不同机械约束下压装PBX炸药反应演化行为

doi:10.12382/bgxb.2021.0445

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为研究机械约束下炸药反应演化行为，加深对武器装药意外点火后反应烈度演化影响因素及机制的认识，对压装PBX炸药反应演化过程进行实验研究。设计一种机械约束装药点火实验装置，采用激光干涉仪和压力传感器分别测量壳体膨胀速度和内部压力，分析不同约束下两种HMX基压装PBX炸药装药的反应演化行为；结合空气冲击波超压测试结果和装置、炸药残骸回收分析，表征装药的反应烈度。研究结果表明：2 MPa机械约束下，PBX-1和PBX-2装药反应最高压力不超过200 MPa，壳体膨胀速度在70 m/s左右，装药反应烈度为爆燃；50 MPa机械约束下，PBX-1和PBX-2装药在百微秒甚至几十微秒内压力超过1 GPa，壳体膨胀速度达到500 m/s，装药发生爆炸反应；不同炸药的力学性能会造成装药反应演化过程存在一定差异，但机械约束影响更明显，新装置2 MPa和50 MPa机械约束装药反应压力和约束壳体速度相差接近1个数量级。

关键词: 压装PBX炸药, 机械约束, 反应演化, 烈度

Abstract: An experimental study was conducted to investigate the effect of mechanical confinement on the reaction behavior and mechanism of explosives, in which different confined charges of HMX based pressed PBXs were ignited at the center of the bottom surface via non-shock initiation with a newly designed mechanically confined charge ignition experimental device. The reaction violence was characterized by the reaction pressure and confinement disc velocity, while overpressure and recovery fragments were also analyzed. The results showed that: under 2 MPa mechanical confinement, charge deflagration occurred, where the maximum pressure of PBX-1 and PBX-2 charges were about 200 MPa, and the expansion velocity of the confinement disc were about 70 m/s; under 50 MPa mechanical confinement, charge explosion occurred, where the pressure of PBX-1 and PBX-2 charges exceeded 1 GPa in hundreds or even tens of microseconds, and the expansion velocity of the confinement disc reached 500 m/s; the physical properties of PBXs may cause some differences in reaction evolution, but the influence of mechanical confinement is more obvious; the reaction pressure and confinement dics velocity differed by almost one order of magnitude under 2 MPa and 50 MPa mechanical confinement using the designed device.

Key words: pressedPBX, mechanicalconfinement, reactionevolution, violence

中图分类号:

TJ55
O381

姚奎光，王淑娟，樊星，聂少云，王翔，代晓淦. 不同机械约束下压装PBX炸药反应演化行为[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(8): 1772-1778.

YAO Kuiguang, WANG Shujuan, FAN Xing, NIE Shaoyun, WANG Xiang, DAI Xiaogan. Reaction Evolution Behaviors of Pressed Plastic-Bonded Explosive (PBX) under Different Mechanical Confinement Conditions[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2022, 43(8): 1772-1778.

