浅海水声信道模型差异对纠错码性能分析的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2013.11.010

兵工学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (11): 1404-1411.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2013.11.010

浅海水声信道模型差异对纠错码性能分析的影响

陈友淦^1,2，许肖梅^1,2，张兰¹，林梅英^1,2

(1厦门大学水声通信与海洋信息技术教育部重点实验室, 福建厦门 361005；2厦门大学海洋与地球学院，福建厦门 361005)

收稿日期:2012-10-09 修回日期:2012-10-09 上线日期:2014-01-22
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41176032、41376040); 中央高校基本科研业务费专项基金/厦门大学基础创新科研基金项目(201112G020、201212G012)；高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金项目(20130121120033)

Effects of Different Sallow Water Acoustic Channel Models on Errorcorrection Code Performance Analysis

CHEN You-gan^1,2, XU Xiao-mei^1,2, ZHANG Lan¹, LIN Mei-ying^1,2

(1Key Laboratory of Underwater Acoustic Communication and Marine Information Technology of the Ministry of Education,Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, Fujian, China;2College of Ocean & Earth Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, Fujian, China)

Received:2012-10-09 Revised:2012-10-09 Online:2014-01-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 由于水声信道复杂多变，很难进行信道建模，迄今为止并没有一个标准的统计信道模型。针对不同的研究对象，往往需要采用不同的水声信道模型，而评估信道建模差异对研究结论的影响则具有重要意义。从信道纠错码角度，在分析时不变信道模型、时变信道模型和准静止衰落信道模型的基础上，结合高效信道纠错码(以LDPC码为例)，讨论了水声信道模型差异对研究纠错码性能可能带来的影响，为实际设计水声通信系统提供参考。仿真结果表明，尽管不同信道建模方式对系统解码的具体信噪比数值要求不大相同，但编译码参数优化设计的方案基本一致，海试数据则进一步验证了上述结论。

关键词: 通信技术, 水声通信, 信道模型, 信道纠错码, LDPC码

Abstract: There have been no standard statistical channel models for the underwater acoustic (UWA) channel as a result of the complex and variability of UWA channel. Different UWA channel models are required for different purposes during the UWA communication research. It is important to evaluate the effect of different UWA channel modeling on research conclusions. From the perspective of channel errorcorrection code, the effects of different channel models on channel errorcorrection code (taking LDPC codes as an example) design are investigated by analyzing several UWA channel models, including timeinvariance model, timevariance model and quasistatic fading model adopted in UWA communication simulation. The simulation results show that the optimized designs of coding parameters are almost the same, although different channel modeling usually requires different signaltonoise ratio for decoding. The sea test data are adopted to further verify the conclusions.

Key words: communication technology, underwater acoustic communications, channel model, channel errorcorrection code, LDPC code

中图分类号:

TN929.3

陈友淦，许肖梅，张兰，林梅英. 浅海水声信道模型差异对纠错码性能分析的影响[J]. 兵工学报, 2013, 34(11): 1404-1411.

CHEN You-gan, XU Xiao-mei, ZHANG Lan, LIN Mei-ying. Effects of Different Sallow Water Acoustic Channel Models on Errorcorrection Code Performance Analysis[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2013, 34(11): 1404-1411.

