基于作战交互网络的体系作战能力计算

doi:10.12382/bgxb.2022.1039

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为解决现有的作战网络模型难以体现作战双方交互动态、节点删除策略脱离作战实际、体系能力量化过度依赖杀伤链数量等问题,提出一种基于交互对抗网络模型的体系作战能力计算分析方法。建立红蓝双方交互网络模型,将双方作战节点都纳入网络模型,通过可达性节点删除策略实现双方节点更新;引入杀伤链能力及体系杀伤链能力等概念,并以毁伤规模量化体系作战能力;考虑到不等概率网络2端连通度计算时的复杂度,采用蒙特卡洛仿真法求解体系杀伤链能力。仿真实验分析了影响体系作战能力的关键变量,并和其他方法进行了对比分析。研究结果表明,指控节点功能能力提升是作战体系的核心关键,对己方体系作战毁伤能力的非线性提升、敌方体系的非线性压制具有重要作用,仿真对比实验验证了所提方法的优越性。

关键词: 体系作战能力, 作战交互网络, 杀伤链, 网络联通性

Abstract:

Traditional combat network models struggle to reflect interaction dynamics between combat parties and often neglect practical node deletion strategies. Additionally, system capability quantification often relies excessively on the number of kill chains. To address these issues, this paper proposes a system combat capability analysis method based on an interactive adversarial network model. The paper establishes a red-blue interactive network model that incorporates both combat nodes into the network model, and suggests updating both nodes through a reachable node deletion strategy. It introduces the concepts of kill chain capability and system kill chain capability, and quantifies the system combat capability based on the scale of destruction. To account for the complexity of calculating two-terminal connectivity in unequal probability networks, this paper uses Monte Carlo simulation to solve the system kill chain capability. Simulation experiments analyze key variables affecting the system combat capability and validate the analysis with other methods. The results show that the enhancement of the functional capability of the accusation node is the core key of the combat system, which plays an important role in the non-linear enhancement of the combat destruction capability of the own system and the non-linear suppression of the enemy system, and the simulation comparison experiments verify the superiority of the method in this paper.

Key words: system combat capability, combat interaction network, kill chain, network connectivity

中图分类号:

N945

陈文钰, 李为民, 张涛, 邵雷, 徐海洋, 王希. 基于作战交互网络的体系作战能力计算[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(10): 2885-2896.

CHEN Wenyu, LI Weimin, ZHANG Tao, SHAO Lei, XU Haiyang, WANG Xi. Calculation of System Combat Capability Using an Interactive Network Approach[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44(10): 2885-2896.

图/表 19

表1 节点连接关系

Table 1 Factors in the table

序号	边	意义	属性
1	E₁:BS→RS	蓝方侦察类节点被红方侦察类节点探测到	预警侦察
2	E₂:BI→RS	蓝方效应类节点被红方侦察类节点探测到	预警侦察
3	E₃:BD→RS	蓝方指控类节点被红方侦察类节点探测到	预警侦察
4	E₄:RS→RD	红方侦察类节点向红方指控类节点传输信息	情报上传
5	E₅:RD→RI	红方决策类节点向红方效应类节点下达命令	指令下达
6	E₆:RI→BS	红方效应类节点对蓝方侦察类节点实施打击	效果施加
7	E₇:RI→BI	红方效应类节点对蓝方效应类节点实施打击	效果施加
8	E₈:RI→BD	红方效应类节点对蓝方决策类节点实施打击	效果施加
9	E₉:RS→BS	红方侦察类节点被蓝方侦察类节点探测到	预警侦察
10	E₁₀:RI→BS	红方效应类节点被蓝方侦察类节点探测到	预警侦察
11	E₁₁:RD→BS	红方指控类节点被蓝方侦察类节点探测到	预警侦察
12	E₁₂:BS→BD	蓝方侦察类节点向蓝方指控类节点传输信息	情报上传
13	E₁₃:BD→BI	蓝方决策类节点向蓝方效应类节点下达命令	指令下达
14	E₁₄:BI→RS	蓝方效应类节点对红方侦察类节点实施打击	效果施加
15	E₁₅:BI→RI	蓝方效应类节点对红方效应类节点实施打击	效果施加
16	E₁₆:BI→RD	蓝方效应类节点对红方决策类节点实施打击	效果施加