参考文献

［1］程永生.军事高技术与信息化武器装备[M].北京：国防工业出版社, 2010.
CHENG Y S.Military high technology and informatization weapon equipment[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2010.(in Chinese)
[2］ ASAY B W. Shock wave science and technology reference library, Vol. 5: non-shock initiation of explosives[M]. Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany: Springer, 2010: 3-14.
[3］ TRINGE J W, KERCHER J R, SPRINGER H K, et al.Numerical and experimental study of thermal explosions in LX-10 and PBX 9501:Influence of thermal damage on deflagration processes[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 2013, 114:043504.
[4］胡海波, 郭应文, 傅华, 等. 炸药事故反应烈度转化的主控机制[J]. 含能材料, 2016, 24(7):622-624.
HU H B, GUO Y W, FU H, et al. Dominant mechanism affecting reaction violence transition of explosive in accidents [J]. Chinese Journal of Energetic Materials, 2016, 24(7):622-624. (in Chinese)
[5］胡海波, 傅华, 李涛, 等. 压装密实炸药装药非冲击点火反应传播与烈度演化实验研究进展[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2020, 40(1): 011401.
HU H B, FU H, LI T, et al. Progress in experimental studies on the evolution behaviors of non-shock initiation reaction in low porosity explosive with confinement[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2020, 40(1):011401. (in Chinese)
[6］ VIGIL A S.High explosive violent reaction (HEVR) from slow heating conditions: LA-UR-99-93[R].Los Alamos，CA,US:Los Alamos National Laboratory, 1999.
[7］ TARVER C M, CHIDESTER S K.On the violence of high explosive reactions[J]. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, 2005, 127: 39-48.
[8］ PERRY W L, DICKSON P M, PARKER G R, et al. Factors affecting explosive reaction violence in PBX 9501[C]∥Proceedings of the 13th International Detonation Symposium. Norfolk, VA, US: Office of Naval Research, 2006: 689-699.
[9］ MAIENSCHEIN J L, WARDELL J F, DEHAVEN M R, et al. Deflagration of HMX based explosives at high temperatures and pressures[J]. Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics, 2004, 29(5): 287-295.
[10］ GLASCOE E A, SPRINGER H K, TRINGE J, et al. A comparison of deflagration rates at elevated pressures and temperatures with thermal explosion[J]. AIP Conference Proceedings,2012, 1426: 555-558.
[11］ TRINGE J W, GLASCOE E A, MCCLELLAND M A, et al. Pre-ignition confinement and deflagration violence in LX-10 and PBX 9501[J]. Journal of Applied Physics，2014,116: 054903.
[12］姚奎光, 赵学峰, 樊星, 等. 高压下PBX-1炸药的燃速-压力特性[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2020, 40(1):011404.
YAO K G, ZHAO X F, FAN X, et al. Burn rate-pressure characteristic for PBX-1 explosive at high pressures[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2020, 40(1):011404. (in Chinese)
[13］ DICKSON P M, ASAY B W, HENSON B F, et al. Observation of the behaviour of confined PBX 9501 following a simulated cookoff ignition[C]∥Proceedings of the 11st International Detonation Symposium. Snowmass, CO, US: Office of Naval Research, 1998: 606-611．
[14］ DICKSON P M, ASAY B W, HENSON B F, et al. Thermal cook-off response of confined PBX 9501[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 2004, 460(2052):3447-3455.
[15］ BERGHOUT H L, SON S F, SKIDMORE C B, et al. Combustion of damaged PBX 9501 explosive[J]. Thermochimica Acta, 2002, 384: 261-277.
[16］ SMILOWITZ L, HENSON B F, ROMERO J J, et al. Direct observation of the phenomenology of a solid thermal explosion using time-resolved proton radiography[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2008, 100: 228301.
[17］ SMILOWITZ L, HENSON B F, ROMERO J J, et al. The evolution of solid density within a thermal explosion I. Proton radiography of pre-ignition expansion, material motion, and chemical decomposition[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 2012, 111(10):103515.
[18］ SMILOWITZ L, HENSON B F, ROMERO J J, et al. The evolution of solid density within a thermal explosion II. Dynamic protonradiography of cracking and solid consumption by burning[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 2012, 111(10):103516.
[19］ HOLMES M D, PARKER G R, HERTWOLE E M, et al. Center-ignited spherical-mass explosion (CISME):LA-UR-18-29651[R]. Los Alamos, CA, US:Los Alamos National Laboratory, 2018.
[20］ PARKER G R, HEATWOLE E M, HOLMES M D, et al. Deflagration-to-detonation transition in hot HMX and HMX-based polymer-bonded explosives[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2020, 215: 295-308.
[21］ HOLMES M D, PARKER G R, BROILO R M, et al. The effect of quasi-static mechanical preload on deflagration violence in PBX 9501[J]. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2020, 2272:100012.
[22］尚海林, 杨洁, 胡秋实, 等. 炸药裂缝中的对流燃烧现象实验研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2019, 40(1): 99-106.
SHANG H L, YANG J, HU Q S, et al. Experimental research on convective burning in explosive cracks[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2019, 40(1): 99-106. (in Chinese)

[1]	段卓平，白志玲，白孟璟，黄风雷. 强约束固体炸药燃烧裂纹网络反应演化模型[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(11): 2291-2299.
[2]	樊新海，李胜利，安钢，武东民，王凯. 装甲车辆传动装置振动烈度监测与评估[J]. 兵工学报, 2009, 30(3): 272-275.