参考文献

［1］ Xu X, Zhou S, Morozov A K, et al. Per-survivor processing for underwater acoustic communications with direct-sequence spread spectrum［J］. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2013,133(5):2746-2754. ［2］ Xu X, Wang Z, Zhou S, et al. Parameterizing both path amplitude and delay variations of underwater acoustic channels for block decoding of orthogonal frequency division multiplexing［J］. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2012,131(6):4672-4679. ［3］ Stojanovic M. On the relationship between capacity and distance in an underwater acoustic communication channel[J]. ACM Sigmobile Mobile Computing and Communications Review, 2007, 11(4): 34-43. [4] 张仁和. 中国海洋声学研究进展[J]. 物理, 1994, 23(9): 513-518. ZHANG Ren-he. Research progress on China ocean acoustics[J]. Physics, 1994, 23(9): 513-518. (in Chinese) [5] 刘胜兴. 浅海水声信道高效纠错编码技术研究[D]. 厦门: 厦门大学, 2009. LIU Sheng-xing. High-efficiency error correcting code techniques for shallow water acoustic channels[D]. Xiamen: Xiamen University, 2009. (in Chinese) [6] 艾宇慧, 惠俊英, 高静. 水声信道相关均衡器仿真研究[J]. 声学学报, 1999, 24(6): 589-597. AI Yu-hui, HUI Jun-ying, GAO Jing. Study of simulation of underwater acoustic channel correlated equalizer[J].Acta Acustica, 1999, 24(6): 589-597.（in Chinese） [7] Wang Z, Zhou S, Preisig J C, et al. Clustered adaptation for estimation of time-varying underwater acoustic channels[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2012, 60(6): 3079-3091. [8] 李国梁. 水声相位相干通信与自适应均衡技术研究[D]. 西安: 西北工业大学, 2007. LI Guo-liang. Research of phase-coherent communications and adaptive equalization for UWA channels[D]. Xi’an: Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2007. (in Chinese) [9] Vajapeyam M, Vedantam S, Mitra U, et al. Distributed space-time cooperative schemes for underwater acoustic communications[J]. IEEE Transactions on Oceanic Engineering, 2008, 33(4): 489-501.

[1]	刘芳, 刘健, 冯永新. 艾森斯坦整数优化的SCMA码本设计方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(5): 1529-1536.
[2]	李彤，苗成林，吕军. 基于功率谱对消的时域相关认知跳频谱检测算法[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(9): 1754-1760.
[3]	范雪冰，王超，佟首峰，南航，关姝，郝世聪，姜会林. 空间光到单模多芯光纤耦合效率分析及影响因素研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(12): 2414-2422.
[4]	唐尧，李波，闫中江，杨懋，左晓亚. 一种基于簇首协调的时分多址路由协议[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(11): 2143-2150.
[5]	姜宇嘉，李旭，邵小桃，孙晨华，李国彦. 无线多跳网络可靠传输保障机制性能分析[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(11): 2151-2158.
[6]	刘颖，唐艺玮，邵小桃，李旭. 基于无线多跳自组网的混合路由研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(1): 184-189.
[7]	江伟华，童峰，王彬，刘世刚. 采用主分量分析的非合作水声通信信号调制识别[J]. 兵工学报, 2016, 37(9): 1670-1676.
[8]	韩笑，郭龙祥，殷敬伟，生雪莉. 基于分频带传输的单载波水声通信技术研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2016, 37(9): 1677-1683.
[9]	李小明，张立中，孟立新，宋延嵩，姜会林. 机载无线激光通信对准-捕获-跟踪系统及动态飞行试验研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2016, 37(6): 1044-1051.
[10]	韩笑，生雪莉，殷敬伟，刘冰. 基于双向判决反馈均衡器的水声通信海试试验研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2016, 37(3): 553-558.
[11]	徐春凤，韩成，姜会林. 航空平台间激光通信捕获链路功率分析与仿真[J]. 兵工学报, 2016, 37(11): 2015-2021.
[12]	杜传报，全厚德，马万治，崔佩璋，王晓明. 载波侦听随机分组码分多址接入协议设计与簇内多址干扰性能分析[J]. 兵工学报, 2015, 36(7): 1256-1265.
[13]	王驰，殷敬伟，杜鹏宇，陈阳. 循环后缀在水声时反正交频分复用系统中的应用研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2015, 36(5): 885-890.
[14]	高天元，胡源，姜会林，王志坚. 机载空间激光通信大气附面层影响及补偿技术研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2015, 36(12): 2278-2283.
[15]	赵义武，娄岩，韩成，姜会林，佟首峰. 飞机间激光通信捕获过程中动态补偿算法研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2015, 36(1): 117-121.

浅海水声信道模型差异对纠错码性能分析的影响

Effects of Different Sallow Water Acoustic Channel Models on Errorcorrection Code Performance Analysis

PDF

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价