图1 杀伤链示意图

Fig.1 Kill chain diagram

图2 多条杀伤链示意图

Fig.2 Multiple kill chains

图3 蒙特卡洛仿真流程

Fig.3 Monte Carlo simulation process

图4 红蓝作战体系网络拓扑图

Fig.4 Network topology of the Red-Blue Combat System

表2 作战节点详细情况

Table 2 Detailed data of combat nodes

类型	数量	能力期望	能力方差	可靠度期望	可靠度方差	防护能力期望	防护能力方差
RS	10	0.3	0.01	0.8	0.01	0.8	0.01
RD	5	0.3	0.01	0.8	0.01	0.8	0.01
RI	10	0.3	0.01	0.8	0.01	0.8	0.01
BS	10	0.3	0.01	0.8	0.01	0.8	0.01
BD	5	0.3	0.01	0.8	0.01	0.8	0.01
BI	10	0.3	0.01	0.8	0.01	0.8	0.01

图5 不同类型红方节点的功能能力对交互前杀伤链均值的影响

Fig.5 Influence of functional ability of different types of red cube nodes on mean value of kill chain before interaction

图6 不同类型红方节点的功能能力对交互前体系作战能力的影响

Fig.6 Influence of functional capability of different red cube nodes on combat capability before interaction

图7 不同类型红方节点的功能能力对交互后杀伤链均值的影响

Fig.7 Influence of functional ability of different types of red cube nodes on mean value of kill chain after interaction

图8 不同类型红方节点的功能能力对交互后体系作战能力的影响

Fig.8 Influence of functional capability of different red cube nodes on combat capability after interaction

图9 不同类型红方节点的功能能力对交互后双方节点损失比例的影响

Fig.9 Influence of functional ability of different types of red cube nodes on the loss ratio of both sides after interaction

表3 A与B的作战节点情况

Table 3 Operation nodes of country A and country B

类型	数量	能力期望	能力方差	可靠度期望	可靠度方差	防护能力期望	防护能力方差
RS	9	0.35	0.01	0.85	0.01	0.75	0.01
RD	3	0.35	0.01	0.85	0.01	0.75	0.01
RI	9	0.35	0.01	0.85	0.01	0.75	0.01
BS	9	0.35	0.01	0.85	0.01	0.75	0.01
BD	3	0.35	0.01	0.85	0.01	0.75	0.01
BI	9	0.35	0.01	0.85	0.01	0.75	0.01

图10 交互前杀伤链数目均值

Fig.10 Mean number of killing chains before interaction

图11 交互后杀伤链数目均值

Fig.11 Average number of kill chains after interaction

图12 交互后双方的节点损失比例

Fig.12 Node loss ratio of both sides after interaction

图13 交互前体系作战能力

Fig.13 System combat capability before interaction

图14 交互后体系作战能力

Fig.14 System combat capability after interaction

图15 交互前体系作战能力(文献[15]中的方法)

Fig.15 System combat capability before interaction (in Ref.[15])

图16 交互后体系作战能力(文献[15]中的方法)

Fig.16 System combat capability after interaction (in Ref.[15])

