高挥发性液体传质速率机理和实验研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2020.06.008

兵工学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (6): 1123-1130.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2020.06.008

高挥发性液体传质速率机理和实验研究

刘文杰¹，白春华¹，刘庆明¹，姚箭¹，王晔²

（1.北京理工大学机电学院，北京 100081; 2.华北科技学院研究生部，河北廊坊 065201）

收稿日期:2019-07-01 修回日期:2019-07-01 上线日期:2020-08-07
通讯作者: 姚箭（1991—），男，博士后 E-mail:7520180081@bit.edu.cn
作者简介:刘文杰（1990—），男，博士研究生。E-mail: 3120160166@bit.edu.cn
基金资助:
中央高校基本科研业务费专项项目(3142019011)；中国博士后科学基金项目(2019M660488)；河北省自然科学基金项目(D2018508107)

Mechanism and Experimental Study of High Volatile Liquid Mass Transfer Rate

LIU Wenjie¹, BAI Chunhua¹, LIU Qingming¹, YAO Jian¹, WANG Ye²

（1.School of Mechanical Engineering， Beijing Institute of Technology， Beijing 100081, China;2.Graduate Department， North China Institute of Science and Technology， Langfang 065201， Hebei， China）

Received:2019-07-01 Revised:2019-07-01 Online:2020-08-07

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为研究高挥发性液体传质速率计算方法，建立矩形风道，在风道中制造不同风速空气流，对103.9 mm液面直径的乙醚液面进行气体与液体（简称气液）传质质量损失的实验研究，分析不同温度对气液传质速率的影响。以实验结果为依据，根据麦克斯韦速率分布理论，结合Mackay等 ^［12］提出的低于沸点温度的气液传质速率计算模型进行量纲分析，提出新的温度修正项，对计算模型进行修正。液面实验结果表明：随着温度的降低，气液传质速率减小；随着风速的减小，气液传质速率减小。通过实验值与计算值的对比得到温度修正项系数为0.559，计算方法中给出气液传质速率与温度、风速0.78的次幂呈正比。为验证气液传质速率计算模型的准确性，进行液柱下流气液传质传热实验，使不同直径乙醚液柱通过2.0 m/s空气流，测量实验前后液体温度变化。根据修正后气液传质速率计算模型计算液柱下流过程中气液传质能量传递导致的温度变化情况，与实验结果进行对比。液柱下流实验结果表明：计算结果与实验测量值对比误差小于等于3.81%，修正后气液传质速率计算模型误差较小，计算精度高。

关键词: 云爆剂, 气体与液体传质, 传质速率, 风速, 液体温度, 挥发速率

Abstract: In order to study the calculation method of high volatile liquid mass transfer rate, a rectangular air duct is established, the different wind speed air flows are formed in the air passage, and the gas-liquid mass transfer loss on ether with 103.9 mm liquid surface diameter is studied experimentally, and the influences of different temperatures on the gas fluid transfer rate are analyzed. Based on the experimental results, the dimensional analysis below the boiling point temperature proposed by Donald Mackay^［12］ is carried out by using Maxwell's rate distribution theory and the gas-liquid mass transfer rate calculation model, and a new temperature correction term is proposed to correct the calculation model. The experimental results of liquid level show that the gas-liquid mass transfer rate decreases with the decrease in temperature and wind speed. The value of temperature correction term coefficient is 0.559 in comparison with the calculated value. The gas-liquid mass transfer rate is proportional to the powers of 0.78 of temperature and wind speed. A gas-liquid-liquid mass transfer heat transfer experiment was carried out to make the different diameter ether liquid columns pass through a 2.0 m/s air flow, and the measurement experiment was carried out. The temperature changes of liquid before and after experiment were measured. According to the modified gas-liquid mass transfer rate calculation model, the temperature change caused by gas-liquid mass transfer energy transfer during the liquid column down-flow process is calculated and compared with the experimental results. The experimental results of liquid column downflow show that the error between the calculated and experimental results is less than or equal to 3.81%, and the calculated error of the modified gas-liquid mass transfer rate calculation model is small with high computational accuracy. Key

Key words: fuel-air-explosiveagent, gas-liquidmasstransfer, masstransferrate, windspeed, liquidtemperature, evaporationrate

中图分类号:

X932
TJ55

刘文杰，白春华，刘庆明，姚箭，王晔. 高挥发性液体传质速率机理和实验研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(6): 1123-1130.

LIU Wenjie, BAI Chunhua, LIU Qingming, YAO Jian, WANG Ye. Mechanism and Experimental Study of High Volatile Liquid Mass Transfer Rate[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2020, 41(6): 1123-1130.

