旋成体高速入水可压缩性影响研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2020.04.011

兵工学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (4): 720-729.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2020.04.011

旋成体高速入水可压缩性影响研究

李国良¹，尤天庆²，孔德才²，李静¹，周伟江¹

(1.中国航天空气动力技术研究院一所，北京 100074；2.北京宇航系统工程研究所，北京 100076)

收稿日期:2019-06-27 修回日期:2019-06-27 上线日期:2020-06-02
通讯作者: 李静(1990—)，女，工程师，硕士 E-mail:lijing_li2010@163.com
作者简介:李国良(1978—)，男，高级工程师，博士。E-mail：liboyang0929@sina.com；
尤天庆(1984—)，男，高级工程师，博士。E-mail：ytqzz@126.com；
孔德才(1983—)，男，高级工程师，硕士。E-mail：bigblue_bit@msn.com；
周伟江(1962—)，男，研究员，博士。E-mail：zwj7349@sohu.com
基金资助:
装备发展部共用技术基金项目（41406040402）；国家自然科学基金项目（11772317）

Effect of Fluid Compressibility on High-speed Water-entry of Revolutionary Body

LI Guoliang¹, YOU Tianqing², KONG Decai²，LI Jing¹，ZHOU Weijiang¹

(1.The First Research Institute, China Academy of Aerospace Aerodynamics, Beijing 100074, China;2.Beijing Institute of Astronautical Systems Engineering, Beijing 100076, China)

Received:2019-06-27 Revised:2019-06-27 Online:2020-06-02

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对目前高速（≥100 m/s）跨水-气体界面多相流数值模拟中空化效应和水介质可压缩性影响等问题，建立一套高速入水数值模拟方法。以旋成体为计算模型，采用剪应力传递(SST) k-ω、标准(Standard)k-ε、重整化群(RNG)k-ε及可实现(Realizable) k-ε 4种湍流模型进行数值模拟，得到速度衰减与入水深度随时间变化的结果及入水1 ms时的空泡形态，并与理论解比较。基于SST k-ω湍流模型与文献［15，17］实验开展对比研究，选取入水速度50 m/s、100 m/s、200 m/s、400 m/s、800 m/s进行计算。研究结果表明：采用SST k-ω湍流模型的数值模拟结果与理论解一致性最好，入水速度衰减、空泡发展与实验结果基本一致，证明该方法的有效性；在入水速度≤100 m/s时，液体可压缩性对入水冲击载荷基本没有影响；在入水速度≥200 m/s时，随着入水速度增加，液体可压缩性对入水冲击载荷影响越大，会弱化入水冲击载荷及延缓最大载荷出现的时间；在考虑液体可压缩性时，空泡形态有收缩现象；入水速度越大，入水过程速度衰减越快，加速度值在入水初期较大；在计算模型周围被超空泡包裹的航行阶段，随着入水深度增加，加速度逐渐减小，加速度的变化逐渐平缓。

关键词: 旋成体, 高速入水, 空化流, 可压缩液体

Abstract: A set of simulation methods for high-speed (≥100 m/s) water-entry is developed for both cavitation and compressible effects in the numerical simulation of multi-phase flow at water-air interface. The revolutionary body is used as a computing model, and the turbulence models, including SST k-ω, Standard k-ε, RNG k-ε, and Realizable k-ε, are utilized for simulation. The change results of velocity damping and water-entry depth with time are obtained. The cavitation configuration at 1 ms is outlined. The simulated results are compared with the theoretical solutions, and the simulated results by SST k-ω agree with the theoretical solutions. The set of methods is used for the reference experiments in Refs. ［15］ and ［17］. Compared with experimental results, the set of methods is validated in terms of velocity damping and cavitation development. Some different water-entry velocities, including 50 m/s, 100 m/s, 200 m/s, 400 m/s and 800 m/s, are regarded as initial condition to be computed. The compressibility of water has no effect on the water-entry impact basically when water-entry velocity is less than 100 m/s. Beyond that, the compressibility of water has much effect on the water-entry impact, which can lessen the impact and delay the time of peak value. In addition, the cavitation configuration has shrunk, especially in the water-air area. With the increase in water-entry velocity, the velocity damping becomes quicker. The acceleration is relatively higher in the beginning of water-entry. During the period of the model covered by supercavitation, the acceleration gradually declines and changes gently with the increase in water-entry depth. Key

Key words: revolutionarybody, high-speedwater-entry, cavitationflow, compressiblewater

中图分类号:

TJ762.2⁺5

李国良，尤天庆，孔德才，李静，周伟江. 旋成体高速入水可压缩性影响研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(4): 720-729.

LI Guoliang, YOU Tianqing, KONG Decai，LI Jing，ZHOU Weijiang. Effect of Fluid Compressibility on High-speed Water-entry of Revolutionary Body[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2020, 41(4): 720-729.