参考文献 29

[1]	TAYLOR J G. Lanchester-type models of warfare and optimal control[J]. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 1974, 21(1): 79-106. doi: 10.1002/nav.v21:1 URL
[2]	MCCARTNEY M. The solution of Lanchester’s equations with inter-battle reinforcement strategies[J]. Physica A:Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2022, 586: 126477. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2021.126477 URL
[3]	KRESS M, CAULKINS J P, FEICHTINGER G, et al. Lanchester model for three-way combat[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2018, 264(1): 46-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.07.026 URL
[4]	赵丹玲, 谭跃进, 李际超, 等. 基于异质网络的武器装备体系结构抗毁性研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2019, 39(12): 3197-3207. doi: 10.12011/1000-6788-2018-1302-11
	ZHAO D L, TAN Y J, LI J C, et al. Research on structural robustness of weapon system-of-systems based on heterogeneous network[J]. Systems Engineering Theory & Practice, 2019, 39(12): 3197-3207. (in Chinese)
[5]	李尔玉, 龚建兴, 黄健. 基于功能链的融合网络功能抗毁性评估[J]. 兵工学报, 2019, 40(7): 1450-1459. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2019.07.015
	LI E Y, GONG J X, HUANG J. Analysis about functional invulnerability of convergent network based on function chain[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2019, 40(7): 1450-1459. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2019.07.015
[6]	王运明, 陈思, 陈波, 等. 基于作战链路效率的指挥与控制网络抗毁测度[J]. 指挥与控制学报, 2017, 3(1): 61-66.
	WANG Y M, CHEN S, CHEN B, et al. Measure of invulnerability for command and control network based on combat link effciency[J]. Journal of Command and Control, 2017, 3(1): 61-66. (in Chinese)
[7]	郭晓成, 马润年, 陈彤睿, 等. 跨层协同指挥控制网络抗毁性研究[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2019, 44(6): 36-40.
	GUO X C, MA R N, CHEN T R, et al. Study on invulnerability of cross-layer cooperative C2 network[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2019, 44(6): 36-40. (in Chinese)
[8]	LI J C, JIANG J, YANG K W, et al. Research on functional robustness of heterogeneous combat networks[J]. IEEE Systems Journal, 2019, 13(2): 1487-1495. doi: 10.1109/JSYST.2018.2828779
[9]	陈登, 陈楚湘, 周春华. 基于“OODA环”的杀伤网节点重要性评估[J/OL]. 兵工学报, 2022(2022-08-25)[2022-11-10]. https://doi.org/10.12382/bgxb.2022.0623.
	CHEN D, CHEN C X, ZHOU C H. Importance evaluation of kill network nodes based on “OODA loop”[J/OL]. Acta Armamentarii, 2022(2022-08-25) [2022-11-10]. https://doi.org/10.12382/bgxb.2022.0623. (in Chinese)
[10]	王超, 郭基联, 符凌云. 基于拓扑势的作战体系网络节点重要度评估方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(8): 1658-1664. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2020.08.020
	WANG C, GUO J L, FU L Y. Research on evaluation method of node importance of combat system-of-systems network based on topological potential[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2020, 41(8): 1658-1664. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2020.08.020
[11]	李尔玉, 龚建兴, 黄健, 等. 基于功能链的作战体系复杂网络节点重要性评价方法[J]. 指挥与控制学报, 2018, 4(1): 42-49.
	LI E Y, GONG J X, HUANG J, et al. Node importance analysis of complex networks for combat systems based on function chain[J]. Journal of Command and Control, 2018, 4(1): 42-49. (in Chinese)
[12]	周琛, 宋笔锋, 尚柏林, 等. 基于作战网络可靠度的体系贡献率评估[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(7): 1875-1883. doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2021.07.19
	ZHOU C, SONG B F, SHANG B L, et al. System of systems contribution rate evaluation based on operational network reliability[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(7): 1875-1883. (in Chinese) doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2021.07.19
[13]	LI J C, ZHAO D L, JIANG J, et al. Capability oriented equipment contribution analysis in temporal combat networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics:Systems, 2018, 51(2): 696-704. doi: 10.1109/TSMC.6221021 URL
[14]	聂俊峰, 陈行军, 史红权. 面向任务驱动的海上编队云作战体系动态超网络模型[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(11): 2513-2521. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2021.11.024
	NIE J F, CHEN X J, SHI H Q. Dynamic super-network model of task-oriented naval fleet “Cloud Combat” system[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2021, 42(11): 2513-2521. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2021.11.024