参考文献

［1］王世英. 二次起爆云爆战斗部的发展趋势［C］∥首届兵器工程大会论文集.重庆：中国兵工学会，重庆市科学技术协会,2017.
WANG S Y. The development trend of the second detonation cloud explosion warhead［C］∥Proceedings of the 1st Ordnance Science and Engineering Conference. Chongqing: China Ordnance Society, Chongqing Science and Technology Association, 2017.（in Chinese）
［2］党福辉. 开敞空间可燃气云爆炸数值模拟研究［D］. 天津：天津理工大学, 2017.
DANG F H. Numerical simulation of flammable gas cloud explosion in open space［D］. Tianjin：Tianjin University of Technology, 2017. （in Chinese）
［3］饶国宁, 周莉, 宋述忠, 等. 云爆药剂爆炸超压测试及威力评价［J］. 爆炸与冲击, 2018, 38(3): 579-585.
RAO G N, ZHOU L, SONG S Z, et al. Overpressure test and power evaluation of cloud explosives explosion［J］. Explosion and Shock, 2018, 38 (3): 579-585. （in Chinese）
［4］王晔, 白春华, 李建平. 弹壳体结构对燃料装药抛撒速率影响的数值模拟研究［J］. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(1): 43-49.
WANG Y, BAI C H, LI J P.Numerical simulation of the effect of shell structure on discharge rate of fuel charge［J］.Acta Armamentarii, 2017,38(1): 43-49.（in Chinese）
［5］郭明儒, 娄文忠, 金鑫, 等. 燃料空气炸药固体燃料浓度动态分布试验研究［J］. 兵工学报, 2016, 37(2): 226-231.
GUO M R, LOU W Z, JIN X, et al. Experimental study on dynamic distribution of solid fuel concentration in fuel air explosives［J］.Acta Armamentarii, 2016, 37(2): 226-231. （in Chinese）
［6］陈嘉琛, 张奇, 马秋菊, 等. 固体与液体混合燃料抛撒过程数值模拟［J］. 兵工学报, 2014, 35(7): 972-976.
CHEN J C, ZHANG Q, MA Q J, et al. Numerical simulation of solid and liquid mixed fuel dispersion process［J］.Acta Armamentarii, 2014, 35(7): 972-976. （in Chinese）
［7］刘焜, 余永刚, 赵娜. 某空气雾化旋流喷嘴在受限空间内雾化特性的实验研究［J］. 兵工学报, 2015, 36(10): 1882-1887.
LIU K, YU Y G, ZHAO N. Experimental study on atomization characteristics of an air atomizing swirl nozzle in a confined space［J］. Acta Armamentarii, 2015, 36(10): 1882-1887. （in Chinese）
［8］赵鹏, 李国岫, 张涛, 等. 基于流体体积方法的燃油液滴蒸发过程数值模拟研究［J］. 兵工学报, 2013, 34(11): 1359-1365.
ZHAO P, LI G X, ZHANG T, et al. Numerical simulation of fuel droplet evaporation process based on fluid volume method ［J］. Acta Armamentarii, 2013, 34(11): 1359-1365. （in Chinese）
［9］ LI X, WANG W W, ZHANG P, et al. Interactions between gas-liquid mass transfer and bubble behaviours［J］. Royal Society Open Science, 2019, 6(5): 190136.

［10］ GUO R W, FU T T, ZHU C Y, et al. Hydrodynamics and mass transfer of gas-liquid flow in a tree-shaped parallel microchannel with T-type bifurcations［J］. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2019, 373: 1203-1211.
［11］ TREYBAL R E. Mass transfer operation［M］. New York, NY, US: McGraw-Hill, 1968:89-94.
［12］ MACKAY D, MATSUGU R S． Evaporation rates of liquid hydrocarbon spills on land and water［J］. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 1973, 51(4):434-439．
［13］ SUTTON G. Micrometeorology［M］. New York,NY,US: McGraw-Hill, 1953:121-124.
［14］ DAVID R L. CRC Handbook of chemistry and physics［M］. 87th ed. Boca Raton, FL, US: CRC Press,2005.
［15］ DALTON J. Experimental essays on the constitution of mixed gases: on the force of steam or vapor from water or other liquids in different temperatures, both in a Torricelli vacuum and in air; on evaporation; and on expansion of gases by heat［J］. Memoirs of the Literary and Philosophical Society of Manchester, 1802, 5: 536-602.
［16］ MENG X Y, ZHENG P J, WU J T, et al. Density and viscosity measurements of diethyl ether from 243 to 373 K and up to 20 MPa［J］. Fluid Phase Equilibria, 2008, 271(1):1-5.
［17］ ANSYS Fluent 14.0 UDF manual ［EB/OL］. https:∥www.ansys.com/.2011-11/2019-04-11.
［18］朱红钧. FLUENT 15.0流场分析实战指南［M］. 北京：人民邮电出版社, 2015.
ZHU H J. FLUENT 15.0 flow field analysis practical guide［M］. Beijing: Posts & Telecom Press, 2015. （in Chinese）

第41卷第6期2020 年6月
兵工学报ACTA ARMAMENTARII
Vol.41No.6Jun.2020

[1]	宋保维，刘占一，胡海豹，黄明明，黄桥高，马骥. 光滑和脊状表面湍流边界层流场对比试验研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2009, 30(6): 769-772.
[2]	1:宋胜宪;2:刘树勇. ー种新型坦克射击固态风速传感器[J]. 兵工学报, 1997, 18(3): 265-269.
[3]	陈钱、张保民、柏连发. Lidar多向风速实时遥测系统[J]. 兵工学报, 1997, 18(2): 121-124.

高挥发性液体传质速率机理和实验研究

Mechanism and Experimental Study of High Volatile Liquid Mass Transfer Rate

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 3

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价