参考文献

［1］ HARKINS T K, STEVES H K, GOELLER J E. Supercavitating water-entry projectile: ADD018834［R］. Washington, DC,US: Department of the Navy,1998.
［2］ LIU Y, YUE D K. Deterministic modeling of water entry and drop of an arbitrary three-dimensional body:ADA629055［R］. Cambridge, CA,US: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2002.
［3］ MAY A. The cavity after vertical water entry: AD679905［R］. White Oak, NC, US: United States Naval Ordnance Laboratory, 1968.
［4］ GILBARG D, ANDERSON R A. Influence of atmospheric pressure on the phenomena accompanying the entry of spheres into water［J］. Journal of Applied Physics, 1948, 9(2):127-139.
［5］ MAY A, HOOVER W R. A study of the water-entry cavity: AD611406［R］. White Oak, NC, US: United States Naval Ordnance Laboratory, 1963.
［6］时素果, 杨晓光, 王亚东. 细长体高速入水过程压力特性试验研究［J］. 应用力学学报, 2018, 35(2):223-228.
SHI S G, YANG X G, WANG Y D. Experimental study on the pressure characteristic of high-speed slender body water entry［J］. Chinese Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2018, 35(2):223-228. (in Chinese)
［7］蒋运华，徐胜利. 运动体小扰动下入水空泡试验研究［J］.弹道学报, 2016, 28(1):81-86.
JIANG Y H, XU S L. Experimental study on water entry cavity for vehicle with small perturbation［J］. Journal of Ballistics, 2016, 28(1):81-86. (in Chinese)
［8］何春涛, 王聪，何乾坤. 圆柱体低速入水空泡试验研究［J］. 物理学报，2012，61(13): 281-288.
HE C T, WANG C, HE Q K. Low speed water-entry of cylindrical projectile［J］. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(13): 281-288. (in Chinese)
［9］夏维学, 王聪，魏英杰. 高速旋转小球入水空泡特性数值模拟［J］. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2018, 50(4): 138-144.
XIA W X, WANG C, WEI Y J. Numerical simulation investigation on water-entry cavity of high-speed spinning sphere［J］. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2018, 50(4): 138-144. (in Chinese)

［10］孙钊, 曹伟, 王聪. 球体垂直入水过程流体动力数值研究［J］. 振动与冲击，2017，36(20):165-172.
SUN Z, CAO W, WANG C. Numerical investigation of hydrodynamic force acting on sphere during water entry［J］. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2017, 36(20):165-172. (in Chinese)
［11］马庆鹏，魏英杰，王聪. 锥头圆柱体高速入水空泡深闭合数值模拟研究［J］. 兵工学报, 2014, 35(9):1451-1457.
MA Q P, WEI Y J, WANG C. Numerical simulation of deep closure of high-speed water entry cavity of cone-cylinder［J］. Acta Armamentarii, 2014, 35(9):1451-1457. (in Chinese)
［12］ MARRONE S, COLARGOSSI A, CHIRON L, et al. High-speed water impacts of flat plate in different ditching configuration through a Riemann-ALE SPH model［J］. Journal of Hydrodyna-mics, 2018, 30(1): 38-48.
［13］ SEAN M M, MICHAEL P K, SCOTT T M, et al. The immersed boundary method for water entry simulation［C］∥Proceedings of the 49th AIAA Aerospace Science Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition. Orlando, FL, US: AIAA, 2011:2011-759.
［14］ NEAVES M D, EDWARDS J R. Time-accurate calculations of axisymmetric water entry for a supercavitating projectiles［C］∥Proceedings of the 34th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit.Portland, OR, US:AIAA, 2004: 2004-2643.
［15］陈晨, 魏英杰, 王聪. 小型运动体高速倾斜入水空泡流动数值研究［J］. 兵工学报, 2019, 40(2):334-344.
CHEN C, WEI Y J, WANG C. Computational analysis cavity flow induced by high-speed oblique water-entry of axisymmetric body［J］. Acta Armamentarii, 2019, 40(2):334-344. (in Chinese)
［16］ LEE M, LONGORIA R G, WILSON D E. Cavity dynamics in high-speed water entry［J］. Physics of Fluids, 1997, 9(3): 540-550.
［17］路中磊. 开放空腔壳体入水过程多相流动特性研究［D］. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学, 2017:58-65.
LU Z L. Study on multiphase flow during water entry of semiclosed cylinder［D］. Harbin: Harbin institute of technology, 2017:58-65.(in Chinese)

第41卷第4期2020 年4月
兵工学报ACTA ARMAMENTARII
Vol.41No.4Apr.2020

[1]	李宜果，王聪，武雨嫣，曹伟，卢佳兴，何乾坤. 跨介质航行体高速入水空泡壁面运动特性[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(3): 574-585.
[2]	杨晓光，党建军，王鹏，王亚东，陈诚，李得英. 波浪对航行体高速入水载荷特性影响[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(2): 355-362.
[3]	张富毅，鲁航，陈泰然，吴钦，黄彪，王国玉. 轴流式喷水推进器启动过程的瞬态特性[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(8): 1592-1603.
[4]	袁绪龙，栗敏，丁旭拓，任伟，周方旭. 跨介质航行器高速入水冲击载荷特性[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(7): 1440-1449.
[5]	马庆鹏，魏英杰，王聪，曹伟，陈超倩. 锥头圆柱体高速入水空泡深闭合数值模拟研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2014, 35(9): 1451-1457.
[6]	白泽宇，王国玉，吴钦，黄彪. 绕圆盘空化流动的拉格朗日拟序结构分析[J]. 兵工学报, 2014, 35(3): 362-370.
[7]	王云, 袁绪龙, 吕策. 弹体高速入水弯曲弹道实验研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2014, 35(12): 1998-2002.
[8]	张成春，任露泉，王晶，张永智. 旋成体仿生凹坑表面流场控制减阻仿真分析[J]. 兵工学报, 2009, 30(8): 1066-1072.
[9]	高树滋、郑建国. 可压缩液体反后坐装置的原理和应用[J]. 兵工学报, 1993, 14(4): 64-68.
[10]	张维全. 钝头旋成体气动カ计算的一种实用方法[J]. 兵工学报, 1990, 11(3): 42-50.

旋成体高速入水可压缩性影响研究

Effect of Fluid Compressibility on High-speed Water-entry of Revolutionary Body

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 10

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价