[15]	LI J C, ZHAO D L, GE B F, et al. Disintegration of operational capability of heterogeneous combat networks under incomplete information[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man Cybernetics-System, 2020, 50(12): 5172-5179. doi: 10.1109/TSMC.6221021 URL
[16]	王耀祖, 尚柏林, 宋笔锋, 等. 基于杀伤链的作战体系网络关键节点识别方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023(3): 736-744. doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2023.03.14
	WANG Y Z, SHANG B L, SONG B F, et al. Identification method of key node in operational system-of-systems network based on kill chain[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023(3): 736-744. (in Chinese) doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2023.03.14
[17]	何盛明, 刘西乾, 沈云. 财经大辞典[M]. 北京: 中国财政经济出版社, 1990.
	HE S M, LIU X Q, SHEN Y. Dictionary of finance and economics[M]. Beijing: China Finance and Economics Press, 1990. (in Chinese)
[18]	中国人民解放军军事科学院. 中国人民解放军军语[M]. 北京: 军事科学出版社, 2011.
	Chinese People’s Liberation Army Academy of Military Sciences. Chinese People’s Liberation Army military terms[M]. Beijing: Military Science Press, 2011. (in Chinese)
[19]	杨松, 王维平, 李小波, 等. 杀伤链概念发展及研究现状综述[C]// 第三届体系工程学术会议论文集——复杂系统与体系工程管理. 珠海: 国防科技大学系统工程学院, 2021: 67-72.
	YANG S, WANG W P, LI X B, et al. Summary of the concepts development and research status of kill chain[C]// Proceedings of the 3rd Symposium on Systems Engineering-Complex Systems and Systems Engineering Management. Zhuhai: College of Systems Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, 2021: 67-72. (in Chinese)
[20]	DAVILA-FRIAS A, YADAV O P. All-terminal network reliability estimation using convolutional neural networks[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability, 2022, 236(4): 584-597. doi: 10.1177/1748006X20969465 URL
[21]	BROWN J I, COLBOURN C J, COX D, et al. Network reliability: heading out on the highway[J]. Networks, 2021: 77(1): 146-160. doi: 10.1002/net.v77.1 URL
[22]	DAVILA-FRIAS A, YODO N, LE T, et al. A deep neural network and Bayesian method based framework for all-terminal network reliability estimation considering degradation[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2023, 229: 108881. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2022.108881 URL
[23]	CUI H J, WANG F, MA X W, et al. A novel fixed-node unconnected subgraph method for calculating the reliability of binary-state networks[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2022, 226: 108687. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2022.108687 URL
[24]	OZKAN O, KILIC S. A Monte Carlo simulation for reliability estimation of logistics and supply chain networks[J]. IFAC-Papers OnLine, 2019, 52(13): 2080-2085.
[25]	MONFARED M, REZAZADEH M, ALIPOUR Z. Road networks reliability estimations and optimizations:a Bi-directional bottom-up, top-down approach[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2022, 222: 108427. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2022.108427 URL
[26]	BROWN J, DEGAGNÉ C. Roots of two-terminal reliability polynomials[J] Networks, 2021, 78(2): 153-163. doi: 10.1002/net.v78.2 URL
[27]	DOHMEN K. Inclusion-exclusion and network reliability[J]. The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics, 1998, 5(1): R36. doi: 10.37236/1374 URL
[28]	BALL M O. Complexity of network reliability computations[J]. Networks, 1980, 10(2): 153-165. doi: 10.1002/net.v10:2 URL
[29]	杨圩生, 王钰, 杨洋, 等. 基于作战环的不同节点攻击策略下的作战网络效能评估[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(11): 3220-3228. doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2021.11.22
	YANG W S, WANG Y, YANG Y, et al. Combat network effectiveness evaluation under different node attackstrategies based on operation loop[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(11): 3220-3228. (in Chinese)

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

1341

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	8	54	0	1279

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	196	1145
比例	15%	85%

摘要

407

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

35	0	372

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	101	306
比例	25%	75%