定制旅游满意度因素分析研究[D]. 昆明: 昆明理工大学, 2021.
	YANG H. Research on the factors affecting customized tourism satisfaction based on the hesitant fuzzy Dematel-Kano model[D]. Kunming: Kunming University of Science and Technology, 2021. (in Chinese)
[24]	宋豪文, 贾红丽, 连光耀, 等. 基于GQFD的无人智能化保障装备能力需求分析[J]. 计算机测量与控制, 2023, 31(6):117-122.
	SONG H W, JIA H L, LIAN G Y, et al. Requirement analysis of unmanned intelligent support equipment capabilities based on GQFD[J]. Computer Measurement & Control, 2023, 31(6):117-122. (in Chinese)
[25]	TORRA V. Hesitant fuzzy sets[J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2010, 25:530-538.
[26]	唐孝安. 基于犹豫决策信息的多属性决策方法研究[D]. 合肥: 合肥工业大学, 2019.
	TANG X A. Research on multi-attribute decision-making methods based on hesitant decision information[D]. Hefei: Hefei University of Technology, 2019. (in Chinese)
[27]	余明亮, 曲双为. 基于AHP与QFD的智能汽车HMI设计研究[J]. 机械设计, 2023, 40(增刊1):196-201.
	YU M L, QU S W. Study on intelligent automobile HMI design based on AHP and QFD[J]. Mechanical Design, 2023, 40(S1):196-201. (in Chinese)
[28]	刘宁元, 汪新凡. 基于关联犹豫模糊信息的TOPSIS多属性决策方法[J]. 统计与决策, 2018, 34(17):66-69.
	LIU N Y, WANG X F. TOPSIS multi-attribute decision-making method based on correlated hesitant fuzzy information[J]. Statistics & Decision, 2018, 34(17):66-69. (in Chinese)

CRs	装备体系任务需求	ECs	装备体系能力需求
CR₁	电子侦察干扰	EC₁	多源情报智能融合
CR₂	人机协同突击	EC₂	智能精确穿透打击
CR₃	反智能作战	EC₃	任务智能规划
CR₄	智能自主攻击	EC₄	快速隐蔽机动
CR₅	隐蔽区域渗透清剿	EC₅	集群自主协同
		EC₆	电磁智能对抗
		EC₇	目标自主识别
		EC₈	战场综合防护
		EC₉	态势自主感知

CRs	装备体系任务需求	ECs	装备体系能力需求
CR₁	电子侦察干扰	EC₁	多源情报智能融合
CR₂	人机协同突击	EC₂	智能精确穿透打击
CR₃	反智能作战	EC₃	任务智能规划
CR₄	智能自主攻击	EC₄	快速隐蔽机动
CR₅	隐蔽区域渗透清剿	EC₅	集群自主协同
		EC₆	电磁智能对抗
		EC₇	目标自主识别
		EC₈	战场综合防护
		EC₉	态势自主感知

变量	CR₁	CR₂	CR₃	CR₄	CR₅
CR₁	0	{0.6}	{0.4,0.5}	{0.4,0.6}	{0.3,0.1}
CR₂	{0.5}	0	{0.7,0.8}	{0.6}	{0.6}
CR₃	{0.4}	{0.6}	0	{0.3}	{0.2,0.4, 0.5}
CR₄	{0.6,0.7}	{0.4,0.5, 0.6,0.7}	{0.5}	0	{0.6}
CR₅	{0.3,05}	{0.7}	{0.4}	{0.4,0.6}	0

变量	CR₁	CR₂	CR₃	CR₄	CR₅
CR₁	0	{0.6}	{0.4,0.5}	{0.4,0.6}	{0.3,0.1}
CR₂	{0.5}	0	{0.7,0.8}	{0.6}	{0.6}
CR₃	{0.4}	{0.6}	0	{0.3}	{0.2,0.4, 0.5}
CR₄	{0.6,0.7}	{0.4,0.5, 0.6,0.7}	{0.5}	0	{0.6}
CR₅	{0.3,05}	{0.7}	{0.4}	{0.4,0.6}	0

变量	CR₁	CR₂	CR₃	CR₄	CR₅
CR₁	0	0.6	0.45	0.5	0.2
CR₂	0.5	0	0.75	0.6	0.6
CR₃	0.4	0.6	0	0.3	0.376
CR₄	0.65	0.535	0.5	0	0.6
CR₅	0.4	0.35	0.4	0.5	0